Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • City to put ranked-choice voting on ballot
    A white man with a beard stands at a covered voting area to fill out his ballot. The cover has the Orange County seal on it.
    An Orange County voter casts his ballot in November 2025.

    Topline:

    Irvine's City Council voted Tuesday to put ranked-choice voting on the November ballot. If approved, the city could potentially switch to the system in 2028. Some council members, however, are worried about the costs.

    Ranked-choice voting: Under this system, voters can rank candidates in order of preference. All top-pick votes are tallied up first. If no one wins, tallies move onto the second choices and so on. Proponents of the method say it allows for fairer outcomes and broadly-supported winners.

    The context: Other cities in California, like Redondo Beach, have implemented the system. For Orange County, Irvine would be one of the first. The only other is expected to be Huntington Beach, which was recently tentatively ordered by a judge to switch.

    The concern: It’s unclear how much this could cost. The council agreed on an amendment that would put a cap on estimated costs, using a percentage of the city’s budget for that year. If it exceeds that, then the city would not use the method in that election.

    Read on…. to learn more about what the ballot measure would do.

    Irvine voters will have an important question at the ballot box in November: Do you want ranked-choice voting?

    Late Tuesday, the City Council agreed to place a measure that would switch council and mayoral elections to the system in 2028, as long as the cost stays within certain parameters. Mayor Larry Agran and council members James Mai and Mike Carroll voted no.

    If passed, Irvine could be one of two Orange County cities to have the system. It comes as a judge recently issued a tentative order for Huntington Beach to use the method. Several California cities, like Redondo Beach in L.A. County, have implemented ranked-choice voting in recent years.

    What Irvine’s vote does

    Right now, Irvine uses a system voters recognize: You cast your vote for one candidate. There's no runoff, so whoever gets the most votes wins outright.

    In November, Irvine voters will be asked about switching to ranked-choice voting. Councilmember Kathleen Treseder, who originally introduced the measure, says this will help stop special interests from using “spoiler candidates” to take votes away from someone they don’t want to win.

    “I am confident that, if we have ranked-choice voting, it’s going to improve the voice of the voters and have better outcomes,” she said.

    The Cal RCV Institute, a supporter of the measure, says it allows for fairer outcomes and more broadly-supported winners. Here's a visual guide to how it works:

    Under the ordinance, ranked-choice voting could happen starting in 2028 — as long as Irvine can feasibly do it technically and financially. Money was a big concern in the council vote because the city’s growing deficit is projected to reach $47 million by the end of the decade.

    If voters approve the measure, Irvine would have upfront costs, like redesigning its ballots, training staff and educating voters. (Some political organizations are expected to help with that.)

    It’s not clear exactly how pricey switching could be, but the first time is expected to be more than what elections cost now. Council members ultimately compromised and put a hard cap into the measure.

    If costs are estimated to go over 0.23% of the city’s general fund budget (that’s $710,000 today), ranked-choice voting would not be used at the next election. The estimated cost of each subsequent election would be checked until the cost is low enough for the city to switch.

    Carroll, who voted no, called out the calculation method because it came from an advocacy group. He disagreed with basing the cap on a budget that hasn’t been decided yet.

    “God bless them, they’re allowed to push it, but I want to be clear that this is lawyering that has no specificity,” he said.

    How ranked-choice voting works

    Voters rank candidates in order of preference. All top-pick votes are tallied up first. If anyone receives more than 50%, they win. If no one does, the candidate with the least votes is eliminated.

    All voters who had that person as their first-choice pick then have their second-choice candidates tallied. The process repeats until a candidate gets a majority of votes. You can learn more about it in our guide here.

    The ballot measure would need a simple majority to pass — that’s 50% plus one vote — and it would be in effect until voters want to change it.

    Irvine’s ballot would be designed to allow for at least five ranked choices, and you’d be able to rank write-in candidates as well.

    Under the motion, preliminary vote tallies would still be released alongside results for other races.

  • The Democratic-backed prop passes
    A person drops a ballot envelope into a slot with an oversized "I Voted" sticker
    A voter turns in their L.A. County ballot.

    Topline:

    California will change its election recall process after voters approved Proposition 5, a ballot measure backed by Democrats who argued the process was too open to partisan exploitation.

    Why it matters: The recall process will now take place in two parts: Voters will first decide in an election whether an official should be removed from office. If successful, they’ll vote again in a follow-up election on who should replace the recalled official. Under the previous system, voters were asked both questions at the same time.

