David Wagner
covers housing in Southern California, a place where the lack of affordable housing contributes to homelessness.
Published May 3, 2024 4:24 PM
A proposed affordable housing apartment building at 800 S. Lorraine Blvd. in L.A.
(
Courtesy L.A. City Planning Dept.
)
Topline:
Homeowners in some pricey corners of Los Angeles have been urging the city to halt streamlined plans for new low-income apartments in designated historic neighborhoods. Now, some local elected leaders have taken up the call.
What’s new: Councilmember Katy Yaroslavksy introduced a motion last Friday that aims to stop the fast-tracking of affordable housing projects in any part of the city identified as an Historic Preservation Overlay Zone, or HPOZ.
The backstory: Mayor Karen Bass created the city’s fast-tracking program, ED1, during her first week in office with the goal of getting 100% affordable housing projects approved within two months. Since ED1’s launch, developers have proposed more than 16,000 apartments for low- and moderate-income renters. The program allows projects to bypass the sorts of contentious public hearings and lengthy environmental reviews that have delayed new housing in the past.
Read the full story… to find out how this fight is playing out for one project in L.A.’s upscale Windsor Village neighborhood.
Homeowners in some pricey corners of Los Angeles have been urging the city to not allow the fast-tracking of plans for new low-income apartments in historic neighborhoods. Such an exemption would further limit efforts to get much-needed affordable housing built quickly.
Now, some local elected leaders are taking up the call, putting forward a proposal to require longer reviews of affordable housing in areas designated for historic preservation.
Councilmember Katy Yaroslavksy introduced a motion last Friday that aims to stop the fast-tracking of affordable housing projects in any part of the city identified as an Historic Preservation Overlay Zone, or HPOZ.
A new motion calls for historic zones to be expempted fromED1, the city's program to fast track affordable housing. Although the 35 zones, shown in blue overlay on the map, make up a small percentage of areas within L.A., together with other exemption would add up to nearly 80% of L.A. ineligible for building under the fast-track program.
(
Courtesy City of L.A.
)
Gary Gero, Yaroslavsky’s chief of staff, told LAist, “We're not trying to stop affordable housing developments in historic zones. We really just want them to work with the community, the neighbors, with the historic zone board and with our office to make the project fit better within the context of the neighborhood.”
L.A. Mayor Karen Bass created the city’s fast-tracking program, ED1, during her first week in office with the goal of getting 100% affordable housing projects approved within two months. Since ED1’s launch, developers have proposed more than 16,000 apartments for low- and moderate-income renters. The program allows projects to bypass the sorts of contentious public hearings and lengthy environmental reviews that have delayed new housing in the past.
L.A.’s historic zones — deemed by the city to have “distinctive architectural and cultural resources” — represent a small but growing portion of the city. HPOZs cover a combined 8.5 square miles and are home to about 3% of the city’s population, according to a 2020 study commissioned by the Los Angeles Conservancy.
L.A. currently has 36 historic zones, encompassing neighborhoods from mansion-lined Hancock Park to working class Lincoln Heights. Prior to 2000, only eight such zones existed in L.A.
Preservationists say these zones are crucial for protecting L.A.’s living history from hasty development that undermines neighborhoods’ unique characteristics. But some housing advocates say the historic designation process is too often hijacked by NIMBY homeowners aiming to block any new housing affordable to residents with lower incomes.
A case study in Windsor Village
A proposed affordable housing apartment building at 800 S. Lorraine Blvd. in L.A.
(
Courtesy L.A. City Planning Dept.
)
The current vacant lot where the proposed affordable project would be built.
(
Courtesy Google Maps street view
)
Yaroslavsky’s motion would ban ED1 projects in historic zones and return new affordable housing projects to the discretion of city council members. Gero said the motion was prompted by one ED1 project in Yaroslavsky’s district at 800 S. Lorraine Blvd, which he called “egregious.”
“It's a refrigerator box,” Gero said. “They did try to gussy it up a little bit to reflect some art deco touches. But it clearly isn't enough.”
