Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
Arts & Entertainment

How To Predict The Oscars' Winners With 'Oscarmetrics' Math

Freshly painted Oscar Statues in preparation for the Governors Awards and the 82nd Academy Awards at a secret location on Oct. 19, 2009 in Northern Los Angeles County. (Kristian Dowling/Getty Images)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

There's a lot of talk around the Oscars about which nominees have momentum and how Hollywood politics play into who wins. But maybe winning your office Academy Awards pool is just about math.

TURNING MOVIES INTO MATH

Ben Zauzmer's spent the last eight years using data analysis to predict who will win the Oscars, and he has a high rate of success -- his model's even managed to top FiveThirtyEight data master Nate Silver.

By day, he's manager of baseball analytics for the Dodgers -- but when he was a Harvard freshman, he wanted to know if that same approach could be applied to predicting the Academy Awards. He'd wanted to know who the math said would win that year's Oscars, but Googling didn't turn anything up.

So he decided to apply Moneyball-style principles to the movies. He spent a month in the library gathering data from websites and press releases, building his own Oscars dataset. Then he started building statistical models using information like the past winners of different awards shows, and how they correlated with who won at the Academy Awards.

He's gone on to write about what that analysis predicts for the Hollywood Reporter, as well as writing a recent book on the subject, Oscarmetrics.

He has a lot less data to work with than the incredibly detailed numbers drawn from thousands of Major League Baseball games, but told us his Oscar predictions are constantly being improved. Zauzmer adds new data sources and tweaks his model to make sure his own biases don't affect what the model spits out as the probabilities.

Sponsored message

WHAT THE MATH PREDICTS

Joaquin Phoenix in Joker. (Niko Tavernise, courtesy Warner Bros.)

It's an interesting year for making predictions, according to Zauzmer, with four movies receiving 10 or more nominations each for the first time ever. That could make determining the winners that much more difficult, without one film leading as clearly. Joker has 11, with 1917, the Irishman, and Once Upon A Time In Hollywood with 10 nominations each.

Looking back, one of the most surprising predictions was in 2012, Zauzmer said. The buzz was that Viola Davis would likely win Best Actress for The Help -- but the math showed Meryl Streep as a slight mathematical favorite.

Streep won for The Iron Lady.

Meryl Streep reacts before she walks onstage to accept the Best Actress Award for The Iron Lady during the 84th Annual Academy Awards held at the Hollywood & Highland Center on Feb. 26, 2012. (Kevin Winter/Getty Images)

Another example: Ang Lee's Best Director win for Life of Pi over Steven Spielberg and Lincoln.

Sponsored message

The math isn't always right -- sometimes the pundits manage to outscore what the hard numbers say.

"And that's to be expected, because the math is essentially establishing probabilities, rather than making predictions. And sometimes things with high probability happen and sometimes they don't," Zauzmer said.

WHAT THE PAST GOT WRONG

Crash won the 2006 Academy Awards in an upset -- and one that critics have long criticized. Who should have won that year? (Mark J. Terrill/AP)

One of the questions he tackles in his book: which movie should have won the Best Picture Oscar each year.

Using stats like the American Film Institute's rankings and the IMDb user votes, he breaks down what modern critics and experts believe were the best choices each year.

He wrote about all the years that the math says the Academy got it wrong.

Sponsored message

"I challenged myself to watch every single one of these movies -- not just the ones that actually won Best Picture, but also the ones that should have won Best Picture," Zauzmer said.

ANALYZING HIMSELF

Being who he is, Zauzmer shared his own personal work stats, and broke down how he spends his time -- 95 percent on statistical work for his day job, the other 5 percent on awards.

"I get to do the Oscars work for this one month of the year, but then the rest of the year, I get to hang out at Dodger Stadium," Zauzmer said. "If that split were able to continue for years in the future, I would be extremely happy."

Oscarmetrics is available now, and the Academy Awards are this Sunday. You can read Zauzmer's predictions for the 2020 Oscarsat the Hollywood Reporter.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right