One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
The Pros And Cons Of 'First Look' Pacts In Hollywood And How Talent Is Reacting
Paramount Pictures released its latest earnings report this week amid rumors of a possible sale.
(
Merkuri2/Getty Images
/
iStock
)
Topline:
There’s a growing trend of high-profile actors and creators securing first-look deals with studios, giving them the initial opportunity to consider new material from talent. These relationships have in some ways replaced the vogue for “overall” deals that dominated the earlier streaming era.
Why it matters: First-look deals suit the current, more austerity-minded era, a lower-risk investment in talent with still potentially meaningful upside. But the lawyers who make these deals on behalf of their clients believe they have both positive and negative aspects.
Positivity first: First-look deals give talent more flexibility than an overall one. They can carve out exceptions, and they can shop a project elsewhere if the studio passes. These pacts can net in the low seven figures annually, and then if a project gets made, there’s the nice surprise of more.
A concerning look: The critique of these deals is that they still present some “handcuffs” on talent, and there’s concern that when a studio passes, it emits a negative signal to the market. But most concerning of all is that first-look deals represent another way for the rich to get richer, that they’re a backdoor way for studios to reward people they want to work with without it showing up in the budget of a particular project. In this way they’re symbolic of the continued erosion of the middle class in Hollywood.
For more . . . read the full story on The Ankler.
This story is published in partnership with The Ankler, a paid subscription publication about the entertainment industry.
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
