Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Racial disparities seen in 'pretextual stops'
    A police officer stands outside the window of a white van on the side of a road with his motorcycle parked behind the vehicle.
    A 2022 LAPD policy in part instructs officers to minimize stops for minor equipment violations.
    Newly released data from the city show that Los Angeles police officers use minor traffic stops as a way to investigate Black and Latino people on suspicion of committing a more serious crime at a higher rate than their share of the citywide population.

    Pretextual stops: Police sometimes use violations of the vehicle code to stop drivers and investigate them for a more serious crime unrelated to the traffic stop, such as possessing drugs or firearms. These are known as pretextual stops.

    LAPD’s policy: In 2022, the LAPD adopted a policy that officers should only conduct pretextual stops when they are “acting upon articulable information” that the person is close to a serious crime that’s worth investigating.

    Several reports: In the last month, two city departments released analyses of pretextual stops since the police adopted its policy. A nonprofit called Catalyst California did a broader analysis of minor traffic stops, too.

    Read on … to see what the analyses found.

    Newly released data from the city show that Los Angeles police officers use minor traffic stops as a way to investigate Black and Latino people on suspicion of committing a more serious crime at a higher rate than their share of the citywide population.

    The LAPD adopted a policy about so-called pretextual stops and began tracking the practice in 2022.

    In a report released at the end of January, the city’s chief legislative analyst found that Black people were involved in nearly 31% of pretextual stops conducted by LAPD officers between spring 2022 and fall 2025. According to 2023 Census estimates, Black people make up 8% of the city’s population.

    According to the report, "Hispanic/Latino" people, who make up just less than half the city’s population, were the subjects of 56% of pretextual stops.

    That analysis, along with a separate report by LAPD, found that of the more than 760,000 people involved in traffic stops between spring of 2022 and fall of 2025, 9% to 10% of them were stopped pretextually.

    Chauncee Smith, an associate director of the racial justice-focused nonprofit Catalyst California, said LAPD’s data is “under inclusive” since it relies on officers subjectively deciding when a stop is pretextual.

    He said an analysis of data from Catalyst California, published in February, demonstrates that pretextual stops don’t result in evidence discovery enough to make up for the negative impacts of the practice.

    “It's affecting the lives of many Black and Latinx Angelenos on an everyday basis,” Smith said, adding that pretextual stops often result in harassment, dehumanization and excessive ticketing or fining of communities of color.

    Pretextual stops 

    Police sometimes use violations of the vehicle code to stop drivers and investigate them for a more serious crime unrelated to the traffic stop, such as possessing drugs or firearms, according to Deepak Premkumar, a research fellow for the Public Policy Institute of California.

     ”Law enforcement officers see tons of violations, and we give them a lot of discretion to determine who they should stop and when,” Premkumar told LAist.

    A plausible example of what a pretextual stop could look like is if police see a car matching the description of one that was involved in a crime in the area, then pull that car over for a broken taillight, Premkumar said.

    The policy the LAPD adopted in 2022 outlines that officers:

    • Can only conduct pretextual stops as long as they are “acting upon articulable information” that the person is close to a serious crime that’s worth investigating. 
    • Should minimize stops for minor equipment violations, such as broken taillights, unless the violation “interferes with public safety.”
    • State the reason for the stop, whether pretextual or not, while their body-worn cameras are filming.

    Despite the adoption of the policy, Catalyst California’s analysis found that the proportion of all officer-initiated stops that are for minor traffic violations has “remained relatively constant since 2019.”

    What to know about the recent analyses of pretextual stops

    After the police adopted its policy in 2022, officers began indicating whether a stop was pretextual or not. The Chief Legislative Analyst and police department rely on this officer discretion in their analyses, which can be found in this council file. As a result, they say they don’t have a point of comparison for before the policy was adopted. 

    In its analysis, Catalyst California looked at all stops for minor traffic violations, which are the kind of traffic violations that are often used to start a pretextual stop. By combining that data with search data, Catalyst California endeavors to approximate a before-and-after look at the LAPD’s policy.

    Racial disparities

    The analysis from the city’s chief legislative analyst included a comparison of pretextual stop rates for different ethnic and racial groups in L.A. compared to their share of the citywide population.

    The analysis found that "Hispanic/Latino" and Black people were overrepresented in data on pretextual stops compared to their share of the population.

