Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • K-town tenants push for better trash collection
    A pile of trash lined up next to a gated fence and building.
    Once a pile of trash appears on the sidewalk in Koreatown, it's common for more to follow, according to residents.

    Topline:

    L.A. plans to add 65 public trash cans in Koreatown after tenants raised concerns about a shortage of places to throw away trash.

    Why it matters: The new trash cans aim to address one of three demands from the Koreatown chapter of the Los Angeles Tenants Union, which launched its Barrio Limpio campaign in September. The group is also calling for dumpsters at all apartment buildings and businesses, as well as more reliable bulky-item pickup.

    The backstory: Martin Mendoza, a member of the Koreatown Tenants Union who lives near Olympic Boulevard and Normandie Avenue, said the campaign grew out of years of complaints from residents. The union has organized monthly cleanups along the 8th Street corridor between Normandie and Vermont avenues for about two years.

    Read on... for more on the new publish trash cans and calls for better trash collection.

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    L.A. plans to add 65 public trash cans in Koreatown after tenants raised concerns about a shortage of places to throw away trash.

    The new trash cans aim to address one of three demands from the Koreatown chapter of the Los Angeles Tenants Union, which launched its Barrio Limpio campaign in September. The group is also calling for dumpsters at all apartment buildings and businesses, as well as more reliable bulky-item pickup.

    Martin Mendoza, a member of the Koreatown Tenants Union who lives near Olympic Boulevard and Normandie Avenue, said the campaign grew out of years of complaints from residents.

    The union has organized monthly cleanups along the 8th Street corridor between Normandie and Vermont avenues for about two years.

    “We knew for a long time that that wasn’t enough,” Mendoza said. “There are practically no trash cans along 8th Street itself for quite a stretch.” 

    The problems go beyond a shortage of public trash cans, Mendoza said. Some apartment buildings do not have enough dumpster space, he said, while others are not emptied regularly. Illegal dumping and infrequent street sweeping also contribute to the problem.

    “This is just a basic service. It’s like having a home without a trash can. Where are you going to put the trash?” Mendoza said. “A lot of our members feel the neglect … probably the biggest thing is sanitation fears, especially public health crises.” 

    The Los Angeles Sanitation Bureau operates 2,472 public trash bins citywide, according to spokesperson Heather Johnson. In Koreatown, the department has 17 automated litter bins and 19 metal slatted bins.

    Johnson said LASAN places public trash receptacles along major commercial corridors and at designated bus stops, using data analytics and working with council offices to determine locations. Depending on how heavily a bin is used, the department says it empties receptacles three to seven days a week.

    Data from Crosstown shows Koreatown had 435 reports involving public trash receptacles from October 1, 2025 through October 29, 2026, nearly double the 219 reports in Highland Park, the next-highest neighborhood in the data.

    MyLA311 defines these as public trash cans located in the public right-of-way, typically near street corners with red curbs or at bus stops. The category includes cans reported as overflowing, damaged, missing or in need of maintenance.

    The union also used Crosstown data and a story published by The LA Local earlier this year about illegal dumping in Koreatown in its campaign launch video.

    ‘Quality of life’

    For volunteers with No Harm KTLA, a group that holds trash cleanups in Koreatown twice a month, overflowing bins are a regular sight. During a recent cleanup around Western Avenue and Third Street, volunteers passed at least three overflowing cans with litter piled around them, said volunteer Tam Phan.

    “I don’t know what the schedule is for Koreatown and how often they pick it up there, but if we’re doing the 1st and 3rd weekends of every month and they’re always overfilled, that’s really not a good look,” Phan said.

    She said volunteers sometimes walk two or three blocks without seeing a trash can. Finding somewhere to dispose of the trash they collect can also be difficult. Near Vermont and Wilshire boulevards, the closest open dumpster the group found was about a mile away, she said.

    “It’s just the quality of life,” Phan said. “There’s just so many little pieces of trash everywhere and it starts to compound.”

    Nicole Arbusto, who lives on Second Street between Normandie and Vermont avenues, said cleanliness varies from block to block. She said the neighborhood has too few public trash cans, and the ones that are there are not emptied regularly.

    “When people see a lot of just litter on the ground, they litter,” she said. “I think if there’s a trash can, people will be more apt to put it in the trash can.”

    The city has several programs to clean up trash in Koreatown. Steve Kang, president of the Board of Public Works, said the city recently launched a rapid-response team dedicated to Koreatown to pick up bulky items and address other forms of blight.

