Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • CA state employees alarmed by E-verify demand
    Signage outside a building reads "1501 Capitol Avenue. Department of Health care services. Department of Public Health."
    Department of Health Care Services headquarters in Sacramento.

    Topline:

    Close to 4,000 employees of the California Department of Public Health were told they must use the federal E-Verify system to keep federal funding. Unions are pushing back.

    More details: In the memo, a department human resources deputy director asked employees to comply with a series of deadlines that culminate on April 10. A separate document distributed by the department said that failing to complete the verification may result in the state losing a contract with the Centers for Disease Control for the national death index, which collects death certificate data from authorities nationwide.

    Union response: SEIU Local 1000 President Anica Walls told CalMatters in an email that forcing all employees to use E-Verify “raised serious concerns for our members about privacy, data security, and the unnecessary re-verification of workers who are already legally employed.”

    Read on... for more about the memo and response to it.

    About 4,000 California Department of Public Health employees have been told they must use a federal verification system to prove they’re U.S. citizens or otherwise legally eligible to work.

    Leaders of the agency said in a memo obtained by CalMatters that the verification is necessary to receive federal funding, but employees and unions are resisting the directive.

    In the memo, a department human resources deputy director asked employees to comply with a series of deadlines that culminate on April 10. A separate document distributed by the department said that failing to complete the verification may result in the state losing a contract with the Centers for Disease Control for the national death index, which collects death certificate data from authorities nationwide.

    The department is also making the move to address incomplete employment eligibility records identified in a recent audit, according to the Service Employees Union International Local 1000, which represents roughly 3,000 department employees.

    As at other U.S. employers, all new California health department employees complete a federal I-9 form to prove their eligibility to work. The department is now asking them to enroll in E-Verify, a program administered by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Social Security Administration. That system compares information provided by an employee on the I-9 to records in federal databases, including at Social Security and the Department of Homeland Security. In some cases it also prompts employers to compare each applicant’s identification document photo with the one they provided during the E-Verify process. The memo said employees will specifically use E-Verify+, which combines filling out an I-9 with verification. Employees hired before November can opt out of using that specific version of E-Verify.

    SEIU Local 1000 President Anica Walls told CalMatters in an email that forcing all employees to use E-Verify “raised serious concerns for our members about privacy, data security, and the unnecessary re-verification of workers who are already legally employed.”

    The union sent a petition to executives in charge of the state agency last month to express concern about the verification and underline that employees submitted documents to prove their work eligibility when they were hired. Walls told CalMatters the health agency is currently the only California state department the union is aware of that has asked their employees to recertify their legal status. The union represents about 100,000 state employees at 140 state agencies, boards, commissions and departments.

    “When federal systems and funding conditions are used to justify expanded data collection from workers, it raises red flags — especially when those workers have already met employment eligibility requirements,” she wrote. “Our members are concerned about their personal data being sent to federal systems with known accuracy and security issues. And this is coming at a time when both U.S. citizens and immigrant workers are understandably concerned about how employment data could be accessed or used by federal agencies.”

    The E-Verify+ requirement is creating fear and uncertainty among employees and may affect employee recruitment and retention in the future, said Jacqueline Tkac, president of the California Association of Professional Scientists-UAW Local 1115, a union that represents roughly 800 health department employees. Amid reports of ICE activity at workplaces and people being taken off the street, the timing could not be worse.

    “E-Verify+ is not a neutral administrative tool. It’s deeply integrated with DHS databases, including systems used by ICE, and relies on biometrics and cross-agency data sharing,” she said in a statement shared with CalMatters. “Introducing this at a time when immigrant communities and public health scientists are being openly targeted by the current federal administration is extremely chilling.”

    The California Department of Public Health did not respond to multiple requests to answer questions. State information officer Nicole Skow told CalMatters that the California Department of Human Resources does not monitor how state agencies verify employment eligibility and that use of E-Verify is determined at a department level.

    It raises red flags — especially when those workers have already met employment eligibility requirements.
    — Anica Walls, president, SEIU Local 1000

    Since it became available in the 1990s, E-Verify has been, by default, a voluntary program for employers, but it has become mandatory for more and more of them over time. The federal government has required E-Verify for certain contracts since 2009 and more than 20 states now require E-Verify for their own contracts or to issue business licenses. Earlier this month, Florida lawmakers passed a bill that requires employers of all sizes to use the federal program.

    Critics of E-Verify say the program needs reforms to address instances in which it makes mistakes, including cases where people commit identity fraud to get jobs they shouldn’t have and false positives leading people to lose jobs that they were lawfully allowed to have. Based on Bureau of Labor Statistics data and the E-Verify error rate, if Congress passed an E-Verify mandate today, the work eligibility status of more than 120,000 people would get inaccurately labeled, allowing ineligible immigrants to work and labeling some authorized workers ineligible, which could lead to loss of wages or jobs, said Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Democrat from Maryland, during a hearing last month where members of Congress debated a bill that would require E-Verify use for all federal contracts.

    The health department’s push to prove eligibility comes at a time when the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency is ramping up I-9 audits that may precede raids. It also comes on the heels of ICE agents shooting and killing two people in Minnesota, the deaths of multiple people in ICE detention facilities, and multiple news reports that the Department of Homeland Security wants to bring similar tactics to California and New York.

    It’s possible the department wants to prepare for or forestall an audit from ICE. I-9 audits increased in Minnesota in recent weeks, Minneapolis-based immigration attorney Matthew Webster told CalMatters. Webster said some appear indiscriminate, with audit notices “basically just being dropped off door to door,” and some seeming to be retaliatory, like a hospital where staff protested ICE’s treatment of a patient shortly before the hospital was audited, and a St. Paul toy store that gave away whistles that protesters use to alert their neighbors to ICE activity, also shortly before it was audited. Webster expects such audits to become more commonplace as tens of billions of dollars continue to pour into the law enforcement agency from the federal budget.

    A set of “Frequently Asked Questions” drafted by the California Department of Public Health and distributed to employees describes E-Verify+ as intended to “reduce errors, streamline onboarding, and improve the overall employee experience.”

    But one employee, who asked to remain anonymous to avoid retaliation, told CalMatters that in light of recent events, they’re concerned about the department providing employee photos to the Department of Homeland Security under E-Verify. They also said the health department should have made it clearer that employees could opt out of the “plus” version of E-Verify and should extend this option to people hired since November, who must always use E-Verify+, according to the questions document.

    “Nowhere in the memo does it tell us we can opt out,” they said. “That information only came after employees raised concerns to the director.”

    For the record: The original version of this story did not correctly describe what health department workers are being asked to verify. It is employment eligibility, whether through citizenship or other legal channels.

  • Angelenos slow to adopt driverless vehicles
    A Waymo autonomous Jaguar electric vehicle is seen in Tempe, Ariz.

    Topline:

    About 5% of L.A. County residents have taken a driverless vehicle in the last year, compared to about 28% who used ridehailing apps like Uber and Lyft, according to the results of a USC survey published today.

    Why not Waymo? The survey found that slightly more people felt safe with a driver in the car versus a robotaxi, but they feel even safer driving themselves. Waymos’ service area is also smaller than ridehailing apps.

    What to look for in the future: “We see a small drop in use of traditional ride-hailing services like Uber and Lyft in the last year,” said the survey’s director Kyla Thomas. “I wonder if Waymo is responsible for that — are we going to see Waymo slowly replace these?  Or how will perceptions of safety evolve? I'm very, very curious to keep tracking that.”

    Read on... to learn more about the results.

    Waymos sometimes feel like they’re all over many parts of Los Angeles, but the vast majority of Angelenos haven’t been quick to adopt the new technology.

    About 5% of L.A. County residents have taken a driverless vehicle in the last year, compared to about 28% who used ridehailing apps like Uber and Lyft, according to the results of a USC survey published Thursday.

    Sociologist Kyla Thomas directs the LABarometer survey, which measures the habits and wellbeing of L.A. County residents, and decided to add questions about driverless vehicle use for the first time since the driverless cars became open to the public in November 2024 — largely out of curiosity.

    “Certainly in my neighborhood in Culver City, I see Waymos everywhere,” Thomas said. “But when you look at the whole county population, how many people are actually using it?”

    Why not Waymo?

    The survey found that slightly more people felt safe using a ridehailing app versus a robotaxi — 12% versus 9% — but 27% of people feel safe driving themselves.

    “Waymos have not reached, in terms of safety, the comfort level that people feel in their own car,” Thomas said.

    LAist has reached out to Waymo for comment, but hasn't heard back.

    Thomas also mentioned convenience and availability as reasons why people aren’t taking Waymos — the cars don’t yet serve any major airports, let alone operate in the San Fernando or San Gabriel valleys, Southeast L.A., and most of the rest of L.A. County. Waymo doesn’t yet have any robotaxi competitors offering rides to the public in the region.

     “Currently, Waymo's coverage area is not as wide as Uber or Lyft, and so as that expands, we might see Waymo use expand,” Thomas said. “I'm very curious to see how this evolves.”

    One of the biggest reasons why Waymo and other ridehailing services don’t have more riders in L.A. won’t be a surprise: People overwhelmingly drive themselves. Of the survey’s respondents, 91% were drivers or passengers in private vehicles, by far the most common method of transportation.

    For comparison, the next most-common category of transportation — walking, skateboards and kick scooters — was used by just 30% of survey respondents.

    Other impressions of Waymo

    Though people felt less safe in Waymos compared to cars with drivers in them, that perception flipped when people were asked about how safe they felt from harassment — at least for one major demographic.

    “Women feel a lot safer in a Waymo compared to an Uber or Lyft,” Thomas said. “Men, we just see just a few percentage point difference in how they're perceiving these different modes.”

    Thomas added that she’s already wondering whether Waymo use will become more common if its service area continues to expand.

    “We see a small drop in use of traditional ride-hailing services like Uber and Lyft in the last year,” Thomas said. “I wonder if Waymo is responsible for that — are we going to see Waymo slowly replace these?  Or how will perceptions of safety evolve? I'm very, very curious to keep tracking that.”

  • Sponsored message
  • Will districts hold bond elections this year?
    A locker room with three section of yellow lockers in rows and blue benches in the center of each aisle.
    The lockers at Hosler Middle School in the Lynwood Unified School District where voters approved an $80 million bond in 2024.

    Topline:

    District leaders across L.A. County are considering whether to ask voters to approve property tax increases this November to fund repairs and renovations ahead of an Aug. 7 deadline.

    Why it matters: Many California schools are at least 50 years old and there’s no dedicated stream of public funding to support their upkeep. Even with a record number of school bonds and a $10 billion statewide bond approved in the 2024 election, many districts are still strapped for funding to repair aging infrastructure and update classrooms.

    How school bonds work: Bonds function like loans. School districts issue bonds to fund facility maintenance and construction and the principal and interest are paid back through property tax increases.

    What we know now: At least four L.A. County school districts have called for a bond measure:

    • Bellflower Unified School District in Southeast L.A. County
    • Hawthorne School District in the South Bay 
    • Keppel Union School District in the Antelope Valley 
    • Valle Lindo School District in the San Gabriel Valley

    What's next: After Aug. 7, we’ll know exactly how many of the county’s 80 school districts will have bond measures on the ballot and work to answer your questions about them in our Voter Game Plan.

    Read on… to learn more about school funding measures. 

    With students are out of school, district leaders across L.A. County are deciding whether to ask voters to approve property tax increases this November to fund repairs and renovations.

    District governing boards have until Aug. 7 to call for ballot measures.

    Even with a record number of school bonds and a $10 billion statewide bond approved in the 2024 election, many districts are still strapped for funding to repair aging infrastructure and update classrooms.

    The Bellflower Unified School District Board voted unanimously in mid June to ask voters to approve a $135 million bond.

    Got school ballot measure questions?

    We want to answer them in our Voter Game Plan. We also want to hear about what repairs your local school needs. Email the reporter with the subject line “2026 school elections.” 

    “ Schools are the heart of communities,” said Erin Simon, superintendent of the Southeast L.A. County district. “You want your school to be something that is aesthetically amazing and beautiful, and places that your kids want to come to, and places that your families want to send [their] kids to.”

    For example, Bellflower High School just celebrated its 75th anniversary and its athletic facilities are showing their age. The district’s facilities master plan calls for new turf in the stadium and locker rooms that are more accessible for students with disabilities.

    Simon said the master plan also identified the need for new roofs, restrooms, plumbing and electrical systems throughout the district.

    At least three other L.A. County school districts have called for bond measures so far.

    Voter-approved school funding defined

    Bond measure

    When voters approve a local school bond, it authorizes districts to borrow money to pay for big projects like repairs and construction. Residents pay back the loan and interest through an increase in property taxes. Local bonds need either a two-thirds or 55% vote to pass; the latter comes with increased accountability measures.

    Parcel tax

    Voters who approve a parcel tax agree to a predetermined tax on each parcel of property to fund school programs, typically not related to facilities upkeep. These measures require a two-thirds vote to pass.

  • The event runs from July 17 to Aug. 16
    A close-up photo of an amusement park ride — a neon green car is racing along a roller coaster track. Half the people are laughing and smiling and the other half looks like they are screaming for it all to end.
    The 2026 Orange County Fair kicks off Friday and is expected to draw hundreds of thousands of people to Costa Mesa.

    Topline:

    The Orange County Fair is back on Friday for its 23-day run in Costa Mesa.

    What is there to do? The fair features rides, games, wacky food and thrilling shows, like the demolition derbies and live music.

    Read on … for the lowdown on this year’s fair.

    The 2026 Orange County Fair kicks off Friday and is expected to draw hundreds of thousands of people to Costa Mesa. To help you best plan for the summer tradition, here’s everything you need to know about the 23-day fest.

    Gates at the OC Event Center at 88 Fair Dr. open on Wednesdays, Thursdays and Sundays from 11 a.m. to 11 p.m. Fridays and Saturdays will have extended hours from 11 a.m. to midnight.

    The fair ends Aug. 16.

    What is there to see and do? 

    Whether you're a thrill seeker, a foodie, or just there for the vibes, the fair should have something for everyone.

    Dozens of carnival rides will include the return of Joker 360, which swings riders into the air while also spinning and flipping. You can also see the Dragon Knights Stilt Show, performers who spring into the air on stilts.

    The Action Sports Arena will also feature motorists zipping around inside the Globe of Death and the demolition derby series will return. Tickets to the various shows can be found here.

    You can also catch live music at The Hangar or the Pacific Amphitheater throughout the fair’s run. Concert tickets include same-day access to the fair.

    El Pachuco Zoot Suit Fashion Show and Lowrider exhibit is a new addition to the fair that will pay homage to the Chicano community’s history, influence and style.

    Fair food is a given. For a chance to try a little bit of everything, fairgoers can try the Taste of the Fair promotion, which offers a variety of delights for just $5 at participating booths.

    Buying tickets 

    Pre-sale tickets are discounted until Thursday, July 16.

    Here’s how much regular tickets cost:

    • General admission on Wednesday and Thursday: $13
    • General admission on  Friday, Saturday and Sunday: $18
    • Seniors ages 65 and up: $10
    • Kids ages 6 through 12: $9 
    • Kids ages 5 and younger can enter for free

    Other admission options include the Every Day Passport. For $60, visitors can enter the fairgrounds every day, including sold-out dates. There are no blackout dates or restrictions.

    What about transportation? 

    There are many ways to get to the fair, but public transportation and rideshare are encouraged.

    Parking is $15 for cars and motorcycles, and $30 for limos and buses.

    Buses will transport fairgoers to and from one of six locations directly to the OC Fair between 10:30 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. on Saturdays and 10:30 a.m. and 11:30 p.m. on Sundays. Rides are $2 each way. Your OC Fair tickets must be purchased in advance to ride.

    A bonus for bookworms

    Kids ages 5 through 11 who read three books can qualify for two free rides at the fair’s Kidland. Fill out this form to receive a QR code.

  • City to put ranked-choice voting on ballot
    A white man with a beard stands at a covered voting area to fill out his ballot. The cover has the Orange County seal on it.
    An Orange County voter casts his ballot in November 2025.

    Topline:

    Irvine's City Council voted Tuesday to put ranked-choice voting on the November ballot. If approved, the city could potentially switch to the system in 2028. Some council members, however, are worried about the costs.

    Ranked-choice voting: Under this system, voters can rank candidates in order of preference. All top-pick votes are tallied up first. If no one wins, tallies move onto the second choices and so on. Proponents of the method say it allows for fairer outcomes and broadly-supported winners.

    The context: Other cities in California, like Redondo Beach, have implemented the system. For Orange County, Irvine would be one of the first. The only other is expected to be Huntington Beach, which was recently ordered by a judge to switch.

    The concern: It’s unclear how much this could cost. The council agreed on an amendment that would put a cap on estimated costs, using a percentage of the city’s budget for that year. If it exceeds that, then the city would not use the method in that election.

    Read on…. to learn more about what the ballot measure would do.

    Irvine voters will have an important question at the ballot box in November: Do you want ranked-choice voting?

    Late Tuesday, the City Council agreed to place a measure that would switch council and mayoral elections to the system in 2028, as long as the cost stays within certain parameters. Mayor Larry Agran and council members James Mai and Mike Carroll voted no.

    If passed, Irvine would be one of two Orange County cities to have the system. It comes as a judge recently ordered Huntington Beach to use the method. Several California cities, like Redondo Beach in L.A. County, have implemented ranked-choice voting in recent years.

    What Irvine’s vote does

    Right now, Irvine uses the system voters recognize: You cast your vote for one candidate, and if they don’t reach a certain percentage, the race heads to a runoff where you vote again months later.

    In November, Irvine voters will be asked about switching to ranked-choice voting. Councilmember Kathleen Treseder, who originally introduced the measure, says this will help stop special interests from using “spoiler candidates” to take votes away from someone they don’t want to win.

    “I am confident that, if we have ranked-choice voting, it’s going to improve the voice of the voters and have better outcomes,” she said.

    The Cal RCV Institute, a supporter of the measure, says it allows for fairer outcomes and more broadly-supported winners. Here's a visual guide to how it works:

    Under the ordinance, ranked-choice voting could happen starting in 2028 — as long as Irvine can feasibly do it technically and financially. Money was a big concern in the council vote because the city’s growing deficit is projected to reach $47 million by the end of the decade.

    If voters approve the measure, Irvine would have upfront costs, like redesigning its ballots, training staff and educating voters. (Some political organizations are expected to help with that.)

    It’s not clear exactly how pricey switching could be, but the first time is expected to be more than what elections cost now. Council members ultimately compromised and put a hard cap into the measure.

    If costs are estimated to go over 0.23% of the city’s general fund budget (that’s $710,000 today), ranked-choice voting would not be used at the next election. The estimated cost of each subsequent election would be checked until the cost is low enough for the city to switch.

    Carroll, who voted no, called out the calculation method because it came from an advocacy group. He disagreed with basing the cap on a budget that hasn’t been decided yet.

    “God bless them, they’re allowed to push it, but I want to be clear that this is lawyering that has no specificity,” he said.

    How ranked-choice voting works

    Voters rank candidates in order of preference. All top-pick votes are tallied up first. If anyone receives more than 50%, they win. If no one does, the candidate with the least votes is eliminated.

    All voters who had that person as their first-choice pick then have their second-choice candidates tallied. The process repeats until a candidate gets a majority of votes. You can learn more about it in our guide here.

    The ballot measure would need a simple majority to pass — that’s 50% plus one vote — and it would be in effect until voters want to change it.

    Irvine’s ballot would be designed to allow for at least five ranked choices, and you’d be able to rank write-in candidates as well.

    Under the motion, preliminary vote tallies would still be released alongside results for other races.