    L.A. Police Capt. Shannon White drafted the department’s report of the same data, which did not include an ethnic or racial breakdown of those involved in pretextual stops.

    At a Los Angeles Police Commission Meeting in February, when she presented the department’s analysis, White said Census estimates for the city don’t necessarily align with “the actual breakdown of our suspects of crime,” who, theoretically, are the subjects of pretextual stops.

    “When you look at the actual breakdown of our suspects of crime…what you will find is that they skew towards communities of color for various societal reasons,” White said.

    According to the LAPD’s analysis, people in Central and South L.A. were subjects of pretextual at higher rates than in the Valley and West L.A.

    Some commissioners at the meeting questioned that disparity.

    “Something just doesn't add up,” Commission President Teresa Sánchez-Gordon said. “Is it racial profiling? Is that bias? Implicit, explicit bias that's in the report?”

    Discovery rates

    The police’s analysis found that searches during pretextual stops yielded contraband, such as firearms and other weapons or drugs, in about every 3 in 10 cases. “Narco-related” evidence is what’s most commonly found in the searches.

    Catalyst California’s report looked more specifically at different kinds of searches and how likely they are to lead to evidence discovery.

    The nonprofit found that since 2022, when officers used consent-only searches during stops for minor traffic violations, they discovered evidence 3% to 10% of the time. The rate was similarly low when the person stopped was on parole or probation.

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is kharjai.61.

    According to Catalyst California’s analysis, the type of search most likely to lead to discovery of evidence is when there’s an existing search or arrest warrant for the person stopped.

    “This was likely because they occurred in situations when there was a higher likelihood of a significant violation, beyond mere pretext,” the nonprofit's researchers wrote.

  • Highs mostly in the mid-80s for the valleys
    The sun rises on the horizon across a valley populated with homes and roads.
    A sunny day with highs in the mid-70s and low 80s.

    QUICK FACTS

    • Today’s weather: Mostly sunny
    • Beaches: Mid-70s
    • Mountains: 70s to 80s at lower elevations
    • Inland: 81 to 86 degrees
    • Warnings and advisories: None

    What to expect: Warmer for the valleys where temperatures there will hover in the mid- to upper 80s.

    Read on ... for where it will be the hottest today.

    QUICK FACTS

    • Today’s weather: Mostly sunny
    • Beaches: Mid-70s
    • Mountains: 70s to 80s at lower elevations
    • Inland: 81 to 86 degrees
    • Warnings and advisories: None

    We're in for another warm and sunny day in SoCal.

    Daytime highs for the beaches will reach the mid-70s and up to the low 80s more inland. Downtown L.A. will see temperatures up to 83 degrees.

    Temperatures for the valley communities and the Inland Empire will reach the mid-80s. The western San Fernando Valley will see temps in the upper 80s, up to 89 degrees for Woodland Hills.

    In Coachella Valley, expect another day with highs in the 90s, up to 96 degrees.

    Friday is expected to be the warmest day of the week.

  • Sponsored message
  • CA schools with low rates lose millions in funds
    A close up of an adult wearing a white lab coat injecting a shot into a child wearing a red striped shirt.

    Topline:

    California schools lost more than $2.2 million in state funding over two years because some students did not have all the vaccinations required by state law, according to data obtained by EdSource from the California State Controller’s Office. 

    Why now: The loss of average daily attendance funding was the result of state audits of more than 1,000 public schools, where more than 10% of kindergartners or seventh grade students were not fully vaccinated in 2023 and 2024. After the state investigated, schools in 72 of those districts lost some funding.

    LAUSD: Los Angeles Unified, the state’s largest school district, with over 400,000 students, lost $324,055 in average daily attendance funding in 2023 and 2024, the two years reviewed by EdSource. The district had a budget of about $19 billion in both years.

    Read on... for more about the loss of funds.

    California schools lost more than $2.2 million in state funding over two years because some students did not have all the vaccinations required by state law, according to data obtained by EdSource from the California State Controller’s Office. 

    The loss of average daily attendance funding was the result of state audits of more than 1,000 public schools, where more than 10% of kindergartners or seventh grade students were not fully vaccinated in 2023 and 2024. After the state investigated, schools in 72 of those districts lost some funding.

    Los Angeles Unified, the state’s largest school district, with over 400,000 students, lost $324,055 in average daily attendance funding in 2023 and 2024, the two years reviewed by EdSource. The district had a budget of about $19 billion in both years.