    “There isn’t a one-size-fits-all criteria. We really work with the community and the council district in identifying the locations for the trash cans,” Kang said.

    In the future, Kang said, the current plastic bins would be replaced with more durable cans bolted into the sidewalk and designed to be harder to tamper with. 

    The 65 new cans would address one of the union’s demands, but Mendoza said residents and community groups should not have to take on the work of keeping their own blocks clean.

    “The voice of our members and a lot of the general public just indicates how widespread this problem is,” Mendoza said.

  • Inside look at executive campaign donations
    Palmer Luckey, co-founder of Anduril Industries, at a 2023 event.

    Topline:

    Palmer Luckey, a 34-year-old tech entrepreneur and billionaire, has pumped more than $350,000 into over 70 campaigns across the country this cycle, and all but two of those campaigns were for Republicans, according to an analysis of the latest Federal Election Commission, or FEC, campaign records.

    The details: Anduril Industries, a military defense-tech company based in Costa Mesa where Luckey is an executive, has more-than-doubled its revenue since President Donald Trump came into his second term, and is projected to double its gains again this year, according to the private markets research company Sacra. The FEC analysis includes processed FEC contributions through June 30 and the most recent filings available through Oct. 14 that the FEC has yet to review. The totals can marginally shift based on amendments or refunds and other reconciliations of the filings.

    A split at Anduril: The records show the company CEO Brian Schimpf and COO Matt Grimm, have donated exclusively to Democrats running for Congress during that time period, following similar donation patterns from previous cycles. Luckey, Schimpf, Grimm, and a spokesperson for Anduril did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

    Anduril Industries, a military defense-tech company based in Costa Mesa, has more than doubled its revenue since President Donald Trump came into his second term, and is projected to double its gains again this year, according to the private markets research company Sacra.

    Its most visible political figure is founder Palmer Luckey, a 34-year-old tech entrepreneur and billionaire who’s been called the “godfather of Republican fundraising on the West Coast.”

    Luckey has pumped more than $350,000 into over 70 campaigns across the country this cycle, and all but two of those campaigns were for Republicans, according to an analysis of the latest Federal Election Commission, or FEC, campaign records.

    The analysis includes processed FEC contributions through June 30 and the most recent filings available through Oct. 14 that the FEC has yet to review. The totals can marginally shift based on amendments or refunds and other reconciliations of the filings.

    The records show the company CEO and COO have donated exclusively to Democrats running for Congress during that time period, following similar donation patterns from previous cycles.

    Luckey, CEO Brian Schimpf, COO Matt Grimm, and a spokesperson for Anduril did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

    The records show that while Luckey donated over $350,000 to federal candidates for this election cycle, Schimpf and Grimm have donated about that same amount to Democratic candidates.

    This divide is just business as usual, said Mike Madrid, a California-based GOP consultant.

    “There’s nothing more nefarious than what it presents itself as,” Madrid said. “Which is a multi-billion-dollar defense company [that] wants to make sure that it has relationships regardless of who is in control of which branch of government.”

    Others say the routine nature of this type of giving is itself the problem. Brendan Fischer, director of strategic investigations at Campaign Legal Center, a nonprofit in Washington, D.C., said those with the deepest pockets often have the loudest voice in Washington.

    “With fewer limits on money in politics, a small number of corporations and executives can have an even greater influence in our elections and over our elected officials,” he said.

    A large sign that says "Anduril" in large white text against a blue sky in the background.
    The Anduril Industries, Inc. logo is seen on a pavilion at Farnborough International Exhibition Centre on July 24, 2026 in Farnborough, England. The Farnborough International Airshow hosts leading innovators from the aerospace, aviation and defense industries.
    (
    Leon Neal/Getty Images
    /
    Getty Images Europe
    )

    Divide at Anduril 

    Luckey founded Anduril alongside Schimpf and Grimm. He grew up in Long Beach, homeschooled by his mother. Luckey began attending Golden West College and Long Beach City College at the age of 14, and studied at California State University, Long Beach, before dropping out to build Oculus VR. He amassed his wealth when Facebook bought the startup for $2 billion in 2014.

    In addition to campaign donations, Luckey hosted fundraisers this summer for Republicans including Senators Tom Cotton of Arkansas and Rick Scott of Florida, and Rep. Ken Calvert of California, according to The Guardian. FEC records show Luckey’s cumulative federal election contributions to GOP-affiliated committees total above $1 million in this election cycle.

    “He’s clearly a very influential bundler and fundraiser,” Madrid said.