    The backstory: Democratic lawmakers placed the constitutional amendment on the ballot in 2024, arguing the current system leads to unnecessary state expense, confuses voters, and can lead to ‘undemocratic’ outcomes, since the winner does not need a majority to win.

    California will change its election recall process after voters approved Proposition 5, a ballot measure backed by Democrats who argued the process was too open to partisan exploitation.

    The recall process will now take place in two parts: Voters will first decide in an election whether an official should be removed from office. If successful, they’ll vote again in a follow-up election on who should replace the recalled official. Under the previous system, voters were asked both questions at the same time.

    About 52% of voters approved the measure and 48% were against it with about 91% of the vote counted Thursday, 9 days after Election Day.

    Democratic lawmakers placed the constitutional amendment on the ballot in 2024, arguing the current system leads to unnecessary state expense, confuses voters, and can lead to ‘undemocratic’ outcomes, since the winner does not need a majority to win.

    Republicans used the recall process in recent years to challenge Democratic politicians. Gov. Gavin Newsom, who survived his own attempted recall in 2021, endorsed the ballot measure to change the rules.

    Voters in Democratic enclaves such as San Francisco, Alameda and Los Angeles counties passed the measure by a wide margin. More rural, Northern California counties like El Dorado and Shasta favored keeping the current system.

    The origins of Prop. 5

    Democratic lawmakers and Secretary of State Shirley Weber began advocating for changes in the aftermath of the failed recall of Newsom in 2021. The recall effort cost taxpayers about $200 million and the campaigns on both sides spent another $100 million. Newsom walked away unscathed, with 62% of voters electing to keep him in office.

    The measure got on the ballot after lawmakers passed Senate Constitutional Amendment 1 in 2024. Democratic Sen. Josh Newman, who was recalled himself in 2018, carried the proposal in the Legislature.

    Republican lawmakers voted against it, arguing the reform was not needed, would dilute the power of voters and lead to additional special election costs because of the need to hold two elections.

    Unlike some of the tax measures on the ballot that spurred multimillion-dollar spending sprees, no group spent any money on the effort.

    Although recalls are often initiated, they rarely make it to voters. Only 11 recalls have made it to the ballot in California since 1913, and only six have been approved by voters. The current recall process is how Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger came into power, replacing Gray Davis in 2003.

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • Sponsored message
  • Mauricio Pochettino led men's soccer in World Cup

    Topline:

    Mauricio Pochettino, who took over an ailing U.S. men's national soccer team in 2024 and led the squad to a Round of 16 finish in the 2026 World Cup, is departing to take over as coach of famed Manchester United.

    The backstory: Pochettino was the highest-profile manager the U.S. had ever hired. His aggressive attacking style of play won praise from his players and fans alike. At the 2026 World Cup, the USMNT finished first in its group and won its first knockout-round game since 2002. Pochettino's three wins were the most at any World Cup by a USMNT coach.

    What's next: Pochettino will lead the U.S. for two more games — against Haiti in the coming days — before departing for Manchester United.

    Mauricio Pochettino, who took over an ailing U.S. men's national soccer team in 2024 and led the squad to a Round of 16 finish in the 2026 World Cup, is departing to take over as coach of famed Manchester United.

    Pochettino was the highest-profile manager the U.S. had ever hired. His aggressive attacking style of play won praise from his players and fans alike. At the 2026 World Cup, the USMNT finished first in its group and won its first knockout-round game since 2002. Pochettino's three wins were the most at any World Cup by a USMNT coach.

    As a player, he represented Argentina in the 2002 World Cup and played in soccer leagues in Spain and France. As a coach, he managed some of Europe's most recognizable clubs: Tottenham Hotspur, Chelsea and Paris Saint-Germain. Last August, he signed an extension to lead the USMNT through the 2030 World Cup, giving him a full four-year cycle to build the team into a true contender.

    Pochettino will lead the U.S. for two more games — against Haiti in the coming days — before departing for Manchester United.

    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Emails are starting to come through
    Four-color Microsoft logo sculpture, with orange, green, blue and yellow square panels, on a concrete base outside a glass building.
    The Micrsoft logo is seen outside the Microsoft Visitor Center are seen at the company’s headquarters Monday, Nov. 9, 2026, in Redmond, Wash.

