With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Sheriff Villanueva Steps Into County's Conflict With Law Firm Over Mandoyan Case

L.A. County Sheriff Alex Villanueva is stepping into the middle of a legal fight between the county and a law firm that had represented him over his rehiring of a deputy who had been fired for domestic violence and dishonesty.
The firm — Quinn, Emmanuel, Urquhart and Sullivan — represented the sheriff until January, 2020. Last fall, it demanded the county pay it for its work. The county refuses, saying it never authorized the sheriff to hire the private firm.
The sheriff says in a sworn declaration that the county had given him permission to retain the attorneys.
The county had sued Villanueva over his rehiring of Caren Carl Mandoyan. The county argued the move was illegal, and in 2020 a judge agreed. The sheriff and Mandoyan have appealed that ruling, according to Villanueva's attorney, Stanley Friedman.
How Did It All Start?
Mandoyan, who joined the force in 2006, later started dating a fellow deputy. His girlfriend ultimately accused him of domestic abuse.
Mandoyan denied her allegations, but a judge issued a temporary restraining order against him.
Then-Sheriff Jim McDonnell fired Mandoyan in September of 2016, citing numerous policy violations pertaining to his conduct toward his girlfriend, domestic violence, and dishonesty/false statements. Mandoyan, for example, did not tell the department he was forced to surrender three guns under the restraining order.
Mandoyan appealed his firing to the County Civil Service Commission, which upheld his termination. He then went to court seeking a judge's ruling voiding his firing.
The New Sheriff Rehires Mandoyan
Mandoyan had joined Villanueva’s 2018 campaign as a volunteer. But he wasn't just any volunteer. He played a key role in rallying deputies to support Villanueva, and served as the candidate's personal driver.
Villanueva was elected in November of 2018 and took office on Dec. 3 of that year.
He immediately convened a special "Truth and Reconciliation Panel" of senior department officials to review Mandoyan's case. It issued a report on Dec. 27, 2018, saying Mandoyan had acted "in an irrational, unprofessional and impulsive manner" and "brought discredit to himself and the department," but still concluded that he should be rehired.
Villanueva reinstated Mandoyan the next day.
The move prompted the Board of Supervisors to ask county counsel to review the rehiring, and in Feb. 2019, Villanueva was informed that the county had determined that his action was illegal and therefore void.
Villanueva refused to heed the order, and the county went to court to try to enforce it, sparking the ongoing legal fight.
A Revelation Undermines The Sheriff’s Narrative
On Jan. 30, 2019, Villanueva said at a news conference that he never had a "predetermined outcome" on Mandoyan. "If the evidence supported termination, he would not be back at work, period," the sheriff declared.
That contention was called into question when the Los Angeles Times revealed in March 2019 that Villanueva pressed to get Mandoyan rehired even before he took office.
The Times reported that a former longtime senior Sheriff’s official quit over what she considered to be an "unethical" and "unprecedented" order from a top Villanueva aide to facilitate Mandoyan’s reinstatement before Dec. 3, 2018.
Alicia Ault, who was chief of the department's professional standards and training division, said in a court deposition that the sheriff-elect's chief of staff told her on Nov. 26, 2018 that it was Villanueva's "No. 1 priority" to get Mandoyan back on the force before the new sheriff's swearing in.
Such a sequence of events would have left the impression that Mandoyan was brought back to work by outgoing Sheriff McDonnell.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care.
-
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings.
-
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past.
-
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.
-
Distrito Catorce’s Guillermo Piñon says the team no longer reflects his community. A new mural will honor local leaders instead.
-
The program is for customers in communities that may not be able to afford turf removal or water-saving upgrades.