Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
California Seeks Public Comment On First-Ever ‘Digital Equity Plan’

An estimated 3.5 million Californians don’t have internet service due to limited infrastructure, affordability issues and other hurdles. That’s an issue for accessing everything from government services to online shopping.
The California Department of Technology issued a draft plan this week to narrow what’s known as the “digital divide.” The 200-page Digital Equity Plan is part of the Newsom administration’s $6 billion effort to ensure, among other things, residents have high-speed internet at home and in schools, libraries and businesses.
The department is asking for public comment, which will remain open till Jan. 25. You can leave it in this online form.
The plan identifies barriers for eight groups:
- low-income residents
- veterans
- incarcerated people
- members of a racial or ethnic minority group
- English-language learners
- people with disabilities
- older adults over 60
- people who live in rural areas
The plan also identifies barriers for other “digitally disadvantaged communities,” including members of the LGBTQIA+ communities and people who identify as women. About 33.5 million California residents — or 85% of the state’s population — belong to one or more of these groups.
The state is also working to develop “meaningful partnerships” to increase connectivity in tribal communities while “respecting sovereignty, ownership and long-term economic sustainability.”
-
When does public comment close? There will be a 45-day public comment period, remaining open until Jan. 25, 2024.
How can I leave a comment? You can read the 200-page draft plan here and submit a public comment online by filling out this form. The California Department of Technology says it will incorporate the feedback and present a final plan in March.
Affordability
Californians spend an average of $83.60 a month on broadband. But according to the state, some of the most vulnerable groups are paying more than the average cost.
Affordability remains the top barrier for about 61% of residents, according to a statewide telephone survey conducted with the CETFund and researchers from USC’s Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism.
The state’s draft plan cites a lack of awareness of low-cost offers, mistrust of government and corporations, and a lack of consumer choice and competition among internet service providers.
While more Californians can access the internet and digital resources than ever before, only 62% of residents say their service is “reliable for their household needs,” according to the survey.
Trusted messengers
Most digital inclusion work happens at the regional and local levels through community-based organizations that are “trusted messengers” and can deliver programs and services with cultural sensitivity. The state’s plan lists more than 700 groups or contacts that offer funding and services ranging from digital literacy training to free devices and tech support.
Even if service is available, about 8% of households lack a computer or broadband subscription, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau. About 23% of residents rely solely on mobile phones for service, and can’t afford devices like computers and tablets. Others lack the skills and technical familiarity due to the “rapid pace of change in technology,” including hardware and software.
The Department of Technology is inviting public comment until Jan. 25 and will publish a final version in the spring.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.