With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
Debating Prop 16: Should Voters Restore Affirmative Action To California’s Constitution?
()
Among the slew of measures on the November ballot is Proposition 16, which would erase the ban on affirmative action at public institutions from California’s constitution. That ban was put in place when voters approved Proposition 209 in 1996.
Southern California Public Radio will host an online event on Wednesday evening to lay out the basics of Prop 16 and to hear from experts on both sides of the debate.
Prop 16 opponents warn the change would put a person’s race ahead of merit in situations such as college admissions. Prop 16 supporters say California’s ban on affirmative action is a kind of systemic racism that’s keeping Blacks and Latinos out of higher education.
The event will include an interview with Lourdes Morales, Principal Fiscal and Policy Analyst with the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office, who wrote an analysis of Prop 16.
Support for LAist comes from
“It repeals those prohibitions that were established by 209,” she said, “and therefore gives the discretion to local governments and the state to institute policies that do consider those policies.”
A Prop 16 victory would not, for example, mandate affirmative action in college admissions. Those decisions would be left to the UC Regents or California State University trustees, who would have to develop policies and action plans to bring back affirmative action.
Private colleges and universities are not affected by the ban on affirmative action and many use race and ethnicity for admissions.
Wednesday’s event begins at 6:30 p.m. RSVP here.
Our news is free on LAist. To make sure you get our coverage: Sign up for our daily newsletters. To support our non-profit public service journalism: Donate Now.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The Palisades Fire erupted on Jan. 7 and went on to kill 12 people and destroy more than 6,800 homes and buildings. -
People moving to Los Angeles are regularly baffled by the region’s refrigerator-less apartments. They’ll soon be a thing of the past. -
Experts say students shouldn't readily forgo federal aid. But a California-only program may be a good alternative in some cases. -
Distrito Catorce’s Guillermo Piñon says the team no longer reflects his community. A new mural will honor local leaders instead. -
The program is for customers in communities that may not be able to afford turf removal or water-saving upgrades. -
More than half of sales through September have been to corporate developers. Grassroots community efforts continue to work to combat the trend.
Best of LAist