The Brief

Electric bicycles allow riders to zip across town in a way that’s more affordable and environmentally friendly than gas-powered cars. They reduce traffic, can help people with mobility issues and generally are fun to use.

But the rising use of e-bikes has also resulted in high-profile collisions and growing safety concerns among parents, healthcare professionals and state legislators. Gov. Gavin Newsom last week signed three new e-bike laws. They follow one he signed earlier this summer to develop an e-bike safety training program for students.

The measures limit youth access to e-bikes, set sidewalk speed limits and clarify what exactly classifies as an e-bike. But critics of the laws fear overregulation and over-policing could discourage riders from a mode of transit they argue is inexpensive, clean and liberating.

Here’s a look at the new laws.

Age limits in San Mateo County

Assembly Bill 2595 authorizes a San Mateo County pilot program banning children under 12 from riding certain lower-speed e-bikes. Parents or guardians whose children violate the law face $25 fines. At the end of the pilot, which is scheduled to sunset in 2031, the county must report to the Legislature about the program, including the number of traffic stops initiated for a citation.

The governor in 2024 signed laws to establish similar programs in San Diego and Marin counties. Other states, including Alaska, Minnesota, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania, also have minimum age requirements for e-bikes ranging from ages 14 to 16. California does not have an age minimum for most e-bikes, although riders of the fastest ones must be at least 16.

A study by researchers from UC San Diego found that e-bike collisions — particularly among riders ages 14 and younger — are “rapidly increasing” in the state. In 2018 there were two incidents, compared to 1,566 in 2024, though e-bike usage in general has expanded over recent years.

Assemblymember Diane Papan, a San Mateo Democrat, proposed the latest pilot after two young children in the county died in collisions involving e-bikes and e-motorcycles. One of the crashes last year in Burlingame involved an SUV driver who initially collided with an 11-year-old on an e-bike. The driver then fatally struck 4-year-old Ayden Fang who was playing on a nearby sidewalk.

“There were multiple responsible parties at multiple points where this could have been avoided,” said Xiaoming Fang, Ayden’s father, at an Assembly hearing in April. “An 11-year-old should not be riding a motorized vehicle that can go up to 20 miles an hour.”

E-bikes require a level of judgment and situational awareness that young children do not yet have, said Robin Pang-Maganaris, a city council member for Belmont.

“What results is not just a risk to those children, but an undue and unfair burden on drivers, parents, teachers and community members who are forced to anticipate the unpredictable movements of these young e-bikes.”

Setting speed limits

The governor also signed AB 2346, which imposes new manufacturing and disclosure requirements for e-bikes and sets speed limits for riding on a sidewalk.

Starting Jan. 1, 2029, Class 2 e-bikes (or an e-bike that provides throttle and pedal assistance up to 20 mph) will be required to have a speedometer, and all e-bikes must have either integrated or detachable front and rear lights. E-bike retailers will be required to disclose to consumers information about each e-bike, including what class it belongs to, its maximum speed and if it has any age restrictions.

Another part of the law taking effect on Jan. 1, 2027 empowers local governments to set speed limits on bike paths and multiuse trails, ranging from 10 to 20 mph, and sets a default statewide limit for riding on sidewalks to 10 mph. Speed limits established before the provision goes into effect can remain.

E-bike vs. e-moto

The third law Newsom signed cracks down on retailers that sell devices that go faster than e-bikes, such as electric motorcycles that can travel over 28 mph, but are marketed to consumers as legal e-bikes.

A 2025 report by San Jose State University’s Mineta Transportation Institute found that illegal e-motos are the primary reason behind increased injuries among electric mobility riders, not legal e-bikes.

Senate Bill 1167 sailed through the Legislature with strong bipartisan support and no vote in opposition. Four key advocacy groups for bicycling and traffic safety — Cal Bike, People for Bikes, Streets for All and Streets are for Everyone — also backed the measure.

The law does not punish legal e-bikes, said Marc Vukcevich, Streets For All’s director of state policy, during a June hearing. Instead, it addresses what he calls “the e-moto problem.”

“Right now, public confidence in e-bikes is being undermined by a different category of vehicle, he said. “Which are high-powered electric mopeds, motor-driven cycles, and e-motos that are being marketed, sold and used as if they were ordinary bicycles or e-bikes.”

Villainizing e-bikes?