    Luckey started Anduril in 2017 with four others: Grimm, Schimpf, Trae Stephens and Joe Chen. That June, executives pitched low-cost border surveillance to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection paid the company to test it.

    Anduril now employs about 8,000 people and generated $2.2 billion in revenue last year. Forbes reported that the Pentagon had more than 120 separate deals with the company before a March software deal with the U.S. Army worth up to $20 billion. That contract allows the military to speed up the purchase and deployment of AI-powered software and hardware, primarily for anti-drone defense.

    Luckey's giving tells only half the story of Anduril's politics. Grimm and Schimpf, who run the company day-to-day, have given only to Democrats running for Congress this cycle, the FEC records show.

    And their resources are vast. After a $5 billion funding round in May valued Anduril at $61 billion, Forbes estimated Schimpf, the 42-year-old CEO, a veteran of the defense company Palantir, was worth $1.5 billion, making him the company's third billionaire.

    A man in a dark blue suit and glasses speaks into a microphone.
    Brian Schimpf, chief executive officer of Anduril Industries, speaks during an event at Tradepoint Atlantic in Sparrows Point, in Baltimore County, Maryland, on Oct. 6, 2026. President Trump announced a $3.7 billion investment by defense contractor Anduril Industries to build a new shipyard at Tradepoint Atlantic, which will manufacture Virginia-class attack submarines.
    (
    Al Drago/Getty Images
    /
    Getty Images North America
    )

    Schimpf and Grimm have together given at least $360,000 to Democratic candidates’ campaigns this cycle, according to the FEC records. Schimpf gave $218,000 and Grimm $142,000. Federal law caps how much one person can give to each candidate’s committee, but not how much a person can give in total, meaning the two can spread their donations across dozens of campaigns. If additional committees — joint fundraising and party committees — are included, that total from the two executives is nearly $1 million.

    Anduril's own political action committee, Anduril PAC, gave $94,000 to Republicans’ and $84,000 to Democrats’ campaigns this cycle, according to the FEC records.

    Thaddeus Kousser, a political science professor at the University of California, San Diego, said the PAC is following a typical strategy of giving, and "retaining access to both sides to make their case in a capitol," rather than spending only on the political party who holds the majority.

    Kousser added that the split among the Anduril executives is less common — with Luckey largely backing Republicans, and Schimpf and Grimm backing Democrats.

    Anduril contracts have soared in recent years 

    Anduril’s business relationship with the federal government began during Trump’s first term.

    Since Trump returned to office, the size of its deals has grown sharply. The company’s first defense contract win, a $12.5 million Marine Corps deal, dates back to 2018, about a year after the company got its start, according to Sacra. Then in 2020, Anduril won border surveillance tower deals with CBP worth $25 million to $36 million, according to Anduril’s newsletter. Anduril also won a nearly $1 billion contract from the U.S. Special Operations Command in January 2022 during President Joe Biden’s administration.

    In March, Anduril was awarded a 10-year, sole-source Army contract with a ceiling allowing them to spend up to $20 billion, about 20 times the 2022 award.

    The deals have kept coming. In June, CBP awarded Anduril a $363 million contract to supply over 200 80-foot surveillance towers across the U.S.-Mexico border in the Southwest. On Oct. 6, Trump visited Sparrows Point, Maryland to announce a $6.6 billion public-private investment anchored by a $2.9 billion Navy contract for Anduril to build a “software-defined shipyard” at Sparrows Point. 

    Campaign spending in California 

    Luckey and Anduril’s executives aren’t just spending on federal candidates across the aisle — they’ve also backed opposite sides of California’s governor’s race. A review of state campaign spending records shows the same split that appears in their individual giving at the federal level. The governor's race is the clearest example, where leaders of the company gave the legal maximums to rival campaigns.

    Palmer Luckey

    • Gave $39,200 to Republican Steve Hilton's campaign for governor during the primary election in June, the max allowed per election.
    • A $19,595 contribution in October brought Luckey’s total to Hilton for the primary and general election this year to $58,795. 
    • Luckey also gave to Michael Gates for California attorney general, Don Wagner for California's secretary of state and a California state Senate candidate running for reelection, Tony Strickland. All three are Republicans. 
    • Luckey’s mother, Julie Luckey, also plays a major role in California politics. She led the campaign to get California’s Prop. 39 on the ballot and is its primary fundraiser. If approved, the November ballot measure would change the state’s constitution to require voters to provide a government-issued ID when they cast a ballot. 

