With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Survey of 2,300 fire survivors reflects long, steep road to recovery

Extensive displacement, temporary housing funds rapidly running out, ongoing worries about contamination, a sense that the world has moved on. And yet, still, a widespread determination to rebuild. That’s the picture the latest survey of Eaton and Palisades fire survivors paints nearly a year after L.A. County’s most destructive fires.
In its third report, the nonprofit Department of Angels surveyed 2,335 people who were affected by the fires about how they’re doing nine months on. Some of the main findings include:
-
When: Wednesday, 6 p.m.
Where: Zoom. RSVP here.
- Roughly 8 in 10 Altadena residents and 9 in 10 Pacific Palisades residents still are not back home.
- The majority of survivors are digging into their savings and taking on debt.
- Temporary housing funds are running out for survivors — more than half of survivors have less than a year of remaining coverage or didn’t have any coverage at all.
- Survivors with lower incomes are facing choices over basic needs: More than 20% of survivors with incomes under $100,000 have had to cut back on food, and about 15% have had to skip medical care.
- Roughly a quarter of survivors want their homes or lots tested for contamination but have been unable to do it. The vast majority of tests that have been performed on homes that still stand have found contaminants above acceptable levels.
The report notes some key differences between the experience of survivors who completely lost their homes and those whose homes still stand, finding that those with homes still standing have had worse experiences with their insurers, more often having to fight to get claims approved, if they can get them approved at all.
Survivors with still standing homes also are more likely to run out of temporary housing assistance more quickly, the report says: “While 35% of those who experienced total loss have over one year of remaining coverage, fewer than 10% of those suffering structural and smoke or ash damage have more than a year remaining.”
Still, the majority of survivors have remained in L.A. County, but renters have been more likely to decide to permanently move from their fire-ravaged neighborhoods: Roughly 1 in 8 renters say they are permanently renting in a different area, according to the report.
For most survivors, the financial mountain they face after losing their homes is a barrier they may not be able to overcome, despite a fierce desire to return home and rebuild.
“Paying both mortgage and rent at the same time is going to make me and my family homeless,” one Altadenan writes in the report. “Supposedly, I make too much money to qualify [for assistance] but don't make enough money to survive.”
At the same time, the mental health effects of the fire remain potent. According to the report, 73% of survivors say their mental health has gotten worse, and 36% say it has gotten much worse since the fires.
“I've started having panic attacks and taking lorazepam,” wrote a Pacific Palisades survey respondent. “I've withdrawn from social interaction and am very depressed, wondering why I should put in the effort to go on.”
The report describes how “survivors of every demographic group, location and income level report similarly high levels of suffering.”
And nearly a year later, most survivors still are not close to rebuilding, with most not yet at the point of getting permits or hiring contractors. And most of those whose homes survived still are stuck in the limbo of remediation.
“This report is more than numbers — it is a window into the lives of survivors nine months after the fires,” Department of Angels cofounders Evan Spiegel and Miguel Santana write in the report. “We hope it serves as a guide for leaders and partners to align decisions, direct resources and design policies that meet families where they are.”
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
Jet Propulsion Laboratory leadership says the cuts amount to 11% of the workforce.
-
The rock legend joins LAist for a lookback on his career — and the next chapter of his music.
-
Yes, it's controversial, but let me explain.
-
What do stairs have to do with California’s housing crisis? More than you might think, says this Culver City councilmember.
-
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care.
-
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings.