Miriam Matthews stands next to the Founders Plaque in 1982
(
Los Angeles Public Library/El Pueblo Monument Photo Collection
)
Topline:
In 1781, 44 men, women and children traveled from Mexico under the banner of Spain, settling indigenous land to found what is now Los Angeles. What is less well-known is that more than half of those pobladores, as they were known, had African ancestry. For decades, the information was repressed or derided by racist historians and civic leaders, eager to Europeanize the past. But in recent years there's been a push to get that information back into the historical record.
Why it matters: In the 1950's, Los Angeles boosters, eager to lure more white Americans to Southern California, increased their campaign to erase L.A.’s multi-ethnic beginnings, and paint the Pobladores as European Spaniards. This meant that many of the founders’ thousands of descendants were unaware of their Black heritage. And the city's true history was blurred.
The backstory: Two Black women made sure the Black Pobladores were recognized and honored. Charlotta Bass, the legendary publisher of The California Eagle, used her paper in the 1940's to tell the truth about the settlers’ heritage. And Miriam Matthews, the first certified Black librarian in California, worked tirelessly to chronicle Black history in Los Angeles, including reclaiming the origins of the city’s founders in a plaque installed in 1981 at one end of the Los Angeles Plaza.
Many of us learned it in history class. In 1781, 44 men, women and children traveled from Mexico under the banner of Spain, settling indigenous land to found what is now Los Angeles.
But did you know that over half of those pobladores, as they were known, had African ancestry? For decades, the information was repressed or derided by racist historians and civic leaders, eager to Europeanize the past.
“The Spanish, like most colonizers, had systems where they categorized people on racial grounds,” says Susan D. Anderson, History Curator and Program Manager at the California African American Museum.
“The census in Spain, like all European censuses, included information about the settlers that revealed this very complicated racial system of categorization. So, the reason that we know the background of the demographic background of the settlers is because of this ancient census-taking system.”
According toEl Pueblo: The Historic Heart of Los Angeles by Jean Bruce Poole and Tevvy Ball, in 1777, Felipe de Neve, Spanish governor of the Californias, asked the Colonial Spanish government in Mexico to help him establish a new pueblo near the flourishing Gabrieleño village of Yang-Na. The land was prime for farming — “a very spacious valley, well-grown with cottonwood and alders, among which ran a beautiful river,” Father Juan Crespi recorded.
Agricultural settlements were badly needed in fledgling Alta California, to provide food for the string of missions and presidios (military garrisons) being built across the colony. They were also needed as a buffer against Russian and British aggressors. Neve’s request was granted and agents for the Spanish crown began searching for “men of the field” who were “without vices or defects” to recruit as settlers.
A statue of Felipe de Neve at La Plaza
(
Los Angeles Public Library
)
Agents focused their recruiting efforts on what are now the Mexican states of Sonora and Sinaloa. According toAmerica’s Black Heritage, one-third of the people living in Sinaloa were of African descent. Intermarriage was common in Spanish Mexico, leading to an elaborate caste system which classified people according to their racial heritage.
In the Sinaloan town of El Rosario, where most of the future settlers lived, two-thirds of the residents were of Spanish and African descent and classified as “mulattos.”
Enslaved Black people were essential to the success of colonizers all over the western world. “The only reason people were settling on Indigenous land is because of the slave trade,” Anderson says.
“And it doesn't matter if it's Uruguay or Mexico or the U.S., it's all the same. There were so many Africans that were brought to the New World. So, for us to think that Mexicans aren't of African descent or Chileans aren't of African descent? It's crazy.”
Compared to enslaved people in the United States, people in bondage in Mexico were often able to purchase their rightful freedom.
“In Mexico, slaves were permitted to marry, and no master could sell and separate wives and husbands or children, and it was relatively easy for a slave to obtain his freedom,” William A. Mason and James Anderson write in America’s Black Heritage. “There was a place in society for the freed slave in Mexico. He was not an outcast.”
