With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Lawsuit alleges University of California illegally considers race in admissions

A lawsuit filed Monday in federal district court alleges that the University of California illegally considers race in undergraduate admissions and gives preference to “non-Asian racial minorities,” including Black and Latino students.
The lawsuit was filed by Students Against Racial Discrimination, an organization founded last year by Richard Sander, a law professor at UCLA, and Tim Groseclose, a professor of economics at George Mason University in Virginia. Sander is a prominent critic of affirmative action and previously filed a lawsuit against UC in 2018. That lawsuit sought more information about UC applicants and suggested that the university might be considering race in admissions, according to Inside Higher Ed.
Proposition 209, a 1996 ballot measure, bans California’s public colleges from considering race in admissions. And in 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court banned affirmative action nationwide.
Stett Holbrook, a spokesperson for UC, said in an email Monday that UC has not yet been served with the lawsuit and will wait until then to “respond as appropriate.” He added, however, that UC complies with Prop. 209. “UC undergraduate admissions applications collect students’ race and ethnicity for statistical purposes only and they are not used for admission,” he said.
The lawsuit filed Monday claims UC “discriminates against large numbers of Asian- American and white applicants, who are denied admission to UC schools based on their race.” The lawsuit asks a judge to appoint an independent monitor to review UC admissions for an indefinite period.
Asian-American students made up 36.3% of UC’s undergraduate students in fall 2024 and white students accounted for just under 20%. Black students accounted for 4.7%, while Latino students made up 26.7%.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
Tens of thousands of workers across Southern California walk out over pay and staffing issues.
-
People in and around recent burn scars should be alert to the risk of debris flows. Typical October weather will be back later this week.
-
Jet Propulsion Laboratory leadership says the cuts amount to 11% of the workforce.
-
The rock legend joins LAist for a lookback on his career — and the next chapter of his music.
-
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain.
-
What do stairs have to do with California’s housing crisis? More than you might think, says this Culver City councilmember.