Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Population in CA is declining, but so is funding
    A young man sits on a green bench with his hands inside the pockets of the black sweatshirt he's wearing along with grey sweatpants. The bench is in front of a yellow building. A sign hangs off the building that shows to trees and reads "Youth United For Community Action."
    Lavain Henderson, a youth mentor with Youth United for Community Action (YUCA), sits outside the organization’s office in East Palo Alto on Dec. 11, 2025. Henderson, who previously experienced homelessness, works with young people as YUCA faces uncertainty tied to federal cuts to permanent supportive housing funding.

    Topline:

    Organizations focused on helping California's homeless youth are credited with contributing to a recent drop in youth homelessness in California — a 24% reduction between 2019 and 2024 — according to a November report by nonprofit John Burton Advocates for Youth. The data is a silver lining amid rising homelessness nationwide, but advocates warn that recent state and federal funding changes could threaten that progress.

    Budget changes: In fiscal year 2018, California began reserving 5% of homelessness funding for youth — what it calls the “youth set aside.” And by fiscal year 2021, the state had increased that set-aside to 10%. During the same time period, it also increased the total amount of funding dedicated to addressing homelessness, with about $5 billion going into its Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention Program (HHAP) since fiscal year 2019. But in the current state budget, lawmakers set aside no new funding for HHAP, though they earmarked $500 million for the program in fiscal year 2026.

    Why it matters: With the funding, youth homelessness organizations can support young adults in a way organizations that cater to adults cannot. Also, in November, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued new guidelines for homelessness funding. The changes include tighter restrictions on which organizations qualify for support and how funds can be used.

    Tucked between the homes of an East Palo Alto neighborhood, there’s a small yellow building.

    Inside, on a weekday in late November, young people — ranging in age from adolescence to early adulthood — were busy at work. They helped each other with homework, met with therapists, and hosted discussions about leadership and political education.

    Although Youth United for Community Action (YUCA) has all the hallmarks of a typical community center, the nonprofit’s mission is more specific: to serve homeless youth.

    Out back, youth mentor Lavain Henderson, 22, showed off a vegetable garden and chicken den, where members can harvest produce and gather freshly-laid eggs.

    Henderson became homeless when he was around 18 and, over a five-year span, bounced between at least four different homeless organizations throughout California. But he struggled to find community. YUCA was different, he said, because it was run by and for young people.

    “There weren’t spaces where I could learn the skills that I need to survive,” he said.

    Organizations like YUCA are credited with contributing to a recent drop in youth homelessness in California — a 24% reduction between 2019 and 2024 — according to a November report by nonprofit John Burton Advocates for Youth. The data is a silver lining amid rising homelessness nationwide, but advocates warn that recent state and federal funding changes could threaten that progress.

    Simone Tureck Lee, one of the authors of the report, said that while the data used in the report is widely considered an undercount, it remains useful for tracking trends over time. She largely attributed the decline in youth homelessness to California’s investments in specifically addressing young people’s needs.

    In fiscal year 2018, California began reserving 5% of homelessness funding for youth — what it calls the “youth set aside.” And by fiscal year 2021, the state had increased that set-aside to 10%.

    During the same time period, it also increased the total amount of funding dedicated to addressing homelessness, with about $5 billion going into its Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention Program (HHAP) since fiscal year 2019, according to the state’s Legislative Analyst’s Office. With the funding, youth homelessness organizations can support young adults in a way organizations that cater to adults cannot, Tureck Lee said.

    “We’re seeing something different than what’s happening nationally and what’s happening among the general population in California,” Tureck Lee said. “We really attribute those changes to these major state investments that came after years of lack of investment.”

    According to Henderson, the other shelters and community centers he once relied on rarely provided him with the resources he needed.

    That changed when he found YUCA. Unlike other programs, Henderson said, YUCA was better able to meet his needs.

    “I don’t think I was able to care for myself like how I’m supposed to,” he said. “There was a lot of things falling through the cracks. I’m still working on myself as a person, but I’ve definitely come a long way.”

    For Henderson, those needs weren’t just physical, like food and shelter; they were emotional, as well. YUCA gave him a sense of community that he hadn’t experienced with other organizations.