    Topline:

    Microsoft said progress is being made in bringing its popular workplace software back online as a global outage enters its second day, disrupting business communications, police crime reporting, court operations, AI tools and many other services. The outage, which affected a wide range of Microsoft 365 services including Outlook, Teams and AI assistant Copilot, left people, institutions and businesses across the world without access to email and other platforms.

    What to know: The company reported “broader improvements” in North America and “sustained improvements across much of Europe,” as well as “encouraging recovery signals” in the Asia-Pacific region. Users may have “intermittent access issues or delayed email delivery as mitigation progresses across the remaining affected infrastructure,” Microsoft said. The total number of people affected is not clear, but the company said in January that it had more than 450 million paid Microsoft 365 commercial subscriptions.

    The backstory: The Redmond, Washington, company first flagged technical issues just before 1 p.m. Eastern time Thursday. So far, there is no indication that the outage was caused by malicious activity, the company said. Microsoft engineers struggled to bring systems online early. “Our actions taken thus far have not provided the anticipated relief,” the company wrote as part of a series of 22 posts on X. By Friday morning there were signs that the situation was stabilizing.

    Microsoft said progress is being made in bringing its popular workplace software back online as a global outage enters its second day, disrupting business communications, police crime reporting, court operations, AI tools and many other services.

    The outage, which affected a wide range of Microsoft 365 services including Outlook, Teams and AI assistant Copilot, left people, institutions and businesses across the world without access to email and other platforms.

    Microsoft said it was making headway as it tried to restore services Friday.

    “We’re seeing encouraging recovery progress, with service availability and email delivery performance improving across a growing portion of affected Microsoft 365 infrastructure,” the company said, as some users started reporting that their emails were restored.

    The company reported “broader improvements” in North America and “sustained improvements across much of Europe,” as well as “encouraging recovery signals” in the Asia-Pacific region.

    Users may have “intermittent access issues or delayed email delivery as mitigation progresses across the remaining affected infrastructure,” Microsoft said.

    The total number of people affected is not clear, but the company said in January that it had more than 450 million paid Microsoft 365 commercial subscriptions.

    Microsoft scrambles to recover services

    In its latest status update, Microsoft reported that it was continuing to see improvements in service with “email queues significantly reduced and approaching normal levels.”

    The Redmond, Washington, company first flagged technical issues just before 1 p.m. Eastern time Thursday.

    So far, there is no indication that the outage was caused by malicious activity, the company said.

    Microsoft engineers struggled to bring systems online early. “Our actions taken thus far have not provided the anticipated relief,” the company wrote as part of a series of 22 posts on X.

    By Friday morning there were signs that the situation was stabilizing.

    “Some users may still experience intermittent access issues or delayed email delivery as recovery continues,” it said in its latest post.

    Europe woke up to disruptions

    In Britain, the outage brought a halt to a trial in Manchester. Judge Maurice Greene sent jurors home because of delays that he said illustrated the danger of the court’s reliance on technology.

    The British government said it is “working closely” with Microsoft to assess any impact on public services but that “robust contingency plans” are in place to minimize disruption.

    British police forces said they’re unable to receive crime reports online and are urging people to phone in urgent requests.

    The National Pharmacy Association said people could face delays getting their prescriptions because the outage is affecting the email systems of the state-run National Health Service.

    In Norway, the government said the outage affected several ministries and had not received any indication about when the problem would be resolved.

    Greece’s Minister of Digital Governance Dimitrios Papastergiou said government ministries using Outlook, Teams and Copilot were affected but not to the degree that would significantly hamper their work.

    Asian businesses and governments were affected

    In Australia, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said Friday that Microsoft had likened the disruption to the 2024 CrowdStrike outage, which stemmed from a faulty update to computers running Microsoft Windows. That outage grounded flights and disrupted hospitals, banks and retailers.

    Burke said he had spoken to Microsoft’s top executive in Australia and the government’s national cybersecurity coordinator about the disruption.

    “They (Microsoft) don’t believe they are dealing with a cyberattack. They believe that they are dealing in some ways (with something) similar to what we saw with respect to CrowdStrike where there is an update that has gone awry,” Burke told reporters in Sydney.

    Hong Kong businessperson Danny Lau, who runs an aluminum firm, said his company couldn’t receive updates from its U.S. customers through Outlook. If the situation dragged on further, this could “impact the production timeline,” he said. Some banks in Hong Kong, an Asian financial hub, also saw some operations disrupted.

