Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
News

LA And Long Beach School Districts Have Concerns About Gov. Newsom’s School Reopening Plan

The entrance to the Long Beach Polytechnic campus (Megan Garvey / LAist)

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.

Superintendents from seven of the state’s largest school districts, including Los Angeles and Long Beach Unified, have sent a letter to Governor Newsom pushing back on his newly proposed reopening plan for schools.

Newsom’s Safer Schools for All Plan, released in late December, encourages California’s 1,037 public school districts to draft plans for offering in-person instruction, once COVID-19 cases reach a low enough threshold.

After those district’s reopening guidelines are approved by local labor unions, county and state officials, and adopted, they can be eligible to receive $450 per student. For LAUSD, that could mean at least $180 million.

But local school districts are not ready to jump on board yet. The letter argues that Newsom’s plan disadvantages large school districts, like LAUSD, that serve low-income families—many of whom are infected with coronavirus at disproportionate rates.

If those schools can’t open for in-person learning because of surging case rates, local districts worry they could lose out on the money offered. The letter calls Newsom’s proposal a reversal of the state’s commitment to equitable funding:

“Affluent communities where family members can work from home will see schools open with more funding. Low-income communities bearing the brunt of the virus will see schools remain closed with lower funding.”

The state’s plan recognizes the potential for unequal support, and promises to weight funding for “districts serving students from low-income families, English learners and foster youth.”

Instead of that, the signatory superintendents want money to be available for all schools.

Sponsored message

Superintendent Jill Baker of Long Beach Unified says she signed the letter because she supports reopening schools, but wants to see a statewide standard for doing that, instead of leaving it up to individual districts, as the Safer Schools Plan suggests.

“None of the school districts were consulted about the plan before it was released,” Baker said. “The letter was an effort to describe what we think needs to be done from here, as the largest urban districts in the state of California.”

Baker says Long Beach Unified might only receive residual funding according to Newsom’s plan, after smaller districts with lower case rates get the first opportunities.

As of January 5, Los Angeles County had a daily new case rate of 65.8 positive cases of coronavirus out of 100,000 residents, adjusted for testing. For classes to reopen, a county must report less than 28 positive cases out of 100,000 residents over a seven-day average.

“Our proposal is to think about an equity-centered approach, to look at the variation of needs across the state,” Baker said.

Along with the demands about equal funding, the letter outlines several other declarations and recommendations:

  • The districts say they are ready to open for in-person instruction whenever health standards are met and the state determines schools should be open

  • Basic reopening guidelines should be standardized for every school district. Once safe, all districts should be mandated to offer in person instruction

  • Public health funds, not money from Proposition 98, should be used for school-site COVID-19 testing and other health-related costs

  • COVID-19 testing and vaccinations should be integrated with schools and funded by the state

  • Supplemental state funding should go towards reopening special education in-person

  • The state should explain how COVID-19 caseload thresholds are determined for deciding if in-person instruction is safe

UPDATE, Jan. 7, 12 pm: This article has been updated to reflect the coronavirus case rate throughout Los Angeles County.

Sponsored message

Our news is free on LAist. To make sure you get our coverage: Sign up for our daily newsletters. To support our non-profit public service journalism: Donate Now.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible year-end gift today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right