By the 1780s, roughly 90 percent of those classified as “mulattos” in Sinaloa were free. Many had probably been free for generations. Spanish agents scoured the area, promising land, rations, salaries, and livestock to potential settlers. Those who signed up included the eleven families who eventually became known as the founders of Los Angeles.
Settlers of Black descent
According to the anthologySeeking El Dorado: African Americans in California, of the eleven original families of Los Angeles, seven involved couples of different racial backgrounds, while two couples were of African Spanish descent.
Some of these couples were Luis and Maria Quintero, Manuel and Maria Tomasa Camero, Jose and Maria Guadalupe Moreno, Antonio and Maria Ana Mesa, and Basillo and Maria Manuela Rosas.
The pioneers left home and made the arduous journey to the Mission San Gabriel, around twenty-five miles away from the new pueblo of Los Angeles. Despite popular belief that they all arrived together at the new townsite on September 6, 1781, records inThe Founding Documents of Los Angeles: A Bilingual Editionmake clear they arrived in L.A. in waves, and each family received both a plot of land for a home and a field to till.
“The first homes, earth covered willow-and-tule huts, were soon replaced by adobe dwellings with flat roofs, which were later waterproofed with a coat of brea from the tar pits a few miles west on the Indian trail toward the ocean,” Poole and Ball write. “The pioneers constructed a dam and irrigation canals, including the zanja madre, or mother ditch, to bring water to the pueblo, and set about tilling and planting the fields.”
Life on the frontier was hard, and there were tensions between the settlers. In 1782, three families were “expelled” from Los Angeles. Antonio Mesa, who was said to be disillusioned with pioneer life, returned with his family to Sonora. Luis and Maria Quintero also left, but they didn’t go far. They settled in Santa Barbara, near three of their married daughters. Quintero became Santa Barbara’s first tailor, and his grandson Josef Rafael Gonzalez, served as alcalde (mayor) of Santa Barbara in 1829.
According to theLA Almanac, the Camero and Moreno families stayed in Los Angeles, where both Manuel and Jose served as city councilmen. They were joined by other settlers of Black descent, including Fernando Reyes, who was the first elected mayor of Los Angeles in 1793.
Pobladores' descendants
By 1790, census records indicate 18% of colonists throughout Alta California were of African descent. This number was probably incorrect, since many Afro Latinos had already begun changing their names and racial classification.
Maria Guadalupe Perez, the wife of Jose Moreno and the last of the Pobladores, lived to see California become an American state in 1850. She died in 1860. Her granddaughter, Catalina, became the life partner of Mexican soldier Don Andres Pico (who also had African ancestry), the brother of the last Mexican governor Pio Pico.
Maria Rita Valdez, the granddaughter of Luis Quintero, was a brilliant businesswoman who ran her family’s prosperous 4,500-acre rancho known as El Rancho Rodeo de las Aguas. She sold it to Henry Hancock and Benjamin D. Wilson in 1854. The area is now known as Beverly Hills.
John Gómez, Adelina Mutaw de Lugo, Minnie Lugo de Gómez, Mary Abelar de Lugo, Isabel Lugo de Wilson, Suzanne Lugo de Barker in May 1937. The Lugo women are direct descendants of Luís Quintero, one of the original pobladores.
(
Los Angeles Public Library/Shades of LA collection
)
But, by the time Maria Guadalupe Perez died, these women’s heritage was being consciously blotted out by the new xenophobic, racist American elites of Los Angeles. “Once the U.S. took over California and then getting into the 20th century, white historians started whitewashing California's history,” Anderson notes.
According to historian William M. Mason, the uproar began in 1884, when historian Hubert Howe Bancroft published the 1781 census of the Pobladores, which included their caste, in his book History of California. The backlash was immediate, with fellow Californian J.M. Guinn deriding the Pobladores’ contributions, claiming they “were mongrels in race…poor in purse, poor in blood, poor in all the sterner qualities of character that our own hearty pioneers possessed.”