    “I didn’t believe that I deserved to have community,” he said, adding that YUCA “definitely opened my eyes to how important having a community is.”

    But in November, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued new guidelines for homelessness funding. The changes include tighter restrictions on which organizations qualify for support and how funds can be used, a change that Tureck Lee said could impact youth homelessness organizations in California.

    And in the current state budget, lawmakers set aside no new funding for HHAP, though they earmarked $500 million for the program in fiscal year 2026.

    Tureck Lee said she expects the loss of HHAP funds this year to have a greater impact on youth-specific organizations than the loss of federal funding in California. But she’s still concerned about what the federal changes might mean for counties like Alameda or Los Angeles, which she said will now have to compete for federal funding, rather than being able to take advantage of the youth set-aside in HHAP.

    The federal government has said it will penalize organizations that provide benefits to people who are undocumented or that recognize transgender people, for instance, Tureck Lee said.

    “All of these values that the Trump administration is very attached to are inserted into the criteria for scoring applications from all these communities,” she said.

    Katie Barnett, a community organizer with the policy and advocacy organization, All Home, said the changes pose a serious risk to the progress made in reducing youth homelessness, as well as to the entire homeless population across California.

    “This is going to have catastrophic ripple effects for every single community in the country, absolutely here in California, where we have not only the Bay Area, but also the Los Angeles area, which has some of the highest rates of specifically chronic and unsheltered homelessness nationwide,” she said.

    Coco Auerswald, a UC Berkeley professor and homelessness researcher, said she expects the impact of the changes to be disastrous.

    According to Auerswald, the real key to addressing overall homelessness is addressing youth homelessness, because homelessness among adults often begins in their youth.

    “If we had been able to change their trajectory,” she said, “the numbers of people experiencing homelessness would be dramatically different.”

    But, she said, the federal government hasn’t done enough to prioritize youth, comparing its approach to using a mop to clean a flooded floor, rather than turning off the faucet.

    “We can’t keep up because the inflow of water is greater than our ability to remove water,” she said. “We have to turn off the faucet.”

    In late November, Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administration sued the federal government over the funding changes, and in December, HUD subsequently rescinded the guidelines. But the agency has yet to issue new ones — leaving nonprofits like YUCA in limbo. In the meantime, Newsom announced $56 million in state grants specifically to address youth homelessness.

    For Henderson, the stakes are personal. YUCA helped him develop the skills he needed as a young adult.

    “I feel like that’s a lot of the work that we do,” he said. “Trying to get the youth to grow as people, to be future leaders. At the end of the day, they’re the future of everything.”

  • LAUSD school rebuilds underway
    A child with light skin tone and curly blonde hair walks across a playground with blue structures.
    Marquez Charter Elementary reopened to students with temporary classrooms and new playgrounds Sept. 30, 2025.

    Topline:

    By the end of January, students will have returned to two of the three public school campuses burned in the Palisades Fire one year prior. The buildings are still in progress, but Los Angeles Unified's superintendent promised they’ll be complete in 2028.

    The backstory: The 2025 fire destroyed two Los Angeles Unified elementary schools— Marquez and Palisades— and damaged Palisades Charter High School, an independently run school on district property.

    Where are the students: 

    • Palisades Charter High School students are scheduled to return to their campus on Jan. 27. They’ve been in a refurbished Santa Monica department store since April. 
    • Marquez Elementary students returned in September to portables covering about one-third of the campus.  
    • Palisades Elementary students continue to share a campus with Brentwood Science Magnet. 

    What’s next: In June, the LAUSD Board approved a $604 million plan to rebuild the three burned schools. District-contracted architects are finalizing their designs and plan to submit to the state for approval in the spring.  The district plans to use money from the $9 billion bond voters approved in 2024 to help pay for the rebuild, but also anticipates reimbursement from its insurer and FEMA.

    By the end of January, students will have returned to two of the three public school campuses burned in the Palisades Fire one year prior, though their classrooms are temporary.

    Palisades Charter High School students are scheduled to return to their campus Jan. 27. They’ve been in a refurbished Santa Monica department store since April.

