Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
Arts & Entertainment

The Oscars are never just about the movies

A woman holds onto the straps of her brown shoulder bag, wearing a black blouse with colorful embroidery.
Karla Sofía Gascón as the title character in Emilia Pérez.
(
Shanna Besson
/
Pathe
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

Listen 8:02
Why do the Oscars get things wrong so often?

What a difference a month makes.

In late January, Netflix's narco-musical Emilia Pérez was riding high with 13 Academy Award nominations, and was widely considered the front-runner for best picture. Its star, Karla Sofía Gascón, who'd made history by becoming the first openly transgender performer to be nominated for an acting Oscar, seemed on a glide path to making history again by winning best actress.

Then, a number of offensive, years-old tweets resurfaced in which Gascón had expressed racist views toward George Floyd, Muslims and diversity at the Oscars — views that were described as "inexcusable" even by her own director — and both star and film lost their awards luster. Until this week, it seemed unlikely that Gascón would even attend the awards ceremony on Sunday.

None of this has much to do with either cinema or art. It's about real-world, off-screen events and behavior, and how they're received by Oscar voters.

Sponsored message

There's a long history of extracurricular considerations figuring into Oscar voting, going back at least to the 1940s, and voters' annoyance at an arrogant 26-year-old tyro named Orson Welles. An interloper from live theater, Welles was convinced he knew better than the Hollywood establishment, and it turns out he did — no one today would argue that John Ford's 1941 How Green Was My Valley can hold a candle to Welles' groundbreaking Citizen Kane — but Valley took home that year's Oscars for best picture and director.

A black and white photo of a man wearing a raincoat and fedora holding on to an umbrella.
Gene Kelly in a photo taken during the filming of the movie <em>Singin' in the Rain. </em>
(
AFP
/
AFP via Getty Images
)

Real-world politics, a movie's subject matter, genre, release date, perceived momentum, and perversely, what won the previous year, can all affect a film's chances at the Oscars. 1952's Singin' In The Rain, arguably the greatest movie musical ever, wasn't even nominated for best picture, largely because another Gene Kelly musical, An American In Paris, had triumphed a year earlier. Apocalypse Now had the bad luck to immediately follow another Vietnam War film, The Deer Hunter.

Immense box office popularity can be a negative with awards voters – witness Steven Spielberg's cinematically inventive E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial losing out to Richard Attenborough's comparatively stodgy 1982 biopic Gandhi. Even Attenborough thought the voters got that one wrong, as he didn't hesitate to tell interviewers for years after. (Spielberg would finally win both picture and director for his 1993 biopic, Schindler's List.)

When voters didn't even nominate Christopher Nolan's 2008 Batman epic The Dark Knight for best picture, the snub was regarded as so egregious that the Academy expanded the best picture field to make room for blockbusters, though the Academy never formally acknowledged The Dark Knight's role in the change. (Following in Spielberg's footsteps, Nolan eventually triumphed, too, just last year, winning director and picture for, yup … a biopic: Oppenheimer.)

All of which is to say that sure, I'll be rooting for my faves as things play out on Sunday's telecast — it starts an hour earlier than usual this year, at 7 p.m. ET — but I'll be watching as much for the gowns and the gaffes as to see what wins.
Copyright 2025 NPR

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right