Los Angeles boosters, eager to lure more white Americans to Southern California, increased their campaign to erase L.A.’s multi-ethnic beginnings, and paint the Pobladores as European Spaniards. This meant that many of the founders’ thousands of descendants were unaware of their Black heritage.
This campaign continued well into the twentieth century. “The racial background of the founders was in the textbooks in the 1940s,” Anderson says. “By the 1950s, when the district put out new textbooks, they erased that information.”
Reclaiming the city's Black heritage
There were some L.A. historians who insisted on reclaiming the city’s Black heritage. In the 1950s, Glen Price, a curator for the Plaza Park Project, commissioned a plaque which pointedly included the race of each of the original 44 settlers. “The plaque soon vanished without a trace,” Cecilia Rasmussen reported in the Los Angeles Times. “Rumor had it that several Recreation and Parks commissioners had been displeased by its public display of the role blacks played in the city’s founding.”
California historian William A. Mason also advocated for reclaiming the founders’ heritage. “In view of our great debt to the pobladores,” he wrote in 1975, “we should celebrate them for what they really were — a racially mixed group with a decidedly Black cast.”
Charlotta A. Bass, publisher and editor of the California Eagle newspaper in the 1950's
(
Los Angeles Public Library/Shades of LA photo collection
)
But it was two Black women who would make sure the Black Pobladores were recognized and honored. “I would say that there are probably two heroes in my book who are associated with these campaigns,” Anderson says. “One isCharlotta Bass.”
Bass, the legendary publisher of The California Eagle, used her paper to tell the truth about the settlers’ heritage. “Of the eleven founding families, 56% would be classified as colored today!” she wrote in 1941,per Victoria Bernal of PBS SoCal. “These are no idle statistics, since the names, lot numbers and race of the founders are preserved in the archives of the State of California and City of Los Angeles."
“In 1948,” Bernalwrites, “she opined about the city's 167th anniversary, ‘When celebrating anniversaries, the City of Angels has always avoided any mention of the fact that among the first settlers (the first 44 persons) there were some important Black angels…’”
As Anderson notes, the other hero in the story was the pioneeringMiriam Matthews, who was the first certified Black librarian in California. Known as the “dean of Los Angeles Black history,” Matthews worked tirelessly to chronicle Black history in Los Angeles, including reclaiming the origins of the city’s founders. "It is a sad commentary when the names of these black families — Antonio Mesa, Manuel Camero, Luis Quintero, Jose Moreno — were omitted from many history books,”she wrote in The Los Angeles Sentinel.
When Matthews was appointed by Mayor Tom Bradley to the bicentennial committee to put together L.A.’s 200th anniversary celebration, she was determined to have a new plaque honoring the Pobladores placed near where the city began. “And that was my top priority: a proper founders monument to be erected in the plaza, in the State Historic Park” shelater said in an interview.
On September 4, 1981, a plaque recreating the 1791 census, complete with the racial backgrounds of each settler, was unveiled on the southern side of the Los Angeles Plaza. There it stands to this day. “A result,” Anderson says, “of a a generations long battle to expose the historical truth.”
SoCal Congresswoman introduces bill after LA fires
Makenna Sievertson
covers the daily drumbeat of Southern California. She has a special place in her heart for eagles and other animals that make this such a fascinating place to live.
Published February 23, 2026 3:42 PM
A man carried his dog while evacuating the Palisades Fire last January.
(
Wally Skalij
/
Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
)
Topline:
A bipartisan bill aimed at protecting pets during disasters has been introduced in Congress, with a Southern California representative citing the rescue efforts of local organizations during last year’s L.A.-area fires.
Why it matters: The PETSAFE Act of 2026 — which stands for Providing Essential Temporary Shelter Assistance For Emergencies — would expand the use of emergency management funds so local governments can plan for evacuations that move animals to safety, as well as provide veterinary care and rescue equipment during disasters.
