With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Review: Scientology Documentary 'Going Clear' Exposes The Horrors Of The Religion

The Church of Scientology has always held a fascination with the American public—no doubt because of its foothold in celebrity culture, but also for its behind-the-scenes grotesqueries and bizarre origin stories (both its own historical roots and its scriptures creation myth). Even before Tom Cruise's highly public Born Again Scientologist phase, many of the revelations chronicled in Lawrence Wright's exposé Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood, and the Prison of Belief were already public knowledge in some manner. Lest we forget Richard Behar's pre-Internet Time magazine cover story "The Thriving Cult of Greed and Power" from 1991. With the release of Alex Gibney's documentary adaptation of Wright's book (which will air on HBO later this month), it might leave one to wonder if there are any new revelations to be gained from a documentary on such a dense book and subject.
Gibney's approach with Going Clear is straightforward and sometimes formally bland. It's a mostly linear presentation of Scientology's history and practices coupled with talking-head interviews with Wright and notable Church defectors, including filmmaker Paul Haggis. Haggis' defection in 2009 was the inspiration for a New Yorker profile by Wright that became the basis for the book. Although the interviews serve as the backbone for the film, Gibney's questioning rarely illuminates. Participants also include former top brass from within the Church, such as Mark Rathbun and Mike Rinder, whose personal experiences could offer insight on the trappings of faith and the psychology of cult devotees, but Gibney doesn't seem interested. Going Clear is more a cataloging of the horrific abuses at Gold Base and the absurdity of founder L. Ron Hubbard's teachings. It makes for a good show.
Condensing a 450-page book into a 2-hour documentary is no easy task, and one could argue that the film lets the material speak for itself. But what role does Gibney's Going Clear serve other than compiling known material and broadcasting it from a larger and louder pulpit? Some of Going Clear truly is compelling, especially the Leni Riefenstahl-like video productions from the church. But once you go through enough anecdotes about the abuses of Scientology's leadership, sometimes misfiring and dramatizing moments into the realm of pure sensationalism (see: the musical chairs sequence involving Queen's "Bohemian Rhapsody"), the shock value wears off. All that's left is a half-hearted inquiry that doesn't really dig up any more dirt.
The Church of Scientology is infamous for bullying and suing its critics into submission, operating under Hubbard's credo of, "Never defend, always attack." It's too bad Going Clear decided to play the same game.
Going Clear: Scientology And The Prison Of Belief is now playing in Los Angeles (Arclight Hollywood), New York (Lincoln Center), and San Francisco (Presidio Theater). It will air on HBO beginning March 29.
Related:
The Challenges Of Making A Scientology Documentary, According To 'Going Clear' Director
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
The L.A. County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday voted to declare immigration enforcement actions a local emergency.
-
Tens of thousands of workers across Southern California walk out over pay and staffing issues.
-
People in and around recent burn scars should be alert to the risk of debris flows. Typical October weather will be back later this week.
-
Jet Propulsion Laboratory leadership says the cuts amount to 11% of the workforce.
-
The rock legend joins LAist for a lookback on his career — and the next chapter of his music.
-
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain.