Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Arts & Entertainment

Stuff White People Like? Lawsuit Claims TV's "The Bachelor" and "The Bachelorette" Don't Feature People of Color

TheBachelor.jpg
The current set of ladies hoping to land the man on "The Bachelor" (ABC)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

When the limo-loads of ladies and lads pull up to the mansion in the hills to meet the mate they're going to compete for on TV's "The Bachelor" and "The Bachelorette," it seems that it's always a white person they're fighting over. A racial discrimination lawsuit expected to be filed today against the show's network, ABC, points out "that over 10 years of the show and 23 seasons, the programs have not featured a single person of color as the featured Bachelor or Bachelorette," according to The Hollywood Reporter.

While some of the prospective brides and beaus who subject themselves to the rigorous faux-reality of the show in the hopes of catching the attention of the singular single the show is aiming to couple (Andrew Firestone, Jake Pavelka, Jennifer Schefft, DeAnna Pappas and so on) have been non-white, the group of Nashville residents behind the class-action suit are going to have to prove that minorities were deliberately excluded.

Leading the suit are African-American football players Nathaniel Claybrooks and Christopher Johnson. It is not clear if they had ever hoped to be the featured "bachelor" on the popular dating show.

The TV biz apparently had been hoping to correct the racial disparities as represented by actors on scripted shows with the glut of "reality" programming that flooded the broadcast and cable networks in the past decade. How successful has the TV industry been? This suit seems to say not so much, at least when it comes to high profile "romance."

In the past, "Bachelor" executive producer Mike Fleiss has admitted he and his colleagues at the show have shied from placing a person of color in the spotlight for fear of "tokenism," even though they have tried to "cast for ethnic diversity," according to a 2011 interview cited by THR.

Calling out the show and the network for lack of diversity, as it turns out, isn't actually new: A 2010 article posits that ABC "continues to underserve America's ever-growing minority population," as evidenced by the mostly "lily-white" contestants and "stars" of the "Bachelor" and "Bachelorette" franchises. So is it that advertisers and American audiences need the "homogeneous" candidate pool and star singleton because they can't handle the idea of interracial dating in the 21st century? Maybe so:

"There may be two things at play here," said Angela Bronner Helm, Senior Editor at BlackVoices.com. "One, the country is still in its heart conservative and feels most comfortable dating intraracially. White Americans, statistically, when dating online, do prefer dating one another. Another issue may be that ABC/Disney, like many movie studios, fears a backlash from 'middle America' and frankly thinks that people will not watch a Black guy dating either black women or white women or vice versa."

ABC has not commented about the pending suit.

Sponsored message
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today