    The lost funds account for 22.1 days of attendance, including about three-quarters of a day, worth roughly $8,000, from a charter school, according to data from the State Controller’s Office.

    San Francisco Unified, with about 50,000 students, was penalized about the same amount — $315,775. The district lost 26 days of daily attendance funding in those two years.

    Oakland Unified lost $155,347 of attendance funding combined in 2023 and 2024 because it could not verify it was in full compliance with state vaccination requirements, according to documents provided by the district.

    Even small school districts lost large chunks of state funding over the two years because of vaccination mandates. Snowline Joint Unified in San Bernardino County, which has about 8,000 students, lost 15.6 days of attendance funding worth $195,390. Ojai Unified in Ventura County, a school district of about 2,000 students, lost 14 days of funding, worth $166,993.

    Because of the state’s complicated school funding system, the amounts schools receive and potentially can lose per student varies.

    California law requires students to be immunized against 10 serious communicable diseases. Proof of immunization is required in kindergarten and seventh grade, as well as upon entering child care, transitional kindergarten, or when transferring schools from out of state. Schools lose attendance funding for the amount of time each year that each student is not fully vaccinated.

    Districts must plan to improve

    Last year, 428 schools were identified as having low vaccination rates and are being audited by the state. Los Angeles Unified, San Francisco Unified, Oakland Unified and Ojai Unified are among the districts that remain on the audit list.

    Districts found to be out of compliance are required to develop a corrective action plan to make sure it doesn’t happen again, according to officials at the California Department of Education.

    San Francisco Unified has taken steps to ensure the district complies with state vaccination law, said Laura Dudnick, director of communications.

    The district has changed its enrollment process to require that immunization records and tuberculosis clearances be submitted in advance, so health workers can review them. During the application cycle for the upcoming school year, families are notified monthly of missing requirements, a move that is expected to reduce last-minute enrollment barriers and increase overall immunization compliance, Dudnick said.

    “We take this responsibility seriously and appreciate the families who have worked with us to obtain required immunizations for their children,” she said. “We are working diligently to ensure students are immunized as required by law.”

    Los Angeles Unified is hosting vaccination clinics and health fairs to provide immunizations and health services, and educating families on the importance of vaccinations, according to district officials. Health teams are also identifying barriers to vaccination and connecting families to resources.

    “The health and safety of our students is our highest priority,” the district said in a statement sent to EdSource. “In response to the state vaccination audit, the district has deployed targeted outreach and support for the identified schools. We have maintained an overall district-wide immunization compliance rate of 98% since the audit.”

    California offers exemptions for children in special education, home-based private schools and for medical reasons. But in 2015, the state Legislature added more oversight to medical exemptions, requiring the California Department of Public Health to review exemptions at schools with an immunization rate of less than 95%, or if a doctor has written more than five exemptions in a year.

    Measles cases soaring

    The 2015 decision came after a major measles outbreak at Disneyland. Now, measles cases are on the rise again, with 982 cases reported in the U.S. so far this year.

    Measles cases in California have been racing upward as well, from four cases in 2023 to 25 in 2025. This year, there have already been 19 reported cases of measles in the state, according to the California Department of Public Health. Los Angeles County alone has had four measles cases reported since Jan. 30.

    “The MMR vaccine is the safest and most reliable way to prevent measles and protect yourself, your family, and your community,” said Los Angeles County Health Officer Muntu Davis in a statement. “Measles spreads easily and can lead to serious complications, including pneumonia, brain swelling, and even death.”

    EdSource is an independent nonprofit organization that provides analysis on key education issues facing California and the nation. LAist republishes articles from EdSource with permission.

  • Henson puppets meet improv in long-running show
    A view of about three puppeteers dressed in black on a stage with a large screen to their left showing a purple female puppet a green male one, a purple male one with glasses in the back and what appears to be a squirrel puppet next to him.
    A staging of "Puppet Up! Uncensored," co-created by Brian Henson.

    Topline:

    “Puppet Up! Uncensored” combines the style of puppetry originated by Jim Henson with improvisational comedy games fueled by audience prompts.

    The backstory: “Puppet Up!” was first created by Jim Henson Company chairman Brian Henson and actor/director Patrick Bristow in 2005 and is playing now at The Montalban in Hollywood.

    The show is actually two shows in one, with the puppeteers fully visible on stage but also performing for a camera. Giant screens above the stage show what the camera sees, creating a two-shows-in-one effect.

