Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
The Pros And Cons Of 'First Look' Pacts In Hollywood And How Talent Is Reacting

Topline:
There’s a growing trend of high-profile actors and creators securing first-look deals with studios, giving them the initial opportunity to consider new material from talent. These relationships have in some ways replaced the vogue for “overall” deals that dominated the earlier streaming era.
Why it matters: First-look deals suit the current, more austerity-minded era, a lower-risk investment in talent with still potentially meaningful upside. But the lawyers who make these deals on behalf of their clients believe they have both positive and negative aspects.
Positivity first: First-look deals give talent more flexibility than an overall one. They can carve out exceptions, and they can shop a project elsewhere if the studio passes. These pacts can net in the low seven figures annually, and then if a project gets made, there’s the nice surprise of more.
A concerning look: The critique of these deals is that they still present some “handcuffs” on talent, and there’s concern that when a studio passes, it emits a negative signal to the market. But most concerning of all is that first-look deals represent another way for the rich to get richer, that they’re a backdoor way for studios to reward people they want to work with without it showing up in the budget of a particular project. In this way they’re symbolic of the continued erosion of the middle class in Hollywood.
For more . . . read the full story on The Ankler.
This story is published in partnership with The Ankler, a paid subscription publication about the entertainment industry.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
Children asked to waive right to see a judge in exchange for $2,500
-
There’s still a lot to be determined as the refinery, which supplies about one-fifth of Southern California's vehicle fuels, works to restore production and as data is collected.
-
The FCC voted to end E-Rate discounts for library hotspot lending and school bus Wi-Fi.
-
About half the Pacific Airshow’s 2025 lineup has been grounded because of the federal government shutdown.
-
USC says it’s reviewing the letter also sent to eight other prestigious schools nationwide. California's governor vowed that any California universities that sign will lose state funding.
-
Scientists say La Niña is likely, but that doesn’t necessarily mean a dry winter in Southern California.