With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Federal Monitors In The Antelope Valley Say LASD Settlement Agreement Stymied By 'Inexplicable' Internal Delays
The federal monitors don’t mince words.
In a searing report, the team tasked with overseeing the beleaguered federal settlement agreement between the Department of Justice and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department over racial profiling allegations in the Antelope Valley sounded the alarm on an unfolding “crisis.”
“[W]e continue to find progress being waylaid by unnecessary obstacles and inexplicable internal LASD delays,” the monitors wrote, citing a variety of concerns including a lack of leadership and executive involvement, a “lack of urgency,” and “insufficient resources.”
In 2015, the DOJ and the Sheriff’s Department entered into a court-ordered settlement agreement and agreed to reforms that included protections against racial profiling.
That agreement grew out of findings from a two-year DOJ investigation which found that deputies routinely racially profiled Black residents in the Antelope Valley.
Monitors requested that the department’s North Patrol Division chief or a commander representing him actively participate in future meetings with the monitoring team.
“Our time and experience here has shown that the lack of consistent involvement by executive leadership — both in meetings and on a daily basis moving the enormous amount of work of Department personnel — has proven to be debilitating,” they wrote.
Monitors outlined a startling picture of an agreement gone sideways.
“[W]e continue to find progress being waylaid by unnecessary obstacles and inexplicable internal LASD delays."
Two years ago, they flagged a federal judge on the lack of progress towards the settlement goals. The latest report states that from the examples they cited then, “not a single area of concern has been resolved to date."
Monitors also wrote that in the seven years since the settlement agreement was signed, the Sheriff’s Department has not assessed any of the numerous data analyses and reports produced by the monitoring team regarding deputy stops and detention information, not has it analyzed their use of force data.
The monitors said the department hasn't upgraded its data system to track incidents where deputies “draw or point their firearms” to conform with a required audit.
According to the monitors, LASD also hasn’t submitted a plan to implement regular testing on training retention.
We’ve reached out to the Sheriff’s Department for comment on the report, and will update this article if it responds.
Racial discrimination continues to be a concern in the Antelope Valley.
L.A. County Sheriff’s deputies disproportionately contact, cite, and arrest Black students in the Antelope Valley, and those students are also disproportionately suspended and expelled at higher rates than other racial groups, according to a report by the County Inspector General’s office.
The analysis was spurred by a year-long investigation into allegations of racial discrimination in Antelope Valley high schools by LAist and ProPublica.
Our investigation found that Black teenagers accounted for 60% of deputy contacts in Lancaster high schools, although they made up only about 20% of the enrollment in those schools.
Antelope Valley residents have questioned the glacial progress of the settlement agreement for years.
“We’ve lost faith in this process, to be quite frank,” said Xavier Flores, president of the Antelope Valley League of United Latin American Citizens, at a virtual town hall meeting with the federal monitoring team last year.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
What do stairs have to do with California’s housing crisis? More than you might think, says this Culver City councilmember.
-
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain.
-
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care.
-
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings.
-
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past.
-
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.