Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Bills will boost pay in fast food and health care
    Three protesters stand side by side. Two are holding large posters that read Fast Food Workers Demand A Seat At the Table.
    Fast food workers rally at the state Capitol in Sacramento on Aug. 31, 2023. Gov. Gavin Newsom in September signed a law that raises the minimum wage for the industry to $20 an hour.

    Topline:

    Gov. Gavin Newsom this year signed two union-backed bills that will boost fast-food and health care workers’ minimum wages.

    Pay hikes: California-based fast-food workers for chains with 60 or more locations around the nation will earn at least $20 an hour beginning in April, $4 higher than the overall state minimum wage of $16 that will be effective Jan. 1. In June, health care workers will earn a minimum of $18, $21 or $23 an hour, depending on what type of facility employs them and where they work.

    Why it matters: The two new laws are expected to trigger pay increases for about 900,000 Californians, some of whom are earning more than minimum wage today.

    What's next: The unions that advocated for the fast-food and health care minimum wages say their list of priorities is long and includes other concerns such as how artificial intelligence will affect work, housing costs, worker classification and more.

    Californians in two industries are set to get new minimum wages just for them next year, and that could lead to pay bumps for other workers, too.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom this year signed two union-backed bills that will boost fast-food and health care workers’ minimum wages.

    California-based fast-food workers for chains with 60 or more locations around the nation will earn at least $20 an hour beginning in April, $4 higher than the overall state minimum wage of $16 that will be effective Jan. 1.

    In June, health care workers will earn a minimum of $18, $21 or $23 an hour, depending on what type of facility employs them and where they work.

    The industry-specific wage increases reflect a shift in unions’ strategies at the Capitol. After the Great Recession, labor groups led campaigns that resulted in then-Gov. Jerry Brown signing a law in 2016 that put California on a path to a $15 minimum wage. That law included inflation adjustments, which is why the minimum wage is higher today.

    The two new laws are expected to trigger pay increases for about 900,000 Californians, some of whom are earning more than minimum wage today.

    They are going into effect in a competitive labor market that has seen employers, especially small businesses, struggling to hire and retain workers. California’s unemployment rate is at 4.8%, which is higher compared with the federal unemployment rate of 3.7% but is near a historic low.

    The new fast-food minimum wage could push up pay for other restaurant and food workers, experts say.

    In a tight labor market, “other food-services companies will likely have to increase wages in order to retain workers in a sector in which chronic understaffing, and the stress and burnout that causes among remaining staff, is already a problem,” said John Logan, professor of labor studies at San Francisco State University.

    A large crowd of people, many with their fists raised, gather around Governor Gavin Newsom, who is holding a piece of paper and standing in front of a podium with a round logo that reads Seal of the Governor of the State of California
    Gov. Gavin Newsom stands with cheering fast food workers after signing legislation raising their minimum wage in Los Angeles on Sept. 28, 2023.
    (
    Alisha Jucevic for CalMatters
    )

    Others say the industry-specific minimum wage could have ripple effects in other industries.

    Keith Miller owns three Subway sandwich shops in Northern California and is spokesperson for the American Association of Franchisees & Dealers, which opposed the fast-food worker legislation. The law passed with support from major fast-food chains, which gained assurances that unions would drop an initiative that would have made the chains liable for their franchises’ labor violations.

    Under the law, Miller said, franchisors like McDonald’s or Subway avoid responsibility but franchisees like him will bear the costs of paying higher wages.

    Miller questioned why fast-food workers were singled out as needing a minimum-wage increase, and added that it could affect industries such as retail. He said retail workers might switch over to fast food if they can make more money there, or retailers might need to raise their workers’ wages.

    “It’s kind of a fallacy that this impacts only fast-food workers,” Miller said. “It kind of creates a market rate. In effect, the minimum wage for a lot of people will be $20.”

    Upcoming minimum wage measures

    California voters in November will see a ballot initiative that would raise the state minimum wage to $18 an hour. It’s backed by billionaire Joe Sanberg.

    Workers in other industries, meanwhile, are fighting for higher minimum wages, too. In Los Angeles, a proposed ordinance would institute a $25 minimum wage for workers in the tourism industry before the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Olympics, which would rise to $30 an hour by 2028.