    Air India and IndiGo said their flight operations were unaffected. IndiGo reported email support services were disrupted, affecting its ability to receive customer queries.

    Air India temporarily rerouted its email services so customer queries could get through without interruption, the company said in a statement.

    The Singapore government said emails were down and that the agency is working with Microsoft to resolve the issue. The Philippines’ Supreme Court said some operations were affected, including email responses.

    In Japan, Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Masanao Ozaki said the government’s IT infrastructure was affected and that officials were “keeping a close eye on the developments.” Japanese authorities had taken steps including securing alternative communication tools such as telephones, the government said.

    U.S.-based industrial technology company Workhorse Group Inc. delayed a quarterly earnings call.

    OpenAI and Anthropic reported problems connecting with Microsoft 365 tools, underscoring the ripple effects as more people use artificial intelligence platforms to interact with other companies’ software.

    The widespread disruptions highlight dependence on a single tech company

    The widespread impact highlights how reliance on one company and its suite of services can be crippling during such an outage, experts and officials said.

    Papastergiou in Greece said government ministries using Outlook, Teams and Copilot were affected.

    He told private Skai television that underscores how countries should develop technological alternatives for services considered crucial for the smooth operation of government.

    Florian Druckenthaner, a spokesperson for Germany’s digitization ministry, said the government’s IT security agency believes German business was widely affected, but there were no reports of major disruption at government level.

    He said that the federal government doesn’t use Microsoft in the cloud, and that the federal administration also uses an email client that was stable.

    Regardless of the cause, Druckenthaner said, the incident shows “the significance of building up redundancies and alternatives – we are working on that.”

    “With no emails coming or going, many office workers feel like they are having a virtual snow day,” said Jeremy Singer, a professor at the University of Glasgow’s School of Computing Science.

    “This problem serves to emphasize the dependence we have built on one company’s digital infrastructure, and may lead us to question whether we need more resilience in our IT ecosystem.”

    Governments and institutions in Western Europe have been trying to reduce their reliance on services provided by a few big U.S. tech services in their continuing push for “digital sovereignty.”

    ___

    AP journalists Adam Schreck in Bangkok, Eileen Ng in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Rod McGuirk in Melbourne, Australia, Sheikh Saaliq in New Delhi, Mayuko Ono in Tokyo, Geir Moulson in Berlin, Menalaos Hadjicostis in Nicosia, and Pan Pylas and Brian Melley in London contributed.

  • Van Hollen will challenge Schumer in Senate
    Chris Van Hollen, who has a light skin tone and short, swept-back hair, speaks into a handheld microphone marked “Crooked Con” and gestures with the other hand, glancing to the side.
    Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., speaks during a panel at Crooked Con at the Walter E Washington Convention Center, in Washington, Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2026

    Topline:

    Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland said today that he will run for Senate Majority Leader in the next Congress, setting up a challenge to Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer after the party swept to power in the midterm elections.

    Why now: Van Hollen’s challenge comes after he said he was considering a bid and after Schumer has said he has the necessary support to win. The closed-door, secret-ballot election will be held in early December. The race will be the first contested election for Democratic leader in decades. The question of whether to reelect Schumer has already divided the caucus and many senators will not say publicly how they will vote. They have privately deliberated about what message to take from the election, and Schumer recruited many of the party’s winning candidates and raised money for them.

    Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland said Thursday that he will run for Senate Majority Leader in the next Congress, setting up a challenge to Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer after the party swept to power in the midterm elections.

    Van Hollen said in a statement that “the American people called for change” and that is why he is running.

    “It’s now on us to meet this moment, and to do that we need new leadership,” Van Hollen said. “This is not about any one person — it’s about answering the call of the American people. That is why I’m running for Senate Majority Leader.”

    Van Hollen’s challenge comes after he said he was considering a bid and after Schumer has said he has the necessary support to win. The closed-door, secret-ballot election will be held in early December.

    The race will be the first contested election for Democratic leader in decades. The question of whether to reelect Schumer has already divided the caucus and many senators will not say publicly how they will vote. They have privately deliberated about what message to take from the election, and Schumer recruited many of the party’s winning candidates and raised money for them.

    Schumer has been talking to Democratic senators since the election about forming an agenda for 2027.

    “I’m going to win it,” Schumer told The Associated Press in an interview last week.