Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Audit deadline missed for meals funding
    A close-up of a clear glass front door in a long, tan walkway. The door has the text "VAS Viet-America Society" displayed, with an additional sign that says "available for lease" below it.
    The Viet America Society's Huntington Beach office with a sign on its door saying the suite was available for lease on Thursday, March 28, 2024.

    Topline:

    A nonprofit at the center of an LAist investigation of O.C. Supervisor Andrew Do missed another deadline to account for over $3 million in taxpayer dollars Do gave the group to feed needy seniors during the pandemic.

    The details: It’s unclear what exactly happened with the money. Viet America Society has missed multiple deadlines to submit details to the county of how it spent the money.

    What their lawyer says: The nonprofit’s lawyer says the audit will be completed within the next few days. He said the nonprofit has had to create documents to show the auditors what happened with the money. “They haven’t kept the normal accounting for what they’ve done. So they’ve had to basically create the…documentation in the form that an accountant would want to watch and see for an audit,” said the attorney, Sterling Scott Winchell.

    The backstory: Viet America Society has faced scrutiny since LAist reporting found public records listing Supervisor Do’s then-22-year-old daughter as a top leader. Do did not disclose the family relationship publicly or to at least three of his four fellow county supervisors.

    A nonprofit at the center of an LAist investigation of O.C. Supervisor Andrew Do has missed another deadline to account for over $3 million in taxpayer dollars Do gave the group to feed needy seniors during the pandemic.

    Viet America Society has faced scrutiny since LAist reporting found numerous records listing Supervisor Do’s then-22-year-old daughter as a top leader. Do did not disclose the family relationship publicly or to at least three of his four fellow county supervisors.

    It’s unclear what exactly happened with the money. The nonprofit was required to submit audits to the county each year confirming it was spent appropriately and that financial records were accurate.

    The first was due two years ago. It still hasn’t been turned in.

    For the past year, county staff have been asking the nonprofit for a copy of the required audit, according to public records.

    In February, the county warned the nonprofit that it could be required to pay millions back to the county if it didn’t provide the audit and other required records about how the money was spent.

    The audit deadline ultimately was extended to this past Sunday, June 30.

    As of Wednesday — three days after it was due — the audit hasn’t been turned in, according to a county spokesperson and the nonprofit’s lawyer. It’s supposed to cover the first two years of the meal contracts: 2021 and 2022.

    “The County has not received the single audits,” wrote Alexa Pratt, a spokesperson for the county department that oversaw the contract.

    What their lawyer says

    Sterling Scott Winchell, the nonprofit’s lawyer, told LAist in an interview Wednesday that the audit will be completed within the next few days. He said the nonprofit has had to create documents to show the auditors what happened with the money.

    “There’s still some things, some documents that need to be located. But basically, it’s almost done. So it’s probably going to go over a few days or so,” Winchell said, speaking by phone. “The meals were delivered. The issue has been they haven’t kept the normal accounting for what they’ve done. So they’ve had to basically create the…documentation in the form that an accountant would want to watch and see for an audit.”

    Winchell said that the nonprofit also has needed to obtain invoices from the vendors it was paying with the county meals money.

    “So they have all the raw materials, but they’ve basically got to assemble it all in a way an accountant can read. But the meals have been delivered.”

    “A lot of what’s left is obtaining invoices from the vendors they used, that they don’t have copies [of],” Winchell said.

    Winchell, who was hired as Viet America Society’s attorney earlier this year, previously served as Supervisor Do’s appointee to the county ethics commission from 2018 to 2023.

    Over $13 million in county funding

    At Supervisor Do’s direction, Viet America Society has received more than $9 million from the county to feed needy residents, plus $1 million to build a Vietnam War memorial. He also joined votes to fund up to $3.1 million in mental health subcontracts for the group, all without disclosing his close family connection.

    Supervisor Do awarded most of the money to the group after it failed to submit the first required audit, according to county records.

    Supervisor Do has not responded to multiple interview requests from LAist over the past six months, including this week. In a November interview with another news outlet, he defended his decisions to award money to his daughter’s group without public disclosure, saying he wasn’t required to disclose his family connection.

    While current law bars elected officials from awarding contracts that financially benefit their spouse or minor children, there is no prohibition on benefitting an adult child or other close relatives. Since LAist began reporting on Supervisor Do, two bills, spurred by the investigation, have been introduced in the state legislature by lawmakers who say it’s a loophole that needs to be closed. One bill was approved unanimously in the Senate, the other in the Assembly.

    Auditors flagged ‘significant’ risks

    Viet America Society eventually hired the accounting firm The Pun Group in early April for the audit, according to a copy of the audit contract, which LAist obtained from the county. The contract states that the audit was expected to be completed by June 30.

    The auditors wrote in the contract that while planning for the audit, they found “significant” risks of inaccurate information in the nonprofit’s own records.

    “We have identified the following significant risk(s) of material misstatement as part of our audit planning,” the auditors wrote.

    Those misstatement risks were listed as “Management override of controls” and “Revenue recognition.”

    Pun Group representatives did not return phone calls and emails from LAist this week asking about their work on the audit.

    What happened with money paid to subcontractors?

    Records show Viet America Society passed on most of the county money for meals to subcontractors in 2021 and 2022. The nonprofit submitted “incomplete” documentation of what happened with those funds, according to a public records response to LAist from the county department that oversees the contracts.

    The county had asked for the details as part of its fiscal monitoring of contractors the county paid with federal coronavirus dollars.

    County officials, in response to LAist’s public records response, wrote that Viet America Society “rescinded” — or took back — financial documents it had provided the county on May 8 because they were "incomplete” and did not document the performance of all of Viet America Society's subcontractors.

    Do’s daughter was listed in leading roles

    LAist has obtained nine different public records listing Rhiannon Do as one of the group’s top leaders, including instances of her signatures as VAS’s president on county-funded subcontracts.

    Rhiannon Do told LAist in April that she’s no longer affiliated with the group, and had no involvement in the county meals funding Viet America Society received. She said her role was limited to mental health services and a different meals program. She said she was not connected to the millions in coronavirus relief dollars that her father directed to the group.

    Public records obtained by LAist show Rhiannon Do signed as the group’s president and represented herself as its executive director, and signed another contract as its president, while the group was still receiving county meals money under one of the contracts currently under scrutiny by the county. Winchell and Rhiannon Do have both disputed that she ever was an officer or director at the nonprofit. Rhiannon has not responded to questions about why multiple records showed otherwise, while Winchell previously has said the documents were not accurate due to apparent “sloppiness” and negligence. He did not say who was responsible.

    County seeks answers over six-figure ‘donation’ of taxpayer funds

    There’s another set of funding for Viet America Society that the county has been calling into question.

    Back in 2020, Supervisor Do provided pandemic meals money for his district to a nonprofit called Hand to Hand Relief Organization, according to county records LAist obtained.

    Hand to Hand, in turn, forwarded much of that $1 million to Viet America Society, according to a county review and a financial ledger Hand to Hand submitted to the county. The ledger, which LAist obtained through a public records request, shows Hand to Hand paid Viet America Society $626,667 that year. It was labeled as “Donation” and “Program Services,” with no other description.

    In February, county staff issued demand letters to Hand to Hand finding that it failed to submit a required audit and to document the services it was paid to provide. It also found Hand to Hand failed to follow requirements to document what Viet America Society was doing for the payments it received as the subcontractor.

    The county demanded a plan to fix these issues by mid March, warning that the group could have to repay the money if it didn’t account for what happened with it.

    Hand to Hand still has not provided any of those required documents, according to Pratt, the county department spokesperson, in an emailed response to LAist’s questions this week.

    Hand to Hand’s leader, Thanh Huong Nguyen, didn’t return a voicemail message Wednesday asking about it.

    After Do directed the initial $1 million to Hand to Hand in 2020, he went on to direct an additional $2 million in meals money to the group in late 2022. Both rounds of money were funded by federal coronavirus dollars that came to the county.

    Asked what county officials now plan to do, given Hand to Hand’s noncompliance, Pratt said the county “is considering next steps.”

  • Is a wildflower 'superbloom' on the way?
    A green field covered mostly in orange flowers.
    Record winter rains led to this colorful explosion near the Antelope Valley California Poppy Reserve back in April 2023.

    Topline

    This on-and-off rain is looking like good news ... for wildflower lovers.

    Why now: We talked to Katie Tilford, a wildflowers expert at the Theodore Payne Foundation here in L.A., which is dedicated to native plants in California. And she is holding out hope that the rains this week and next will be just what we need to see California poppies and more bloom big in the upcoming weeks.

    The wildflower forecast: "A little more rain would be nice," she said, "Then I think we’ll have a really good bloom this year. Either way, I think there’s going to be some flowers for sure … but a little more rain would really just kick things up a notch.”

    How good might it get? And as for the question we always ask this time of year … will it be a superbloom kind of year? Only Mother Nature knows for sure. But Tilford says she’s already seeing signs there will be plenty of wildflowers to enjoy in the coming weeks, so you might want to make a plan to get out there.

    This on-and-off rain is looking like good news ... for wildflower lovers.

    We talked to Katie Tilford, our go-to wildflowers expert at the Theodore Payne Foundation here in L.A., which is dedicated to native plants and wildflowers in Southern California.

    And she is holding out hope the rains this week and next will be just what we need to see California poppies and more bloom big in the upcoming weeks.

    "A little more rain would be nice," she said, "Then I think we’ll have a really good bloom this year. Either way, I think there’s going to be some flowers for sure … but a little more rain would really just kick things up a notch.”

    And as for the question we always ask this time of year … will it be a superbloom kind of year?

    Only Mother Nature knows for sure. We plant nerds also know that that the term superbloom gets thrown around with regularity during wildflower season, even though it refers to very specific conditions created by a potent cocktail of early rains, cool temps, hot temps, and late rains. So, we repeat: Stay tuned.

    But Tilford says she’s already seeing signs there will be plenty of wildflowers to enjoy in the coming weeks, so you might want to make a plan to get out there.

    One surefire spot: the Antelope Valley California Poppy Reserve, when the poppies hit full bloom. There is a live cam to help you time your trip for the best blooms.

    Another great resource is also the wildflower hotline hosted by Theodore Payne. Starting in March, it will be updated each Friday with the latest wildflower news and tips on where to see it all. Call: 818 768-1802, Ext. 7. 

  • Man who sawed them down gets 2 years in prison
    A green tree lays on the sidewalk. The bottom part of the trunk that the tree used to sit on still stands.
    A fallen tree on the sidewalk at the intersection of Olympic Boulevard and Hope Street in Los Angeles on April 21, 2025.

    Topline:

    A man who sparked outrage in downtown Los Angeles last year after using a chainsaw to cut down about a dozen streetside trees was sentenced to two years in prison.

    Why now: Samuel Patrick Groft, 45, was sentenced Wednesday after pleading no contest to nine felony counts of vandalism and two misdemeanor counts of vandalism in Los Angeles County Superior Court.

    The case against him: Groft sometimes hacked away at large, decades-old trees in the middle of the night, and for others, he wielded a cordless power saw on busy sidewalks in broad daylight, according to surveillance videos reviewed by the Los Angeles Police Department. Neighborhood outrage continued to grow as the destruction continued over the course of at least five days beginning April 17 until his arrest April 22 — Earth Day.

    The damage caused: LAist’s media partner CBS LA reported that witnesses at trial estimated there was nearly $350,000 in damage caused to city- and privately owned trees. At the time, Zach Seidl, a spokesperson for the mayor’s office, described the incident as “truly beyond comprehension.”

    What's next: Groft was ordered to pay restitution, a hearing for which is set for April 15.

  • Annual gathering with White House unraveling

    Topline:

    An annual meeting of the nation's governors that has long served as a rare bipartisan gathering is unraveling after President Donald Trump excluded Democratic governors from White House events.

    More details: The National Governors Association said it will no longer hold a formal meeting with Trump when governors are scheduled to convene in Washington later this month, after the White House planned to invite only Republican governors. On Tuesday, 18 Democratic governors also announced they would boycott a traditional dinner at the White House.

    Why it matters: The governors' group, which is scheduled to meet from Feb. 19-21, is one of the few remaining venues where political leaders from both major parties gather to discuss the top issues facing their communities. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Tuesday that Trump has "discretion to invite anyone he wants to the White House."

    Read on... for what this means for the group and what happened last year at the White House meeting.

    An annual meeting of the nation's governors that has long served as a rare bipartisan gathering is unraveling after President Donald Trump excluded Democratic governors from White House events.

    The National Governors Association said it will no longer hold a formal meeting with Trump when governors are scheduled to convene in Washington later this month, after the White House planned to invite only Republican governors. On Tuesday, 18 Democratic governors also announced they would boycott a traditional dinner at the White House.

    "If the reports are true that not all governors are invited to these events, which have historically been productive and bipartisan opportunities for collaboration, we will not be attending the White House dinner this year," the Democrats wrote. "Democratic governors remain united and will never stop fighting to protect and make life better for people in our states."

    Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt, a Republican who chairs the NGA, told fellow governors in a letter on Monday that the White House intended to limit invitations to the association's annual business meeting, scheduled for Feb. 20, to Republican governors only.

    "Because NGA's mission is to represent all 55 governors, the Association is no longer serving as the facilitator for that event, and it is no longer included in our official program," Stitt wrote in the letter, which was obtained by The Associated Press.

    The governors' group, which is scheduled to meet from Feb. 19-21, is one of the few remaining venues where political leaders from both major parties gather to discuss the top issues facing their communities. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Tuesday that Trump has "discretion to invite anyone he wants to the White House."


    "It's the people's house," she said. "It's also the president's home, so he can invite whomever he wants to dinners and events here at the White House."

    Representatives for Sitt and the NGA didn't comment on the letter. Brandon Tatum, the NGA's CEO, said in a statement last week that the White House meeting is an "important tradition" and said the organization was "disappointed in the administration's decision to make it a partisan occasion this year."

    In his letter to other governors, Stitt encouraged the group to unite around common goals.

    "We cannot allow one divisive action to achieve its goal of dividing us," he wrote. "The solution is not to respond in kind, but to rise above and to remain focused on our shared duty to the people we serve. America's governors have always been models of pragmatic leadership, and that example is most important when Washington grows distracted by politics."

    Signs of partisan tensions emerged at the White House meeting last year, when Trump and Maine's Gov. Janet Mills traded barbs.

    Trump singled out the Democratic governor over his push to bar transgender athletes from competing in girls' and women's sports, threatening to withhold federal funding from the state if she did not comply. Mills responded, "We'll see you in court."

    Trump then predicted that Mills' political career would be over for opposing the order. She is now running for U.S. Senate.

    The back-and-forth had a lasting impact on last year's conference and some Democratic governors did not renew their dues last year to the bipartisan group.
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • New law bans fees for help with VA
    Governor Gavin Newsom, a man with light skin tone, slightly gray hair, speaking with his hand raised behind a podium with signage that reads "Delivering for veterans."
    Gov. Gavin Newsom answers questions at the California Department of Veterans Affairs after signing a bill that prohibits unaccredited private companies from billing former military service members for help with their claims, in Sacramento on Feb. 10, 2026.

    Topline:

    Many veterans turn to private companies for help filing disability claims at the Department of Veterans Affairs and then face bills that run well into the thousands of dollars.

    About the new law: A booming industry that charges veterans for help in obtaining the benefits they earned through military service must shut down or dramatically change its business model in California by the end of the year under a new law Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Tuesday. The law prohibits unaccredited private companies from billing former military service members for help with their Department of Veterans Affairs claims.

    The backstory: Technically, it was already illegal under federal law to charge veterans for that work, but Congress 20 years ago removed criminal penalties for violations, and scores of private companies emerged, offering to speed up and maximize benefit claims.

    Read on... for more about the new law.

    A booming industry that charges veterans for help in obtaining the benefits they earned through military service must shut down or dramatically change its business model in California by the end of the year under a new law Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Tuesday.

    The law prohibits unaccredited private companies from billing former military service members for help with their Department of Veterans Affairs claims.

    Technically, it was already illegal under federal law to charge veterans for that work, but Congress 20 years ago removed criminal penalties for violations, and scores of private companies emerged, offering to speed up and maximize benefit claims.

