With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
The Pros And Cons Of 'First Look' Pacts In Hollywood And How Talent Is Reacting
Paramount Pictures released its latest earnings report this week amid rumors of a possible sale.
(
Merkuri2/Getty Images
/
iStock
)
Topline:
There’s a growing trend of high-profile actors and creators securing first-look deals with studios, giving them the initial opportunity to consider new material from talent. These relationships have in some ways replaced the vogue for “overall” deals that dominated the earlier streaming era.
Why it matters: First-look deals suit the current, more austerity-minded era, a lower-risk investment in talent with still potentially meaningful upside. But the lawyers who make these deals on behalf of their clients believe they have both positive and negative aspects.
Positivity first: First-look deals give talent more flexibility than an overall one. They can carve out exceptions, and they can shop a project elsewhere if the studio passes. These pacts can net in the low seven figures annually, and then if a project gets made, there’s the nice surprise of more.
Sponsored message
A concerning look: The critique of these deals is that they still present some “handcuffs” on talent, and there’s concern that when a studio passes, it emits a negative signal to the market. But most concerning of all is that first-look deals represent another way for the rich to get richer, that they’re a backdoor way for studios to reward people they want to work with without it showing up in the budget of a particular project. In this way they’re symbolic of the continued erosion of the middle class in Hollywood.
For more . . . read the full story on The Ankler.
This story is published in partnership with The Ankler, a paid subscription publication about the entertainment industry.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
