Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Officials denied entry to inspect detention center
    The exterior of the Adelanto ICE Processing Center, surrounded by barbed wire fencing and surveillance cameras.
    The Adelanto Detention Center in Adelanto, northeast of Los Angeles, on April 20, 2019.

    Topline:

    According to two Democratic lawmakers, the Department of Homeland Security is implementing new restrictive rules on visiting the Adelanto ICE Processing Center, which impacts their ability to conduct Congressional oversight.

    Denied entry despite notice: Reps. Raul Ruiz and Norma Torres were turned away at the Adelanto ICE Processing Center gate, despite providing the required 72-hour notice. Ruiz says ICE suddenly imposed a seven-day rule, contradicting federal law that allows unannounced visits for Congressional oversight.

    Transparency in question: The lawmakers intended to assess detainees' access to legal counsel, healthcare, and communication with family. Ruiz says the locked gate and shifting rules show a pattern of evasion, prompting calls for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to resign.

    Two Inland Empire Congress members were locked out at the gate of Adelanto ICE Processing Center last week as they attempted to check on constituents held there.

    The episode illustrates the obstacles some Democratic lawmakers have experienced trying to observe conditions in ICE detention centers, and what they say are restrictive rules that interfere with Congressional oversight.

    Rep. Raul Ruiz, a Palm Desert Democrat, planned to learn if detainees had legal representation and had seen an immigration judge, and whether they had access to healthcare, hygiene and nutrition.

    “I had a questionnaire that was prepared with staff and the ACLU and other organizations that asked if they, for example, were allowed a lawyer, phone calls, if they were able to communicate with their loved ones, if they were read their rights,” Ruiz said.

    On Monday, July 7, he submitted a request to ICE to tour the facility last Friday with Rep. Norma Torres, an Ontario Democrat. An Instagram post by the two lawmakers showed an earlier message from Torres’ office on July 3, also asking to schedule a visit.

    Both requests complied with ICE requirements for 72 hours notice, Ruiz said. But those were courtesy gestures, he said, since federal law doesn’t require advance notice for Congressional oversight visits. When Ruiz and Torres arrived, ICE turned them away.

    “They turn around and tell me it’s now seven days notice,” he said. “They keep moving the goal post. We showed up in the hopes that Congressmember Norma Torres and I could enter the facility and speak with an ICE agent and do our jobs. As soon as they saw us they shut the gate and locked it with a chain and a deadbolt.”

    The two lawmakers posted a video outside the locked gate, demanding to enter and calling for the resignation of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.

    The same day, Ruiz said, Rep. Jay Obernolte, a Hesperia Republican, also scheduled a visit and was allowed inside.

    A statement from ICE said Obernolte had provided seven days notice for touring the detention facility, but Ruiz and Torres had not.

    “Congressman Raul Ruiz and Congresswoman Norma Torres showed up to Rep. Obernolte’s approved visit; ignoring the established DHS directive regarding visiting ICE facilities,” the agency stated. “They were advised that ICE would be more than happy to accommodate their visit—provided it was scheduled in accordance with DHS policy.”

    In a message on X after the visit Friday, Obernolte said he was satisfied with the conditions he observed. He toured the dormitories, cafeteria and recreation facilities, observed the meals and confirmed that detainees had access to legal counsel.

    “It’s clear to me that this facility is doing its job: ensuring that detainees are treated humanely – with access to medical care, legal representation, and timely hearings – while helping ICE carry out its mission to enforce our immigration laws,” Obernolte wrote.

    An earlier group of Southern California lawmakers who visited the facility in June reported problems with the facility. They found detainees were held “without enough food, clean clothing, the ability to call their families or access to a lawyer,” according to Rep. Judy Chu, a Pasadena Democrat.

    Ruiz said the 72 hour notice requirement - and even more so the seven day notice period - makes it hard to tell if the facility is consistently maintaining humane conditions, or has spruced them up in advance of a Congressional visit.

    He’ll try to schedule a visit again with at least seven days notice. If he still can’t get access, he’ll consider legal action to challenge the restrictions. The effort to access immigration detention facilities is about due process and also the workings of democracy, Ruiz said.

    “When you have an executive branch who’s purposely denying a member of the legislative branch to provide oversight of the executive branch, then you're starting to go down a very dangerous slippery slope that is contrary to the Constitution and ideas of the founding fathers and three co-equal branches of government,” Ruiz said. “They precisely did not want a single figure to act like a king.”

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • How to take advantage of LADWP’s instant rebate
    A screenshot of a web page that shows the price of a $59.99 air purifier going down to $0.
    The $0 cost might grab your eye, but be warned you'll still have to pay about $5 in sales tax.

    Topline:

    As Los Angeles deals with fire season and fluctuating air quality, LADWP customers can get an air purifier shipped to their home for the price of sale tax.

    Here’s what to do: First, make sure you’re an LADWP customer. If you are, find a bill or log in online to find your account number — you’ll need to input your address and account information to use the rebate. Then, go to this page on LADWP’s website and add the air purifier to your cart. You should see something like this:

    A screenshot showing a $50 instant rebate applied to the purchase of an air purifier. The subtotal is $0, and the only cost shown is $4.87 in sales tax.
    LADWP's website made getting the rebate on this air purifier very easy.
    (
    Screenshot from LADWP website
    )

    Is this for real?: I can personally confirm my purchase had no hidden fees, other than the sales tax on the $49.99 purchase. Be aware that the total seen above depends on a discount going on right now at many retailers, so if it ends the price would go up to about $15 including tax (still not a bad deal). It only let me add one purifier to my cart, for the record.

    How long will this rebate last?: LAist has reached out to LADWP to confirm.

    Shipping options: The order is fulfilled by Best Buy, and the one-week shipping option I chose was free. You can also pay for expedited shipping if you need it sooner.

    About the purifier: It’s a small Levoit air purifier with a nightlife that can handle rooms of about 250 square feet. You can find more specifications on LADWP’s website, including its energy efficiency ratings.

    Other rebates: Though most of the rebates on the LADWP site aren’t instant rebates, you can still use them for a variety of energy-efficient devices, including air conditioners, TVs and smart thermostats. Some of the rebates are up to $100 — you can explore the offerings here.

  • Sponsored message
  • Nearly 150,000 ballots rejected in primary
    A man pushes a cart with several green baskets containing stacks of ballots. On both sides of him are tall carts with white baskets and people are pictured in the background seated at long tables.
    Ballots are sorted the day after California’s primary election at the LA County Ballot Processing Center, June 3, 2026, in City of Industry, Calif.

    Topline:

    Nearly 150,000 California voters had their mail-in ballots rejected for the state’s June primary, a spike from recent elections even as the state attempts to make voting easier with the goal of boosting participation and counting every ballot.


    Why were the ballots rejected?: The primary driver of the higher rejection numbers is late-arriving ballots, according to data compiled by the secretary of state’s office. Voting experts suspect the main problem is postmarks on ballots that came after Election Day, making them ineligible to be counted. The culprit could be U.S. Postal Service changes that might affect the timing of when postmarks are applied. Kim Alexander, president of the nonpartisan California Voter Foundation, said the jump in rejected ballots because of lateness is a major concern that — along with postal procedures — might also be connected to a late surge in ballots in June. Many voters waited until the final days to make a decision in a wide-open and chaotic race for governor.

    United States Postal Service changes: In January, a group of mostly Democratic U.S. senators sent a letter to the U.S. Postal Service, alarmed that mail-processing changes might affect postmark dates for mail-in ballots during an election year that will determine control of Congress. Updated agency policy says postmarks might not indicate the first day the Postal Service received the mail, but rather the day it was handled in one of its processing centers. Those centers are increasingly likely to be further away from certain communities because of recent consolidations within the Postal Service, which could further delay postmarks.

    LOS ANGELES (AP) — Nearly 150,000 California voters had their mail-in ballots rejected for the state’s June primary, a spike from recent elections even as the state attempts to make voting easier with the goal of boosting participation and counting every ballot.

    California has become notorious for its ponderously slow vote counts that can drag on for weeks and sometimes longer, largely the result of multiple changes over the years that were intended to increase turnout but have done little to achieve that. Among the changes: Every voter receives a mail-in ballot that can arrive at an election office seven days late and still be counted, provided the envelope is postmarked by Election Day.

    Yet even with that generous weeklong window, the primary driver of the higher rejection numbers is late-arriving ballots, according to data compiled by the secretary of state’s office. Voting experts suspect the main problem is postmarks on ballots that came after Election Day, making them ineligible to be counted. The culprit could be U.S. Postal Service changes that might affect the timing of when postmarks are applied.

    Late-arriving ballots drove the rejections

    According to state data, 148,241 mail ballots were rejected in the June election, or a rate of 1.73% of all mail ballots.

    In raw numbers, that’s up from the 2024 primary, when 108,982 mail ballots were rejected, or a 1.56% rate. In 2022, 105,818 mail ballots were voided during the primary, or a rate similar to 2024.

    Lateness accounted for 93,479 rejected ballots in June, by far the largest category for disqualifying a ballot. That was up from about 70,000 in the 2022 primary and about 76,000 in the 2024 primary, though turnout in those elections was smaller compared to last June.

    Kim Alexander, president of the nonpartisan California Voter Foundation, said the jump in rejected ballots because of lateness is a major concern that — along with postal procedures — might also be connected to a late surge in ballots in June. Many voters waited until the final days to make a decision in a wide-open and chaotic race for governor.

    “Ballots rejected due to lateness are caused primarily to being postmarked too late to count, not because they arrived too late to count,” Alexander wrote in an email.

    Rejection rates have fluctuated over time, but the growing number of those set aside for lateness compared to recent elections “does really demand the question why this is happening,” said Mindy Romero, director of the Center for Inclusive Democracy, a nonpartisan research group.

    Lawmakers concerned about USPS postmark changes

    In January, a group of mostly Democratic U.S. senators sent a letter to the U.S. Postal Service, alarmed that mail-processing changes might affect postmark dates for mail-in ballots during an election year that will determine control of Congress.

    Updated agency policy says postmarks might not indicate the first day the Postal Service received the mail, but rather the day it was handled in one of its processing centers. Those centers are increasingly likely to be further away from certain communities because of recent consolidations within the Postal Service, which could further delay postmarks.

    On Thursday, two Wisconsin Democrats, U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin and Gov. Tony Evers, called on the Postal Service to address delays that caused hundreds of ballots to arrive after Election Day in the state in April. In June, a federal judge halted President Donald Trump’s executive order that sought to create a federal voter list and limit who can receive a mail ballot.

    Earlier this year, California election officials urged voters to send their mail ballots early, warning that Postal Service changes could lead to slower mail service.

    In California, the highest mail ballot rejection rate in June — 3.52% — was in Tulare County, in the agriculture-heavy Central Valley. It was followed by Alpine County, south of Lake Tahoe, and Merced County, also in the Central Valley, which both notched a 3.36% rejection rate.

    Mismatched signatures and multiple ballots in an envelope

    Nearly 44,000 ballots were set aside because the voter’s signature didn’t match the one on record with county officials. Over 8,300 ballots were rejected because there was no signature on the returned ballot envelope.

    In 743 cases, the voter had already cast a ballot, so the mail ballot was voided. Other reasons for rejection included a ballot being missing from the return envelope, or multiple ballots were sent back in a single envelope.

    The data didn’t break down the uncounted ballots by party registration.

    Florida, Texas and other large population states quickly wrap up vote counting, while California is a national laggard.

    After the June primary, President Donald Trump seized on California’s reputation as the national slowpoke in vote counting to renew his long-standing criticism of the state’s elections, while the Republican’s Department of Justice launched an investigation into Los Angeles County’s elections.

    There is no indication of any widespread problems with mail voting, which has gained in popularity among Democrats and Republicans alike. A report by the Brookings Institution published in 2025 found that the number of cases of mail voting fraud was minuscule — about four cases per 10 million mail ballots.

  • How is Shadow adapting to Jackie's absence?
    A bald eagle, with black feathers on its wings and white weathers on its tail, is in its nest.
    Bald eagle Jackie is seen laying an egg as captured by the Friends of Big Bear Valley and Big Bear Eagle Nest Cam

    Topline:

    An eagle believed to be Jackie, one of the beloved Big Bear eagles who've stolen hearts nationwide, is in critical condition and receiving care at the Ojai Raptor Center. With Jackie missing from the nest for over a week, what does it mean for her longtime partner, Shadow?

    Is it Jackie? While the eagle receiving care shows signs of being the famed Jackie, we can't be 100% certain it's her just yet. The last time Jackie was seen in the nest was July 12.

    Jackie's condition: A pair of subadult eagles in Big Bear Lake attacked her, and in a Thursday afternoon post, the Ojai Raptor Center said they were providing “around the clock” care for the eagle. They provided her with a blood transfusion, and ruled out lead poisoning as a cause for her continuing critical condition.

    Does Shadow now have a side piece? Shadow was seen on a Friend of Big Bear Valley stream on Wednesday socializing with a different subadult female eagle. Friends of Big Bear Valley say that the subadult eagle Shadow was spotted hanging out with could potentially be one of two that fought with Jackie.

    Is Shadow moving on? Lori Arent, assistant director at the Raptor Center at the University of Minnesota, said during an interview on LAist's daily news show, AirTalk, that it's unlikely Shadow's thinking about his dating prospects right now.  "It's not really that time of year where the hormones are going to be stimulating these birds to pair bond."

    Single dad Shadow: He's been seen defending the nest from other subadult eagles, and taking care of this year's eaglets, Sandy and Luna, who recently took their first flights. The new independence of the kiddos may mean that Shadow is less territorial and simply tolerating the female seen hanging around his nest, Arnet said.

    Does Shadow know Jackie is alive? Arnet said eagles don't have a reflective mindset to ponder this kind of question, and that he's likely not thinking about where Jackie is or isn't, but instead focusing on what the immediate needs of him and his children are.  "And so right now there's this other bird, and maybe if the fledglings are not around and he's not providing care, it's OK that this other bird is in his space."

    What's next: It's unclear when or if Jackie will be healthy enough to be released back into the wild or how Shadow and his potential new "friend" will react upon her return.

    Go Deeper: Listen to the full AirTalk conversation to hear about how Jackie dumped her last "life" partner for Shadow.

    Listen 16:25
    AirTalk: The latest with beloved Big Bear eagles Jackie and Shadow

  • More cases in the US this year than in all of 2025
    A woman wearing a plaid coat is pictured walking into a building. The door is being held open by a woman wearing a white sweater and black pants. In front of the entrance is a green sign with a white, left pointing arrow and the words "measles clinic" in white.
    A measles vaccination clinic at the Andrews County Health Department in Texas last year.
    Topline:
    The number of measles cases in the U.S. has surpassed the record-breaking tally for all of 2025, with five more months of 2026 still to come. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention logged 2,318 cases of measles as of Thursday, according to an agency update on Friday.


    Most cases in over 30 years: The nation had 2,289 cases in 2025, the worst year for measles in 35 years, Now, 2026 has easily become the U.S.’s worst year for measles since 1991, as major outbreaks in South Carolina, Utah and Arizona have sickened hundreds and smaller clusters of cases sparked in other states.

    Vaccination rates have fallen: The U.S. eliminated local measles spread in 2000 by maintaining high vaccination rates, which have fallen in recent years to below the 95% coverage needed to prevent outbreaks. In November, international health officials will meet to determine if the U.S. and Mexico have lost their measles-free status.

    The number of measles cases in the U.S. has surpassed the record-breaking tally for all of 2025, with five more months of 2026 still to come.

    The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention logged 2,318 cases of measles as of Thursday, according to an agency update on Friday.

    The nation had 2,289 cases in 2025, the worst year for measles in more than three decades. Now, 2026 has easily become the U.S.’s worst year for measles since 1991, as major outbreaks in South Carolina, Utah and Arizona have sickened hundreds and smaller clusters of cases sparked in other states.

    In November, international health officials will meet to determine if the U.S. and Mexico have lost their measles-free status. The U.S. eliminated local measles spread in 2000 by maintaining high vaccination rates, which have fallen in recent years to below the 95% coverage needed to prevent outbreaks.

    Measles Activity in California

    As of 12PM on July 20, 2026, there have been 52 confirmed measles cases reported. Details here: https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/Pages/Immunization/measles.aspx

    For context: Recent Measles Cases in California

    • In 2025, 25 cases were confirmed

    • In 2024, 15 cases were confirmed

    • In 2023, four cases were confirmed

    Measles cases are undercounted

    While measles cases in the U.S. are climbing, it may be impossible to say exactly how far-reaching the spread is. Public health departments and disease researchers have long acknowledged that official counts are incomplete, because some people get sick and don’t seek out treatment — something not unique to measles.

    Furthermore, experts say the spread might be greater than what’s known because the virus is one of the most contagious known to medicine and vaccination rates nationwide have declined. National vaccination rates for measles, mumps and rubella — which dropped to 92.5% among kindergartners in the 2024-25 school year, from 95.2% in 2019-20 — obscure even lower rates in certain communities.

    In Utah, where public health officials have fought measles for more than a year, the virus has sickened more than 700 people during that time, according to the state health department. Experts relying on mathematical modeling and genetic analyses indicate that a large outbreak on the Utah-Arizona border could be around three to four times bigger than what’s currently known, state epidemiologist Dr. Leisha Nolen said.

    The picture is muddier in South Carolina, which had the nation’s largest outbreak in 35 years. There, the 997 total is likely an undercount, the state health department has said, but it doesn’t know by how much.

    Dr. Brannon Traxler, acting director of the state department of health, said the undercount is “impossible to know and may vary during the course of an outbreak.”

    Data gaps can make it hard to reliably estimate an outbreak’s true scope. Experts say hospitalization rates can be a good barometer, but measles hospitalizations are not required to be reported in every state.

    “If we really had some kind of solid gold standard for the percentage of all cases that have hospitalization or some measure of severity, then that would be another way of estimating the outbreak size that we could see if it’s consistent with these other methods,” said Damon Toth, an applied mathematician at the University of Utah’s medical school who is working on one of the Utah outbreak analyses.

    Researchers are still analyzing the 2025 Texas outbreak

    In Texas, researchers are still working to estimate the size of the state’s 2025 outbreak and early findings show it might have been nearly twice the size of the 762 known cases.

    Rémy Pasco, a mathematical epidemiologist at the University of Colorado Boulder who is working on the analysis, said the undercounts were unsurprising. In the absence of an adequate community vaccination rate — 95% according to health experts — “there’s just not much you can do about measles once you have it,” he said.

    The CDC defines an outbreak as three or more linked cases. But by the time three such cases are identified in communities with low vaccination rates and less disease surveillance, “either you missed the previous ones or you’re going to have a lot more,” he added.

    Dr. Varun Shetty, Texas’ chief state epidemiologist, said there were instances where people tested positive for measles but health officials couldn’t confirm who else was in the person’s household or if they were sick.

    “What we’re able to count and report is almost always an underestimate of what actually occurred, because it relies on people being willing to be able to get tested, to share information with healthcare providers and with public health,” Shetty said. “Sometimes that just doesn’t happen.”

    The state health department previously reported that 182 probable measles cases went unconfirmed in March 2025 among minors in Gaines County — the epicenter of the outbreak — due to a lack of information. The confirmed case count for the western Texas county for the whole outbreak is 414.

    Shetty expects to keep seeing measles cases and even outbreaks because so many people are unprotected.

    “It’s really critical, not only for individual people, but for communities, to have high vaccination coverage,” he said.

    Vaccination is about protecting others, physician says

    Dr. Mark Roberts, retired director of the Public Health Dynamics Lab at the University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, worries most for the people he calls “innocent bystanders.”

    Research and measles modeling by his team shows those who cannot get vaccinated — young babies, people with weak immune systems and those who rarely don’t get robust immunity from the vaccine — bear the brunt of outbreaks early on.

    Some people see skipping vaccination as like deciding not to wear a seat belt in a car, Roberts said.

    “Not vaccinating your kid is like saying, ‘I don’t want my car to have brakes,’” he said. “Because it’s other people that you can hit. It’s not just you in your car. It’s other people.”

    ___

    The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.