    Brian Schimpf and Matt Grimm

    • Schimpf gave $39,200, the maximum allowed by state rules, to Democrat Eric Swalwell's campaign for governor in December 2025, before he suspended his campaign following multiple sexual harassment allegations that he denied at the time. 
    • Schimpf gave another $39,200 to Democrat Xavier Becerra's campaign for governor in October.
    • Grimm gave Becerra $39,200 in October. Grimm also donated $2,500 to Brian Goldsmith, a Democrat running for State Senate in California’s 24th district.

    The records show no contributions from the three Anduril executives to state ballot measure committees.

    Schimpf focused his contributions toward California candidates: 11, who received a cumulative total of at least $50,500. Grimm gave Rep. Dave Min (D-Calif.) the maximum, $7,000, one of nine candidates he gave the maximum amount allowed. Min, who represents coastal Orange County, has been a vocal critic of the Trump administration, and joined Sen. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) in an oversight push on Trump's pardons.

    National influence

    Most of Schimpf's total donations, nearly three quarters of $1 million dollars, did not go to individual candidates. FEC records show more than two-thirds of it, over $520,000, went to the Democrats' House and Senate campaign committees and to joint fundraising committees, which take one large check and split it among several campaigns and party committees.

    At least an additional $218,000 went to candidates, many of whom have committee seat oversight roles for the defense industry or ties through their own backgrounds, the records show. He gave to 15 of the 27 Democrats on the House Armed Services Committee. Grimm gave to six of those members, according to the records.

    Luckey's giving points the other way. Of the more than 70 federal campaigns he supported in U.S House or Senate races, only two were Democrats: Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas and Rep. Betty McCollum of Minnesota, the records show.

    The practice of strategic donations to both sides of the aisle isn’t new, but the scale has changed, said Madrid, the GOP consultant.

    "I don't believe for a moment that there's anything more nefarious going on here than what has been going on for the entirety of the existence of the republic," he said. However, there are "a lot more billionaires than there used to be."

    Fischer, with the Campaign Legal Center, said campaign donations can have significant consequences for taxpayers.

    “There's a well-documented record of federal contractors using their corporate resources to support lawmakers, and those lawmakers then channeling rewards in the form of taxpayer-funded contracts,” he said. “Taxpayer dollars are being used to reward political donors rather than to advance the public's interest.”

    Gerald Rich and Maloy Moore contributed to this story.

    How we reported this story

    To examine the giving, reporters at Stanford University used DataTalk, a research assistant built by Big Local News and the Stanford Open Virtual Assistant Lab that answers campaign-finance questions using official FEC data.

    The reporters reviewed FEC records for the 2025-26 election cycle, covering processed contributions received through June 30, 2026, and the most recent filings available through Oct. 14 that the FEC has yet to review. Because the FEC itemizes only donors whose cumulative giving to a committee exceeds $200, the figures are a floor.

    Reporters asked the tool for the itemized contributions of Palmer Luckey and the company's two top executives, CEO Brian Schimpf and COO Matt Grimm, as well as for donations from Anduril's political action committee. Additional FEC analysis examined other committee contributions.

    California state filings were reviewed manually by LAist via the California Secretary of State's website.

  • Sponsored message
  • Trump admin files appeal to Supreme Court
    The Supreme Court building's columned facade rises under a blue sky, with a fountain and a person walking in the plaza below.
    The Supreme Court is pictured Monday, Oct. 5, 2026, in Washington.

    Topline:

    President Donald Trump’s administration appealed to the Supreme Court on Monday in its push to sideline 20,000 disputed California mail ballots the day before the pivotal midterm elections.


    Why now: The emergency appeal came after an appeals court rejected the request to set aside some 20,000 ballots from people the federal government suspects may not be citizens. The federal government says those ballots should not be counted until the voters’ status can be verified. California officials say the list is highly unreliable and likely includes many people who are U.S. citizens.


    The backstory: The Republican Trump administration has prioritized identifying noncitizen voters this year, despite them being rare. Lower courts have sided with California, with a district judge warning that segregating ballots would “wreak havoc” on the midterm elections and erode trust in the democratic process.

    President Donald Trump’s administration appealed to the Supreme Court on Monday in its push to sideline thousands of disputed California mail ballots the day before the pivotal midterm elections.

    The emergency appeal came after an appeals court rejected the request to set aside some 20,000 ballots from people the federal government suspects may not be citizens.