    “ I am just overwhelmed with gratitude for the constant support that has been shown for our school and for our families, our teachers, all of our administrators and staff,” said Principal Pamela Magee at a press conference Tuesday with Los Angeles Unified leaders. Pali High is an independent charter high school located on district property.

    In June, the LAUSD Board approved a $604 million plan to rebuild the high school, as well as two burned district elementary schools— Marquez and Palisades.

    Superintendent Alberto Carvalho said the three campuses’ new buildings will open in 2028— shaving two years off of the original 5-year timeline.

    “ These projects will come in on time or ahead of schedule,” Carvalho said. “These projects will come in at or below budget, and these projects will honor the resilience, the determination, the courage and yes, the suffering and the sacrifice of the community of the Palisades.”

    About the costs and the design

    The district plans to use money from the $9 billion bond voters approved in 2024 to help pay for the rebuild, but also anticipates some reimbursement from its insurer and FEMA.

    District-contracted architects are finalizing their designs and plan to submit to the state for approval in the spring, said Chief Facilities Executive Krisztina Tokes. She said the plan is to rebuild with future environmental risks in mind.

    “ From the earliest design stages, wildfire resiliency has been treated as a core requirement and not an add-on,” Tokes said. For example, using fire-resistant concrete blocks, installing enhanced air filtration systems and planting shade trees where they won’t hang over buildings.

    Environmental testing preceded students’ return to the fire-impacted campuses. Director of the Office of Environmental Health and Safety Carlos Torres said the district continues to monitor air quality through its network of sensors and is developing a plan for periodic testing.

    “We just can't just walk away,” Torres said.

    Enrollment is down at all three schools compared to before the fires, but district leaders say they are confident families will return to the rebuilt campuses.

    “I find it hard to believe that this community won't come back to its former glory,” said Board Member Nick Melvoin, who represents the Palisades. “We gave a lot of thought in an accelerated timeline to rebuilding for the next century.”

    Marquez Charter Elementary

    What’s the damage? The campus is a “total loss.” More than three dozen classrooms, administration buildings, the school’s auditorium and playground burned down.

    How much has LAUSD budgeted to rebuild? $202.6 million

    Where are the students? Students returned in September to portables covering about one-third of the campus. There’s also two playgrounds, a garden, library and shaded lunch area. Enrollment has dropped 60% compared to before the fire from 310 to 127 students.

    What’s next? District-contracted architects are finalizing their designs and plan to submit to the state for approval in the spring.

    A group of elementary school aged students sit in a circle on gray carpet. A woman with light skin tone and long brown hair pulled back leans in to the center of the circle.
    Palisades Charter Elementary School teacher Ms. Davison talks with her students in their new classroom on the campus of Brentwood Elementary Science Magnet last year.
    (
    Brian van der Brug
    /
    Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
    )

    Palisades Charter Elementary

    What’s the damage? About 70% of the campus was destroyed including 17 classrooms, the multipurpose room and play equipment.

    How much has LAUSD budgeted to rebuild? $135 million

    Where are the students? Students continue to share a campus with Brentwood Science Magnet. Enrollment has dropped 25% compared to before the fire from 410 to 307 students.

    What’s next? District-contracted architects are finalizing their designs and plan to submit to the state for approval in the spring.

    A white building with PALI and four images of dolphins in blue. There are blue skies and hills in the background.
    Palisades Charter High School, pictured in December 2025, is scheduled to reopen to students Jan. 27, 2026.
    (
    Kayla Bartkowski
    /
    Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
    )

    Palisades Charter High School

    What’s the damage? About 30% of the campus was destroyed including 21 classrooms, storage facilities and the track and field.

    How much has LAUSD budgeted to rebuild? $266 million

    Where are the students? Students started the school year in a renovated Sears building in downtown Santa Monica. Enrollment has dropped 14% compared to before the fire, from 2,900 to 2,500 students.

    What’s next? Classes will resume at the main campus Tues. Jan. 27 in a combination of surviving buildings and 30 new portable classrooms.

  • Sponsored message
  • Astrophysicist Ray Jayawardhana to lead university
    Ray Jayawardhana, the incoming president of Caltech, speaking at a podium during an announcement ceremony at The Athenaeum in Pasadena. He is wearing a dark suit and patterned tie, standing in front of a large orange backdrop featuring the Caltech logo.
    Incoming Caltech president Ray Jayawardhana speaks during an announcement ceremony at Caltech in Pasadena on Tuesday.

