Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • State bill to require law enforcement to show ID
    A group of people are crowded around a black podium that's facing outwards towards the camera. A large off-white building is behind them with the words "City Hall" arching above the large entrance. The sky is blue and clear, except for one small cloud.
    Pasadena Mayor Victor Gordo speaks in support of the "No Vigilantes Act" at City Hall.

    Topline:

    A new California bill — called the “No Vigilantes Act,” announced Monday by state Sen. Sasha Renée Pérez (D-Pasadena) — would require law enforcement working in the state to clearly display identification information, including either name or badge number, and ban bounty hunters from engaging in any form of immigration enforcement.

    Why it matters: Francisco Castañon says he saw an unmarked, tinted black car in Pasadena last week, and suspected it might belong to a federal agent conducting immigration operations in the area. When he tried to snap a photo of the license plate, the driver got out and pointed a gun at him.

    Some context Stories like Castañon’s have been reported across the country as federal authorities conduct immigration sweeps, sparking protests in response. Adding to the confusion, some local and state leaders say, are instances in which it’s not clear whether a person is law enforcement or someone who might be taking the law into their own hands.

    Read on ... to learn more about the bill.

    When Francisco Castañon saw an unmarked, tinted black car in Pasadena last week, he suspected it might belong to a federal agent conducting immigration operations in the area. So he decided to snap a photo of the license plate.

    To his surprise, Castañon said, the driver of the vehicle, wearing a black “police” vest over a plain T-shirt, jumped out and pointed a gun at him. Cellphone video recorded by a bystander, and shared by KTLA, appears to show at least part of the incident as it unfolded.

    “ I thought it was going to be my last day on Earth,” he told LAist. “ I really thought that was going to be my last moments.”

    Several stories like Castañon’s have been reported across the country as federal authorities conduct immigration sweeps, sparking protests in response. Adding to the confusion, some local and state leaders say, are instances in which it’s not clear whether a person is law enforcement or someone who might be taking the law into their own hands.

    A new California bill — called the “No Vigilantes Act,” announced Monday by state Sen. Sasha Renée Pérez (D-Pasadena) — aims to address the issue.

    If it becomes law, it would require law enforcement working in California to clearly display identification information, including either name or badge number, and ban bounty hunters from engaging in any form of immigration enforcement.

    Pérez said that when federal immigration officers don’t identify themselves, it opens up opportunities for others to take advantage of the situation.

    “ We are supposed to assume they are federal agents from Homeland Security or ICE, but the truth is, unless these individuals provide proper identification, we don't know,” she said at a news conference outside Pasadena City Hall.

    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has condemned impersonators, posting on social media in March that “it’s dangerous, illegal and will be prosecuted.”

    What we know — and what we don’t — about the incidents

    Castañon, who spoke at the news conference, said he saw the unmarked car with tinted windows and bars in the backseat — like those found in police vehicles — around  Orange Grove Plaza Center last Wednesday.

    He said he was on the way to his family’s businesses to make sure they got home safely. Because he had seen videos and reports of people being detained in immigration actions in the area, the car stood out as suspicious to him and other community members who had gathered at the plaza.

    He said he ran toward the intersection of Los Robles Avenue and Orange Grove Boulevard to snap a photo of the license plate with his cellphone.

    Castañon said the driver jumped out of the vehicle and ordered him to move away from it. The man had the gun in his hand, Castañon said, but offered no badge, no name and no explanation.

    “ At that moment, I was terrified,” Castañon said Monday. “ I keep thinking to myself, what if I hadn't run?  What if I had froze up or simply said the wrong thing at that moment? How far would have that man gone?”

    It’s still unclear if the man was a federal agent or an armed vigilante, according to Castañon and Pasadena Mayor Victor Gordo, who also spoke at the news conference.

    While it is uncertain whether the man who pointed the gun at Castañon was actually law enforcement or whether he was impersonating a federal agent, there have been recent reports of people doing the latter.

    One example was in South Carolina in January, where a man was charged with kidnapping after allegedly detaining a group of Latino men. And in North Carolina, also in January, a man was arrested on suspicion of sexually assaulting a woman and threatening to deport her if she didn’t comply.

    Angelica Salas, executive director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, or CHIRLA, said members of her organization have witnessed and received reports of people believed to be federal agents drawing weapons on bystanders in the Los Angeles area.

    She told LAist that the organization hasn't been able to find some of the people who’ve been picked up in apparent immigration actions.

    “Family members don't know where they are. All they know is that a neighbor told them that some unmarked car picked them up,” Salas said. “So did they get picked up by ICE or did they get picked up by somebody else?”

    About the bill

    Pérez said in a statement that legislation like the “No Vigilantes Act” would have been unnecessary and unheard of under other circumstances, but these are “extraordinary” and “unprecedented” times.

    She said there is a need for stronger, more consistent standards for law enforcement identification.

    The bill would work alongside another state bill that would prevent police at all levels from covering their faces while working.

    If passed, the “No Vigilantes Act” would go into effect at the beginning of next year.

  • Ways to volunteer, give back this season
    A person out of frame gives a gift to a child in line with other children and adults inside a room decorated in red and green balloons and ribbons.
    Cesar Becerra Jr. happily receives a gift from church members at Rock of Salvation.

    Topline:

    If you’re looking to donate, volunteer or find ways to give back, we’ve rounded up a list to help you get started.

    Why now: With the holiday season underway, organizations across Boyle Heights and East LA are seeking volunteers to help distribute food, assemble bicycles, sort toys and sponsor families in need.

    Local food distributions: The Weingart East LA YMCA hosts a food distribution every Monday and Wednesday to ensure families have access to nutritious meals. Volunteers are needed for each food distribution from 8:45 a.m. to noon.

    Read on ... for other ways to give back on the Eastside.

    This story was originally published by Boyle Heights Beat on Nov. 25.

    With the holiday season underway, organizations across Boyle Heights and East LA are seeking volunteers to help distribute food, assemble bicycles, sort toys and sponsor families in need.

    If you’re looking to donate, volunteer or find ways to give back, we’ve rounded up a list to help you get started.

    Build bicycles and organize donations at a toy giveaway

    The Weingart East LA YMCA is hosting its 19th Annual Toy Giveaway on Dec. 18, and volunteers are needed to help prepare toys and provide support. Before the event, volunteers can help by assembling bicycles and sorting and organizing toys on Dec. 17 from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. Volunteers are also needed to assist on event day from 3:30 p.m. to 8 p.m.

    Address: 2900 Whittier Blvd., Los Angeles

    How to volunteer: https://ymcala.volunteermatters.org/project-catalog/1567

    Volunteer at local food distributions

    The Weingart East LA YMCA hosts a food distribution every Monday and Wednesday to ensure families have access to nutritious meals. Volunteers are needed for each food distribution from 8:45 a.m. to noon.

    Address: 2900 Whittier Blvd., Los Angeles

    How to volunteer: https://ymcala.volunteermatters.org/project-catalog/1472
    Mercado al Aire Libre, which started earlier this month, provides families with free, fresh and seasonal produce on the first and second Wednesdays of every month at its farmers-market-style food distribution. The mercado takes place from 10 a.m. to noon on the first Wednesday of the month and from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. on the second Wednesday. The next mercado will be on Dec. 3.
    Address: Salesian Family Youth Center, 2228 E. Fourth St., Los Angeles

    How to volunteer: Those interested in volunteering can reach out to Celene Rodriguez by phone at (323) 243-5758 or email at celene@visionycompromiso.org.

    Drop off toys at First Street businesses

    LAFC’s Expo Originals supporters group is collecting new, unwrapped toys and Venmo donations ahead of its annual community toy drive Dec. 14. Venmo contributions will go toward toy purchases, and the last day to donate is Dec. 6. Toys can be dropped off in person at the locations below until Dec. 13.

    Where to donate: 

    Yeya’s Restaurant — 1816 First St., Los Angeles

    Distrito Catorce — 1837 First St., Los Angeles

    More information: https://www.instagram.com/p/DRNLVDkj_FM/

    Donate a new jacket at a homeless shelter

    Proyecto Pastoral is collecting new jackets to keep its participants at the Guadalupe Homeless Shelter warm.

    Where to donate: Jackets can be dropped off at the Proyecto Pastoral office located at 135 N. Mission Road from 9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

    Sponsor a family, child or classroom ahead of the holidays

    Proyecto Pastoral has many opportunities for the community to give back during its Holiday Drive this year. Those interested in fulfilling holiday wishes for a family, child or classroom have until Dec. 1 to register. Proyecto Pastoral will pair sponsors with community members in need to fulfill items from their wish list.

    Individual toys also can be dropped off at Proyecto Pastoral’s office. The toys will be distributed to children who participate in Proyecto Pastoral’s youth programs at their end-of-year celebrations.

  • Sponsored message
  • Major landlord Greystar agrees to $7M settlement
    A man is standing out of focus behind a dark wooden podium, with it's metal logo in focus. The logo reads, in part, "Office Of The Attorney General" and "liberty and justice under law" in the center.
    California Attorney General Rob Bonta during a news conference Aug. 2.

    Topline:

    Greystar, which manages hundreds of properties in California, has agreed to pay $7 million to settle a lawsuit alleging the company and other landlords used a price scheme to raise rents artificially high.

    Background: In January, Greystar was named as a defendant in an antitrust lawsuit filed by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, the U.S. Department of Justice and several other states against software company RealPage, which officials say uses algorithmic models to recommend price increases to subscribers.

    Bonta alleges that Greystar used RealPage’s system to coordinate rental prices with other landlords by illegally sharing and gathering confidential information. According to his office, RealPage’s “price alignment scheme” affected rentals across the country, especially in multifamily buildings in Southern California, including in Los Angeles, Orange County and San Bernardino.

    The settlement: Bonta announced last week that, as part of the settlement, Greystar has agreed to stop using software that uses competitively sensitive information to set rent prices, including from RealPage.

    The company has also agreed to cooperate in the federal prosecution of RealPage and the other landlords named as defendants, such as Camden and Willow Bridge.

    Greystar statement: Greystar told LAist that it’s “pleased this matter is resolved,” and the company “remain[s] focused on serving our residents and clients.”

    Go deeper ... for more information on the case.

    Greystar, which manages hundreds of properties in California, has agreed to pay $7 million to settle a lawsuit alleging the company and other landlords used a price scheme to raise rents artificially high.

    In January, Greystar was named as a defendant in an antitrust lawsuit filed by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, the U.S. Department of Justice and several other states against software company RealPage, which officials say uses algorithmic models to recommend price increases to subscribers.

    Bonta alleges Greystar used RealPage’s system to coordinate rental prices with other landlords by illegally sharing and gathering confidential information. According to his office, RealPage’s “price alignment scheme” affected rentals across the country, especially in multifamily buildings in Southern California, including in Los Angeles, Orange County and San Bernardino.

    "Whether it's through smoke-filled backroom deals or through an algorithm on your computer screen, colluding to drive up prices is illegal,” Bonta said in a statement. “Companies that intentionally fuel this unaffordability by raising prices to line their own pockets can be sure I will use the full force of my office to hold them accountable.”

    Details on the settlement

    Greystar is the largest landlord in the U.S., according to the Department of Justice, managing nearly 950,000 rental units across the country. In California, the company manages about 333 multifamily rental properties that use RealPage’s pricing software, according to Bonta’s office.

    Bonta announced last week that as part of the settlement, Greystar has agreed to stop using software that uses competitively sensitive information to set rent prices, including from RealPage.

    The company also has agreed to cooperate in the federal prosecution of RealPage and the other landlords named as defendants, such as Camden and Willow Bridge.

    Greystar said in a statement to LAist that it’s “pleased this matter is resolved” and the company “remain[s] focused on serving our residents and clients.”

    Settlement with RealPage

    The U.S. Justice Department’s Antitrust Division filed a proposed settlement with RealPage on Monday to resolve its claims against the company.

    If the settlement is approved by the court, RealPage would be required to stop using competitors’ private, sensitive information to set rental prices and remove or redesign features in its software that limited price drops or aligned prices between competitors, according to the Justice Department.

    RealPage also would be required to cooperate in the lawsuit against property management companies that have used its software and agree to a court-appointed monitor to make sure it complies with the proposed settlement.

    Dirk Wakeham, president and CEO of RealPage, said in a statement Monday that the proposed resolution marks an important milestone for the company and its customers.

    "We are pleased to have reached this agreement with the DOJ, which brings the clarity and stability we have long sought and allows us to move forward with a continued focus on innovation and the shared goal of better outcomes for both housing providers and renters,” Wakeham said.

    RealPage denies any wrongdoing, attorney Stephen Weissman said in a statement.

  • Most mobility upgrade claims rejected
    Five people bike on a street. The bikes are DoorDash branded. The five people are wearing sunglasses, and three are wearing helmets.
    One of the appeals partially accepted stemmed from a road safety project the city completed on Hollywood Boulevard last year.

    Topline:

    On Monday, Los Angeles officials considered claims that it did not install Measure HLA-mandated mobility upgrades where it should have. But the Board of Public Works rejected most of the claims, meaning the city maintains its position that it has been doing road work largely in accordance with Measure HLA. It was the first hearing of its kind since the city began accepting appeals this summer.

    Measure HLA: The ordinance requires the city to install mobility upgrades, like bike lanes and pedestrian signal improvements, when it resurfaces at least one-eighth of a mile of certain streets throughout the city. As of August, L.A. city residents can file appeals claims to the Board of Public Works explaining why they think the city was not complying with Measure HLA. For more instructions and an explanation on that process, you can read LAist’s story here.

    First round of appeals: The Board of Public Works partially sided with the appellant in one appeal and rejected the other six. Joe Linton, in his capacity as a resident and not as editor of Streetsblog L.A., filed all the appeals heard on Monday. “It’s the very first time, so we’re kind of throwing a lot of spaghetti at the wall and seeing what sticks,” Linton told LAist. “Not a lot stuck.”

    One appeal approved: Linton partially won his appeal claiming the city did not adequately install pedestrian improvements along a nearly half-mile portion of Hollywood Boulevard that it resurfaced last year. The city said it will publish an “appeals resolution plan” to fix sidewalks there within the next six months. “It was really obvious to me that the city’s justification … was not true, so I was glad that that was acknowledged,” Linton said.

    Most rejected: In the other six appeals, the Board of Public Works agreed that the city’s work was properly exempted from Measure HLA because it only involved restriping the road. Linton had argued in those appeals that the city's work should have triggered Measure HLA because it involved reconfiguring lanes, modifying parking and adding new signage.

    More appeals to be heard: The Board of Public Works on Monday will hear four additional appeals Linton filed.

  • Residents will vote next November
    Ferries travel back and forth in Newport Beach.
    Newport Beach residents to decide on plan to build far fewer housing units in the city.

    Topline:

    Newport Beach voters will decide if they want to replace a state-approved housing plan with one that zones for far fewer new homes in 2026.

    How we got here: Proponents of the plan called the Responsible Housing Initiative say the state-approved housing plan will negatively affect quality of life.

    About the initiative: The initiative rejects the city’s current housing plan — which allows for more than 8,000 homes — and instead proposes just 2,900 homes exclusively for extremely low-, very low-, low- and moderate-income households.

    The state-approved city plan: According to California law, Newport Beach needs to build 4,845 new units — 3,436 of which must be affordable for very low-, low- and moderate-income households.

    Read on ... for more on next steps and tug-of-war over development plans.

    Newport Beach voters will decide if they want to replace a state-approved housing plan with one that allows for far fewer new homes in 2026.

    Proponents of the plan, called the Responsible Housing Initiative, say the current plan will make the city overcrowded and negatively affect quality of life.

    “This isn’t downtown Los Angeles,” said Charles Klobe, president of Still Protecting Our Newport, which backs the Responsible Housing Initiative.

    Last week, city leaders voted to put the initiative in front of voters after the Newport Beach Stewardship Association submitted the Responsible Housing Initiative petition with more than 8,000 signatures. The initiative rejects the city’s current housing plan and instead proposes an amendment to the general plan to facilitate the development of 2,900 homes exclusively for extremely low-, very low-, low- and moderate-income households.

    The city’s current housing plan, which has the backing of the state, allows for more than 8,000 homes, including the required affordable housing units.

    “ We're against the city building more market rate than the state required. We believe it's a giveaway to developers who will fund re-election campaigns of the council,” Klobe said.

    What does California law require?

    California’s Housing Element Law sets housing targets for local governments to meet, including for affordable units. It allows the state to intervene every eight years to let cities know how much housing they must plan for. The law also requires cities to put together a housing element showcasing how they will achieve the state’s plan. The state then approves of the element or sends it back to cities to reconfigure according to the requirements.

    According to California law, Newport Beach needs to build 4,845 new units — 3,436 of which must be affordable for very low-, low- and moderate-income households. According to the city, Newport Beach can’t just plan for affordable housing units “because that would assume all future projects would be 100% affordable, which is not realistic based on previous development experiences.” And so, the city’s rezone plans include more than 8,000 units.

    Councilmember Robyn Grant said during the council meeting that she’s not in favor of the state mandate. But, she added, “After extensive legal analysis and public outreach and workshops and hearings and meetings and more meetings, this council approved an updated general plan to bring Newport Beach into compliance and avoid serious penalties, including the loss of local land use control."

    Newport Beach did appeal the state’s housing mandates on the grounds that it did not take into account how some of the city’s coastal lands are protected from urban development, but the appeal was rejected.

    To learn more about how Newport Beach arrived at its state-approved housing plan, click here.

    What is the Responsible Housing Initiative proposing?

    The Responsible Housing Initiative counts the number of housing units already in development and proposes an additional 2,900 affordable housing units to meet the state mandate.

    Klobe said they believe the initiative will receive state backing because “they claim to want affordable housing and our initiative requires it.”

    Supporters of the measure contend the city’s current plan will increase the population, result in excessive traffic and disrupt the quality of life. They also sued Newport Beach for not first going to voters, but they failed in court.

    To learn more about the Responsible Housing Initiative, click here.

    What’s next

    Voters will have a chance to weigh in on the Responsible Housing Initiative in November 2026.