    Jovan Houston, an airport security worker at Los Angeles International Airport, said she has been working there for six years and makes $19.78 an hour. She said a boost in wages would be “extremely” helpful for her and her 13-year-old son. They live with her niece and her four kids because rent is so expensive, Houston said.

    “It’s cramped, but I can’t afford to move,” she said, adding that she has coworkers “who work two or three days to survive. They’re sleeping in the back on their breaks because they’re tired.”

    Even as she fights for the Los Angeles ordinance that would raise her wages, Houston thinks it’s possible that her company would cut workers if forced to pay them more.

    “They might eliminate workers,” Houston said. “I’m definitely worried about that.”

    The effects of higher minimum wages

    The costs and potential consequences of the higher minimum wages worry some people, including economists and the governor, while others see upsides.

    Economist Christopher Thornberg, one of the founding partners of Beacon Economics, said that in a competitive market, increasing minimum wages for the lowest-paid workers will lead to higher prices for consumers. For example, McDonald’s and Chipotle executives have said they plan to raise prices next year to offset increased labor costs.

    But Michael Reich, an economics professor at UC Berkeley, said the effect of increased wages on product costs is relatively low and is usually seen in labor-intensive industries like dining and fast food. Reich said that when wages rise 10%, costs in the restaurant industry go up by about 2% to 3% and usually just on a one-time basis instead of a yearly increase.

    Reich said raising wages for workers can lead to their upward mobility. Any negative effects such as higher costs for consumers or contribution to inflation are negligible, he and other economists say.

    By increasing minimum wages for the lowest-paid workers, “you raise the standard of living,” Reich said. “That is quite significant.”

    A woman with brown skin, wearing a baseball cap and a purple t-shirt, holds a poster over her head that reads Kaiser: Patients First. Beside her are dozens of other protesters, most holding posters that read Kaiser Workers On ULP Strike
    Kaiser Permanente employees on strike on Oct. 4, 2023. The workers held a demonstration in front of the Kaiser Permanente South Sacramento location. The strike resulted in a contract that gradually raises the minimum wage at Kaiser to $25 an hour.
    (
    Miguel Gutierrez Jr.
    /
    CalMatters
    )

    In addition, securing minimum wages for certain groups could eventually be used as a model to benefit other types of workers, such as gig workers who don’t currently have employee status, said Nelson Lichtenstein, a professor at UC Santa Barbara who has written books about labor history.

    “One could see a wage commission… for the Uber world that can establish certain kinds of criteria, which would have the effect of a minimum wage,” Lichtenstein said.

    Meanwhile, the new minimum wage for health care workers is expected to cost $4 billion in the first year — half from California’s general fund and half from federal funds — during a time when it is facing a gaping budget deficit. So the governor reportedly is seeking changes, though it is unclear what form they will take.

    What's next for California labor?

    Worker advocates and labor leaders are cheering their victories on wages as they strive to improve workers’ lives in other ways.

    The unions that advocated for the fast-food and health care minimum wages say their list of priorities is long and includes other concerns such as how artificial intelligence will affect work, housing costs, worker classification and more.

    “We can talk about leave, minimum wage, etc., but it doesn’t matter if we’re replacing people with robots in the workplace,” said Lorena Gonzalez Fletcher, head of the California Labor Federation.

    Isabel Urbano, a spokesperson for the Service Employees International Union, which campaigned for the fast-food bill and played a critical role in championing the minimum wage increase Gov. Brown signed in 2016, said: “The wage increase won’t mean anything if we don’t stabilize schedules and have predictable hours.”

    Lisa Fu, executive director of the worker-advocacy group California Healthy Nail Salon Collaborative, said “what’s happening in the state and around the country with the labor movement has been really really inspiring for us,” though she said her organization’s main goal is to educate nail-salon workers and businesses about labor laws. Fu said there is “widespread” misclassification of such workers as independent contractors who are not entitled to sick pay, breaks and more.

    While she said a minimum wage is one concern, “understanding of labor laws is the first step” in an industry that is primarily made up of Vietnamese immigrants. The median hourly wage for nail-salon workers in the state, including tips, is $10.94 an hour, she said, citing American Community Survey data.

    Gonzalez Fletcher said labor is more focused on pushing for improvements in contracts, which she said tends to help raise wages of nonunion workers, too. But she said she continues to support any efforts to raise the state minimum wage. “The only way to keep up with inflation is to increase wages,” she said.

