Support for LAist comes from
Local and national news, NPR, things to do, food recommendations and guides to Los Angeles, Orange County and the Inland Empire
Stay Connected
Listen

Share This

News

60 years of deception and land sales in California City: 7 takeaways from my investigative podcast

The developer of California City, Nat Mendelsohn, built hundreds of miles of roads through the empty desert. He sold land to tens of thousands of people. Today, most of the roads are abandoned. The landowners live all over the world. (Chava Sanchez/KPCC)
()

Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.

Our news is free on LAist. To make sure you get our coverage: Sign up for our daily newsletters. To support our non-profit public service journalism: Donate Now.

Four years ago, while reporting a story about the drought, I received a tantalizing tip: In a small town in the Mojave Desert, salespeople were making tens of millions of dollars hawking empty desert land to unsuspecting buyers by convincing them the area would boom one day -- and if they got in now, they could get rich.

It seemed like such an anachronism, a relic of Southern California post-war hubris, or maybe even Gold Rush-style boosterism. How could this be happening in the 21st century?

My 8-episode investigative podcast, California City, seeks to answer that question, as well as a bunch of others that came up over the course of my reporting. Here are 7 key takeaways:

Support for LAist comes from

1. California City was founded by a Czechoslovakian immigrant with a vision to build a city from scratch in the desert

In the mid-1950s, real estate developer Nat Mendelsohn began to buy a ton of land in the Mojave Desert, 100 miles north of Los Angeles. He envisioned building a city of 200 square miles in this otherwise desolate spot. There would be a golf course, a university, a mall, a massive park and an airport. There would be half a million residents living along winding city streets that were curved to slow down traffic.

Like many urban planners at the time, Mendelsohn thought major cities like Los Angeles were overcrowded, polluted and dangerous. People needed a place to go, to start over. California City would be that place.

As Mendelsohn saw it, city folks could come and buy an empty lot -- for cheap. They could build a house, or just hold onto the land and sell it in the future. It was supposed to be a good investment.

The cover of an annual report has a black and white photo of a man holding a mic
A photo of Nat Mendelsohn, the founder of California City, on the cover of the 1961 annual report to property owners.
()

2. Mendelsohn's sales tactics drew the attention of Ralph Nader, and got the company in serious trouble with the FTC

Most of the land Mendelsohn sold was bought by participants of a program he created that taught people how to be a real estate agent-- by selling land in California City. Graduates of the program were expected to buy a piece of land themselves, and refer their friends and family.

Support for LAist comes from

Mendelsohn advertised the program in major newspapers around the West, and it was wildly successful. By 1970, Mendelsohn had 3,000 salesmen and 24 sales offices around the world. Ultimately, more than 73,000 people bought land, netting Mendelsohn's company hundreds of millions of dollars.

Top of page reads: Opportunity to enter new profession
A 1969 newspaper ad for the real estate training program that Nat Mendelsohn used to sell so much land
()

But by the late 1960s, people who had bought land in California City were starting to realize that the growth they'd been promised wasn't happening. And many of the amenities they'd been told were coming had yet to be built.

Around the same time, a young Ralph Nader asked his gang of consumer protection attorneys, the "Nader's Raiders," to investigate land sales and development throughout California. The complaints about California City caught the eye of the attorney leading the project, who included a chapter on the city in the report.

"This is no ordinary real estate scheme," read the report. "Mendelsohn isn't trying to sell land, and the public isn't really buying the land. They're engaged in a grand illusion of creating wealth...NK Mendelsohn has perfected the art of turning desert dust into gold -- but only for himself."

After the Nader's Raiders' published their report in 1971, the Federal Trade Commission began to investigate. They sued Mendelsohn's company, which was then known as Great Western Cities. In 1977, the company settled, and was ordered to pay what was, at the time, the largest consumer refund in the history of the FTC. In 1984, the company declared bankruptcy. That same year, Nat Mendelsohn died.

