The Brief

The Long Beach City Council passed a series of reforms on Tuesday that will prohibit federal agents on non-public city grounds, create a certificate program for businesses offering safe spaces to undocumented residents, and establish penalties for city workers or contractors who do not comply with its sanctuary policies.

Long Beach has never formally declared itself a “sanctuary city” — a term that has no defined legal meaning — but, since 2018, it has continued to expand its rules around non-cooperation with civil immigration enforcement, a common theme in sanctuary policies.

Tuesday’s vote was the second expansion this year of its ordinance, titled the Long Beach Values Act, and comes as high-profile immigration sweeps have continued across the Los Angeles region, where officials with the Department of Homeland Security say they have arrested more than 4,000 people since beginning their mass deportation operation on June 6.

Long Beach’s policy already banned most cooperation and data sharing between city departments and federal immigration enforcement, including a prohibition on honoring most detainer requests from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which will often ask local jurisdictions to hold inmates for extra time so agents can retrieve them for deportation. Now that non-coordination will be even more visible.

‘No Entry’ signs will soon be posted on doors and entryways in city buildings or properties that aren’t open to the public — a move meant to stop federal agents from entering without a judicial warrant. In the event authorities show up, employees will also be trained to ask for court papers.

City staff will be required to learn the new policies through pre-recorded modules online, as well as during upcoming town halls later this month. Those who don’t follow the rules could be subject to “warnings, suspensions, demotions or dismissals.”

“If there is a policy where somebody willingly, maliciously disobeys it, people get fired in the city for that,” City Manager Tom Modica said. “That’s not acceptable, doesn’t matter what the policy is.”

Residents will be allowed to report violations in an online portal, maintained by the city’s Human Resources Department.

Changes also extend to vendors, including those contracted with the city or hoping to bid on a project.

The city already prohibits employees and third-party workers from sharing data with federal authorities, but the prohibition hasn’t always been followed: The city police department mistakenly shared license plate data with ICE in 2020.

This change goes much further, allowing Long Beach to end contracts with vendors that don’t follow the Values Act, without any legal repercussions. It can also be grounds to disqualify applicants from bidding on a project.

Any data shared with a vendor must be either returned or destroyed — it’s at the city’s discretion — within 10 days.

However, City Attorney Dawn McIntosh clarified that the city cannot dictate terms in all cases, including on some major contracts, such as with cybersecurity firms, multi-national corporations like Microsoft or with specialized goods or services. Going forward, her office will also work to obtain public records on federal enforcement and pursue “legal remedies for damages to city property, programs or revenues.”

Lastly, the new policy establishes a “Safe Place” certificate for businesses that complete “Know Your Rights” training with locally accredited nonprofits.

The changes represent “a massive undertaking” for city employees, said Modica, at a scope workers have “never really experienced before.”

“It’s not something that we have had to deal with in the past,” Modica said. “The potential for masked agents with weapons to show up at your workplace asking to detain people.”

Proponents of the changes say the policies will further engender trust with people in migrant communities, allowing them to feel comfortable cooperating with local authorities, and extend beyond a performance to score political points.

Audience members at a Long Beach City Council meeting hold up signs in favor of a stronger sanctuary city policy on Jan. 7, 2025

(

Thomas R. Cordova

)

But supporters of immigrants’ rights present Tuesday night had mixed feelings about the latest amendment.

Several took note that this version dropped two requests made by civil rights groups in a Dec. 9 letter, including the removal of exceptions that allow some cooperation with immigration agents when the deportee has a serious or violent criminal history as well as the ability for individuals or groups to sue the city in the event it does not uphold the sanctuary ordinance.

Maribel Cruz, associate director of local immigrant rights group ÓRALE, asked the city to remove the loophole and to restore a private right to legal action. “The Long Beach Values Act is a powerful policy that can truly provide concrete protections but the policy as it stands is not enough,” Cruz said.

In an Aug. 8 memo by the city manager’s office, Modica explained that state law would require the city to defend employees sued for potentially violating the Values Act, a costly path that could “cripple city processes.” It would also create a “disparity” in how the city already handles allegations of employee misconduct and may conflict with employee or union agreements.

Nick Masero, a deputy city attorney, said removal of the exception for assisting ICE with deportees convicted of certain felonies could leave Long Beach open to “legal challenges and judicial scrutiny, which it might not survive.”

Establishing a private right of action, he added, would waive several legal immunities enjoyed by the city and result in “new, expensive and meritless litigation.”

