With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
2 prosecutors sue LA County district attorney; claim they were demoted over Menendez case

Two Los Angeles County prosecutors are suing District Attorney Nathan Hochman, alleging he demoted them because they supported re-sentencing the Menendez brothers, who are serving life in prison for murder.
In separate lawsuits filed Monday in Superior Court, deputy district attorneys Nancy Theberge and Brock Lunsford accuse their boss of retaliation, harassment and defamation. They also allege both intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress and violations of the state labor code.
“Theberge and Lunsford assert that they were punished for fulfilling their legal duties, applying the law as written, and standing up for justice,” Theberge’s lawsuit states.
One of the suits also alleges that Hochman retaliated against Theberge for supporting Hochman’s opponent in the last election.
The lawsuit seeks unspecified compensatory damages, as well as punitive damages against the individual defendants.
The District Attorney's Office said Hochman does not comment on pending litigation.
Details from the court documents
Theberge and Lunsford were first assigned to review the Menendez case by then-District Attorney George Gascón. The attorneys concluded that under California resentencing laws, the Menendez brothers were entitled to a resentencing hearing.
The brothers shot and killed their parents in their Beverly Hills home in 1989. Later, they were convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Gascón, who had promised a more rehabilitative approach to criminal justice, supported the finding and filed a motion with the court seeking resentencing. He said Erik and Lyle Menendez, who have long claimed they were sexually abused by their father, had “paid their debt to society.”
In her lawsuit, Theberge said she and Lunsford’s support of resentencing the Menendez brothers — which could lead to their release — “was grounded in fact, supported by law, and filed with integrity.”
During last year’s campaign for district attorney, Hochman promised to review the Menendez case. And when he was elected in November, he demoted Theberge and Lunsford and installed his own people to conduct the review.
Theberge’s lawsuit says the “backlash” was "politically motivated, vindictive, and unlawful.”
In his lawsuit, Lunsford said he was “an exemplary employee” and never received a poor performance review. He said he followed the law by stating the Menendez brothers should be resentenced “because their incarceration is no longer in the interest of justice and that to recommend against resentencing would be a violation” of California law.
Theberge, a unit leader and former public defender, was transferred out of the District Attorney's Office entirely and reassigned to the Alternate Public Defender's Office, which the complaint describes as a "clear punitive move.''
Lunsford, a 25-year veteran, was stripped of his supervisory duties and reassigned to a low-level calendar deputy position in a remote branch court, according to the suit.
Claims of retaliation
When Hochman announced earlier this year that he opposed resentencing the brothers, he said he believed they had shown insufficient remorse for their crime. He said he and his prosecutors had thoroughly reviewed the case and were reversing Gascón’s decision to file for resentencing.
He did not disclose any demotions among members of his staff at the time, and his office did not respond to questions this week related to the allegations made in the lawsuit, including claims that the two deputy district attorneys were retaliated against.
“Theberge and Lunsford were not only demoted but also subjected to a campaign of retaliation, harassment, and reputational harm,” Theberge’s lawsuit states.
Deputy District Attorney John Lewin is named as a co-defendant in the case. According to the lawsuit, Theberge said Lewin accused her of dishonesty and breaching her duty of candor to the court in connection with her motion for resentencing.
Her lawsuit called that a “slanderous attack on her integrity.”
Lewin had no comment.
After Lunsford spoke out in her defense, Lewin publicly ridiculed Theberge and Lunsford, calling them a “quisling”— a term likening him to a Nazi collaborator.
“These retaliatory acts created a hostile and humiliating work environment and were directly connected to their role in filing the Menendez motion,” the lawsuit states.
Theberge accuses the District Attorney’s Office of retaliating against her for multiple unlawful reasons, including “Hochman’s belief that Theberge supported his political opponent, a violation of civil service rules and California Statutes prohibiting political discrimination.”
Likewise, Lunsford said in his lawsuit that the district attorney retaliated against him for various reasons, including standing up for Theberge when she was allegedly harassed in the office.
“Theberge was discriminated against and treated differently even compared to Brock Lunsford, a younger male,” the lawsuit states. “Theberge was removed from the District Attorney’s office entirely and Lunsford was demoted but allowed to remain at the District Attorney’s office.”
Prosecutors and lawyers in the Menendez brothers’ case are expected back in court Friday.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
Doctors say administrator directives allow immigration agents to interfere in medical decisions and compromise medical care.
-
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings.
-
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past.
-
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases.
-
Distrito Catorce’s Guillermo Piñon says the team no longer reflects his community. A new mural will honor local leaders instead.
-
The program is for customers in communities that may not be able to afford turf removal or water-saving upgrades.