This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
Federal Charges Filed Against SoCal Edison Over Bobcat Fire Damages
The Bobcat Fire burns in the Angeles National Forest on Sept. 21, 2020, becoming one of the largest fires in Los Angeles County's history with over 100,000 acres scarred by the fire.
(
Frederic J. Brown
/
AFP via Getty Images
)
A federal lawsuit was filed Friday against Southern California Edison for its role in the massive 2020 Bobcat Fire. The U.S. Attorney’s Office alleges that the utility failed to maintain trees that came into contact with power lines and caused the blaze.
Why it matters
- The fire burned more than 114,000 acres, including 100,000 acres in the Angeles National Forest.
- It also destroyed 171 structures and 178 vehicles, damaged 47 structures, and resulted in the evacuation of residents in Sierra Madre, Monrovia, Bradbury and Duarte.
The National Interagency Coordination Center, the agency that mobilizes resources for wildfires, said the estimated cost for containing the Bobcat Fire was $100 million. Nearly three years later, trails and campgrounds are still closed to the public.
The backstory
Map of the Bobcat fire's path.
(
Courtesy County of L.A.
)
The Bobcat wildfire, which began on Sept. 6, 2020, ripped through 100,000-plus acres of land in a matter of weeks. Rebuilding the homes that were lost has continued to be a challenge for residents.
This is not the first lawsuit filed against the energy provider in relation to the fire. Earlier this year, property owners whose homes were damaged by the Bobcat Fire also filed a lawsuit seeking compensation for their damaged properties, loss of income, and other damages.
Sponsored message
SoCal Edison spokesperson released the following statement in response to the lawsuit:
"Our thoughts remain with the people who were affected by the Bobcat Fire, who lost homes, vehicles and were evacuated; we are reviewing the US Department of Justice’s legal action and it would not be appropriate to discuss outside of the court process."
What's next
While an amount will be determined at trial, the attorney general's office is seeking compensation for costs incurred due to fire suppression; property damage; the rehabilitation, restoration and reforestation of the burned areas; damage to archeological sites, as well as environmental and administrative costs.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