All three laws passed in the Legislature by almost unanimous votes, but they faced some criticism from e-bike advocates.

In its opposition to the San Mateo pilot, Streets for All characterized the plan as ineffective and premature since data from San Diego County’s pilot has not yet been submitted. In developing more pilots before reviewing data from existing ones, the move “undermines evidence-based policymaking,” it said.

There’s also concern about proper enforcement, said David Martinez, Streets for All’s state policy manager.

“How can you tell a 13-year-old from a 12-year-old?” he said. “I don’t know if that’s easily discernible.”

E-bike proponents also said they worried the new measures risk criminalizing e-bike riders, and they argued that legislators should focus more on creating roads that accommodate all types of users, instead of just regulating e-bikes. They point out that thousands of Californians die every year in vehicle collisions.

“Fifty percent of all vehicle trips in the country are three miles or less,” said Martinez. “That’s a bikeable distance. If we just had more protected, safe infrastructure where people from ages 8 to 80 can ride safely and feel comfortable while riding, then we can also … reduce the number of crashes that happen.”

This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

This story first appeared on The LA Local.

On a hot September morning, a handful of elders moved between tables of fresh fruits and vegetables on the Korean Resource Center’s back patio, picking up groceries as trot music played in the background.

Some sat together, chatting as they waited for a raffle. Organizers gave away bags of rice, containers of kimchi and other staple groceries in the Koreatown community.

It was the second “Sijang,” Korean for market, a mutual-aid food distribution program launched by KRC over the summer.

Sijang and other community efforts like it come as businesses and residents adjust to changes in CalFresh, California’s version of the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

Stricter eligibility requirements and changes to how benefit are provided took effect Oct. 1, adding to the challenges facing low-income families across the country.

In Los Angeles County, about 1.5 million people receive CalFresh benefits, while another 320,000 are eligible but aren’t enrolled, according to the latest available data.

As more residents struggle to afford food, community markets like Sijang can help connect them with groceries.

“Groceries are commonly an item that is cut and people historically rely on community and social networks like churches and charity and grassroots mutual aid programs, where social welfare program and public institutions fail,” said Danny Park, who spearheads the program.

Sijang is organized in partnership with Polo’s Pantry and the Hollywood Food Coalition. The next marketplace is scheduled for Friday, Oct. 23. KRC says no one will be turned away.

Park said it grew out of the center’s work with residents and conversations with members and staff experiencing economic hardship.

“In our pilot day of Sijang … close to 50 people from family to seniors were lined up before we opened our doors, a sight that is not uncommon in Koreatown and Los Angeles,” Park said.

Bags of groceries at the Korean Resource Center during its Sijang mutual-aid and community marketplace event on Sept. 18.

(

Hanna Kang

/

The LA Local

)

KRC’s work has given the organization a close look at the financial pressures facing residents. In 2025, the center helped 4,286 people enroll in public assistance programs, including EBT, General Relief and Medicaid, Park said. Staff handled an average of 18 enrollments each day.

Food insecurity remains widespread across Los Angeles County. A USC Dornsife study published in December found that 24% of county households experienced food insecurity last year.

KRC staff sometimes help elderly residents take cans and bottles to recycling centers to earn money, Park said.

One neighborhood over in Pico Union, With Love Market & Café is also trying to help residents afford food. But the changes to the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, have hit the business hard, said Anna Cho-Son, the market’s community programs director.

Most of With Love’s customers use EBT, she said, and the market has seen a decline in EBT users since the changes took effect.  The market has also lost contracts after some of its partner organizations lost funding.

The market is owned by 38 investors from the community and loses money on groceries, Cho-Son said. It has relied heavily on EBT spending, and the decline in customers using those benefits has compounded other financial challenges.

“We lose money on groceries, and so we were really relying on a lot of EBT dollars,” she said. “But obviously, people are not able to spend as much money as they were previously.”

Asked how the market is preparing for the full impact of the SNAP changes, Cho-Son said, “We’re deeply not prepared for it.”

With Love is trying to help customers stretch their grocery budgets through a produce incentive program called With More California. The program, which operates as a localized extension of California’s Market Match initiative, matches SNAP spending on California-grown produce, Cho-Son said, allowing customers to receive up to $40 worth of free produce a day.

Cho-Son said the market has been increasing outreach at schools and community colleges because many people who could benefit from these programs do not know they exist.

Customers who do use the program regularly return to buy produce, she said.