    The federal government says those ballots should not be counted until the voters’ status can be verified. California officials say the list is highly unreliable and likely includes many people who are U.S. citizens.

    The Republican Trump administration has prioritized identifying noncitizen voters this year, despite them being rare.

    A district court judge forcefully denied the Justice Department’s request and warned that the demand could disenfranchise citizens in the Nov. 3 midterm elections to determine control of Congress.

    The Justice Department asked the high court for a “limited injunction” that would direct California to “stop commingling suspected illegal ballots with legal ones” while the case continues to play out.

    Voting has been underway in California, a largely Democratic state, since early October. All of the state’s roughly 23 million registered voters are mailed a ballot. Hundreds of thousands of ballots have already been processed.

    Lower courts have sided with the state, with a district judge warning that segregating ballots would “wreak havoc” on the midterm elections and erode trust in the democratic process.

    “If the Executive can discount votes and threaten an ongoing election due to unproven allegations, then our democracy is in danger,” U.S. District Judge David O. Carter wrote.

    The Justice Department has sought to move the case along quickly, unsuccessfully asking an appeals court to intervene early.

    The Trump administration has racked up a series of wins in emergency appeals before the Supreme Court, but the justices previously rejected the president’s push to restrict mail ballots ahead of the midterms.

  • Changes abound. How to plan accordingly

    Topline:

    Consumers who buy Affordable Care Act health insurance are going to see changes both big and small as open enrollment for 2027 coverage kicks off. These include premium increases, possible additional identity checks, potential delays in working with a broker and new limits on which immigrants can get subsidies.

    Why now: Open enrollment starts Nov. 1 in most states. Idaho, Connecticut and Massachusetts started earlier, and some states have been allowing "window shopping" to check premium rates.

    Read on ... for tips on how to plan accordingly.

    Consumers who buy Affordable Care Act health insurance are going to see changes both big and small as open enrollment for 2027 coverage kicks off. These include premium increases, possible additional identity checks, potential delays in working with a broker and new limits on which immigrants can get subsidies.

    Shoppers need to plan accordingly.

    Open enrollment starts Nov. 1 in most states. Idaho, Connecticut, and Massachusetts started earlier, and some states have been allowing "window shopping" to check premium rates.

    A continued decline in overall enrollment is expected, mainly because of the expiration of enhanced subsidies at the end of 2025. Policy experts say the end of those subsidies led millions to drop or lose coverage through the first few months of this year.

    But the Trump administration sees victory in the falling enrollment, crediting its various efforts to reduce fraud, including the August cancellation of policies covering 760,000 enrollees suspected to be improperly signed up. A small number of those enrollees have regained coverage.

    Have your ID ready

    One of the biggest changes for people shopping for their 2027 coverage will be increased scrutiny of both consumers and agents. The requirements are aimed at thwarting fraud or improper enrollments. For consumers, it could slow the enrollment process.

    Stay up to date with our Up First newsletter, sent every weekday morning.

    The new rules, outlined by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, affect only consumers using agents or brokers to help them enroll through the federal marketplace, which serves 29 states. They do not apply to state-based exchanges, which have their own rules and have in most cases been more successful at preventing fraudulent sign-ups.

    For starters, all consumers using an agent in the federal marketplace will need to get a one-time confirmation code or link to authorize a specific agent to enroll them or make changes on their behalf. It will be sent to consumers by text message, email or an automated phone call from one of the private enrollment platforms used by their agent. Returning consumers who have incorrect or outdated contact information will first need to call the federal marketplace themselves or submit an application online to update it.

    Additionally, consumers and policyholders deemed "high-risk" must verify their own identity before authorizing an agent. CMS defines as "high-risk" first-time applicants or those with existing coverage whose applications involve a change of state, as well as consumers working with a new or different agent or with a monthly premium payment of $30 or less.

    Joshua Brooker, who oversees an insurance agency in Pennsylvania, said CMS appears to have selected people in those groups for greater scrutiny because "someone who is moving to a new state or switching brokers — that could be a broker trying to impersonate a consumer."

    The $30-a-month cutoff may be tied to concerns that plans with no or low monthly premiums are easier for bad agents to target for unauthorized enrollments because the policyholder may never get a bill. Some rogue agents even pay the low monthly amount themselves and still make a profit from the commission, Brooker said.

    The broad nature of the new rules, though, has Brooker concerned "that up to 1 in 5 consumers is going to have to do extra identity proofing" and may just give up and not get insured.