Why now: Rep. Judy Chu, a Democrat who represents Pasadena and Altadena in the 28th Congressional District, helped introduce the bill earlier this month with several House of Representatives colleagues, including Republican Rep. Brian Mast of Florida and Democrat Rep. Dina Titus of Nevada.Chu told LAist she’ll never forget seeing the cats, dogs and other animals with burned feet and singed fur who were being cared for by Pasadena Humane in the aftermath.on Fire
A bipartisan bill aimed at protecting pets during disasters has been introduced in Congress, with a Southern California representative citing the rescue efforts of local organizations during last year’s L.A.-area fires.
The PETSAFE Act of 2026 — which stands for Providing Essential Temporary Shelter Assistance For Emergencies — would expand the use of emergency management funds so local governments can plan for evacuations that move animals to safety, as well as provide veterinary care and rescue equipment during disasters.
Rep. Judy Chu (D-CA) helped introduce the bill earlier this month with several House of Representatives colleagues, including Republican Rep. Brian Mast of Florida and Democrat Rep. Dina Titus of Nevada.
Chu, who represents Pasadena and Altadena in the 28th Congressional District, said when the Eaton Fire tore through her district, many families delayed evacuations because they couldn’t bear to leave their pets behind.
She told LAist she’ll never forget seeing the cats, dogs and other animals with burned feet and singed fur who were being cared for by Pasadena Humane in the aftermath.
“But to think, if there is even one more thing we could do to keep our precious pets safe, wouldn't we want to do that?” Chu said. “So this PETSAFE Act could go a long way towards making sure that our loved pets can indeed survive a disaster.”
About the bill
Pasadena Humane teams looked for pets and wildlife in Eaton burn zones, dropping off food and water along the way.
(
Courtesy Pasadena Humane
)
The PETSAFE Act now has been referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. The bill would amend the Emergency Management Performance Grant program to increase the federal cost share for certain animal-related preparedness activities from 50% to 90%.
Supporters say this would lower barriers and make it more affordable for communities to roll out emergency protection plans for people and pets.
Specifically, the PETSAFE Act would allow state, local and tribal governments to use grant money awarded by FEMA toward pet supplies, crates, veterinary equipment, emergency generators and training, among others.
Pet owners whose homes are under disaster-related evacuation orders can be faced with an “impossible choice” — leaving their pets behind or staying home with them, which risks the owner’s own safety and complicates rescue efforts for first responders, according to Chu’s office.
The bill aims to address the challenges pet owners and first responders face without authorizing new federal spending, according to Mast’s office.
How we got here
Chu said local shelters, including Pasadena Humane, and communities across California stepped up to care for all kinds of animals during the Eaton Fire, which ignited in January 2025.
A horse was housed in the organization’s garage when Chris Ramon, Pasadena Humane’s president and CEO, ran into its owner walking down Raymond Avenue for miles.
“Part of me likes to think that this won’t happen again,” Ramon told LAist last month. “But the realist in me realizes … disaster preparedness is something that just is an ongoing conversation for us at Pasadena Humane.”
Chu also cited the work of the ASPCA, which helped more than 530 animals during the Eaton Fire, including goats, parakeets, pigs and a gecko, according to the organization.
She said local organizations did “tremendous” work and “lovingly cared for” the rush of animals affected by the fire.
“But what we would want to do is to make sure that there is an even better system for animal evacuation and ways to ensure that pets could be safe,” Chu said, adding that would relieve the burden on places like Pasadena Humane.
Other laws aiming to protect pets
This is not the first time last year’s fires have led to new legislation focused on protecting pets during emergencies.
A new state law known as the FOUND Act, which went into effect Jan. 1, was inspired by Oreo the Pomeranian, who reunited with its Pacific Palisades owner in an emotional, viral video during the Palisades Fire.
The law requires cities and counties to include procedures for rescuing pets during mandatory evacuations in their next emergency plans, which need to be updated every five years to qualify for FEMA assistance.
