The Los Angeles City Council voted 8-4 Tuesday to accept the controversial donation of four-legged robot dog for use by the L.A. Police Department.
At issue is whether the use of robotics is ultimately safer or more dangerous for the police using the technology and the people interacting with law enforcement.
At the council meeting, Councilmember Hugo Soto-Martínez called the move to more law enforcement automation highly disturbing. Soto-Martínez, who was one of the no votes, said accepting the pricey donation "sets a dangerous precedent for our future in our community safety."
The matter initially came before the council in March, when it was delayed after a series of speakers opposed the move. At that time councilmembers John Lee and Traci Park said the robot can save lives.
Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez, who was not present for Tuesday's vote, objected back in March, arguing that the robot could be used to target Black and Latino communities.
"In New York, the city council moved forward," she said at the time. "They implemented them and some of the first places they used them on were public housing, housing for Black, brown and low-income people."
Voting yes: Bob Blumenfield, Kevin de León, John Lee, Tim McOsker, Traci Park, Monica Rodriguez, Katie Young Yaroslavsky, and Paul Krekorian.
Voting no: Heather Hutt, Curren Price, Nithya Raman, Hugo Soto-Martínez.
Absent: Eunisses Hernandez, Marqueece Harris-Dawson.
A "Quadruped Unmanned Ground Vehicle," according to LAPD documentation, "refers to a ground vehicle operated on four legs without an onboard human presence."
To address concerns about possible misuse of the robot dog, Yaroslavsky introduced an amendment that requires the LAPD to deliver quarterly reports on its usage, its outcomes and any issues about the use of it. It was approved by the council.
Council members also retain the ability to alter the policy or suspend the robot's services at any time.
In a statement, the LAPD said it would begin using the robot dog after training and testing in the coming months.
"We will continue to explore new technologies and tools to enhance public safety efforts and better serve our communities," the statement said.
According to the LAPD's statement after the approval:
The QUGV shall not be equipped with any weapon systems including any non-lethal or less-lethal weapon technology, shall not be equipped with or use any facial recognition software or analysis capabilities, and the QUGV shall not be used for routine patrol duties or covert surveillance operations.
In that same news release, LAPD Chief Michel Moore said he was "appreciative of the approval today by the majority of the City Council in accepting the donation of the Los Angeles Police Foundation in acquiring this state-of-the-art mechanical robot."
"This technology will allow us to better protect our officers and the community allowing us to use modern technology to deescalate dangerous situations," he said.
LAPD officials previously said it would be used by SWAT officers in life-threatening situations, specifically: "The QUGV will be assigned exclusively to Metropolitan Division's SWAT team and shall be reserved for use in high-risk incidents that meet SWAT deployment criteria."
According to documentation filed by the LAPD with the city council, permissible uses are:
The $278,000 robot will be donated by the L.A. Police Foundation, a nonprofit group that has "awarded more than $44 million in grants to the LAPD" since 1998, according to its website.
A public safety committee recommended going forward with accepting the gift earlier this year in a 4-1 vote.
