One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
AI supercomputers need lots of electricity. Should California raise their bills?
An Amazon Web Services data center in Hilliard, Ohio, under construction. Ohio is one of several states moving ahead on regulations for data centers.
(
Brian Kaiser
/
Bloomberg via Getty Images
)
Topline:
California is falling behind other states in building data centers that power artificial intelligence supercomputers, as well as putting guardrails around their environmental impact. Democratic state lawmakers are now exploring rules for data centers aimed at protecting sustainability and energy affordability.
What’s on the table: Democrats are considering new special electricity rates for data centers aimed at controlling costs for other customers, similar to policies in Indiana, Ohio and West Virginia. They’re also weighing new energy reporting standards to better understand the supercomputers’ impacts on California’s electric grid.
Why now: Electrical utilities are embracing data centers as a catalyst for increasing electrical demand (and padding their bottom line) following an era of energy efficiency. PG&E anticipates new data centers coming to Northern California will require power equivalent to 6.5 million new homes in the next 10 years.
Walk the tightrope: Environmentalists and ratepayers argue an influx of new data centers could, if not managed properly, leave ratepayers with costly stranded assets, or even outpace the growth of renewable energy on the grid. Big Tech-backed lobby groups, however, fear aggressive new rules will make California a less attractive option for building advanced tech infrastructure.
The kicker: if lawmakers don’t find a way forward soon, they risk losing a critical sector of the booming AI industry to other states, while simultaneously failing to align data centers already in California with the state’s ambitious climate goals.
Go deeper: The full story is in POLITICO's California Climate newsletter.
Sponsored message
This story is published in partnership with POLITICO.
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