3. After Great Western Cities went bankrupt, a former employee quietly continued selling vacant land in California City

In the 1970s, a man named Tom Maney began working for Great Western Cities. Maney helped negotiate the settlement with the FTC, and after Great Western Cities declared bankruptcy in 1984, he acquired some of the assets, including a lot of vacant California City land and a small resort called Silver Saddle Ranch.

Support for LAist comes from

Maney continued selling vacant desert land, using the resort as an attraction to draw potential buyers. But in an interview, Maney told me he and Silver Saddle have nothing in common with Nat Mendelsohn or Great Western Cities.

"The only similarity is that we sold land," he said.

A "For Sale" yard sign is planted in a bleak desert landscape
"Land for sale" signs litter the empty desert in California City.
(
Chava Sanchez
/
LAist
)

4. In 2011, Silver Saddle transitioned from selling vacant desert lots to selling shares of a confusing real estate investment called 'landbanking'

Landbanking is where a group of people jointly own a huge chunk of land. In Silver Saddle's case, approximately 1,000 acres of empty desert on the outskirts of California City, divided into 4,000 shares. The idea was that the land would appreciate in value, and when it did, all the co-owners could sell it to a developer and make a lot of money.

Since 2011, Silver Saddle's sales agents sold "shares" of the landbanking project to more than 2,000 people, for up to $30,000 each. Between 2011 and 2019, Silver Saddle made more than $56 million.

5. Silver Saddle targeted a very specific type of customer: Latino, Filipino and Chinese people, most of whom lived in California and often spoke English as a second language

During the sales pitch, potential customers were divided up by ethnicity and paired with a salesperson who spoke their primary language. They watched a presentation about the area's potential. According to sources I spoke with and court documents, sales agents suggested that wealthy businessmen like Elon Musk and Bill Gates were investing nearby. They compared California City to Las Vegas and other large cities in the Southwest that began as tiny desert outposts.

Support for LAist comes from
A promotional brochure from Silver Saddle, which is part of the DBO's lawsuit against the company.
()

The salespeople held raffles for free airline tickets to Hong Kong and Manila, shopping sprees, watches, cameras and other perks to encourage people to invest. They had an elaborate referral program: Anyone who bought a share of the landbanking project and then referred their friends would receive $2,000.

Sales agents allegedly used high-pressure tactics that made it very difficult for potential customers to say no. The contract had no cancellation period, and buyers were required to pay $41 a month in membership fees to Silver Saddle -- indefinitely.

6. The California Dept. of Business oversight charged Silver Saddle with fraud and shut the company down in 2019

In September 2019, the California Department of Business Oversight filed a lawsuit against Silver Saddle, accusing the company of securities fraud. A judge appointed a receiver to take control of the company's assets and property while the case proceeds. The case is still on-going. A trial date has been set for July 2021.

7. It's unlikely that people who invested in Silver Saddle will get their money back

When the court-appointed receiver took over last September, Silver Saddle's finances were a mess. Their books were so disorganized that the DBO's fraud examiner determined it was probably deliberate -- Silver Saddle must have been transferring money between multiple accounts to make it difficult to trace. Most of the money, the DBO learned, was gone. A lot of it was used to pay sales agents.

The receiver is currently trying to sell the ranch and all the land around it to help pay back people who bought into the landbanking operation. But even if the sale goes through, it won't generate nearly enough money to make all the investors whole. That's because the land Silver Saddle sold was "near worthless real estate," according to the DBO. Silver Saddle sold shares of the landbanking project for around 100 times more than what they were really worth.

If you'd like to follow the Silver Saddle court case, follow me on Twitter: @guerinemily.

If you have a tip or story to share about California City or Silver Saddle (or anything else), email me: eguerin@scpr.org

Listen to the podcast

California City
Listen 6:31
Listen 6:31
How I Found Out About California City
It was supposed to be a simple story about the California drought. Instead, reporter Emily Guerin became obsessed with the bizarre history of a sprawling, half-built desert city.

As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.

Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.

We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.

No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.

Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.

Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

Chip in now to fund your local journalism
A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right
(
LAist
)

Trending on LAist