“I think the biggest and most important metric is that people come back, and they come back specifically for that program,” Cho-Son said.    

She added the market is also looking for ways to build a more sustainable local food system, rather than relying entirely on temporary grants and emergency food assistance.

“I think as we’re trying to do these emergency programs, we’re aware that food is obviously such an immediate need,” she said, “but in the long term, that’s not going to fix anything.”

The Korean Resource Center

With Love Market & Café

Fall is here, and so are the cozy, seasonal drinks. If you’re looking to skip out on chain lattes and support local instead, this guide is for you.

Whether you’re a pumpkin spice lover or not, these Eastside cafes have a variety of drinks and pastries to choose from.

Cafe Niña

Add a ghost design to your drink at Cafe Niña.

(

Courtesy of Cafe Niña

)

What started as a home-based coffee shop in Boyle Heights has now expanded to a brick-and-mortar location in East Los Angeles. Find their fall menu at both locations. If you’re looking for spooky vibes, ask for a ghost design on the inside of your cup.

• Pumpkin pillon latte: Pumpkin with piloncillo
• Durazno Latte: Peach cobbler-inspired latte

Acurrúcame Café

The pumpkin spice latte is made with fresh pumpkin and espresso at Acurrúcame Café.

(

Courtesy of Acurrúcame Café

)

This cafe is known for specialty drinks available only to customers who order in person. Its pumpkin spice matcha and latte are available now, while the Franken-Berry latte and the Beetlejuice matcha will be available starting September 26.

• Pumpkin spice matcha or latte: Made with fresh pumpkin and either matcha or espresso
• Franken-Berry latte: Made with espresso and blueberries
• Beetlejuice: Matcha made with blackberries

Semillas Café y Flores

Maple brown sugar shaken espresso from Semillas Café y Flores.

(

Courtesy of Semillas Café y Flores

)

Pair your fall pastries, including maple pecan blondies, ginger molasses cookies or a slice of pumpkin loaf with your choice of fall drinks:

• Carrot cake latte: House-made spiced carrot syrup, espresso, cream cheese cold foam with pecan crunch topping
• Manzanita tonic: Spiced apple cider, tonic water, espresso, house-made canela syrup with apple crisp topping
• Canelita cold brew: House-made canela syrup, Chiapas cold brew with cinnamon cold foam
• Maple shaken espresso: Maple syrup, sea salt, espresso shaken with ice, topped with a splash of milk and maple cold foam

Cafe Cafe Mobile Coffee

The butternut squash latte topped with cookie crumble from Cafe Cafe Mobile.

(

Courtesy of Cafe Cafe Mobile

)

Not a pumpkin spice lover? Cafe Cafe Mobile has you! Its butternut squash latte has been a crowd favorite during the fall season.

• Butternut squash latte: An ode to pumpkin spice but with butternut squash spices, topped with cookie crumble.

Cake Girl

Pumpkin spice cold brew from Cake Girl.

(

Courtesy of Cake Girl

)

Anhelo Coffee

For all the cookie butter and piloncillo pumpkin lovers out there, Anhelo Coffee has you covered:

• Cookie butter latte: Cookie butter blended with espresso; iced version available with cream top and sprinkled with crushed Biscoff cookies.
• Piloncillo pumpkin spice latte: House-made piloncillo pumpkin spice syrup blended with espresso.
• Piloncillo pumpkin spice cold brew: Cold brew coffee topped with house-made piloncillo pumpkin spice cream.
• Cookies & cream matcha: Matcha blended with cookies and cream

California Community Colleges announced an agreement Thursday with Arizona State University that creates a guaranteed transfer pathway for students.

In recent years, ASU has been rapidly expanding, “growing with no end in sight and expanding well beyond the state's borders,” as AZ Central put it. For California community colleges, the new agreement offers a new option for students who struggle to transfer to the California State University and University of California systems.

For over a decade, California community college students could enroll in a two-year associate degree of transfer after it was codified in law. There are about 60 ADT options students can do. The law envisioned that if students completed that program, they were guaranteed admission to a California State University campus. In recent years, that guaranteed transfer degree has also let students transfer to Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs).

What transfer options do students have?

But the transfer process is not an easy one.

A state audit of the transfer process in 2024 found that only 21% of students who started at a California community college between 2017 and 2019 transferred to a four-year university within four years of starting their ADT program. The audit pointed to “financial insecurity, family responsibilities, and an inability to relocate.”

