This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
Federal Judge Orders Full Restoration Of DACA -- And That New Applicants Be Admitted
DACA recipients and their supporters rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court on June 18, 2020 in Washington, DC. On Thursday morning, the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, denied the Trump administration's attempt to end DACA, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
A federal judge in New York has ordered that the Trump administration restore the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program to its status before the Trump administration attempted to end it in September of 2017.
The program, known as DACA, has been in limbo since then, kept alive by the courts, but not open to new applicants. DACA allows young immigrants who are in the U.S. without legal status but were brought here as children to live and work in the country legally.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled this past June that DACA may continue, but the Trump administration pushed back with new restrictions. In July, acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf issued a memo refusing to accept new applicants, and forcing DACA recipients to renew once a year instead of every two years, as the program had worked.
Last month, a federal judge issued a ruling invalidating Wolf's memo, concluding that the acting Homeland Security secretary was not properly appointed and did not have the legal authority to make these changes.
Today's ruling directs Homeland Security to open the program to new applicants and restore the two-year renewal period for DACA protection and work permits. From the ruling:
DHS is DIRECTED to post a public notice, within 3 calendar days of this Order, to be displayed prominently on its website and on the websites of all other relevant agencies, that it is accepting first-time requests for consideration of deferred action under DACA, renewal requests, and advance parole requests, based on the terms of the DACA program prior to September 5, 2017, and in accordance with this court's Memorandum & Order of November 14, 2020.
"My fear is, this is great news, but we still need to see whether USCIS listens to the order of this federal court to start taking initial applications, because they've defied the Supreme Court when they were told to do so back in June."
Sponsored message
This summer, after the Supreme Court ruling and before the Wolf memo was issued, the federal government did not provide guidance to would-be new applicants. Perez pointed out that there's also a pending legal challenge to DACA in Texas, where a hearing is set for later this month.
The Obama-era program, begun in 2012, protects hundreds of thousands of young immigrants from deportation, including an estimated 200,000 in California. President-elect Joe Biden has pledged to reinstate DACA in his immigration plan.
*This story has been updated.
READ MORE ABOUT DACA:
- In LA, Biden Election Victory Encourages DACA Recipients Who've Felt Under Siege
- Supreme Court Upholds DACA, Protecting 'Dreamers' (For Now)
- 'It Was A Relief': DACA Students Find Hope In Supreme Court Ruling
- Trump Administration Refuses To Accept New DACA Applicants Despite Court Rulings
Our news is free on LAist. To make sure you get our coverage: Sign up for our daily newsletters. To support our non-profit public service journalism: Donate Now.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