  • Lead singer of The Mavericks died Monday

    Topline:

    Raul Malo, the leader of the country band The Mavericks and one of the most recognizable voices in roots music, died Monday night, according to a representative of the band. The guitarist and singer had been battling cancer.

    Why it matters: Over a career that lasted four decades, The Mavericks lived up to the band's name, challenging expectations and following a roadmap crafted by Malo's expansive musical upbringing as the son of Cuban immigrants in Miami.

    Why now: He was hospitalized last week, forcing him to miss tribute shows staged in his honor at the Ryman Auditorium over the weekend. He was 60 years old.

    Raul Malo, the leader of the country band The Mavericks and one of the most recognizable voices in roots music, died Monday night, according to a representative of the band. The guitarist and singer had been battling cancer.

    He was hospitalized last week, forcing him to miss tribute shows staged in his honor at the Ryman Auditorium over the weekend. He was 60 years old.

    "No one embodied life and love, joy and passion, family, friends, music and adventure the way our beloved Raul did," read a statement released by his family.

    Malo's group, The Mavericks, mourned the loss of their leader in a social post.

    "Anyone with the pleasure of being in Raul's orbit knew that he was a force of human nature, with an infectious energy," the statement read. "Over a career of more than three decades entertaining millions around the globe, his towering creative contributions and unrivaled, generational talent created the kind of multicultural American music reaching far beyond America itself."

    Over a career that lasted four decades, The Mavericks lived up to the band's name, challenging expectations and following a roadmap crafted by Malo's expansive musical upbringing as the son of Cuban immigrants in Miami.

    "I grew up in a very musical household. There was all kinds of music around always," he told WHYY's Fresh Air in 1995. "We listened to everything from Hank Williams to Celia Cruz to Sam Cooke to Bobby Darin. It didn't matter."

    In 1992, Malo told NPR that his widespread influences weren't always understood or appreciated in his South Florida hometown, but he said that his struggle to fit in taught him to trust his instincts. Malo had become the guitarist and lead singer for The Mavericks in 1989, alongside co-founders Robert Reynolds and Paul Deakin, and his roaring, sentimental voice defined the band's sound and remained its constant as the group's catalog moved from slow, tender ballads to full-throttle rock songs. In 1995, the band released its biggest hit with "All You Ever Do Is Bring Me Down," a swinging country song featuring an assist from Tex-Mex accordion legend Flaco Jimenez.

    As the band grew in members and devoted listeners, The Mavericks continued to push the boundaries of American music, weaving a richly layered tapestry of textures and stories. With more than a dozen studio albums, The Mavericks collected praise and recognition from the Academy of Country Music, the Country Music Association and the Recording Academy. Although they took a hiatus for several years, Malo never stopped making music — and returned to his bandmates with renewed inspiration.

    Following its 30th anniversary, the group released its first full-length Spanish album in 2020, aptly titled En Español. The record reimagined Latin standards and folklore-tinged popular tunes; it also made an implicit political statement about Latin music's contributions to American culture.

    "In our own little way, if we could get somebody that perhaps is on the fence on issues and hears us singing in Spanish and perhaps reminds them of the beautiful cultures that make up what this country is trying to be and what it should be, so be it," Malo told NPR at the time. "Yeah, I'm OK with that."

    The following year, the Americana Music Association recognized The Mavericks with the Trailblazer Award. In 2024, the band released its last studio album, Moon & Stars. The release coincided with news of Malo's cancer diagnosis, which he discussed openly with NPR's Ayesha Rascoe.

    Before being hospitalized last week, Malo had been scheduled to perform with The Mavericks at a pair of tribute concerts held this past weekend at the legendary Ryman Auditorium in Nashville. Over 30 artists, including Patty Griffin, Jim Lauderdale and Steve Earle, still gathered to pay tribute to Malo, with some of the proceeds of the night going to the cancer prevention organization Stand Up To Cancer.

    According to his spokesperson, though Malo was too ill to attend, the concert was streamed to his hospital room Friday night.

    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Sponsored message
  • Max Huntsman issues criticism of Sheriff's Dept.
    Max Huntsman is a former prosecutor who became L.A. County's inspector general.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department has mostly blocked efforts to investigate misconduct within its ranks, according to the county inspector general, who announced his retirement Tuesday after 12 years on the job.