With the backdrop of criticisms by local civil rights groups that the policy package continues to allow some loopholes and lacks public accountability tools, Mayor Rex Richardson reminded the room that the city never asked to be put into this situation.

Looking back at a turbulent few months, he recounted “increased enforcement activities,” “masked individuals” and “unmarked vehicles” that have sown “fear and terror” into residents. He stressed that existing city policy must keep pace with the ever-advancing tactics used by federal immigration authorities.

As part of a $3.7 billion spending plan unveiled last month, Richardson suggested the city reserve $5 million for assistance and legal defense for those facing the specter of deportation or federal cuts that could put more people on the streets.

He also recommends establishing a new legal reserve for the city attorney’s office to defend against legal challenges the Trump Administration may bring against Long Beach directly.

“We need to continue to place a focus on why we’re in this situation is because of the federal government,” Richardson said. “… This is a situation that was brought upon us, not something that we welcome.”

California Attorney General Rob Bonta is rejecting President Donald Trump's claims of voter fraud in the state's primary elections, where ballots are still being counted.

"Truly embarrassing, unhinged, wild-eyed, dangerous, reckless, desperate," Bonta said when asked about the president's comments. "What's your evidence for the bold claim you've made? He has none."

With midterm elections approaching, Bonta told Morning Edition he expects more election-related misinformation, including from government officials.

Officials are preparing for more election claims

Bonta reacted to a recent announcement from Bill Essayli, first assistant U.S. attorney for the Central District of California, who said on X that his office is conducting multiple election fraud investigations.

"Every count, recount, hand count, audit and court case has demonstrated there is no widespread voter fraud," Bonta said. "It is very unfortunate that we're in a place now where people disregard inconvenient facts, manufacture their own facts."

He points to misinformation spread by reality TV personality Spencer Pratt, who is running for mayor of Los Angeles. City council member Nithya Raman surpassed Pratt on Monday and will face incumbent Mayor Karen Bass in November.

"He's suggesting that some of the votes that went to his opponent … belong to homeless individuals," Bonta said. "So misinformation and disinformation abounds. It's irresponsible and dangerous, especially for those who propagate it knowingly or without doing some critical thinking of their own."

Transparency and public trust

Some of the doubt around elections, Bonta said, comes from a lack of understanding about how votes are counted and why results can take time, especially in California, where final tallies do not come the next day.

Mail-in ballots take longer to process than in-person ballots, because officials must scan bar codes, remove envelopes and check signatures against those on file. In California, around a quarter of the electorate returns their ballots on Election Day, which means officials don't start processing millions of votes until then.

"In LA County, the registrar of voters is completely transparent. You can go online right now and look at the livestream of the vote counting. You can go visit the registrar of voters as they're counting ballots to take a look around. The light of day is shining bright on the operations of the vote counting in LA County," Bonta said.

"But some don't want to understand," he continued. "And Trump has basically taken the position that if he wins or the person that he supports wins, the election was fair. If he lost or the person he supported lost, it was rigged. And that's just not right."

'The danger is the action that follows the lie'

Bonta says the best strategy for state officials to counter false claims is simply confronting them.

"The best counter to misinformation and disinformation is calling it out, confronting it, providing the facts that show that it's demonstrably false," he said. "So I immediately went to my own platforms to share how Trump is lying. The facts rebut everything and contradict everything that he said, and it's important that he be called out for it, because it's wrong and it's not true."

"I'm worried about what he might do. Will he deploy the military? Will he deploy ICE to the polls? Will he interfere with the U.S. Postal Service in the November election, and the vote-by-mail ballots that move through the U.S. Postal Service?" he said.

"All those things are possible, and they rest on this lie, this fabrication that there's widespread voter fraud," Bonta added.

"So, the danger is the action that follows the lie," he added. "And we're prepared. We've been tabletopping, preparing our response, our action for each of those scenarios."

A new legal fight over Trump's election order

Bonta's warnings come as he co-leads a multistate lawsuit challenging Trump's latest elections-related executive order, which he says unlawfully tries to interfere with states' constitutional authority to run elections by restricting voter eligibility and mail voting to federally preapproved lists.

The lawsuit, filed with a coalition of more than 20 other attorneys general and Pennsylvania's governor, asks a federal court to block key provisions of the order, which they say would force states to rapidly overhaul election procedures and create confusion and chaos.

White House responds but offers no evidence

NPR reached out to the White House, asking for evidence of the president's claims of voter fraud in California's primary.

White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson wrote back that "countless Americans share the same concerns as President Trump" and added the president is pushing for legislation that would establish "a uniform photo ID requirement for voting, prohibit no-excuse mail-in voting and end the practice of ballot harvesting."

The response did not include specific evidence to support the president's allegation of voter fraud in California's primary.
Copyright 2026 NPR

This story first appeared on The LA Local.

For a lot of the runners who showed up to this year’s MacArthur Park summer kickoff 5k, the race itself was only part of the reason they went.

Student Angel Tapia, 17, from Miguel Contreras Learning Complex in Westlake, participated to help spur a different future for the park. 

“The more attention we give this park as a community, the more likely it is to get fixed by the city,” he said. “This park does mean a lot to the community. I invited all my friends to the 5k, and most of them did come.”

Hundreds of runners gathered close to the MacArthur Park Community Center for the free event Saturday, which included race bibs, T-shirts and medals for the first 400 participants.

But beyond getting some exercise, many participants said the event represented an effort to reclaim a park that has become a symbol of challenges such as homelessness and public drug use. For them, the race was a chance to show what the park can be like, when it is actively used by the community.

Edwin Gomez, 17,from Belmont High School in Westlake, said the park is tied to his upbringing with his brother.

“I used to come here and play soccer. I had a team here,” he said. “This park holds a lot of childhood memories for the community.”

Like many residents, Gomez said concerns about homelessness and safety have made it harder to enjoy the park in recent years. Still, he believes community events can help restore what the park once meant.

“I hope it can give those memories back again, especially to the younger generations,” he said. “I don’t want people to be afraid of coming here.”

Westlake resident Natally Barajas, 20, hesitated at first when a friend invited her to participate in the race.

“My mom thought it was crazy considering everything that goes on here,” Barajas said.

But after arriving and seeing families, runners and volunteers filling the park, she said the atmosphere felt different.

“They did a pretty good job cleaning the place,” she said. “It made it safer with the runners here. If you bring people together, especially in a place like this, it makes people feel more supported in whatever they want to do,” she said.

Chelsea Lucktenberg, a spokesperson for Council District 1 who also ran the race, said the event is part of a larger effort from the city to activate public spaces through community programming.

“We want to create more opportunities for families to connect and enjoy moments of joy in their community,” Lucktenberg said. “That’s why we’ll continue organizing events like this one, along with summer movie nights and World Cup watch parties.”

Even participants from out of town said they could see the significance of the event.

Kendrick Rong, 15, of West Covina, heard about some of the park’s challenges but felt encouraged by what he saw that morning.

“I heard that this place is not great to play sometimes, but I think Los Angeles is turning it into a better place, making it cleaner and more accessible for everyone,” he said. “I wanted to participate in this race because getting good exercise is always good for you.”

SoFi Stadium workers who had threatened to walk off the job during the World Cup have reached a tentative labor deal, averting a strike.

Their union, Unite Here Local 11, announced the deal Tuesday morning. The workers were pushing for better pay and protections against ICE, which is part of security plans for the World Cup.

" We won everything we asked for," said union spokesperson Maria Hernandez.

That includes premium pay for workers staffing the World Cup and similar events, and a pay bump across the board, although Hernandez declined to say how much.

Under the new agreement, workers will also maintain the right to strike over safety concerns, including the presence of immigration agents at the workplace. Hernandez called that "unprecedented" for a union contract.

" Usually when you win a contract, workers give up the right to strike," she said. "But that did not happen in this case, which is pretty huge."

Around 2,000 food and beverage workers at SoFi Stadium are covered by the contract. They still need to vote to finalize the deal.

Susana Lahargue, who works at at the stadium, said she was happy with the agreement.

"We got the best contract," she said. " It was a good negotiation."

A spokesperson for Legends Global, the company that operates food and beverages at the stadium, said in a statement that it was pleased the two sides reached an agreement.

“[We] look forward to delivering an outstanding hospitality experience for fans at the FIFA World Cup matches," the spokesperson wrote in a statement to LAist.

SoFi Stadium will host eight World Cup matches starting Friday, when the U.S. plays Paraguay.

As vote tallies in the Los Angeles mayoral election trickled in slowly over the last week, unsubstantiated claims exploded on X that a fraudulent plot was underway to deprive the MAGA-backed former reality TV star Spencer Pratt the second-place slot to advance to the November runoff against incumbent Democrat Karen Bass.

