With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
California Seeks Public Comment On First-Ever ‘Digital Equity Plan’
An estimated 3.5 million Californians don’t have internet service due to limited infrastructure, affordability issues and other hurdles. That’s an issue for accessing everything from government services to online shopping.
The California Department of Technology issued a draft plan this week to narrow what’s known as the “digital divide.” The 200-page Digital Equity Plan is part of the Newsom administration’s $6 billion effort to ensure, among other things, residents have high-speed internet at home and in schools, libraries and businesses.
The department is asking for public comment, which will remain open till Jan. 25. You can leave it in this online form.
The plan identifies barriers for eight groups:
- low-income residents
- veterans
- incarcerated people
- members of a racial or ethnic minority group
- English-language learners
- people with disabilities
- older adults over 60
- people who live in rural areas
The plan also identifies barriers for other “digitally disadvantaged communities,” including members of the LGBTQIA+ communities and people who identify as women. About 33.5 million California residents — or 85% of the state’s population — belong to one or more of these groups.
The state is also working to develop “meaningful partnerships” to increase connectivity in tribal communities while “respecting sovereignty, ownership and long-term economic sustainability.”
-
When does public comment close? There will be a 45-day public comment period, remaining open until Jan. 25, 2024.
How can I leave a comment? You can read the 200-page draft plan here and submit a public comment online by filling out this form. The California Department of Technology says it will incorporate the feedback and present a final plan in March.
Affordability
Californians spend an average of $83.60 a month on broadband. But according to the state, some of the most vulnerable groups are paying more than the average cost.
Affordability remains the top barrier for about 61% of residents, according to a statewide telephone survey conducted with the CETFund and researchers from USC’s Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism.
The state’s draft plan cites a lack of awareness of low-cost offers, mistrust of government and corporations, and a lack of consumer choice and competition among internet service providers.
While more Californians can access the internet and digital resources than ever before, only 62% of residents say their service is “reliable for their household needs,” according to the survey.
Trusted messengers
Most digital inclusion work happens at the regional and local levels through community-based organizations that are “trusted messengers” and can deliver programs and services with cultural sensitivity. The state’s plan lists more than 700 groups or contacts that offer funding and services ranging from digital literacy training to free devices and tech support.
Even if service is available, about 8% of households lack a computer or broadband subscription, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau. About 23% of residents rely solely on mobile phones for service, and can’t afford devices like computers and tablets. Others lack the skills and technical familiarity due to the “rapid pace of change in technology,” including hardware and software.
The Department of Technology is inviting public comment until Jan. 25 and will publish a final version in the spring.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
-
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol.
-
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails.
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight.
-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.