Robert Garrova
explores the weird and secret bits of SoCal that would excite even the most jaded Angelenos. He also covers mental health.
Published February 23, 2026 3:34 PM
Firefighters spray water onto a burning property in Altadena.
(
Brian Feinzimer
/
LAist
)
Topline:
Citing the partial government shutdown, the Department of Homeland Security announced Sunday that the Federal Emergency Management Agency would pause non-emergency work. The move could put a freeze on reimbursements for the ongoing Eaton and Palisades fire recovery efforts.
The background: Under the public assistance program, FEMA can reimburse 75% or more of the costs of debris removal, infrastructure projects and other work in disaster areas like Altadena and Palisades. But on Sunday, the DHS said FEMA will scale back to life-saving operations only effective this week.
LA County responds: In a statement, the L.A. County Office of Emergency Management called the measures “unprecedented,” “frustrating” and “highly disappointing.” The county said the success of the firestorm recovery is dependent on timely reimbursement for ongoing and completed work.
“Delays in the administration of the FEMA Public Assistance Program affect the restoration of our communities and impact ongoing hazard mitigation for future hazards and disasters,” L.A. County OEM said in the statement.
If you're enjoying this article, you'll love our daily newsletter, The LA Report. Each weekday, catch up on the 5 most pressing stories to start your morning in 3 minutes or less.
Destiny Torres
is LAist's general assignment and digital equity reporter.
Published February 23, 2026 2:46 PM
A bankruptcy court Monday approved KPC Group and Lendlease’s $470 million bid for the property.
(
Mario Tama
/
Getty Images
)
Topline:
The graffiti-covered skyscrapers in downtown L.A. have a potential new owner. On Monday, a bankruptcy court approved KPC Group and Lendlease’s $470 million bid for the property.
What we know: KPC Group owns a network of eight healthcare facilities across Southern California. The California-based development company has stakes in the commercial, hospitality and healthcare sectors. Australia-based Lendlease is the original contractor for the property.
Why it matters: The troubled buildings, officially called Oceanwide Plaza, are hard to miss. The structures went viral in 2024 for their colorful graffiti. After widespread attention, the city of Los Angeles also had to spend millions to secure the property.
How did we get here? Construction on the buildings stopped in 2019 after money troubles, and the developer — Oceanside Holdings — was forced to file for bankruptcy in 2024.
Officials say: Dr. Kali P. Chaudhuri, founder and chairman of the KPC Group, said in a statement that the purchase marks a milestone in improving that part of downtown. “We are eager to work in partnership with the City of Los Angeles and the Downtown community to move quickly on what is truly a keystone project for Downtown revitalization and that will deliver economic benefits across the region,” he said.
What’s next? The purchase is subject to final court approval, which officials expect sometime this year.
Jill Replogle
covers public corruption, debates over our voting system, culture war battles — and more.
Published February 23, 2026 2:05 PM
A home for sale sign in front of a house in Huntington Beach.
(
Allen J. Schaben
/
Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
)
Topline:
The U.S. Supreme Court will not review a lower court’s ruling that Huntington Beach has to comply with state housing mandates.
The backstory: The Orange County beach city filed suit against California in 2023 in an effort to fight the state's order to make way for 40,000 new homes. Last year, a federal appeals court ruled against the city.
Huntington Beach’s argument: The city had argued that since it’s a charter city, which gives it some autonomy from the state, it should not have to comply with state housing law. The Ninth Circuit didn’t buy that argument, and now, the Supreme Court has declined to review that decision. LAist has reached out to the city for a response to the high court’s decision.
State applauds decision: In response to the decision, state Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a statement: “After years of meritless resistance that has wasted taxpayer dollars, Huntington Beach can no longer claim that the U.S. Constitution is on its side. It is not.”
What’s next? Huntington Beach has also lost its housing battle in state court. The city is now facing a looming court-imposed deadline in mid-April to zone for 13,368 new homes. Until then, the city’s authority to approve or deny local changes to land use is restricted.