    Why now: In an open letter, Max Huntsman cited examples of how the county has thwarted his efforts to watchdog the department, which in the past has been plagued by accusations that deputies use excessive force and lie on the job. Huntsman said one example is former Sheriff Alex Villanueva’s misuse of criminal enforcement powers to discredit critics, such as opening an investigation into former County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl.

    “My requests for investigation were rejected,” Huntsman’s letter reads. “Even after receiving an official subpoena, the Sheriff’s Department has failed to turn over records regarding the improper surveillance.”

    He added: “Sometimes members of the public wonder if frightening new surveillance techniques will be used for improper purposes under the guise of criminal investigation. Sadly, the answer is yes.”

    County response: Asked to respond, the Sheriff’s Department issued a statement saying it valued the office of the inspector general and all county oversight bodies and that it wished Huntsman and his family well in his retirement. The department said it “continues to make great strides in advancing the Department in a transparent manner.”

    LAist also reached out to the county CEO and county counsel for comment, but they declined.

    Read on ... for more information on Huntsman's letter.

    The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department has mostly blocked efforts to investigate misconduct within its ranks, according to the county inspector general, who announced his retirement Tuesday after 12 years on the job.

    In an open letter, Max Huntsman cited examples of how the county has thwarted his efforts to watchdog the department, which in the past has been plagued with accusations that deputies use excessive force and lie on the job.

    Huntsman said one example is former Sheriff Alex Villanueva’s misuse of criminal enforcement powers to discredit critics, such as opening an investigation into former County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl.

    Villanueva was sheriff from 2018 to 2022.

    “My requests for investigation were rejected,” Huntsman’s letter reads. “Even after receiving an official subpoena, the Sheriff’s Department has failed to turn over records regarding the improper surveillance.”

    He added: “Sometimes members of the public wonder if frightening new surveillance techniques will be used for improper purposes under the guise of criminal investigation. Sadly, the answer is yes.”

    Before becoming inspector general in 2013, Huntsman, 60, was a deputy district attorney who specialized in public corruption. He told LAist on Tuesday that the inspector general job wasn’t something he wanted initially.

    “I didn’t want to go work for politicians,” he said. “But the need to provide some kind of independent reporting and analysis was significant.”

    The Sheriff’s Department issued a statement saying it valued the Office of the Inspector General and all county oversight bodies and that it wished Huntsman and his family well in his retirement.

    The department said it “continues to make great strides in advancing the department in a transparent manner.”

    LAist also reached out to the county CEO and county counsel for comment, but they declined.

    After George Floyd

    In the letter, Huntsman says the state of California has come a long way in strengthening the power of local law enforcement oversight bodies, in part because of the 2020 murder of George Floyd by police in Minneapolis.

    After widespread protests — and lobbying by Huntsman — the state provided authority to inspectors general to enforce subpoenas requiring law enforcement agencies to hand over documents and authorized external investigation of police misconduct, including deputy gang conduct.

    The Sheriff’s Department — backed by county lawyers — has resisted.

    “Los Angeles County may not follow those laws, but it will not be able to avoid them forever,” Huntsman wrote. “The county refuses to require the photographing of suspected gang tattoos in secretive groups that the undersheriff has identified as violating state law.”

    “Just a few weeks ago, we requested some information regarding an investigation, and a pair of commanders refused to give it to us,” Huntsman said in an interview with LAist.

    Origin of the office 

    The Inspector General’s Office was created by the county Board of Supervisors in 2013 in response to a scandal that included former Sheriff Lee Baca covering up the abuses of jail inmates.

    Baca went to federal prison.

    Since then, the office has issued dozens of reports with recommendations for improving living conditions inside jails that some have described as “filthy,” stopping abuses of juveniles inside juvenile halls and providing shower privacy for inmates as part of the requirements under the Prison Rape Elimination Act.

    “All of these abuses were reported by the Office of Inspector General and recommendations were ignored,” Huntsman wrote. Often, it took court orders to enact change.

    “When we first blew the whistle on the torturous chaining of mentally ill prisoners to benches for 36 hours at a time, it was only a court order that ended the practice,” he wrote. “Time and time again, this pattern repeated itself.”