Developers behind the project say their plans for a 70-unit building would not remove any historic structures. The current site is a vacant lot. Most apartments would be reserved for renters earning up to 80% of the area’s median income, or $70,650 for a one-person household. The rest would be reserved for renters earning up to 120% of the area’s median income.
“There's just such an enormous benefit to allowing low-income and moderate-income households to move into these areas,” said Gary Benjamin, the project’s land use consultant.
The Lorraine development is located within the Windsor Village HPOZ, an area singled out for preservation due to its concentration of homes built “in the French, English and Spanish Colonial Revival modes” as well as the “Hollywood Regency and Streamline Moderne styles.”
Buying a home in Windsor Village is far out of reach for most Angelenos. One four-bedroom house about a block away from the Lorraine project is currently on the market for $1.75 million.
Benjamin was aware that this project is in an HPOZ. He said the building’s exterior was designed to blend in with the neighborhood. It uses neutral colors and inserts arches into the facade. He said he didn’t expect the neighborhood’s historic designation to become a roadblock under ED1.
“There are other existing multifamily apartment buildings, including several three to four-story apartment buildings in the area,” Benjamin said. “What was so great and promising about ED1 was allowing that certainty — understanding that there are certain objective standards that all projects are required to comply with.”
Why nearby homeowners object to the project
Some homeowners in Windsor Village say the planned six-story building is simply too tall.
“There are wonderful craftsman houses and so forth in the neighborhood,” said Barbara Pflaumer, president of the Windsor Village Association.
“This is a big building,” she said. “It looms over all the other houses in the neighborhood. And it doesn't fit architecturally with what we currently enjoy.”
Pflaumer said neighbors also oppose the project’s lack of on-site parking, a common concern about ED1 projects, which have mostly eschewed room for cars. Housing located near transit stops does not need to provide on-site parking under a 2022 state law.
Growing roadblocks for ED1 projects
Single family residential housing zones, shown here in pink, dominate the city of L.A.
(
Courtesy Othering & Belonging
)
ED1 opponents have called to stop the fast-tracking of affordable housing in more and more of the city since Mayor Bass launched the program. The largest carve-out came last summer when Bass canceled ED1 projects in areas zoned for single-family homes, which make up 74% of the city’s residential land.
Yaroslavsky’s motion to exempt historic districts from ED1 was seconded by Councilmember Heather Hutt. It has not yet been scheduled for a vote. Representatives from Yaroslavsky’s office expect it to be put on the planning and land use committee’s agenda in coming weeks.
How to watchdog local government
For people who live in L.A., the Board of Supervisors and City Councilhave the most direct impact on housing affordability in your neighborhood.
The best way to keep tabs on your own local government is by attending public meetings for your city council or local boards. Here are a few tips to get you started.
Find meeting schedules and agendas: City councils usually meet at least twice a month, although larger ones may meet weekly. Committees and boards tend to meet less often, typically once a month. You can find the schedule and meeting agenda on your local government’s website, or posted physically at your local city hall. Find more tips here.
Learn the jargon: Closed session, consent calendars and more! We have definitions for commonly used terms here.
How to give public comment: Every public meeting allows community members to give comment, whether or not it’s about something on the agenda. The meeting agenda will have specific instructions for giving public comment. Review more details here.
If you care about housing affordability
For people who live in L.A., the Board of Supervisors and City Councilhave the most direct impact on housing affordability in your neighborhood.
The best way to keep tabs on your own local government is by attending public meetings for your city council or local boards. Here are a few tips to get you started.
Find meeting schedules and agendas: City councils usually meet at least twice a month, although larger ones may meet weekly. Committees and boards tend to meet less often, typically once a month. You can find the schedule and meeting agenda on your local government’s website, or posted physically at your local city hall. Find more tips here.
Learn the jargon: Closed session, consent calendars and more! We have definitions for commonly used terms here.
How to give public comment: Every public meeting allows community members to give comment, whether or not it’s about something on the agenda. The meeting agenda will have specific instructions for giving public comment. Review more details here.
Frank Stoltze
is a veteran reporter who covers local politics and examines how democracy is and, at times, is not working.
