Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
LA DA Declines to File Charges Against Ex-Inglewood Police Officers In 2016 Fatal Shooting Of Couple

Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón has decided against filing criminal charges against any of the five former Inglewood police officers involved in the controversial 2016 fatal shooting of a couple.
The officers “had an honest belief in the need for self-defense and defense of others when they used deadly force” against Marquintan Sandlin and Kisha Michael, said a memo from the DA’s Justice System Integrity Division. “This honest and reasonable belief precludes criminal liability.”
All five officers were fired after the shooting, a highly unusual move by any police department.
In 2018, the city of Inglewood paid a total of $8.6 million — one of the largest such payouts in the city’s history — to settle wrongful death lawsuits by Sandlin and Michael’s families.
It's not uncommon for the DA to decline to file charges against an officer in a case in which the officer’s department determines the shooting violated policy and a city pays out a civil settlement.
The shooting and the settlement came during intense public scrutiny of police shootings, particularly of Black people. Both Sandlin and Michael were Black.
A Date Goes Horribly Wrong
Michael, 31, and Sandlin, 32, were on a date when they were killed, according to Michael’s twin sister Trisha Shanklin, who said they'd been out together before.

Inglewood police found them passed out or asleep in their car just after 3 a.m. on Feb. 21, 2016. Officers backed off after they determined that Michael had a loaded handgun in her lap, according to the DA’s report.
The report describes how police parked four patrol cars around the Chevrolet Malibu sedan to box it in, and then tried using flashing lights, an air horn and blaring sirens to rouse the two for 40 minutes, without success.
When the couple finally awoke, Sandlin tried to drive away but was boxed in.
(The officers) had an honest belief in the need for self-defense and defense of others when they used deadly force ... This honest and reasonable belief precludes criminal liability.
“Multiple officers stated Sandlin leaned to his right and reached towards Michael’s lap, where they had observed the gun,” the report said. One officer fired two shotgun blasts.
Then, according to the report:
Michael, in the front passenger seat, opened her door. “Several seconds later, multiple officers ordered Michael not to reach for the gun,” but she lowered her hands toward her lap. “Seeing movement, several officers yelled that Michael was reaching for the weapon.”
This time, all five officers started shooting. They fired 20 shots into the car, one from a high-powered rifle atop an armored military style truck they had summoned. Michael was struck 13 times.
“Once Sandlin and Michael awoke, their lack of compliance with commands and their movements consistent with reaching for the gun caused the officers to believe the use of deadly force in defense of themselves or others was necessary,” the DA’s report said.
In a statement released late Wednesday, Gascón noted that his office had informed Sandlin's and Michael's families about the decision not to file charges, saying, "this is excruciating" and "the families are understandably devastated." The DA added: "We do want to be clear: the burden of proof for prosecution is high. Our decision does not mean that what happened is right."
The Families Say No One Needed To Die
In the lawsuit settled by Inglewood for $8.6 million, the families argued:
- The officers could have disarmed Sandlin and Michael without using deadly force
- That the officers were in well-covered positions when they opened fire
- That they used excessive force.
The DA disagreed.
“The easy accessibility of the loaded gun and the impairment of the occupants presented a tactical challenge to the officers to retrieve the weapon without risking death or great bodily injury to themselves or the vehicle’s occupants, as well as to effectuate an arrest and possibly render medical aid,” the report said.
It took the DA’s office — spanning the administrations of Jackie Lacey and Gascón —more than six years to reach a conclusion in the case.
The DA’s report said the investigative file prosecutors received from the Inglewood Police Department was “incomplete.” Inglewood police investigated their own officers’ shootings at the time.
The report said the DA’s office essentially had to reinvestigate the shooting. It’s a huge challenge to begin investigating any shooting months after it happened.
Gascón entered office promising to scrutinize police shootings more closely than his predecessors, and he has. The DA filed criminal charges against three officers for on-duty shootings in his first 15 months in office; only one officer faced charges in the previous nearly two decades.
The DA’s report on the Inglewood case noted that legislative changes enacted in 2020 have made the totality of the circumstances surrounding an officer shooting relevant to the criminal inquiry. But the change did not apply to this shooting because it occurred before the law’s enactment.
The five former officers — Sean Reidy, Richard Parcella, Michael Jaen, Andrew Cohen and Jason Cantrell — filed a lawsuit against the city of Inglewood claiming racial discrimination. They claim they were discriminated against and fired because they're white. They say they were following the orders of two more experienced sergeants at the scene, and that the sergeants — both of whom are Latino — were not fired.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.