With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
LA City Council Puts Off Decision On Controversial Robot Dog Until May

The Los Angeles City Council has delayed a decision on whether to accept a donated four-legged robot dog for use by the L.A. Police Department.
The decision at Tuesday's meeting to postpone a vote came after a public safety committee recommended going forward earlier this year in a 4-1 vote.
The $278,000 robot would be donated by the L.A. Police Foundation, a non-profit group that has "awarded more than $44 million in grants to the LAPD" since 1998, according to its website.
The robot dog has been highly controversial and public comments Tuesday were full of people objecting to its use.
What exactly is a robot dog?
Officially known as a "Quadru-ped Unmanned Ground Vehicle," the robot, according to LAPD documentation "refers to a ground vehicle operated on four legs without an onboard human presence."
What would it be used for?
LAPD officials have said it would be used by SWAT officers in life-threatening situations, specifically: "The QUGV will be assigned exclusively to Metropolitan Division's SWAT team and shall be reserved for use in high-risk incidents that meet SWAT deployment criteria."
According to documentation filed by the LAPD with the city council, permissible uses are:
Who is for the robot, and who is against it?
In January, four of the five members of the public safety committee voted to recommend that the city accept the donation.
On Tuesday, Councilmembers John Lee and Traci Park said the robot can save lives.
Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez objected, countering that the robot could be used to target Black and Latino communities.
"In New York, the city council moved forward," she said. "They implemented them and some of the first places they used them on were public housing, housing for Black, Brown and low-income people."
What's next?
The vote has been rescheduled to May 5.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
What do stairs have to do with California’s housing crisis? More than you might think, says this Culver City councilmember.
-
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain.
-
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care.
-
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings.
-
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past.
-
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.