Published November 24, 2025 5:01 PM
Federal law enforcement officers conduct an immigration enforcement operation.
(
Hyoung Chang
/
Denver Post via Getty Images
)
Topline:
Democrats on the House Committee on Oversight on Monday launched a new tracking system to document possible misconduct and abuse during federal immigration enforcement operations under the Trump administration, according to Rep. Robert Garcia of Long Beach, who is the ranking member of the committee.
The details: As of Monday, the the new dashboard listed 252 incidents dating back to Jan. 26. Only incidents verified by reputable media outlets or referenced in litigation are included, according to the committee website. Social media videos without corroboration are not included. Each incident is categorized as either under one or more of the following types of possible misconduct: "concerning use of force," "concerning arrest/detention," "concerning deportation," and an "enforcement action at a sensitive location.” Incidents involving U.S. citizens are categorized with a "U.S. Citizen" tag.
The backstory: Immigrant rights organizations and many Democratic leaders have long expressed concerns about the practices of federal immigration authorities carrying out President Donald Trump’s mass deportation plan. “Our Dashboard shines a light on the harmful actions perpetrated against U.S. citizens and immigrants across the country,” Garcia said in a statement.
In-custody deaths: More than 40 members of the U.S. House, including 15 representatives from California, are also demanding answers from federal authorities about the record number of people who died in immigration detention this year. Fifteen people have died so far this year, including two at the Adelanto immigration detention center.
Coyotes like this one are among the many animals driven closer to humans during periods of drought.
(
Courtesy Kendall Calhoun
)
Topline:
A study from UCLA found that in drier years, larger animals are more likely to head closer and closer to where people live.
What’s driving this: It depends on the animal, but food and water are the main factors. Less rain means less standing water and less vegetation for herbivores. As these animals look for food and water in more populated areas, omnivores and carnivores also follow them.
What animals are affected: Among many others, deer, elk, squirrels, mountain lions, bobcats, and black bears are all inclined to leave their natural habitats to seek out supplemental food sources in yards and agricultural areas.
Read on... for more on what the data tells about our wild visitors and what are climate has to do with them.
If you’ve noticed more wildlife visiting your yard in recent years — maybe digging up your vegetable garden or even drinking from your pool — you’re not alone.
A recent study from UCLA found that larger predators like mountain lions and bears are more likely to interact with humans and travel closer to population centers in drier years. To determine this, the researchers analyzed state data collected on reported property damage, nuisances, conflicts and sightings.
“It kind of runs the full gamut of how people interact with wildlife around their neighborhoods and their homes,” said UCLA postdoctoral researcher Kendall Calhoun, the lead author on the study.
It's not just P-22. Mountain lions across the whole state are forced to leave their habitats for survival.
(
Courtesy Kendall Calhoun
)
Different motivations for different animals
As you might expect, different animals might have different reasons for entering populated areas. But in large part, Calhoun said, it comes down to animals’ survival instincts.
The primary motivator for many herbivores is likely to be food. That’s because with less precipitation, there’s also less plant material for them to eat. (Don’t forget: even with all the rain we’ve had recently, much of Southern California is still in a drought.)
“ Deer and elk might be pushed to find those food resources in places that they normally wouldn't go, like agriculture, crops, things from people's yards, persimmons from your tree,” Calhoun said.
And as herbivores get pushed toward humans, the animals that prey on them are too. In fact, the species that saw the highest increases in clashes with humans were omnivores and carnivores, specifically mountain lions, coyotes, black bears and bobcats.
But even these animals have varying reasons for getting close to people.
“Mountain lions might be more inclined to look for supplemental food in livestock — that might be a sheep or a goat,” Calhoun said. “Black bears may be more willing to go into your trash to look for food to help supplement what they're missing in their resource-scarce natural areas.”
Meanwhile, animals of all kinds might enter a yard even when they have enough food to look for standing water.
About the data
Researchers analyzed data from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife that were reported over the last several years as part of a citizen science initiative.
One important caveat is that the researchers primarily looked at conflicts between wildlife and residents, and there may be differences in how these interactions are reported.