    Consumers designated high-risk must prove their identity through a CMS-approved third party such as credit company Experian, which generally asks questions only the consumer should be able to answer. People who fail this test may be asked to call Experian's help desk or submit their applications themselves by creating a healthcare.gov account, which requires them to upload identification such as a driver's license, a passport, immigration papers or another form of ID.

    "Some people may have trouble not because they're not real, but because they don't have a credit file, or have moved, or have changed names," said Stacey Pogue, a senior research fellow at the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University.

    She said the changes might "be an appropriate response by CMS that targets fraudulent enrollments but might also create extra hurdles."

    There may be fewer brokers

    CMS in September issued a rule that places a moratorium on brokers new to offering ACA coverage. Agents not registered with the federal marketplace in 2026 will not be allowed to assist with enrollments for 2027 until February at the earliest, past the end of open enrollment season.

    CMS said it took this step because a disproportionate number of "significant compliance concerns" in 2026 came from newly registered agents or brokers. Additionally, the agency has kicked out "hundreds of non-compliant agents and brokers" this year.

    Jason Fine, who runs a brokerage in Florida, said he agrees with the concept behind these changes. He has reported multiple times to CMS, for instance, that rogue agents have switched his clients' coverage without authorization, wanting the agency to take action against them. But he said the updated rules also raise concerns.

    "Everything they are doing in the long term makes sense," he said. However, in the short term, "I don't know if they care about the chaos it will cause."

    That's because the moratorium will make it much harder for small brokers to help clients this year. His agency and others often pare their staffing after open enrollment but hire again toward the end of the year. He was planning to add up to 10 agents to his core staff of about five but has been told by recruiters that he's unlikely to be able to find anyone who was registered for 2026 and is still available.

    He suggested that the move unintentionally benefits larger call centers, some of which were doing much of the marketing that regulators feared led to unauthorized switching. Call centers often maintain larger staffs.

    "They can afford to keep a staff of 25 or 40 people all year long," Fine said.

    Groups representing agents are very unhappy with the directive. One, the National Association of Benefits and Insurance Professionals, filed a lawsuit on Oct. 15 against the Trump administration over the moratorium, saying it unfairly targets 19,000 agents who may want to sell ACA plans for next year.

    "Just because you're a new agent doesn't mean you are fraudulent," said Ronnell Nolan, president of Health Agents for America, another sales agent group, which on Oct. 21 filed suit seeking a temporary restraining order on the moratorium. "All these agencies who have trained new agents and paid thousands of dollars now have people who won't be able to work."

    It all leads to an important piece of advice from Georgetown's Pogue: Consumers should not delay making appointments. "If you rely on an agent or broker, and a lot of people do, their slots might fill up faster because there will be fewer of them to help with enrollment. I would reach out early."

    Costs will continue to be an issue

    This year, after Congress did not renew the expiring enhanced subsidies, most people getting ACA coverage saw what they had to pay increase. Higher earners lost subsidies entirely. Add in double-digit premium increases, and most people had to pay substantially more for their coverage.

    Still, most people who buy ACA coverage for next year will receive a subsidy. It will just be less generous than it was before the enhancements expired at the end of 2025.

    The subsidies are pegged to the premium costs of benchmark plans, the name given to the second-lowest-priced silver-tier plan in an area.

    This helps offset premium increases.

    "For most folks, overall affordability will stay about the same," said Louise Norris, a health policy analyst for HealthInsurance.org. "That's not to say it's great, but if you were able to manage the premiums this year, it should be similar to that."

    But there are other factors at work, too.

    Last year's average premium increase of 26% was the largest in years. It was driven in part by insurers' fear that the expiration of subsidies would cause healthier people to drop out of the marketplace. Other drivers often cited for such increases include a rise in overall medical care costs and general inflation, and labor shortages.

    For the upcoming year, those dynamics remain a concern, with premiums slated for double-digit increases, although at 15%, slightly lower than last year.

    Subsidies are income-based and cut off for households earning more than four times the federal poverty rate. During this open enrollment season, that amount is $63,840 for a single person, $86,560 for a couple, and $109,280 for a family of three, for example.

    "The biggest issue we will face is affordability," said Anne Petry, who, with her father, owns Jaggi Petry Insurance & Investments in Forsyth, Illinois, and helps customers purchase health insurance, including ACA plans. "There definitely will come a breaking point for people."

    Agents and other experts say consumers should not allow their plans to automatically renew and should instead go online to compare premiums and coverage, which can change each year even for the same plan. There may be less expensive alternatives, including plans from new insurers, so they suggest looking at not just premiums, but also deductibles and other costs. At the same time, several insurers, including Cigna, have dropped all or part of their ACA coverage areas.

