Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • CA state employees alarmed by E-verify demand
    Signage outside a building reads "1501 Capitol Avenue. Department of Health care services. Department of Public Health."
    Department of Health Care Services headquarters in Sacramento.

    Topline:

    Close to 4,000 employees of the California Department of Public Health were told they must use the federal E-Verify system to keep federal funding. Unions are pushing back.

    More details: In the memo, a department human resources deputy director asked employees to comply with a series of deadlines that culminate on April 10. A separate document distributed by the department said that failing to complete the verification may result in the state losing a contract with the Centers for Disease Control for the national death index, which collects death certificate data from authorities nationwide.

    Union response: SEIU Local 1000 President Anica Walls told CalMatters in an email that forcing all employees to use E-Verify “raised serious concerns for our members about privacy, data security, and the unnecessary re-verification of workers who are already legally employed.”

    Read on... for more about the memo and response to it.

    About 4,000 California Department of Public Health employees have been told they must use a federal verification system to prove they’re U.S. citizens.

    Leaders of the agency said in a memo obtained by CalMatters that the verification is necessary to receive federal funding, but employees and unions are resisting the directive.

    In the memo, a department human resources deputy director asked employees to comply with a series of deadlines that culminate on April 10. A separate document distributed by the department said that failing to complete the verification may result in the state losing a contract with the Centers for Disease Control for the national death index, which collects death certificate data from authorities nationwide.

    The department is also making the move to address incomplete employment eligibility records identified in a recent audit, according to the Service Employees Union International Local 1000, which represents roughly 3,000 department employees.

    As at other U.S. employers, all new California health department employees complete a federal I-9 form to prove their citizenship. The department is now asking them to enroll in E-Verify, a program administered by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Social Security Administration. That system compares information provided by an employee on the I-9 to records in federal databases, including at Social Security and the Department of Homeland Security. In some cases it also prompts employers to compare each applicant’s identification document photo with the one they provided during the E-Verify process. The memo said employees will specifically use E-Verify+, which combines filling out an I-9 with verification. Employees hired before November can opt out of using that specific version of E-Verify.

    SEIU Local 1000 President Anica Walls told CalMatters in an email that forcing all employees to use E-Verify “raised serious concerns for our members about privacy, data security, and the unnecessary re-verification of workers who are already legally employed.”

    The union sent a petition to executives in charge of the state agency last month to express concern about the verification and underline that employees submitted documents to prove their citizenship when they were hired. Walls told CalMatters the health agency is currently the only California state department the union is aware of that has asked their employees to recertify their citizenship status. The union represents about 100,000 state employees at 140 state agencies, boards, commissions and departments.

    “When federal systems and funding conditions are used to justify expanded data collection from workers, it raises red flags — especially when those workers have already met employment eligibility requirements,” she wrote. “Our members are concerned about their personal data being sent to federal systems with known accuracy and security issues. And this is coming at a time when both U.S. citizens and immigrant workers are understandably concerned about how employment data could be accessed or used by federal agencies.”

    The E-Verify+ requirement is creating fear and uncertainty among employees and may affect employee recruitment and retention in the future, said Jacqueline Tkac, president of the California Association of Professional Scientists-UAW Local 1115, a union that represents roughly 800 health department employees. Amid reports of ICE activity at workplaces and people being taken off the street, the timing could not be worse.

    “E-verify+ is not a neutral administrative tool. It’s deeply integrated with DHS databases, including systems used by ICE, and relies on biometrics and cross-agency data sharing,” she said in a statement shared with CalMatters. “Introducing this at a time when immigrant communities and public health scientists are being openly targeted by the current federal administration is extremely chilling.”

    The California Department of Public Health did not respond to multiple requests to answer questions. State information officer Nicole Skow told CalMatters that the California Department of Human Resources does not monitor how state agencies verify employment eligibility and that use of E-Verify is determined at a department level.

    It raises red flags — especially when those workers have already met employment eligibility requirements.
    — Anica Walls, president, SEIU Local 1000

    Since it became available in the 1990s, E-Verify has been, by default, a voluntary program for employers, but it has become mandatory for more and more of them over time. The federal government has required E-Verify for certain contracts since 2009 and more than 20 states now require E-Verify for their own contracts or to issue business licenses. Earlier this month, Florida lawmakers passed a bill that requires employers of all sizes to use the federal program.

    Critics of E-Verify say the program needs reforms to address instances in which it makes mistakes, including cases where people commit identity fraud to get jobs they shouldn’t have and false positives leading people to lose jobs that they were lawfully allowed to have. Based on Bureau of Labor Statistics data and the E-Verify error rate, if Congress passed an E-Verify mandate today, the citizenship status of more than 120,000 people would get inaccurately labeled, allowing ineligible immigrants to work and labeling some U.S. citizens ineligible to work, which could lead to loss of wages or jobs, said Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Democrat from Maryland, during a hearing last month where members of Congress debated a bill that would require E-Verify use for all federal contracts.

    The health department’s push to prove citizenship comes at a time when the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency is ramping up I-9 audits that may precede raids. It also comes on the heels of ICE agents shooting and killing two people in Minnesota, the deaths of multiple people in ICE detention facilities, and multiple news reports that the Department of Homeland Security wants to bring similar tactics to California and New York.

    It’s possible the department wants to prepare for or forestall an audit from ICE. I-9 audits increased in Minnesota in recent weeks, Minneapolis-based immigration attorney Matthew Webster told CalMatters. Webster said some appear indiscriminate, with audit notices “basically just being dropped off door to door,” and some seeming to be retaliatory, like a hospital where staff protested ICE’s treatment of a patient shortly before the hospital was audited, and a St. Paul toy store that gave away whistles that protesters use to alert their neighbors to ICE activity, also shortly before it was audited. Webster expects such audits to become more commonplace as tens of billions of dollars continue to pour into the law enforcement agency from the federal budget.

    A set of “Frequently Asked Questions” drafted by the California Department of Public Health and distributed to employees describes E-Verify+ as intended to “reduce errors, streamline onboarding, and improve the overall employee experience.”

    But one employee, who asked to remain anonymous to avoid retaliation, told CalMatters that in light of recent events, they’re concerned about the department providing employee photos to the Department of Homeland Security under E-Verify. They also said the health department should have made it clearer that employees could opt out of the “plus” version of E-Verify and should extend this option to people hired since November, who must always use E-Verify+, according to the questions document.

    “Nowhere in the memo does it tell us we can opt out,” they said. “That information only came after employees raised concerns to the director.”

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • LA County considers plans near Olympic venues
    An aerial view of audience stands and a grassy field. Buildings are in the distance behind the arena.
    The Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum is among the Olympic venues for the 2028 Games.

    Topline:

    L.A. County is considering plans to remove potentially thousands of unhoused people from areas around sports venues ahead of the Olympic Games in 2028.

    What is the report: County officials issued a strategy report last week advising local governments on how to clear people from encampments near major events and move them into temporary housing. However, the same report notes that there are concerns there won't be enough beds and there's no new funding for such an effort.

    Reaction: Shayla Myers with the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles said the plan is aimed at eliminating visible signs of homelessness for the Olympics, rather than actually addressing the root causes of the housing crisis.

    Read on... for more what else is in the report.

    L.A. County is considering plans to remove potentially thousands of unhoused people from areas around sports venues ahead of the Olympic Games in 2028.

    County officials issued a strategy report last week advising local governments on how to clear people from encampments near major events and move them into temporary housing. However, the same report notes that there are concerns there won't be enough beds and there's no new funding for such an effort.

    Sarah Mahin, L.A. County's director of Homelessness Services and Housing, submitted the report at the direction of the Board of Supervisors. It’s one of the first indications of how homelessness in the region might be approached ahead of and during the Olympic Games.

    Shayla Myers with the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles said the plan is aimed at eliminating visible signs of homelessness for the Olympics, rather than addressing the root causes of the housing crisis.

    " You're not actually getting people off the streets. You're simply attempting to make specific locations clear," she said of the county's approach. "It is about taking resources to clear encampments in the most visible locations when you have cameras and tourists all putting their focus on Los Angeles."

    L.A. County's Homeless Services and Housing Department did not immediately return requests for comment.

    Efforts to remove unhoused people will focus on the security perimeters of Olympic venues, according to the county's report.

    "The County will use any established security perimeters…to identify and coordinate with host jurisdictions to prioritize encampments that may be affected," Mahin wrote.

    LA28, the private nonprofit planning the Olympics, also told the county that those security perimeters would be its focus, according to the report.

    “In the event that LA28 is advised that relocating unhoused individuals may be necessary for their own safety, we will ensure that the appropriate local government stakeholders have sufficient time to plan for the necessary services and housing support,” LA28 wrote in a statement to LAist. 

    A spokesperson for L.A. Mayor Karen Bass said her office was in touch with the report's authors to "discuss next steps in continuing efforts to address this humanitarian crisis."

    As part of the regional strategy, the county has developed a tool to estimate costs for cities looking at removing encampments around venues. That tool allows local jurisdictions to enter the expected number of people, the percentage of individuals who will go into shelters, and how many people will need long-term housing support.

    How LA houses unhoused people

    L.A. has several distinct programs that house people, but they can be broken up into a few broad categories:

    Temporary housing: Whatever you think of as a “homeless shelter” would be included here. This kind of housing isn’t meant to be long term — whether it’s group shelters, tiny home villages, or repurposed hotels and motels. The goal of these programs is for people to stay until they can find permanent housing.

    Permanent housing: This is housing you can stay in long term, like an apartment with a renewable yearlong lease. The government provides permanent housing for unhoused people in two main ways:

    • Tenant-based vouchers: Think of these sort of as housing coupons that make privately owned units affordable for people with low incomes. 
    • New permanent housing units: These are either newly constructed with government money (like Proposition HHH) or existing units that local governments acquire for housing.

    Myers with the Legal Aid Foundation said she appreciated the county's focus on moving people into shelters, but that the plan would open up unhoused people to possible criminalization.

    "The first round is to offer shelter, and the second round is often to bring in cops or to put up fences or to invest in citations," she said.

    The report includes the latest "point in time" count of people living outside in the council districts of Los Angeles hosting Olympic events, as well as other host cities like Long Beach and Pasadena. In total, that number is more than 5,300 people.

    "However, the number of unsheltered individuals in the areas immediately surrounding event venues should be reassessed closer to event dates to ensure an accurate estimate," the report states.

    County supervisors Hilda Solis and Janice Hahn introduced a motion asking for the report in 2024, referencing concerns about public perception of local government's approach to homelessness ahead of many major events coming to Los Angeles.

    "Efforts to address homelessness in advance of international sporting events in other jurisdictions have had uneven results, leading to accusations that governments are busing unhoused individuals to the outskirts of host cities without addressing the underlying lack of shelter capacity," the motion states.

    The county's guidance points out that additional resources for plans to clear encampments at this point don't exist.

    Representatives for Long Beach, for example, told the county that it could be challenging to secure motel rooms for interim housing at typical rates around the Olympics. The city also expressed concern about unsheltered people and at-risk tenants being displaced. 

    Clearing encampments without enough housing resources could lead to displacing more unhoused people and those at risk of homelessness, Mahin wrote.

    2028 Olympics FAQ

    How is Los Angeles preparing for the Games? Who is on the hook to pay for the 2028 Olympics?

  • Sponsored message
  • Beauty 2 the Streetz remembers nonprofit founder
    Shirley Raines posing in front of a colorful "TikTok House Party" step-and-repeat backdrop. She is wearing a vibrant, black blazer dress covered in eclectic, neon-colored patches and graphic prints. She has her hand on her hip and is looking directly at the camera with a confident smile.
    Shirley Raines attends TikTok House Party at VidCon 2022 in Anaheim. She died this week at age 58.

    Topline:

    Shirley Raines, who focused her work on building up the dignity of unhoused people in L.A., has died. She was 58.

    About Raines: Known as Ms. Shirley to friends and followers on social media, Raines won a CNN Hero of the Year award in 2021 and an NAACP Image Award in 2025 for her work providing food, makeovers and hygiene products to unhoused people through Beauty 2 the Streetz.

    Raines’ background: Raines, who is from Compton, turned to personal beauty to help her cope with the loss of her infant son decades ago, focusing her efforts on building up the dignity of all people, even those society would consider “broken.”

    "This surely hasn't been easy. I stand before you a very broken woman," she said when accepting her CNN award in 2021. “There are a lot of people in the street that are without a mother, and I feel like it's a fair exchange. I'm here for them."

    Raines's cause of death is not yet known. She is survived by her sister and five of her six children, who often appeared in her social media posts.

    Shirley Raines smiles at the 2022 Long Beach Pride Parade. She is wearing a vibrant, oversized rainbow feathered boa that wraps around her shoulders and a red baseball cap adorned with jewels.
    Beauty 2 The Streetz founder Shirley Raines attends the 2022 Long Beach Pride Parade in Long Beach, California. She was grand marshal for the parade that year.
    (
    Chelsea Guglielmino
    /
    Getty Images North America
    )

    What Beauty 2 the Streetz has said: “This loss is devastating to the entire Beauty 2 The Streetz team, the communities we serve, and the countless individuals whose lives were forever changed by Ms. Shirley’s love, generosity, and selfless service,” the organization said in an Instagram post announcing Raines’ death. “Her legacy will continue to live on through the work she started and the hearts she touched.”

    About Beauty 2 the Streetz: Even before starting her nonprofit, Raines did outreach work on Skid Row. She started Beauty 2 the Streetz as a social media page in 2017 after Skid Row residents complimented her style as she was doing outreach work. So she gave them makeovers, growing from a social media page to a full-fledged nonprofit.

  • HB blocked in bid to require ID at the polls
    A man with a white hat, gray shirt, and red shorts drops a white envelope into a yellow and white metal box with large black letters that say "Official Ballot Drop Box."
    Dropping a ballot in an official ballot drop box in Huntington Beach.

    Topline:

    Huntington Beach's controversial voter ID law is illegal and cannot be implemented. That’s the upshot following this week's California Supreme Court decision not to review a lower court decision striking the law down.

    The backstory: Huntington Beach voters approved a measure in 2024 allowing the city to require people to show ID when casting a ballot. That contradicts state law — voters in California are asked to provide ID when they register to vote, but generally not at polling places. The state and a Huntington Beach resident subsequently sued the city to block it, leading to this week's legal action.

    What’s next? California voters may get a chance to weigh in on the debate this fall if a voter ID initiative makes it to the ballot. The initiative would require people to show a photo ID when they vote, or to include the last four digits of a government issued ID on their mail-in ballots.

    Huntington Beach's controversial voter ID law is illegal and cannot be implemented. That’s the upshot following this week's California Supreme Court decision not to review a lower court ruling striking the law down.

    The backstory

    Huntington Beach voters approved a measure in 2024 allowing the city to require people to show ID when casting a ballot. That contradicts state law — voters in California are asked to provide ID when they register to vote, but generally not at polling places. The state and a Huntington Beach resident subsequently sued the city.

    The city’s argument

    The city has tried to argue that it can implement its own rules for citywide elections because it’s a charter city, which gives it more autonomy. Last year, an appeals court rejected that argument and blocked the voter ID law.

    Reactions to the ruling

    California leaders applauded the state high court’s refusal to review the case.

    “Today’s victory makes one thing crystal clear: No city in our state, charter and non-charter alike, is above the law,” California Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a statement.

    Secretary of State Shirley Weber called the decision “another victory for California, for voters, and for democracy.”

    LAist has reached out to Huntington Beach Mayor Casey McKeon and a city spokesperson for comment.

    The bigger picture

    Voter ID has long been a controversial issue. Supporters say it’s a commonsense measure to prevent voter fraud. Opponents say it’s an unnecessary barrier considering that proven voter fraud is exceedingly rare, despite occasional political stunts meant to expose flaws in the system.

    What’s next?

    California voters may get a chance to weigh in on the debate this fall if a voter ID initiative makes it to the ballot. The initiative would require people to show a photo ID when they vote, or to include the last four digits of a government issued ID on their mail-in ballots.

    How to keep tabs on Huntington Beach

    • Huntington Beach holds City Council meetings on the first and third Tuesday of each month at 6 p.m. at City Hall, 2000 Main St.
    • You can also watch City Council meetings remotely on HBTV via Channel 3 or online, or via the city’s website. (You can also find videos of previous council meetings there.)
    • The public comment period happens toward the beginning of meetings.
    • The city generally posts agendas for City Council meetings on the previous Friday. You can find the agenda on the city’s calendar or sign up there to have agendas sent to your inbox.

  • An interview with Grammy-nominated jazz vocalist
    A man with dark skin tone, wearing a striped shirt and gray pants, sits on a yellow single sofa next to a stand with a lamp on one stand and magazine stand and plan on the other side. He looks at the camera.

    Topline:

    With the release of his sophomore album, Fly, in October 2024, jazz vocalist, composer and songwriter Michael Mayo ascended to new artistic heights.

    L.A. artist: Much like his lauded 2021 debut album, Bones, the Los Angeles-born singer flexed his jazz-influenced musical prowess on Fly, enthusing critics with the album's floating production, expressive songwriting and its highlighting of his expansive vocal range.

    Grammy nominations: The album ultimately landed Mayo his first Grammy nominations, with Fly being nominated for best jazz vocal album and best jazz performance for the album's track "Four."

    Read on... for more about Mayo.

    With the release of his sophomore album, Fly, in October 2024, jazz vocalist, composer and songwriter Michael Mayo ascended to new artistic heights.

    Much like his lauded 2021 debut album, Bones, the Los Angeles-born singer flexed his jazz-influenced musical prowess on Fly, enthusing critics with the album's floating production, expressive songwriting and its highlighting of his expansive vocal range. The album ultimately landed Mayo his first Grammy nominations, with Fly being nominated for best jazz vocal album and best jazz performance for the album's track "Four."

    A man with dark skin tone, wearing a brown striped shirt, smiles while looking out of frame.
    Micheal Mayo's sophmore studio album, Fly, was the follow-up to his critically acclaimed debut album, Bones.
    (
    Lauren Desberg
    )

    In an interview with All Things Considered, Mayo said that his artistry is driven by his focus on remaining true to himself and what he wants to express as a singer.

    The track "Four" is a reinterpretation of a Miles Davis tune from the 1950s, which became a jazz standard. In an interview with All Things Considered, Mayo said it's important to respect and learn traditional jazz music, but merely copying it would go against the vision of the jazz greats, who tried to push the artform to new places. And though Mayo says he's not consciously trying to modernize jazz, he says leading with authenticity helps him innovate in his music.


    "I'm going to make the musical statements that feel the most natural," Mayo said about his stylistic choices on Fly.

    While speaking to NPR's Ailsa Chang, Mayo discussed the people who helped make Fly take flight and how he approaches taking artistic risks.

    Listen to the full interview by clicking on the blue play button above.

    This interview is part of an All Things Considered series featuring first-time Grammy nominees, ahead of the Grammy Awards on February 1.
    Copyright 2026 NPR