The Brief

On the last Friday night of its 60-plus years in business, the cocktail lounge at Pickwick Bowl was hopping.

Bartender Guillermo Lozano had been serving up drinks at a steady clip to a stream of old-timers — some dropping in from mere blocks away, others having made the trek from miles outside the city — soaking up the vibes at the bowling alley before this Burbank institution closes its doors for good this week.

Bartender Guillermo Lozano has been bartending at Pickwick Bowl since around 2018.

(

Fiona Ng/LAist

)

"Business has been very good," Lozano said. "Guess because the people got the news of closing down. So probably that's the reason that they're coming."

Outside the bar, small groups of friends and families gathered at the lanes — laughing, chatting, taking turn to spot up and knock out a strike.

Come Tuesday, Aug. 15, all this — the lanes, the lounge, and more — will be gone, to make way for a townhouse community totalling more than 90 units, including a small number of low-income housing. The project was approved last year, after a protracted battle between the developer and the Burbank City Council.

Pickwick Bowl, on the last Friday night before it closes for good.

(

Fiona Ng/LAist

)

The bowling balls at Pickwick Bowl.

(

Fiona Ng/LAist

)

Pickwick Bowl opened in the late 1950s, part of an ever-evolving 8.5-acre complex that has included an ice rink, an inn, a landscaped garden, and up until the '80s, a swimming pool. It's been owned by the same family since 1961.

Changes aside, the bowling alley has been a constant for generations of Burbankers and Angelenos.

For some, it was their go-to spot to bring a date. For others, a no-frills watering hole to down a beer at the end of a long week. For many, a wholesome family joint that's every bit Americana itself.

LAist.com spoke to some devotees who made their pilgrimage to Pickwick Bowl on its final weekend.

Alexandra Kirby, Burbank

Alexandra Kirby and her huband Darin and daughter Isabel at Pickwick Bowl.

(

Fiona Ng/LAist

)

"It's an iconic landmark. You could take your kids here or your family members. It's such a little piece of Americana.

I understand things change and things evolve, but, it's kind of like a symbol of losing another piece of a small town to me. And it reminds me, you know, certain places that you just kind of take for granted aren't always gonna be there."

Rigo Jimenez, City Terrace

Rigo Jimenez worked in Burbank and used to hit up Pickwick Bowl.

(

Fiona Ng/LAist

)

"I used to work around here when I was young and we used to hang out here all the time. The bar looks the same. The booths look the same. The bowling alley still looks the same. The drinks were a lot cheaper — $2 beers back then. Oh man, I used to bring my dates here. It was safe. You start bowling, then you start drinking, then you forget all about bowling. Good times.

Support places like this, you know, we never know when they're gonna be gone. Especially after the pandemic, so many legacy businesses went down. The fabric of Los Angeles is changing for the worst, I think. We are gonna have the Olympics in 2028, but it's like, what L.A. is gonna be shown to the world? Not our L.A., tell you that."

Kevin Gershan, Toluca Lake

Kevin Gershan laments the closing of Pickwick Bowl, as well as many other shuttered neighborhood staples in Burbank.

(

Fiona Ng/LAist

)

"First time I came here I was in high school and I was in a bowling league in Encino and the Pickwick Bowl was one of the bowling alleys that we played in.

What brought me here is this is ending on the 15th, and it's really sad because all these great places that have been around, especially in the Burbank area [have closed]. First, Genio's went away, it's now the Social Security Office. Gary Bricks Ramp down on Hollywood Way, it's still there as a restaurant, but it's not Gary anymore. Viva [Rancho Cantina], which is across the street, closed. It's now a new Mexican restaurant. So a lot of the things of our childhood are disappearing and when you can come back before something closes, it brings back all those memories of your childhood."

Jennifer Nelson, Burbank

Jennifer Nelson and her son, Jack, at Pickwick Bowl.

(

Fiona Ng/LAist

)

"We come every so often. My son really loves bowling. I mean, there's a new bowling alley, but it's not this. This is what I remember when I was a kid, a bowling alley like this. It's really indescribable, the feeling of, you know, bowling with your family. You're making memories with your family and your friends, and it's innocent and it's just a good time.

We don't have a lot of that anymore. Everyone's on their phones, on their [games], but this is something you do together. We need more of these places and we need family and community to be together."

Pickwick Bowl has become a community landmark in Burbank.

(

Fiona Ng/LAist

)

A federal judge ruled today that the Trump administration is not entitled to personal information belonging to California’s 23 million voters. Judge David O. Carter made the ruling.

Last year, the U.S. Department of Justice sued California, along with 22 other states and Washington, D.C., for access to their full, unredacted voter files. That includes driver’s license, social security numbers and other sensitive data.

DOJ officials said they needed the data to assess whether states were properly maintaining their voter rolls and ensuring "only American citizens are voting, only one time," as Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon said in a social media post in December.

California refused, citing state and federal privacy law. Only a handful of states have complied with the government’s request for their full voter files, according to the Brennan Center for Justice, which has been tracking the issue nationwide.

What did the judge say?

In Judge Carter’s ruling, he wrote that amassing sensitive information at the federal level would have a chilling effect on voter registration, which would lead to decreased turnout “as voters fear that their information is being used for some inappropriate or unlawful purpose.”

He added, “This risk threatens the right to vote which is the cornerstone of American democracy."

LAist emailed a request for comment to a spokesperson for the Department of Justice but has not yet received a response.

Reaction to the ruling

Jenny Farrell, executive director of the League of Women Voters of California, applauded the decision. The group had joined California in opposing the government’s data request.

“ We think that voters should never have to choose between their privacy interests and the right to participate in our democracy,” she said.

Justin Levitt, a Loyola Law School professor and former Department of Justice employee said, “The court did what we thought the court should do.”

Levitt and a group of other former DOJ employees had filed an amicus brief in the case, siding with California.

In a news release, California Secretary of State Shirley Weber wrote: “I will continue to uphold my promise to Californians to protect our democracy, and I will continue to challenge this administration's disregard for the rule of law and our right to vote.”

What's next?

The DOJ's lawsuits against other states are still making their way through the courts.

During a hearing in the case in December, Judge Carter said he anticipated his eventual ruling — whichever way it went — would be appealed, and that a final decision on the issue could rest with the U.S. Supreme Court.

A Superior Court judge has found that the city of Los Angeles violated public open records laws nearly two years ago by taking action on matters related to its homelessness response and failing to report it.

That decision could be a factor in an ongoing hearing in federal court where a different judge is considering whether to hold the city in contempt of court.

In a ruling last week, L.A. County Superior Court Judge Curtis A. Kin found that the city violated the Brown Act on two occasions in January and May 2024 when it took action in closed session on the following:

— approving an encampment reduction plan;

— approving a memorandum of understanding with the county for support on interim housing beds and other issues.

Afterward, the city did not report those approvals in open session.

The city argued its actions were allowed under the Brown Act because they stemmed from the ongoing settlement between the city and the L.A. Alliance for Human Rights, a group of business owners and residents who sued the city over its response to the homelessness crisis.

But Kin disagreed with that argument, saying what the city had done in closed session did not fall within the Brown Act exemptions because they were policy decisions, not litigation decisions concerning the L.A. Alliance settlement.

In federal court, U.S. District Judge David O. Carter has been overseeing the city’s compliance with the settlement. Carter has said he’s concerned “the city has demonstrated a continuous pattern of delay” in meeting its obligations.

Carter has been hearing testimony since November from city officials and others in an ongoing contempt-of-court hearing. This week, the judge said in court documents that he would consider Kin’s ruling as the contempt hearing proceeds.

The parties were last in federal court earlier this week. It’s not yet clear when that hearing will resume.

Sidewalk vendors can now apply to receive a free, health-code-compliant food vending cart through a new program launched in a partnership between the county and the city of Los Angeles.

Who can apply

To receive a cart, applicants must be at least 18 years old, live in LA County, be self-employed as a sidewalk vendor, and earn less than $75,000 annually from vending, according to a news release. Applicants must operate within unincorporated LA County or the city of LA, and commit to full compliance with public health and safety regulations.

You can find the application here.

Permits to secure

Vendors who are awarded carts will have to secure required permits in order to begin operating as fully permitted businesses. This includes obtaining the Compact Mobile Food Operation (CMFO) certificate from the LA County Department of Public Health and any Sidewalk Vending Registration Certifications or permits required to comply with the county and city sidewalk vending programs.

Applications will be selected by lottery, will be reviewed on a monthly basis, and will be prioritized based on “compliance readiness.” Priority will also be given to those who are based in the county’s “highest-need areas,” as according to the county equity explorer map.

Eligible applicants will be connected to partner organizations like Inclusive Action for the City to help navigate the permitting process and to provide business business support and language assistance.

What kind of carts?

Carts offered through the program include:

• Integrated grill carts for precooked meat for tacos, hot dogs, and hamburgers that are assembled on a cart
• Hot-holding carts for pre-portioned cooked tamales, corn, quesadillas, gyros, pupusas
• Cut fruit carts for fruits, bionicos, and acai bowls
• Cold-hold ice cream carts that store prepackaged ice cream items

Currently, the county and city have 50 hot-holding and 30 cold-holding carts for the first round of awards with 40 integrated grill carts underway.

More about the program

The launch of the Sidewalk Vending Cart Program – which invests $2.8 million in more than 280 carts – follows the passage of state legislation that decriminalized street vendors and that streamlined the permitting process.

“The program aims to help vendors meet new legal requirements, overcome financial barriers to formalization, and operate safely and legally in their communities,” according to the news release.

Los Angeles County Board Chair Hilda Solis said the program can help ensure a “permitted pathway” toward entrepreneurship.
“Many vendors are navigating increasingly difficult and uncertain times due to cruel federal immigration actions, and we know vendors play an essential role in the economic and cultural vitality of Los Angeles County,” Solis said in a statement. “This is more than a program — this is a chance to support small business growth, economic stability, and even generational wealth.”

The biggest mobile network in the United States, Verizon, experienced a huge outage on Wednesday, leaving at least tens of thousands of customers without cell service for much of the day.

An update on Verizon's website today said the outage had been resolved. "We are sorry for what you experienced and will continue to work hard day and night to provide the outstanding network and service that people expect from Verizon," it said.

What happened?

It's still unclear. Verizon has not posted details nor an explanation of the cause of the outage on its website. In an email to NPR, a company spokesperson wrote that the problem stemmed from "a software issue" and that Verizon is conducting a full review.And while Verizon hasn't released a figure for how many customers were affected, the staff at the Downdetector website — where users go to report service outages — posted on Facebook that they received 2.3 million outage reports for Verizon throughout the day. (That doesn't necessarily translate to 2.3 million affected customers.)

Cell networks experience small outages fairly regularly, though, and sizable ones are not uncommon. Verizon had a disruption across several major cities in September 2024, and competitor AT&T was hit by a large outage in February 2024, affecting more than 125 million registered devices and customers in all 50 states.

Sanjoy Paul, a wireless network expert at Rice University, says telecommunications systems have become more complex over the past decade and a half as they've moved from physical infrastructure — wires and cables — and into the cloud.

"What used to be a completely hardware-dependent network transformed into a complete software-dependent network," he said. That shift has given operators more flexibility to add services or tweak products but, he said, it has come at the expense of reliability.

With a cloud and software-based networks, there are more opportunities for glitches and attacks, he said. Small issues with computer code buried inside these systems can have big consequences.

What have been some consequences of the outage?

Users had no connectivity for much of the day and were only able to access "SOS" mode during the outage.

Verizon, which has styled itself as America's best and most reliable network, has been in damage control mode. The company has issued instructions for customers to restart their devices to reconnect to the network if they are still having problems. It also pledged $20 credits as "a way of acknowledging your time and showing that this matters to us," according to their website.

The Federal Communications Commission said in a statement it was "continuing to actively investigate and monitor the situation to determine next steps."

Could it happen again?

Yep — to Verizon or any of its competitors.

Since the cause of this latest outage remains unclear, it's too early to say whether or not this exact thing could happen again. But Lee McKnight, an associate professor in the School of Information Studies at Syracuse University, told NPR's Morning Edition outages are "a fact of life these days for major telecommunications firms."

"Modern telecom networks are cloud networks. 5G networks are mainly, like, hundreds of different cloud services," he said. "The telecom companies haven't yet adjusted their training to that reality, that their staff have to be expert not just in cell towers and wireless, like we think about, but about cloud services, like AWS, or Microsoft, or Google."

At the end of the day, experts say, consumers should consider having a "Plan B" for connectivity. That may mean a land line for your house or getting a second phone on a different cell network.
Copyright 2026 NPR