    Huntsman wrote the county has permitted the Sheriff’s Department to block oversight and defunded the Office of Inspector General by removing a third of its staff.

    “It's not surprising the county has driven out two successive chairs of the Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission,” he wrote.

    “Government always claims to value transparency and accountability, but shooting the messenger is still the most common response to criticism,” Huntsman wrote.

    Despite setbacks, Huntsman values work 

    Huntsman told LAist on Tuesday that he was proud of his career as a public servant.

    “I’ve really enjoyed the work and I’m sad to have it end,” he said.

    It’s a sentiment he echoed in his letter, adding that despite the setbacks and roadblocks, he was proud of the people with whom he shared the office.

    “It has been my honor to work with a talented, brave and tireless group of public servants to ensure that the public knows what its government is doing,” he wrote.

    He noted the inspector general’s reports are fact-checked by the office and public.

    “When government abuses occur, they are sometimes kept secret, but that is no longer the case for much of what is happening in Los Angeles County,” Huntsman wrote. “What you do about it is up to you.,”

    Huntsman’s last day is Friday.

  • The move is meant to help clear city streets
    A person wearing a yellow safety shirt and black pants unloads an RV with an X on its side off a tow truck.
    In a 12-to-3 vote, the L.A. City Council is moving forward to implement AB 630, a state law that allows abandoned or inoperable RVs worth less than $4,000 to be destroyed.

    Topline:

    The L.A City Council voted 12-3 today to implement a state law that will make it easier to clear some RVs from city streets.

    The backstory: Last month, the council's Transportation Committee voted to bring a proposal before the council to implement a policy change that allows the city to impound and immediately destroy abandoned or inoperable RV's worth less than $4,000. The change is inspired by new state law AB 630 that was created to prevent previously impounded RV's from ending back up on the street.

    The motion, authored by Councilmember Traci Park, reports that abandoned RV's pose as public and safety hazards.

    What's next: Councilmember Nithya Raman requested that an implementation plan be presented to the council's public safety and housing and homelessness committees.

    Go deeper: L.A. pushes policy to make it easier to remove RVs from city streets.

    Topline:

    The L.A City Council voted 12-3 today to implement a state law that will make it easier to clear some RVs from city streets.

    The backstory: Last month, the council's Transportation Committee voted to bring a proposal forward to implement a policy change that allows the city to impound and immediately destroy abandoned or inoperable RVs worth less than $4,000. The change is inspired by new state law AB 630, which was created to prevent previously impounded RVs from ending back up on the street.

    The motion, authored by Councilmember Traci Park, reports that abandoned RVs pose as public and safety hazards.

    What's next: Councilmember Nithya Raman requested that an implementation plan be presented to the council's public safety and housing and homelessness committees.

    Go deeper: L.A. pushes policy to make it easier to remove RVs from city streets.

  • Supes approve rule requiring police to show ID
    A group of people wearing camoflauge uniforms, helmets, face shields and black masks covering their faces are pictured at night
    A line of federal immigration agents wearing masks stands off with protesters near the Glass House Farms facility outside Camarillo on July 10.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors gave its final stamp of approval today to an ordinance requiring law enforcement to display visible identification and banning them from wearing face coverings when working in certain jurisdictions in L.A. County.

    Where it applies: The ordinance will take effect in unincorporated parts of the county. Those include East Los Angeles, South Whittier and Ladera Heights, where a Home Depot has been a repeated target of immigration raids, according to various reports.

    What the supervisors are saying:  “What the federal government is doing is causing extreme fear and chaos and anxiety, particularly among our immigrant community,” said Supervisor Janice Hahn, who introduced the motion, in an interview with LAist before the final vote. “They don't know who's dragging them out of a car. They don't know who's throwing them to the ground at a car wash because they act like secret police.”

    About the vote: Supervisor Lindsay Horvath was not present for the vote but coauthored the ordinance. Supervisor Kathryn Barger abstained. All other county supervisors voted to approve it.

    The back and forth: California passed a similar law, the No Secret Police Act, earlier this year. The Trump administration already is suing the state of California over that law, calling it unconstitutional. For her part, Hahn said that the law is meant to protect residents' constitutional rights, and that legal challenges won’t affect the county’s position “until we're told by a court that it's unconstitutional.”

    The timeline: The new law will go into effect in 30 days.