Another reason: CSU and UC had complicated transfer requirements that were difficult for students to navigate. And transfer students weren’t always offered their first-choice CSU or UC school — so even if they got into a CSU or UC school, sometimes they didn’t go because it was not in the region they were applying to.

The audit also found:

• every community college did not offer all ADTs
• all CSU campuses did not accept all the ADTs
• not all community colleges offered counseling to make sure students had the required number of units to transfer. 

The Arizona State option

Enter ASU with a golden ticket, literally.

At a signing ceremony at their center downtown, ASU officials demonstrated — printed-out tickets in hand — how ASU was going to guarantee a degree pathway for every student who completes the ADT.

 ”The plan here is to try to increase transfer, increase completion of baccalaureates in equitable ways for Californians,” said James Todd, chief academic officer at the California Community Colleges.

“ What makes this unique is this is the most comprehensive ADT partnership that has existed for the California Community Colleges,” said Jeff DeFranco, special advisor to the provost at ASU. “Arizona State University is accepting all 60 associate degrees for transfers. So we're saying we're accepting all these, and those 60 actually lead and open you up to nearly ... 100 different degree options.”

Students who choose to transfer to ASU can enroll on campus in Arizona, do the program online or opt for ASU Local, where you do your coursework online but you have a weekly meeting with your fellow students and ASU staff.

“ What ASU could provide is, for instance, let's say you can't leave your community, and this was the case for many students: childcare, supporting an intergenerational household, work commitments, whatever was going on — sometimes they can't leave,” he said. “ASU has more than 200 bachelor's degrees online, and that is very unique.”

Californians will decide on more than a dozen ballot initiatives this November, covering a wide range of proposals focused on housing, taxes, recall elections, voter identification and more.

One ballot measure would approve an $11.25 billion bond for affordable housing; another would create a new down payment assistance program for homebuyers. Proposition 40 would establish a one-time 5% tax on the net worth of billionaires in California, while two other propositions would limit new taxes and potentially nullify Prop. 40. Other ballot measures, if approved, would change the recall election process in California, require identification to vote and speed up the environmental review process for certain developments.

It’s a lot of information to wade through on your own.

That’s why LAist unveils its Voter Game Plan each election season, with guides to help you cast a ballot that aligns with your values and beliefs. (The one thing we don’t do? Tell you how to vote. That is up to you.) For the Nov. 3 general election, LAist is also hosting a series of ballot cram sessions focused on helping you make informed decisions.

The series kicked off on Wednesday with AirTalk Host Larry Mantle and a panel of experts focused on the long list of statewide propositions in a one-hour cram session.

Michael Alvarez, professor of political and computational social science at CalTech; Sara Sadhwani, associate professor of politics at Pomona College, and Lee E. Ohanian, a professor of economics at UCLA and senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, provided an overview of each ballot measure. The trio described the pros, cons and stakes of every decision Californians face this November, including the confusing and conflicting trio of tax measures you’ll see on your ballot as Props. 40, 41 and 42.

“There’s a lot of uncertainty as to how much revenue this might generate. There’s a lot of uncertainty, in particular, if it’s going to generate revenue in sufficient time to help the Californians who are really in need of having healthcare,” said Alvarez on Prop. 40, which would create a one-time tax on billionaires to fund healthcare.

Lee and Sadhwani both noted that there's a question of whether the tax would drive billionaires out of the state. “If you think that super high wealthy people should be paying more in taxes, there’s better ways to do this,” said Lee.

As for Prop. 41, which would require audits of new tax programs, and Prop. 42, which would ban new taxes on personal property, the panel agreed the measures are confusing.

Both propositions would nullify Prop. 40 if they receive more votes in support than the billionaire tax measure. That’s the big thing to remember, said Sadhwani: “They’re really the poison pills of Prop. 40, the billionaire’s tax. So a yes on 41 or a yes on 42 is a no essentially for Prop. 40.”

“I’ll be honest, Prop. 41 as well as Prop. 42 kind of makes my eyes glaze over,” said Sadhwani. Alvarez added that the measures make his head spin. Experts — they’re just like us!

LAist’s upcoming voter cram sessions will focus on judicial elections and Orange County.

You can find LAist’s Voter Game Plan and dozens of guides to the Nov. 3 election here at LAist.com/Vote