With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
Activists Pressure University Of California To Employ Undocumented Students Who Don't Have Work Permits
University of California students are pushing U.C. Regents to approve a proposal that would allow students who are undocumented and don’t qualify for a work permit to be hired on campus.
For many college students, having a job on campus is not only convenient, it helps them graduate.
“Not having a work permit has been tough,” said Abraham Cruz Hernandez, a UCLA undergraduate student majoring in labor and workplace studies.
Cruz Hernandez arrived in the United States when he was 7 years old. He’s undocumented and is not part of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program that protects people with similar status from deportation and authorizes them to work in the country.
“Not being able to work… is another reason why I wasn't able to finish in four years,” he said. He’s in his fifth year at UCLA and the tuition charges and other non-academic costs keep piling up. Not being able to work has severely limited opportunities for him to work with professors on research projects that pay those working on them.
Cruz Hernandez and other students and scholars are part of the Undocumented Student-Led Network. The organization held on-campus and online events this week hoping to reach the U.C. Regents' ears as the policymaking body prepares for their regular meeting later this month. The student activists hope the increased visibility of their cause will put pressure on the Regents to adopt a change to the way the public university system hires people on its 10 campuses.
“If you want undocumented students also to be able to graduate without a mountain of debt, they obviously have to be able to work,” said Ahilan Arulanantham, a UCLA law professor who co-directs the school’s Center for Immigration Law and Policy.
There’s a growing list of undocumented students who are graduating from high schools and don’t meet a 2007 arrival cutoff under DACA that would have allowed them to obtain a work permit.
Did the federal government leave out an important detail in immigration law?
For about a year and a half, Arulanantham co-led a team that studied the federal law that prohibits people who are undocumented from obtaining legal employment, 1986’s Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA).
Unlike other federal laws that explicitly direct state governments and their agencies to follow the legislation, Arulanantham and his colleagues found no such words in IRCA. The team wrote an interpretation that argues that the omission leaves the door open for states and their agencies to hire people who are undocumented.
If you want undocumented students also to be able to graduate without a mountain of debt, they obviously have to be able to work.
“It's definitely novel. This is not a theory that, as far as we know, has been adopted by any state government thus far,” Arulanantham said.
A long list of legal scholars across the country, from law schools at Yale and NYU to Stanford and U.C. Berkeley signed on to the findings:
"As law professors with considerable experience in immigration law, we write primarily to affirm that we believe that the legal foundation for hiring undocumented students within UC, as described in the attached memorandum, is sound."
Pressure has been building for decades for legislators to address the arrival to and the presence of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. By one count, about 27,000 California high school graduates each year are undocumented. Not all of them go on to college but thousands do — and for the ones who reach graduation day the future does not look bright.
“You're going to have a large population of highly educated people,” said Jean Reisz, a USC law school professor, “who have grown up and spent the majority of their lives in the U.S. who won't be eligible to work in the U.S. but also are not going to be going anywhere else.”
Will U.C. Regents decide at their next meeting?
Last October, U.C. Regents chair Richard Leib told the L.A. Times he’d like to see the employment change become reality. It would be a radical departure from current practice.
-
The U.C. Regents’ two-day meeting begins on March 15 and is livestreamed.
-
Members of the public may address U.C. Regents either by phone or in-person. Here's how to leave a public comment.
The U.C. Office of the President says it has supported students who are undocumented and the university is weighing that support against “potential impacts and legal risks” for U.C. and those students.
“We are reviewing the proposal and are in the process of determining the appropriate next steps,” said U.C. spokesperson Ryan King by email.
There’s an uphill battle, Reisz said, for this novel interpretation of federal law to stick.
All employers have been bound by IRCA and this new proposal calls into question whether states really are bound by it.
"All employers have been bound by IRCA and this new proposal calls into question whether states really are bound by it," she said.
But she agrees that state governments and their agencies aren’t explicitly told in IRCA to follow the law but they’ve done so anyway. If U.C. makes the change, it’s likely that legal challenges will come from organizations that oppose expanding rights for people who are undocumented, she said.
California's two other higher education systems California State University and the California Community Colleges, have, at times, adopted policies first enacted by the University of California. Observers wonder if that could happen with this change.
"That is impactful, because we know that those two systems have even higher numbers of undocumented students," said Julia Vásquez, a professor at Southwestern Law School, and the director of the Community Lawyering Clinic.
Vásquez added that the change might also even allow public universities to hire staff who are undocumented.
Vásquez said it’s likely U.C.’s general counsel is vetting the proposal and would likely seek an opinion from California Attorney General Rob Bonta.
“If the UC implements this…” Vásquez said, “they can be leaders.”
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
-
The historic properties have been sitting vacant for decades and were put on the market as-is, with prices ranging from $750,000 to $1.75 million.
-
Users of the century old Long Beach wooden boardwalk give these suggestions to safely enjoy it.
-
The Newport Beach City Council approved a new artificial surf park that will replace part of an aging golf course.
-
The utility, whose equipment is believed to have sparked the Eaton Fire, says payouts could come as quickly as four months after people submit a claim. But accepting the money means you'll have to forego any lawsuits.
-
The City Council will vote Tuesday on a proposal to study raising the pay for construction workers on apartments with at least 10 units and up to 85 feet high.
-
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol.