With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
Solar Vote
Solar panels in a parking lot outside South East High School, an L.A. Unified School District campus in South Gate. (Photo courtesy of LAUSD)
(
Courtesy of L.A. Unified School District
)
Topline:
California Public Utilities Commissioners unanimously voted to cut rooftop solar incentives for apartments, schools and other properties with multiple electric meters.
Why it matters: Solar advocates worry the change will make apartment owners and other commercial property owners less likely to install solar, while schools say it makes onsite solar power generation unaffordable. Solar adoption on these types of properties has already lagged under the current, more generous incentives, and solar advocates worry this change will further put renewable energy out of reach for renters, small business owners and schools. A similar decision last year to cut solar incentives for single-family homes has led to a steep drop-off in solar adoption.
What the state says: The five commissioners agreed the proposal “right-sizes” solar subsidies, emphasizing current subsidies increase rates for customers who don’t have solar. They also said the change is needed to encourage more adoption of solar plus battery storage.
Support for LAist comes from
What’s next: The policy goes into effect in 2024 and doesn’t apply to buildings that already have solar, or qualifying low-income housing.
Go Deeper:
California Could Cut Solar Incentives. What This Could Mean For Apartments and Schools
With Rooftop Solar Energy Out Of Reach For Many, Here’s What 'Community Solar' Could Do For Us
California Cuts Rooftop Solar Incentives. Here’s What That Means
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The historic properties have been sitting vacant for decades and were put on the market as-is, with prices ranging from $750,000 to $1.75 million. -
Users of the century old Long Beach wooden boardwalk give these suggestions to safely enjoy it. -
The Newport Beach City Council approved a new artificial surf park that will replace part of an aging golf course. -
The utility, whose equipment is believed to have sparked the Eaton Fire, says payouts could come as quickly as four months after people submit a claim. But accepting the money means you'll have to forego any lawsuits. -
The City Council will vote Tuesday on a proposal to study raising the pay for construction workers on apartments with at least 10 units and up to 85 feet high. -
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol.
Best of LAist