For example, you might not report a deer eating fruit from an overloaded tree as a nuisance, but even a peaceful black bear digging through your trash could raise alarm bells.
"People also really value having wildlife living alongside them," Calhoun said. "It really is important for us to try to strike that balance where there's pros for both sides, without some of the negative interactions that come with living in close proximity with wildlife species."
Learn more about human-wildlife interactions
There’s more background on the research on UCLA’s website, and you can find the full study here.
You can also learn much more about interactions between humans and wildlife in LAist’s Imperfect Paradise podcast series, “Lions, Coyotes, & Bears.”
Listen
45:45
Lions, Coyotes, & Bears Part 1 Redux - The Mountain Lion Celebrity
Destiny Torres
is LAist's general assignment and digital equity reporter.
Published November 24, 2025 3:32 PM
A student takes notes during history class.
(
Allison Shelley
/
via EDUimages
)
Topline:
Fast, affordable internet service in parts of L.A. County is expected to become available soon and organizers say now is a good time to sign up for alerts when the program goes live.
How much will the service cost? There will be different plans available — low income, market rate and small business — at different internet speeds and fixed price rates. The low-cost service plan will start at $25 per month for qualifying families. Those who don’t qualify could also purchase plans starting at $65 a month.
How will it work? The internet provider, WeLink, will install a Wi-Fi router inside a home and a 4-inch radio on the roof that will then connect to the internet network.
Why it matters: About 23% of households in East L.A. and Boyle Heights, and more than 40,000 households in South L.A., don’t have home internet.
Read on … for how to stay in the loop when the service rolls out.
Low-cost internet service will soon roll out in parts of L.A. County at the end of this year, and organizers say eligible households can sign up for alerts when the service becomes available.
The service — a partnership between L.A. County and internet provider WeLink — is the latest project from the county’s “Delete the Divide,” an initiative meant to bridge the digital divide in underserved neighborhoods.
Major funding for the project comes from the American Rescue Plan Act, as well as a grant from the California Public Utilities Commission.
It’s badly needed
About 23%, or more than 20,000, households in the East L.A. and Boyle Heights area don’t have home internet, according to Delete the Divide.
The service will also soon be coming to South L.A., where more than 40,000 households were identified as lacking home internet.
What you need to know
There will be different plans available — including low-income, market-rate and small business options — at fixed prices. The low-cost plan will start at $25 per month for qualifying families. Those who don’t qualify could also purchase plans starting at $65 a month. Monthly rates are fixed until at least September 2027.
Every plan includes unlimited data, a router and parental controls.
Low-cost internet service will soon roll out in South L.A. at the end of this year.
(
Courtesy of L.A. County
)
Low-cost internet service will soon roll out in parts of East L.A. and Boyle Heights at the end of this year.
(
Courtesy of L.A. County
)
How it works
WeLink will install a Wi-Fi router inside a home and a 4-inch radio on the roof to connect the household to the internet.
Interested households can sign up for updates and be notified by WeLink when service is available here.
Robert Garrova
covers general assignment stories and mental health.
Published November 24, 2025 2:34 PM
Fresh produce and fruits at the farmers market.
(
Courtesy Food Access LA
)
Topline:
A program that offers CalFresh recipients an extra $60 a month to spend on fresh produce at participating stores and farmers markets is restarting thanks to renewed state funding.
How it works: When CalFresh recipients spend money on fresh fruits and vegetables at participating locations, their EBT cards are immediately rebated the amount they spend, up to $60 a month.
Funding boost: Thanks to a boost of $36 million in state funding, program organizers are hopeful it will last about 10 months. The renewed funding comes after food banks and meal programs in Los Angeles were forced to scramble to serve a rush of people looking for help during the longest government shutdown in American history.
The quote: The continuation of the program was a priority for State Sen. Laura Richardson, who represents cities including Carson and Compton. “You know, people are hurting," Richardson told LAist. "The number one thing that we hear that people are concerned about is affordability."
Find participating locations: There are about 90 participating retailers and farmers markets. You can find a list here.