    Topline:

    Caltech has selected astrophysicist and Johns Hopkins University provost Ray Jayawardhana as its next president.

    Who he is: According to his introduction video, Jayawardhana goes by "Ray Jay."

    His academic work in astronomy explores how planets and stars form, evolve and differ from each other. He's part of a team that works with the James Webb Space Telescope to observe and characterize so-called exoplanets — planets around other stars — with an eye toward the potential for life beyond Earth.

    In addition to his time as provost at Johns Hopkins, where he oversees the university's 10 schools, Jayawardhana has also taught at Cornell University, the University of Toronto and the University of Michigan and also had a research fellowship at the University of California, Berkeley. He got his undergraduate degree at Yale and earned his Ph.D. at Harvard.

    Why now: In April, current Caltech President Thomas F. Rosenbaum announced he'd retire after the 2025-26 academic year. Rosenbaum has led the university for the past 12 years.

    What's next: Jayawardhana will step into his new role July 1.

  • Trump admin plans to halt billions to CA
    President Donald Trump speaks during a White House event to announce new tariffs April 2, 2025.

    Topline:

    The Trump administration says it’s planning to freeze about $10 billion in federal support for needy families in California and four other Democrat-run states, as the president announced an investigation into unspecified fraud in California.

    The backstory: The plans come on the heels of the Trump administration announcing a freeze on all federal payments for child care in Minnesota, citing fraud allegations against daycare centers in the state.

    The potential impact on California: The plans call for California, Minnesota, New York, Illinois and Colorado to lose about $7 billion in cash assistance for households with children, almost $2.4 billion to care for children of working parents, and about $870 million for social services grants that mostly benefit children at risk, according to unnamed federal officials speaking to the New York Times and New York Post.

    Read on ... for more on the fraud allegations and Gov. Gavin Newsom's response.

    The Trump administration says it’s planning to freeze about $10 billion in federal support for needy families in California and four other Democrat-run states, as the president announced an investigation into unspecified fraud in California.

    The plans come on the heels of the Trump administration announcing a freeze on all federal payments for child care in Minnesota, citing fraud allegations against daycare centers in the state.

    The state’s Democrat governor, Tim Walz — who ran for vice president against Donald Trump’s ticket in 2024 — announced Monday he was dropping out of running for reelection. He pointed to fraud against the state, saying it’s a real issue while alleging Trump and his allies were “seeking to take advantage of the crisis.”

    On Monday, the New York Post reported that the administration was expanding the funding freeze to include California and three other Democrat-led states, in addition to Minnesota. Unnamed federal officials cited “concerns that the benefits were fraudulently funneled to non-citizens,” The Post reported.

    Early Tuesday, President Trump alleged that corruption in California is worse than Minnesota and announced an investigation.

    “California, under Governor Gavin Newscum, is more corrupt than Minnesota, if that’s possible??? The Fraud Investigation of California has begun. Thank you for your attention to this matter! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP,” the president wrote on his social media platform Truth Social.

    He did not specify what alleged fraud was being examined in the Golden State.

    LAist has reached out to the White House to ask what the president’s fraud concerns are in California and to request an interview with the president.

    “For too long, Democrat-led states and governors have been complicit in allowing massive amounts of fraud to occur under their watch,” said an emailed statement from Andrew Nixon, a spokesperson for U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which administers the federal childcare funds.

    “Under the Trump administration, we are ensuring that federal taxpayer dollars are being used for legitimate purposes. We will ensure these states are following the law and protecting hard-earned taxpayer money.”

    Gov. Gavin Newsom’s press office disputed Trump’s claim on social media, arguing that since taking office, the governor has blocked $125 billion in fraud and arrested “criminal parasites leaching off of taxpayers.”

    Criminal fraud cases in CA appear to be rare for this program

    Defrauding federally funded programs is a crime — and one LAist has investigated, leading to one of the largest such criminal cases in recent years against a California elected official, which surrounded meal funds.

