Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
LA Sheriff Villanueva Calls Guardado Inquest ‘Circus Stunt’

Sheriff Alex Villanueva Thursday decried a planned coroner’s inquest into the fatal shooting of Andres Guardado by an L.A. County Sheriff’s deputy as “a circus stunt.”
The sheriff also dismissed the County Board of Supervisors’ decision earlier this week to explore the legal options for removing or impeaching him, calling it “a power grab.”
The supervisors voted Tuesday to explore options for removing the elected sheriff beyond a voter-led recall effort.
"They have not allowed me to actually do my job without their interference since the day I was sworn in," Villanueva said on our public affairs show AirTalk. The sheriff took office in December 2018.
In the case of Guardado, the 18-year-old killed by a deputy who shot him in the back after a foot chase in June, the supervisors directed Chief Medical Examiner-Coroner Dr. Jonathan Lucas to hold a public inquest.
The coroner announced the inquest this week, saying it will begin on Nov. 30. It will be a formal public process in which witnesses can be called to testify. The inquest, the first such proceeding in more than 30 years in L.A. County, “ensures that our residents will have an independent review of all the evidence and findings of our office and of the cause and manner of death of Mr. Guardado,” Lucas said in a statement.
Villanueva said inquests can be useful but argued that the coroner has already determined the manner and cause of Guardado’s death. The coroner ruled the death a homicide.
“You’re trying to create a trial for something that already happened,” the sheriff said.
This is the second time this year Villanueva finds himself at odds with the coroner over the Guardado case. In July, Lucas overrode a "security hold" by the sheriff's department and released the autopsy, which determined that Deputy Miguel Vega shot Guardado five times in the back.
Villanueva said the coroner's decision to release the autopsy before the department had been able to interview Vega amounted to interference. He accused Lucas of having “sacrificed the integrity of the investigation in a bid to satisfy public curiosity.”

RESISTING OVERSIGHT
The sheriff disputed complaints from both County Inspector General Max Huntsman and the Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission that he has been uncooperative in investigating deputy shootings.
Villanueva continued his war of words with Huntsman, calling him “a political attack dog of the board [of supervisors].”
Huntsman, who is charged with monitoring department practices, has said Villanueva refuses to provide documents and access to department personnel regarding deputy shootings, discipline, hiring and other issues.
As he has in the past, the sheriff called Huntsman a liar: “He’s been dishonest since day one.”
Villanueva said he’s given the inspector general “everything he is legally entitled to.”
The sheriff’s comments reflected his resistance to outside oversight. In an unprecedented move last year, he accused Huntsman of illegally accessing department records and opened a criminal investigation of the inspector general.
Villanueva’s critics called it an act of intimidation.
The county ordinance that created the Office of Inspector General in part provides him access to department “information; documents; materials; facilities; and meetings, reviews, and other proceedings necessary to carry out the OIG's duties under this section.”
Villanueva also refused this year to respond to a subpoena by the Civilian Oversight Commission to testify about how he was handling coronavirus inside the jails, saying the panel didn’t have the authority to issue it.
In March, voters gave the commission subpoena power in response to a campaign to force the sheriff to be more transparent and accountable.
The sheriff is fighting the panel’s authority in court.
Echoing his criticism of Huntsman, Villanueva called the oversight commission “a political attack show.”
“Once they get their act together and they start behaving like a rational objective body I'd be more than happy to attend” commission meetings, he said.
The commission last month called for the sheriff’s resignation.
THE ARREST OF JOSIE HUANG: ‘MISTAKES MADE ON BOTH SIDES’
Villanueva also seemed to double down on his view that the arrest of our reporter, Josie Huang, was justified, while saying “there [were] mistakes made on both sides.”
Huang was tackled and arrested Sept. 12 during a small protest outside a hospital where two deputies were being treated after being shot in an ambush hours earlier.
“She got way too close to the action” while filming deputies making an arrest, the sheriff said, while adding that the deputies “were too quick in arresting her … they should have given her more time to comply” with their order to move back.
The department still charged Huang with obstructing justice. On Sept. 22, District Attorney Jackie Lacey declined to prosecute her, noting that "while deputies had reason to ask her to back up, Ms. Huang was not given the opportunity to comply with their demand."
Villanueva has repeatedly claimed, inaccurately, that Huang did not identify herself as a reporter and that she refused to comply with deputies' orders to stand back.
We debunked many of the sheriff’s claims in a previous story, which you can read here.
Huang’s arrest was decried by journalism organizations and First Amendment advocates.
The sheriff acknowledged on AirTalk that Huang was, in fact, wearing a work ID that clearly showed she was with KPCC, but he said that she did not identify herself until she was already on the ground being handcuffed, and that it was unlikely deputies would recognize "KPCC" as a local news organization.
The public should consider the "human element," the sheriff argued, and recognize that in the heat of the moment, when a handful of protesters were chanting for the deaths of deputies, it may have been difficult to tell Huang apart from the crowd.
Our news is free on LAist. To make sure you get our coverage: Sign up for our daily newsletters. To support our non-profit public service journalism: Donate Now.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.