A portion of these unfounded conspiracy theories pointed to changing betting odds for the three top candidates on prediction market sites Kalshi and Polymarket to suggest something sinister is afoot with the vote count. Some influencers supercharging such fraud claims online did so in posts sponsored by the companies themselves.

"They are actually doing it. They are counting votes until SPENCER LOSES. Someone DO SOMETHING," Trump-aligned influencer Mila Joy wrote to her half a million followers a day after the election as she reshared a Polymarket post with a graph showing that Pratt's betting odds were falling on the site.

"Is CA cheating to get Spencer Pratt out?" questioned commentator David Freeman, who posts under the handle Gunther Eagleman on X, as he shared a Kalshi post showing the odds between Pratt and progressive Democrat Nithya Raman. The Associated Press called the second-place spot for Raman on Monday afternoon after her vote share overtook Pratt's on Sunday.

At the bottom of both X posts, the words "paid partnership" appear in tiny font, a subtle reference to the millions of dollars Kalshi and Polymarket have pumped into programs that pay influencers to reshare corporate posts as a way to boost engagement.

The Los Angeles mayoral race is the clearest example yet of how prediction market posts about changing betting odds for candidates are being weaponized on X to sow doubt about the integrity of elections.

It's likely a preview of what's to come this year ahead of the midterm election. Kalshi and Polymarket are increasingly pervading ever more corners of daily life. Their rise has set off dozens of legal battles and raised novel questions about the ways betting on just about anything can have real-world consequences. Now it appears they are driving the latest battlefield in political misinformation wars on X.

"From the perspective of the influencer looking to get rich, their only job is to attract attention," Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, wrote in an email. "They will do this by sharing markets that align with what their audiences want to see. And if the betting markets are wrong, it is much wiser for them to allege fraud (and keep the lucrative promotions contract) rather than acknowledge that the gambling sites got it wrong."

In recent days, Kalshi and Polymarket have attempted to rein in some of their paid influencers. After NPR asked Kalshi about several partnership posts on Friday, the company said it told the influencers to take the posts down. Some of the posts, including Freeman's post questioning "CA cheating," have been deleted. Semafor first reported on Kalshi's crackdown.

On Monday, Polymarket told NPR it, too, is pulling back its sponsorship of some creators who were spreading election falsehoods. Joy's post is still live on X with the "paid partnership" tag, but the tag has been removed from posts by two other influencers paid by Polymarket.

"Companies shouldn't be paying people to spread misinformation," said Brendan Nyhan, a political scientist at Dartmouth College, who has reviewed the sponsored posts that flew across X. "In the Trump Republican Party, fraud allegations are going to be often received with a lot of enthusiasm, especially when people often get confused about the difference between the odds of someone winning and vote share."

Inside Kalshi and Polymarket paid partnerships 

Paying influencers as social media promoters is a type of "growth hacking" tech startups often deploy to maximize the reach of their brand in an attempt to drive more users to the services.

"It's a high-risk, high-reward situation," said Seton Hall University's Jess Rauchberg, who studies digital media culture. "But it's a strategy that gets people talking about the brand."

Polymarket and its rival, Kalshi, are both reining in paid posts from influencers after they spread falsehoods about the Los Angeles mayoral race.

(

Theo Marie-Courtois

/

AFP via Getty Images

)

Kalshi and Polymarket have offered creators as much as $500 per post, according to two people who formerly worked on partnerships at Kalshi and Polymarket and who were not authorized to speak publicly about the programs.

Inside Kalshi, the approach has sparked debate over what responsibility the company has when creators promote its site by spreading misinformation and other harmful content across X, according to the former Kalshi employee.

A Kalshi spokesperson confirmed on Monday that the company now prohibits anyone in its affiliate program from questioning the integrity of an election or undermining a legal ruling or official determination about an election.

Previously, the company took a mostly hands-off approach to what its affiliate creators posted to boost one of Kalshi's markets, according to the former Kalshi employee.

Before the recent controversy, one of the only times Kalshi cut ties with a paid creator over a post promoting the company was when one of their contributors posted to X celebrating the death of conservative political activist Charlie Kirk, the former Kalshi employee said.

Similarly at Polymarket, affiliate posts were given wide latitude, as long as the person posting plugged the company's markets, according to the former Polymarket employee. And there appeared to be little vetting of creators, with Polymarket tapping former Rep. Matt Gaetz as one of its paid contributors. The U.S. House Ethics Committee found Gaetz paid an underage girl for sex.