    When it comes to the federal childcare funds that are being frozen, the dollar amount of fraud alleged in criminal cases appears to be a tiny fraction of the overall program’s spending in California.

    A search of thousands of news releases by all four federal prosecutor offices in California, going back more than a decade, found a total of one criminal case where the press releases referenced childcare benefits.

    That case, brought in 2023, alleged four men stole $3.7 million in federal childcare benefits through fraudulent requests to a San Diego organization that distributed the funds. All four pleaded guilty, with one defendant sentenced to 27 months in prison and others sentenced to other terms, according to authorities.

    It appears to be equivalent to one one-hundredth of 1% of all the childcare funding California has received over the past decade-plus covered by the prosecution press release search.

    Potential impact on California families

    The plans call for California, Minnesota, New York, Illinois and Colorado to lose about $7 billion in cash assistance for households with children, almost $2.4 billion to care for children of working parents, and about $870 million for social services grants that mostly benefit children at risk, according to unnamed federal officials speaking to the New York Times and New York Post.

    In the largest category of funding, California receives $3.7 billion per year. The program is known as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, or TANF.

     ”It's very clear that a freeze of those funds would be very damaging to the children, families, and providers of California,” said Stacy Lee, who oversees early childhood initiatives "at Children Now, an advocacy group for children in California.

     ”It is a significant portion of our funds and will impact families and children and providers across the whole state,” she added. “It would be devastating, in no uncertain terms.”

    About 270,000 people are served by the TANF program in L.A. County — about 200,000 of whom are children, according to the county Department of Public Social Services.

    “Any pause in funding for their cash benefits – which average $1000/month - would be devastating to these families,” said DPSS chief of staff Nick Ippolito.

    Ippolito said the department has a robust fraud prevention and 170-person investigations team, and takes allegations “very seriously.”

    It remains to be seen whether the funding freeze will end up in court. The state, as well as major cities and counties in California, has sued to ask judges to halt funding freezes or new requirements placed by the Trump administration. L.A. city officials say they’ve had success with that, including shielding more than $600 million in federal grant funding to the city last year.

    A union representing California childcare workers said the funding freeze would harm low-income families.

    “These threats need to be called out for what they are: direct threats on working families of all backgrounds who rely on access to quality, affordable child care in their communities to go to work every day supporting, and growing our economy,” said Max Arias, chairperson for the Child Care Providers United, which says it represents more than 70,000 child care workers across the state who care for kids in their homes.

    “Funding freezes, even when intended to be temporary, will be devastating — resulting in families losing access to care and working parents facing the devastating choice of keeping their children safe or paying their bills.”

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is ngerda.47.

    Federal officials planned to send letters to the affected states Monday about the planned funding pauses, the New York Post reported. As of 3 p.m. Tuesday, state officials said they haven’t gotten any official notification of the funding freeze plans.

    “The California Department of Social Services administers child care programs that help working families afford safe, reliable care for their children — so parents can go to work, support their families, and contribute to their communities,” said a statement from California Department of Social Services spokesperson Jason Montiel.

    “These funds are critical for working families across California. We take fraud seriously, and CDSS has received no information from the federal government indicating any freeze, pause, or suspension of federal child care funding.”

  • CA is investing in housing for fire survivors
    The charred remains of what used to be the interior of a home, with a stone fireplace sticking out from the rubble.
    A home destroyed in the Eaton Fire on Jan. 8.

    Topline:

    California is investing $107.3 million in affordable housing in L.A. County to help fire survivors and target the region’s housing crisis.

    What we know: In an announcement Tuesday, the state said the money will fund nine projects with 673 new affordable rental homes specifically for communities impacted by the January fires.

    Where will these projects go? The homes will not replace destroyed ones or be built on burn scar areas, according to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office. The idea is to build in cities like Claremont, Covina, Santa Monica and Pasadena to create multiple affordable housing communities across the county.

    Officials say: “We are rebuilding stronger, fairer communities in Los Angeles without displacing the people who call these neighborhoods home,” Newsom said in a statement. “More affordable homes across the county means survivors can stay near their schools, jobs and support systems, and all Angelenos are better able to afford housing in these vibrant communities.”

    Dig deeper into how Los Angeles is remembering the anniversary of the fires.