    “It's really fun to let people see how we do it,” Henson told LAist, “because it's clever and it's chaotic.”

    And as Henson explains in the opening of the show, adding the improv element is in some ways a natural extension of the way his dad worked, with his preference for other puppeteers (like Frank Oz), who were able to “ad lib” while puppeteering.

    Read on … for Henson’s take on the recent Muppet Show special on Disney+, and his explanation for the enduring appeal of puppets.

    Six comedic improvisers, dozens of fuzzy puppets and limitless possibilities.

    That pretty much sums up Puppet Up! Uncensored, which combines the style of puppetry originated by Jim Henson with improvisational comedy games fueled by audience prompts.

    The performers don’t shy away from adult themes, so it can lean a little raunchy, earning this particular cast of puppets the group title of “miskreants.”

    Three to four rows of fuzzy felt Jim Henson-style puppets behind a director's chair that reads "Patrick."
    The "miskreant" puppets from "Puppet Up!"
    (
    Omar Gaieck
    )

    The world lost Jim Henson in 1990, but many artists, including his own children, have kept both the craft and the business going. Son and accomplished puppeteer Brian Henson is chairman of the L.A.-based Jim Henson Company and creator of Puppet Up! Uncensored.

    While no “Muppets” are included in the show, the production does include recreations of several original Jim Henson puppets from early in his career interspersed with others from previous Henson productions and some more recent creations made for Puppet Up! specifically.

    “They're really old,” Henson said. “It's super fun to rebuild those puppets and actually perform those scenes in front of a live audience. That hasn't happened in 40, 50 years probably.”

    Behind the scenes takes center stage

    Puppet Up! is really two shows at once.

    On top of being a mash-up of sketches, hosted by director and co-creator Patrick Bristow, the audience actually gets to see how it all happens.

    The Henson style of puppetry, from design to performance, is tailored for the camera, but in Puppet Up! Uncensored, audience members see both a staged-for-screen performance on video projection, and all the puppeteers' work that’s usually hidden from view, including the performers’ faces when things go awry.

    “It's really fun to let people see how we do it because it's clever and it's chaotic,” Henson said. “It also means our audience watches the show in a kind of very different way.”

    Bringing it all out into view allows the audience to connect with performers who are usually behind the scenes. “ It sort of just gives it a double layer of entertainment value,” Henson said.

    Puppets vs. artificial intelligence

    The Muppet Show was brought back by Disney for a Disney+ special earlier this month in honor of the show’s 50th anniversary. Jim Henson’s Muppets actually turned 70 in 2025, and the appetite for the characters and the district Henson style of puppetry hasn’t waned. Audiences are hungry for details of a Miss Piggy movie, reportedly helmed by Jennifer Lawrence and Emma Stone.

    (While Disney has owned the Muppets since 2004 and The Jim Henson Company now only consults on Muppet projects when it is asked to, Henson’s take on the recent special is that it was “really good” and he hopes it’s picked up as a series. All he knows about the Miss Piggy movie, he told LAist: “I don’t think it’s very far along.”)

    What’s behind the lasting appeal of puppets and The Muppets specifically?

    Henson argues puppetry may be the oldest art form if you think about the basic act of imbuing an object with personality — something parents do instinctively with young children.

    “ I used to bring to life my daughter's pajamas,” he said. “That was the way to get her to put her pajamas on so that she would go to bed.”

    But that doesn't mean it's ever been particularly mainstream. Even Jim Henson had to shop around the original Muppet Show before it found a spot on American primetime TV, but Henson said he’s felt a shift in just the past few months in response to artificial intelligence.

    “The AI craze has created a backlash of, 'Please let me see human craftsmanship, human artistry, where I know that this is coming from a human's artistic mind,'” Henson said. “So I think right now there is just an enormous appreciation for artistry that is not computer-generated in any way. That will benefit all sorts of arts, but it certainly benefits puppetry for sure.”

    Some puppet philosophy

    Henson describes Puppet Up! as a celebration of the “absurdity of the human condition” and said performing with puppets can elicit a more open response from audiences.

    “The audience watches puppets with the innocence of a child, even if they're 70 years old,” he said.

    And that distance can allow an emotional access you might not get with actors alone.

    “It makes it possible to laugh at themselves rather than be offended,” Henson said. “So particularly in a period of time like now, where everybody's scared of somebody hating them … we can sort of play out examples of that kind of friction with puppets. That's gonna give you objectivity and allow you to sort of reflect.”

