The National Park Service is asking for public input for its study on whether the L.A. coastline between San Pedro and Santa Monica should qualify for national park designation.
Federal officials held a public meeting Wednesday and outlined the study process.
Congress passed a law in 2022 that called for this study and greenlit funding for the three-year effort.
Lawmakers will use the findings to decide whether to designate the stretch of coastline — which includes the Santa Monica Pier, Ballona Creek and RAT Beach — a national park.
Sarah Bodo, project manager at NPS, said the coastline is interpreted as part of the sea to approximately 200 yards inland.
“The 200-yard number is an effort to include the beach areas and the public lands, while excluding private property from the study area,” Bodo said. “In cases where private property is within 200 yards, those properties are excluded from the study.”
What are the criteria?
To become a national park, the area needs to contain nationally significant resources, not already be in the national park system and require direct NPS management.
Sequoia National Park, for example, was recognized in 1890 to protect the giant trees from logging.
Officials will also consider where the access, cost and size of the area can be managed by the department.
“A study area must meet all four of the criteria,” Bodo said.
What happens now?
The agency is early in the study process. If you have thoughts on the matter, now is the time to share them.
The public comment period is open until April 6.
In the coming months, the agency will review that feedback before preparing a study report for Congress.
Only Congress and the president have the ability to designate a new national park.
“At that point, it will be up to Congress or the president to take action or not. There is no timeline for further action from Congress or the president,” Bodo said. “The completion of the study does not establish a new park unit.”
The process could take years. The last designation given to Missouri’s Ste. Genevieve National Historic Park in 2018, according to the Associated Press. Congress ordered the study for that park in 2005.
-
L.A. is one of several California cities piloting the technology. -
Immigration enforcement has hit undocumented and immigrant neighborhoods hardest and hurt small businesses, according to new report -
Bald eagles can lay a replacement clutch if the eggs are lost early in the incubation process, as seen in the nest several seasons ago.
Outstanding questions
One question raised at Wednesday’s meeting was what the benefits and downsides of having NPS manage this area are.
Bodo said that would depend on what the legislation would say if designated and how management would work.
“The National Park Service is required to conserve unimpaired scenery, natural and historic objects, wildlife of parks, and to provide for their enjoyment by the public. That's our overall mission,” Bodo said. “National parks can also generate economic activity in nearby communities.”
And, if designated, how exactly would management of this area work?
It’s also still too early to say, but existing property owners, like the county or city, could continue to own and manage the property, Bodo added.
“If this were to be designated, there maybe wouldn't be significant changes in that arena,” Bodo said. “The Park Service would seek to work collaboratively with local communities and existing agencies on common goals for resource protection and recreational opportunities.”
Another question asked was how might Park Service involvement along the L.A. coast affect fishing and hunting regulations?
“That's really dependent on land ownership, so if land ownership did not change, nothing would change,” Bodo said.
How you can participate
The National Park Service is looking for public input. A second virtual meeting will be held March 11 at 6 p.m. You can join here.
Public comments are also being accepted online here.
