Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
LA County and two cities sue SoCal Edison over damage from deadly Eaton Fire
L.A. County cited video footage and photographs in its lawsuit against Southern California Edison that show fire below transmission towers owned and operated by the utility.
(
Los Angeles County
)
Pasadena, Sierra Madre and Los Angeles County on Wednesday announced that they had filed separate lawsuits in L.A. County Superior Court against Southern California Edison for its alleged role in the deadly Eaton Fire.
The lawsuits accuse SoCal Edison’s equipment of starting the fire in Eaton Canyon, citing reports that the utility filed with the California Public Utilities Commission that a “fault was detected” at or near the same time.
The cities and county also point to photos and videos that show fire near the base of SoCal Edison transmission towers.
The lawsuits are looking to cover damages from the Eaton Fire, which burned more than 14,000 acres, destroyed more than 9,000 structures, and killed at least 17 people in January. L.A. County alone estimates that damages will total hundreds of millions of dollars or more.
Support for LAist comes from
Sierra Madre Mayor Robert Parkhurst said in a statement that the fire devastated irreplaceable wilderness areas that are central to the city’s identity and character.
"What makes this disaster particularly troubling is its preventability," Parkhurst said in a statement. "The documented weather warnings provided Edison with ample notice of the dangerous conditions developing in our community."
A spokesperson for SoCal Edison told LAist that they “are reviewing the lawsuits that were recently filed and will address them through the appropriate legal process.”
The details
The cities and county are looking to cover costs for destroyed infrastructure, parks, road damage, cleanup efforts, overtime for employees and lost taxes, among others.
“We are committed to seeking justice for the Altadena community and the taxpayers of Los Angeles County,” Dawyn R. Harrison, the county counsel who filed the case, said in a statement.
Support for LAist comes from
All three lawsuits accuse SoCal Edison of having “negligently failed” to safely inspect and maintain its equipment — and the vegetation around it.
They also allege that SoCal Edison didn’t de-energize all of its electrical equipment in and around Eaton Canyon, despite being warned of the destructive windstorm and extreme fire weather conditions days in advance by the National Weather Service.
“Despite its knowledge of extreme fire risk, [SoCal Edison] deliberately prioritized profits over safety,” the lawsuits allege.
The utility is accused of having a “history of safety failures,” with the lawsuits pointing to at least eight other wildfires, including the 2017 Thomas and 2018 Woolsey fires, which burned more than 370,000 acres altogether.
Lisa Derderian, public information officer for Pasadena, said in a statement that the city has a responsibility to pursue appropriate compensation for the costs of rebuilding the public infrastructure the community relies upon.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist