Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
Arts & Entertainment

Should Hollywood studios license their content to train AI models?

Multiple prints of "AI" scattered across a gigantic white board. In front righthand side, a male-presenting figure stands small, apparently mid-speech.
Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai speaks at a Google I/O event in Mountain View.
(
Jeff Chiu
/
AP
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Topline:

AI companies are expected to license Hollywood content to train its models. Should studios and production companies say yes if they have the chance? Or should they hold out because of the risks?

Why it matters: Next year, AI companies are expected to dish out a whopping $10 billion licensing content from media and entertainment companies to train their models. Hollywood could cash in on that spending spree, particularly at a time when so many media companies are struggling with their finances. But it could come at an existential cost to the business, with those same models putting traditional studios out of business.

The argument for: The big lesson from streaming was that if you don’t get ahead of the curve, Big Tech will. The same could go for AI: If you aren’t actively working with AI companies and licensing your titles to them, someone else will come around and figure out a way to profit in your place.

The case against: Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has suggested that his company likely will not need more training data before long and that individual titles are overvalued. That signals that AI companies may not pay studios what they believe their titles to be worth — and not enough to make the trade worth it. Plus, there could be massive labor issues, as below-the-line workers and talent will want to be compensated for their work being ingested by AI.

For more... read the full story on The Ankler.

This story is published in partnership with The Ankler, a paid subscription publication about the entertainment industry.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right