On Monday, Polymarket said that while it does not have language specifically banning creators from posting election-related disinformation, any post denying the result of an election would violate its rules against spreading false and misleading information.

Polymarket told NPR posts from two of the creators it works with have lost the "paid partnership" tag. It has not asked creators to delete any posts, but told them about the company's content guidelines.

While the company would not specify which creators, NPR confirmed "paid partnership" tags have been removed from Jun. 4 posts by right-wing influencers Benny Johnson and Kangmin Lee sharing the same Polymarket post about Raman's rising odds on the betting site.

Seton Hall University's Rauchberg said the crackdowns are just the latest example of how the rival companies are constantly trying to one-up each other.

"They want to spread this rhetoric that 'Kalshi is for everyone, Polymarket is for everyone,'" she said. "They want to give the impression that they don't have a political affiliation, but consumers are becoming more savvy that both companies are engaging in a type of 'purity politics,' each trying to outdo the other over which is the best app to use."

Not disclosing whether a social media post was sponsored is illegal under rules the Federal Trade Commission adopted in 2024. The Trump administration has not rolled back these rules, but it has also not announced any enforcement actions.

Why California vote counting attracts fraud claims

The Los Angeles mayor race was particularly vulnerable to becoming the focus of election conspiracy theories for a number of reasons. Prediction market data may have been one of them.

Pratt, an outsider candidate who received outsized attention and engagement on X, was favored for second place on betting markets on both Kalshi and Polymarket's sites in the days before the election — even when the largest polls of likely voters showed him in third place.

Election workers process ballots for the California state primary election at the Los Angeles County Ballot Processing Center on June 5, 2026 in City of Industry, California.

(

Justin Sullivan

/

Getty Images

)

While the city's mayor is a nonpartisan office, a registered Republican like Pratt faced a challenge in heavily Democratic Los Angeles. But some social media commentators cited his favorable betting odds as evidence he could reach the November runoff.

Posts about what betting markets are saying about a candidate can confuse voters who may not understand the difference between betting behavior and a poll, said Zarine Kharazian, a Ph.D candidate at the University of Washington's Center for an Informed Public, who studies online rumors related to elections.

"It runs the risk of confusing people into thinking that, 'Okay, these markets have the pulse on public sentiment about the election and who's going to win,' when that's not necessarily the case," Kharazian said.

Heading into the Jun. 2 primary, election experts were already worried that California's notoriously slow ballot count would provide the opportunity for baseless fraud allegations to blossom.

A large portion of voters in the state use mail-in ballots, a form of voting President Trump has tried to associate with fraud. Election officials must verify mailed-in and dropped off ballots, making them slower to count. The state accepts ballots that are postmarked on the day of the election that arrive within seven days.

Ballots that are counted later in the process typically skew Democratic since more voters from that party embrace voting by mail. This phenomenon has been the basis for unfounded allegations of fraud in recent years, including by Trump.

The challenge has been particularly stark this year because so many Californians waited until Election Day to drop off their ballots, said David Becker, executive director of the Center for Election Innovation and Research.

State officials are "doing what they've always done — counting all the ballots, under transparent observation from the candidates and parties, and reporting each batch as soon as they can," Becker said, "yet the profiteers and grifters are loudly echoing our foreign adversaries in spreading lies designed to delegitimize our transparent election process."

President Trump himself has claimed without evidence that there was fraud in the Los Angeles mayoral's race. He called the election race "rigged" in a Truth Social post early Monday, and wrote it was "not possible" for Pratt to lose to Raman after his initial lead when vote counting began. The first assistant U.S. Attorney for the Los Angeles area, Bill Essayli, announced on X days earlier that his office had multiple election fraud investigations underway.

Over the weekend, Essayli debunked one popular conspiracy theory circulating on X — that Pratt had received zero votes in a ballot count update — as false.

Election experts say the baseless fraud allegations in California do not bode well for the upcoming November midterm season.

"I think we're going to get punched in the face so badly on election denialism in November," said Stephen Richer, the former Republican recorder for Maricopa County, Arizona, who dealt with baseless fraud allegations in the aftermath of the 2020 election. He is now a legal fellow at the Cato Institute and a senior fellow at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government.

Richer recalled that during the 2020 election, people trying to undermine the election results latched on to graphs that showed a blue line representing former President Joe Biden's totals suddenly jump higher as ballots were counted.

"And so now it seems that they're using these prediction market graphs to tell a similar story," Richer said.
Copyright 2026 NPR