    "Puppet Up! Uncensored" is playing at The Montalbán from Friday through Sunday.

  • Commission recommends a range of reforms
    An empty chamber has chairs in a horseshoe shape in an ornate room
    The Charter Reform Commission proposes a wide range of changes to city government to increase public trust.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles City Charter Commission on Tuesday approved a set of recommendations aimed at improving how the city operates, including streamlining the City Attorney’s Office, creating an anti-corruption office and doubling the charter-mandated funds set aside for city parks.

    The backstory: The commission was created in the wake of the 2022 City Hall tapes scandal, wherein members of the council were heard on audio discussing how to hold onto power. The conversation was laced with crude and racist remarks, triggering calls for resignations. Council President Nury Martinez resigned, but councilmembers Gil Cedillo and Kevin de Leon remained.

    Voters have final say: The commission’s recommendations will go to the City Council, which will decide whether to place the proposals on the June ballot. Any changes to the charter require voter approval.

    What's next: Tuesday’s meeting was the latest in a series of commission meetings to discuss various reforms. There’s another one today, where commissioners are expected to propose increasing the size of the City Council from 15 to 23 members.

    The Los Angeles City Charter Commission on Tuesday approved a set of recommendations aimed at improving how the city operates, including streamlining the City Attorney’s Office, creating an anti-corruption office and doubling the charter-mandated amount of funds set aside for the city parks.

    The commission also recommended spelling out more clearly how to suspend any councilmember who is accused of a crime. But the panel stopped short of creating a legislative recall process where the council could trigger a recall election on its own. Right now, the only way to recall a member of the council is to launch a signature-gathering drive.

    The commission was created in the wake of the 2022 City Hall tapes scandal, wherein members of the council were heard on audio discussing how to hold onto power. The conversation was laced with crude and racist remarks, triggering calls for resignation. Council President Nury Martinez resigned, but councilmembers Gil Cedillo and Kevin de Leon remained.

    The commission’s recommendations will go to the City Council, which will decide whether to place the proposals on the June ballot. Any changes to the charter require voter approval.

    Tuesday’s meeting was the latest in a series of commission meetings to discuss various reforms. There’s another one Thursday, where commissioners are expected to propose increasing the size of the City Council from 15 to 23 members.

    Bifurcating the City Attorney’s Office

    Right now, the City Attorney’s Office handles both civil litigation and criminal prosecution of misdemeanors. The proposed charter change would make the city attorney responsible solely for the criminal prosecution of misdemeanors and create a law department (or similar office) appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the City Council that serves and represents city officials for all other legal functions.

    The idea arose out of concerns over conflicts of interest.

    Commission staff wrote in a report that bifurcating the office and making the position that represents the city civilly an appointed position “without the need to fundraise or garner endorsements” reduces the possibility of conflict of interest.

    Creating an Inspector General’s Office

    The commission recommended creating an Office of Inspector General that would be part of the Ethics Commission and would be designed to root out corruption within city government. The inspector general would launch investigations on behalf of the ethics commission, other commissions and on its own.

    The idea is to “reduce political influence, enhance accountability and rebuild public trust in local government,” staff wrote in a report.

    Increasing funding for parks

    Right now, the city charter requires an annual appropriation for the Department of Recreation and Parks of at least .0325% of the assessed value of all property in the city. The formula has remained unchanged since the 1930s.

    The commission recommends doubling it to .065%.

    Dozens of people who showed up to the panel’s meeting and on zoom spoke out in favor of this reform.

    “Literally the infrastructure is crumbling,” said Sakae Koyama, co-president of Friends of Elysian Park. “The lack of staffing is breaking the parks system. You have terrible morale.

    “I don’t understand why something that everyone can use is not being funded properly.”

    The commission also recommended installing language in the charter that would enshrine the right to an attorney for somebody facing deportation. But the proposal was watered down amid concerns it would cost the city too much to provide attorneys.

    Instead, the proposal said any right is subject to the City Council’s decision to fund it.

    The commission rejected expanding the authority of neighborhood councils, which are advisory bodies currently.

    What’s next

    The commission will consider even bigger charter reforms at its meeting today, including expanding the size of the City Council and changing L.A.'s election system to ranked-choice voting.

    The panel meets in the Board of Public Works session room 350 in City Hall at 4 p.m.

    You may also join via Zoom.