    "If you just sit on the sidelines and let the policy auto-renew, you might miss out on what could be a better opportunity," Norris said. She said it is important to check options because the cap on out-of-pocket maximums for ACA plans is also increasing.

    That amount, which represents the most a consumer must pay toward deductibles, copayments and coinsurance before the policy is expected to cover remaining in-network medical costs, was $10,600 for an individual and $21,200 for a family plan this year. In 2027, it will grow by 13% to $12,000 for an individual and $24,000 for family coverage. Lower caps on out-of-pocket maximums are set for households earning up to 2.5 times the federal poverty level.

    The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which Congress passed last year, also strips subsidy eligibility from many lawfully present immigrants, including people holding temporary H-1B work visas, refugees, asylees, people with temporary protected status, and those with pending green-card applications.

    Three immigrant groups can still get ACA subsidies: green-card holders, who have permanent legal status; certain Cuban and Haitian immigrants; and citizens of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands or Palau.

    KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

    Copyright 2026 KFF Health News

  • Last strike was 2 years ago
    A group of people walk straight. Some of them are holding up signs that reach "CSU PAY UP OR STRIKE OUT."
    California Faculty Association members and supporters rally at Cal State Long Beach on Tuesday, Oct. 27, 2026.

    Topline:

    The union that represents 29,000 faculty members is asking its members to authorize a strike after negotiations with California State University reached an impasse. Members have till Nov. 19 to vote. The California Faculty Association last went on strike in January 2024.

    Why are we back here: While the union seeks pay raises, members say this negotiation is also about all the ways higher education has changed since they won their last contract: That includes provisions guaranteeing academic freedom — in the face of pressure from the Trump administration over DEI and and artificial intelligence guardrails.

    CSU's position: In a statement, Amy Bentley-Smith, a spokesperson for the university system, said CSU has reached agreements with four other unions “demonstrating that meaningful agreements can be achieved through collective bargaining.”

    The union that represents 29,000 faculty members is asking its members to authorize a strike after negotiations with California State University reached an impasse. Members have until Nove. 19 to vote.

    The California Faculty Association last went on strike in January 2024.

    Now they are back at the bargaining table. While the union seeks pay raises, members say this negotiation is also about all the ways higher education has changed since they won their last contract: That includes provisions guaranteeing academic freedom — in the face of pressure from the Trump administration over DEI and and artificial intelligence guardrails.

    “This is the boldest proposal we've had as a bargaining team, as a union,” said Elaine Villanueva Bernal, who teaches chemistry at Cal State Long Beach and also serves on the bargaining team.

    She and other members of the union rallied this past week in support of the authorization vote, one of many such demonstrations across the state.

    They said the union is fighting for members to decide whether to use artificial intelligence and to “not to be replaced with AI, for our work not to be evaluated by AI.”

    Even if the vote passes, that doesn’t mean a strike will happen; contract talks can still continue.

    A person with medium-light skin tone wearing a black t-shirt, colorful shawl and a black hat with the letters CFA holds up a sign that reads "Fight Zombie Wages, California Faculty Association."
    Elaine Villanueva Bernal teaches chemistry at Cal State Long Beach and serves on the CFA bargaining team.
    (
    Yusra Farzan
    /
    LAist
    )

    In a statement, Amy Bentley-Smith, a spokesperson for the university system, said CSU has reached agreements with four other unions “demonstrating that meaningful agreements can be achieved through collective bargaining.”

    “We believe that continued negotiations, rather than a strike, offer the best path toward reaching a fair and sustainable agreement with CFA. Our priority remains supporting our faculty, serving our students and avoiding unnecessary disruption to their education,” she said.

    Why is another strike possible?

    In January 2024, faculty members went on strike across the state, disrupting classes for around 500,000 students. The strike lasted one day — to the disbelief of many union members.

    “The last contract sucked. The union caved after one day. We had all the momentum of faculty here and a lot of support to keep the strike going,” said Helen Hood Scheer, a cinematic arts professor at Cal State Long Beach. “However, I will say that at some of the other CSUs that are not as healthy as we are, I think some other people felt like it was a good contract.”

