With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Lohan's Latest Court Date: No Deal, No Delay, No Show
Lindsay Lohan's lawyer Mark Heller leaves the LAX C on March 1, 2013 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Valerie Macon/Getty Images)
()
Mark Heller, the attorney for Lindsay Lohan, was in court today to meet the new judge on her case and to try to get the whole works delayed so they could work out a deal. But it was no dice on all fronts, and Lohan's trial will continue as scheduled, with Lohan herself ordered to appear at the next date.
Superior Court Judge James R. Dabney rejected a motion to dismiss charges stemming from a car accident in June when the actress was already on probation in a separate case, reports City News Service.
Dabney also denied a defense motion to continue the March 18 trial date to April, and scolded Heller for filing papers that did not conform to California procedures.
Heller is a New York-based attorney, who had to make special arrangements to be able to represent LiLo in Los Angeles, including getting a local lawyer to vouch for him. That attorney, however, hasn't practiced law for a few years. His first appearance in L.A. on behalf of Lohan was at the end of January, when Lohan bravely fought a cold and getting turned down at hotels to make it into court.
Support for LAist comes from
Dabney pointed out Heller's errors in the pleadings, and admonished him for not being aware of California court proceedings. He told Heller that if Lohan wants Heller to stay on as her counsel, "Dabney would require her to sign a waiver stating that Heller was not competent in California law," adds L.A. Now.
Heller pleaded for Dabney to show "compassion" for his client, as she heads towards trial on misdemeanor charges associated with a traffic accident last summer. She's also on the hook for a possible probation violation.
Earlier this week, Heller also appealed to prosecutors to have them work as a team behind the scenes to "fix" Lohan, through some non-traditional means not afforded to the average defendant. In a letter, Heller indicated that if the court basically stalls the case, it would help Lohan become the "proud, productive and positive contributor in her life, to her family, society, and to her industry."
Dabney was not into the stalling idea. The show must go on.
There's also been talks of a plea bargain, though Lohan has said she doesn't want one. But so far no plea deal has been made. Dabney said plea talks can continue, and don't have to stop just because the trial gets underway. L.A. Now adds:
To avoid trial on [the misdemeanor] charges, as well as violating her probation on a separate shoplifting conviction, Lohan will have to agree to serve at least 90 days in a lockdown rehabilitation facility, according to a source familiar with case. The Los Angeles City Attorney has refused to allow Lohan to receive anything less, according to a source.
It's back to court March 18 for Lohan and Heller.Incidentally, the actress was not required to attend today's pre-trial hearing. She was rumored to have been partying in New York instead.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The historic properties have been sitting vacant for decades and were put on the market as-is, with prices ranging from $750,000 to $1.75 million. -
Users of the century old Long Beach wooden boardwalk give these suggestions to safely enjoy it. -
The Newport Beach City Council approved a new artificial surf park that will replace part of an aging golf course. -
The utility, whose equipment is believed to have sparked the Eaton Fire, says payouts could come as quickly as four months after people submit a claim. But accepting the money means you'll have to forego any lawsuits. -
The City Council will vote Tuesday on a proposal to study raising the pay for construction workers on apartments with at least 10 units and up to 85 feet high. -
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol.
Best of LAist