    “We owe our veteran community a debt of gratitude — for their years of service and sacrifice," Newsom said in a written statement. "By signing this bill into law, we are ensuring veterans and service members get to keep more money in their pockets, and not line the coffers of predatory actors. We are closing this federal fraud loophole for good.”

    Critics call the private companies “claim sharks” because their fees are often five times the monthly benefit increase veterans obtain after using their services. CalMatters in September, for instance, interviewed a Vietnam-era veteran who was billed $5,500 after receiving benefits that would pay him $1,100 a month.

    Depending on a disability rating, a claim consulting fee under that model could easily hit $10,000 or more.

    “We owe it to our veterans to stand with them and to protect them from being taken advantage of while navigating the benefits they've earned,” said Sen. Bob Archuleta, a Democrat representing Norwalk. Archuleta, a former Army officer, carried the legislation. “This is not about politics; it's about doing what's right. Making millions of dollars on the back of our veterans is wrong. They've earned their benefits. They deserve their benefits.”

    California’s new law is part of a tug-of-war over how to regulate claims consulting companies. Congress for several years has been at a stalemate on whether to ban them outright, allow them to operate as they are or regulate them in some other way.

    California is among 11 states that have moved to put the companies out of business, while another group of mostly Republican-led states has legalized them, according to reporting by the veteran news organization The War Horse.

    That split in some ways reflects the different ways veterans themselves view the companies. The bill had overwhelming support from organizations that help veterans file benefits claims at no cost, such as the American Legion and Veterans of Foreign Wars, as well as from Democratic Party leaders, including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco.

    But the VA’s claims process can take months and sow uncertainty among applicants. Several of the claims consulting companies say they have helped tens of thousands of veterans across the country, and that they have hundreds of employees.

    Those trends led some lawmakers to vote against the measure, including Democrats with military backgrounds.

    “We're going to say to you, ‘Veteran, you know what, I don't know if you are too stupid or too vulnerable or your judgment is so poor you can't choose yourself,'” said Sen. Tom Umberg, a Democrat and former Army colonel, during a debate over the measure last month.

    The new law was such a close call for lawmakers that nine of 40 senators did not vote on it when it passed that chamber last month, which counts the same as a “no” vote but avoids offending a constituency that the lawmaker wants to keep.

    It was also one of the 10 most-debated measures to go before the Legislature last year, according to the CalMatters Digital Democracy database. Lawmakers spent 4 hours and 39 minutes on the bill at public hearings in 2025 and heard testimony from 99 speakers.

    Two claims consulting companies spent significant sums hiring lobbyists as they fought the bill, according to state records. They were Veterans Guardian, a North Carolina-based company that spent $150,000 on California lobbyists over the past two years; and Veterans Benefit Guide, a Nevada-based company that spent $371,821 lobbying on Archuleta’s bill and a similar measure that failed in 2024.

    Those companies view laws like California’s as an existential threat. Both have founders with military backgrounds. Veterans Benefit Guide sued to block New Jersey’s law prohibiting fees for veterans claim consulting, and a federal appeals court sided with the company last year.

    "This was the hardest bill I’ve had to work on since I’ve been in the Legislature," said Assemblymember Pilar Schiavo, a Santa Clarita Democrat who supported the law. "We know why that is, because there was so much money on the other side."

    Charlotte Autolino, who organizes job fairs for former military service members as the chairperson of the Veterans Employment Committee of San Diego, criticized Newsom’s decision to sign the law. She spoke to CalMatters on behalf of Veterans Benefit Guide.

    “The veterans lose,” she said. They lose the option. You’re taking an option away from them and you’re putting all of the veterans into one box, and that to me is wrong.”

    But David West, a Marine veteran who is Nevada County’s veterans service officer, commended Newsom. West was one of the main advocates for the new law.

    “The veterans of California are going to know that when (Newsom) says he’s taking care of everybody, he’s including us; that he values those 18- and 19-year-olds who are raising their hands, writing a blank check in the form of their lives; to then ensure that they aren’t writing checks to access their benefits,” West said.

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.