With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Should Hollywood studios license their content to train AI models?
Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai speaks at a Google I/O event in Mountain View.
(
Jeff Chiu
/
AP
)
Topline:
AI companies are expected to license Hollywood content to train its models. Should studios and production companies say yes if they have the chance? Or should they hold out because of the risks?
Why it matters: Next year, AI companies are expected to dish out a whopping $10 billion licensing content from media and entertainment companies to train their models. Hollywood could cash in on that spending spree, particularly at a time when so many media companies are struggling with their finances. But it could come at an existential cost to the business, with those same models putting traditional studios out of business.
The argument for: The big lesson from streaming was that if you don’t get ahead of the curve, Big Tech will. The same could go for AI: If you aren’t actively working with AI companies and licensing your titles to them, someone else will come around and figure out a way to profit in your place.
Sponsored message
The case against: Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has suggested that his company likely will not need more training data before long and that individual titles are overvalued. That signals that AI companies may not pay studios what they believe their titles to be worth — and not enough to make the trade worth it. Plus, there could be massive labor issues, as below-the-line workers and talent will want to be compensated for their work being ingested by AI.
For more... read the full story on The Ankler.
This story is published in partnership with The Ankler, a paid subscription publication about the entertainment industry.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