    Two women, one wearing a grey t-shirt and the other a red t-shirt, smile straight ahead. One has on a black cap and the other a hat. The one wearing red holds up a sign that reads "Liberation through Public Education California Faculty Association." Both have light skin tone.
    Helen Hood Scheer and her friend came out to a rally in Cal State Long Beach to signal their support for a strike authorization vote after negotiations between the California Faculty Association and CSU reached an impasse.
    (
    Yusra Farzan
    /
    LAist
    )

    She said she drove over an hour on a day she does not have to teach to be on campus for the rally to “let the chancellor know that we’re serious.”

    Hood Scheer said some professors are living below the poverty line, while CSU Chancellor Mildred Garcia makes close to $1 million annually.

     Lily Housepeters, an associate professor of geography at Cal State Long Beach and vice president of the CFA Long Beach chapter, said the bargaining team has made changes because some members were ready to strike longer and were disappointed with some of the contract gains.

    “This time around, we have a much more inclusive bargaining team. We've expanded our bargaining team. We have members of our bargaining team from every single campus,” she said.

    The effects of the Trump administration on faculty

    The landscape of higher education has also changed since the last contract.

    Contract negotiations have centered federal funding cuts to research and to grants that sought to increase representation of historically excluded groups on campus.

    “ We should be able to teach the classes that we need to teach, that we want to teach, that students actually demand, without government or political interference,” said Melissa Hidalgo, a lecturer in women’s, gender and sexuality studies at Cal State Long Beach. “When your federal government tries to tell you that certain subjects are off the table now because they don't like them, when you can't talk about things like gender and race anymore, when we start to have directives coming from the top down, this is how we know that our, our academic freedom is under attack.”

    Two people wear a red tshirt, one with black pants and the other with jeans. Other people are in the background. One of the women holds up a sign, "Rent is too damn high!"
    CFA members and supporters rally in support of a strike authorization vote after negotiations between the union and CSU reached an impasse.
    (
    Yusra Farzan
    /
    LAist
    )

    Deborah Ham, a retired education professor, came out to support the rally on Tuesday at CSU Long Beach. As someone who has taught for over 35 years, Ham said, the attacks on education are nothing like she’s seen before.

    “I feel an attack on our work, on our way of life, on our way of believing, on our humanity, and it's very, very painful. As someone who taught children and English as a second language to immigrants, to see the attack on everyone is just Nazism,” she said. “It just is frightening to me, and I don't like seeing this in my community. And so that's another reason why I am here, to protect our community.”

    Ronald Loewe, a professor of anthropology said academic freedom protections are important because he has seen pushback on faculty and students who have spoken out in support of Palestinian rights.

    At rallies including the one on campus on Tuesday, faculty members use amplified sound and it’s something that has been done for years, he said. But, during a protest in support of Palestinian rights,  ”five faculty members were sanctioned for using amplified sound. There's been a lot of attempts to kind of pick on faculty members and students who've spoken out in favor of Palestine or have been critical of Israel.”

    A spokesperson for Cal State Long Beach told LAist no faculty member has been disciplined for taking part in actions related to Palestinian advocacy.

    Have something to say?

    A board of trustees is responsible for rules and policies adopted across the California State University system. Have a concern? Contact them.

    AI has changed contract negotiations

    Loewe also wants to see strong artificial intelligence guardrails in the new contract.

    “I think that the university has really excluded us from having kind of any input or any say in the development of artificial intelligence on campus. It's affecting our teaching, it's affecting student learning, and it's making people stupid,” he said.

    The CSU system recently renewed a controversial contract with OpenAI that costs $13 million annually, a decision Loewe and Housepeters say faculty were not consulted on.

     ”We also see lots of other spending throughout the CSU that we would argue is wasteful or is not in priority with faculty working conditions, which are student learning conditions,” Housepeters said.

    During the recent heat waves that pummeled Southern California, for instance, she said some faculty had to work in offices without air conditioning where temperatures hit over 90 degrees.

    The union, Housepeters said, is also fighting for improved working conditions and reducing workload for some faculty members. She said the union wants “ a transformational contract where tenure-track faculty would receive more time for research, and our lecturer faculty would receive more time for service because currently all of their service is uncompensated.”

    Some students are joining the rallies

    Joining the faculty members in support of their fight for a new contract were students Christina Henry and Zack Medway.

    Henry, who is studying history, said she hoped to become a professor one day.

    “I think it's important that our professors get a living wage. They do so much to set us up for our future careers. Their career should be rewarding for them as well,” she said.

    “ If we truly want to value education as a country,” said Medway, a graduate student. “We need to honor and respect the people who do the work and the people who do the learning, and know that learning is uncomfortable and necessary.”