Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Many dentists still don't accept Medi-Cal
    A bald man with a small white beard sits on a couch wearing beige shorts and a pink button up shirt
    Bobby Moske of San Rafael, California, had to get his tooth pulled after waiting months for authorization for a root canal under Medi-Cal. Now he wants implants, but Medi-Cal won’t cover it.

    Topline:

    California is among a growing number of states that provide comprehensive dental benefits to adults enrolled in Medicaid, and some lawmakers want to add more dental cleanings, examinations, and implants to the safety-net program. Yet many dentists don’t accept Medi-Cal, the state’s Medicaid program, so new benefits would offer no guarantee that patients could get care.

    The backstory: The UCLA Center for Health Policy Research found that 21% of California dentists saw Medi-Cal patients of all ages, according to data from 2019 to 2021. Often those dentists limit the number of Medi-Cal patients they will see, meaning only 15% of adults might get dental care in any given year, said Elizabeth Mertz, a dentistry professor and medical sociologist at the University of California-San Francisco.

    What the state is doing about it: One of the bills moving through the California Legislature would expand Medi-Cal coverage of dental implants — artificial tooth roots implanted into the jawbone that support artificial teeth — and crowns, giving patients with broken or missing teeth more options.

    Read on... to understand why some dentists don't provide Medi-cal covered patients access to treatments.

    SAN RAFAEL, Calif. — When Bobby Moske went to a community clinic a few years ago with a toothache, he couldn’t find a dentist in Marin County willing to take Medicaid to do a root canal.

    Marin Community Clinics referred the 75-year-old to a dentist about 20 miles away in San Francisco, but his tooth decayed while he waited months for authorization to cover the procedure. In the end, his tooth was pulled.

    It was the sixth time in a decade Moske had lost a tooth for lack of dental care, he said. The behavioral health peer specialist wears a denture that must be removed at mealtime, making eating a chore. He often struggles to mash food between his gums, and he limits his diet to things he can easily chew. Nuts and steak, for instance, are off the table. It can be embarrassing to sit down for a meal with clients or colleagues.

    “I feel like I give off the impression of somebody who doesn’t take care of himself, and I do take care of myself,” Moske said. “I try very hard. So, when I go out, I try not to smile.”

    California is among a growing number of states that provide comprehensive dental benefits to adults enrolled in Medicaid, and some lawmakers want to add more dental cleanings, examinations, and implants to the safety-net program. Yet many dentists don’t accept Medi-Cal, the state’s Medicaid program, so new benefits would offer no guarantee that patients could get care.

    The UCLA Center for Health Policy Research found that 21% of California dentists saw Medi-Cal patients of all ages, according to data from 2019 to 2021. Often those dentists limit the number of Medi-Cal patients they will see, meaning only 15% of adults might get dental care in any given year, said Elizabeth Mertz, a dentistry professor and medical sociologist at the University of California-San Francisco.

    “The issue is you have coverage that is useless,” Mertz said. “The state does provide coverage, but almost no dentist will accept it.”

    One of the bills moving through the California Legislature would expand Medi-Cal coverage of dental implants — artificial tooth roots implanted into the jawbone that support artificial teeth — and crowns, giving patients with broken or missing teeth more options.

    Currently, Medi-Cal covers implants only when “exceptional medical conditions are documented,” according to the state’s 2024 benefits guide. It’s unclear how many private dental plans cover implants, but preliminary research has shown about half of individuals enrolled in a PPO plan nationwide have some type of coverage, said Mike Adelberg, executive director at the National Association of Dental Plans.

    Under the bill, introduced by Democratic Sen. Aisha Wahab, Medi-Cal patients could qualify for an implant if their dentist determines it is the best option to replace a missing tooth.

    “If you need an implant, you should be able to get it, especially our most vulnerable,” Wahab said. “The poorest of the poor in California deserve this.”

    The Senate passed the bill unanimously in May, and a vote is pending in the Assembly Appropriations Committee. Elana Ross, a spokesperson for Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, declined to comment on the bill.

    Four in 10 U.S. adults have had permanent teeth pulled, according to an analysis by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The CDC also reports that low-income older adults are at higher risk for tooth loss, which can cause discomfort and affect eating and speaking. The fix can be prosthetic devices, such as bridges and dentures, or replacement teeth, but they can be costly, especially for those without insurance or on government programs with limited benefits.

    While the alternatives might be a better fit for some patients, implants are “the standard of care,” said Sohail Saghezchi, director of UCSF’s oral surgery residency program.

    “They’re not able to eat everything that they want, and, a lot of times, foods like vegetables and fruits are harder to eat,” he said.

    The Department of Health Care Services, which oversees Medi-Cal, estimates it would cost between $4 billion and $7 billion a year for about 1.5 million implants — a price tag Wahab fears could be problematic since Newsom in June signed a state budget closing an estimated $46.8 billion deficit.

    The cost of an implant varies widely. DHCS estimates it would reimburse dentists between $3,000 and $4,500 for each implant surgery. FAIR Health, a national nonprofit that estimates health costs, reported a median charge for a typical implant in California between October 2022 and September 2023 ranged from about $4,000 to $4,800. Location matters, too. In San Franciso, for example, an implant is closer to $8,000, Saghezchi said.

    “Reimbursement rates need to cover the costs of providing the service,” said Alicia Malaby, a spokesperson at the California Dental Association. “As with any Medi-Cal benefit, coverage is not meaningful unless the state is willing to fully invest in it to ensure people can actually access the care they need.”

    The California Dental Association, which does not support the current bill, has raised concerns about the invasiveness of implant surgery, which requires regular follow-up appointments. It’s sponsoring legislation to require Medi-Cal to cover a standard two teeth cleanings and examinations a year for people 21 and older, as opposed to one.

    DHCS spokesperson Leah Myers said the state has increased Medi-Cal reimbursements to dentists since the passage of Proposition 56 in 2016 and created a web-based app to enlist more dentists. More than 14,000 dentists — about 40% — were enrolled in the Medi-Cal program, as of July, according to the latest numbers published by the Dental Board.

    But for people such as Moske, finding a dentist and getting needed care feels impossible. In most of California, 3 in 4 Medi-Cal patients 21 and up didn’t have a dental appointment in 2023, according to DHCS.

    When Moske testified in support of the implant bill in June, he took out his denture, held it up to show lawmakers, and opened his mouth.

    “I’m here to show you something,” Moske said. “Please don’t be offended. These are the teeth I lost.”

    After Moske had finished speaking, Assembly member Reggie Jones-Sawyer (D-Los Angeles) turned to his fellow members and removed his own denture.

    “I know exactly what you went through,” he said. “I have dental insurance from the city of Los Angeles and the state of California and still had problems getting things covered. I thank you for being brave enough to let people know.”

    This article was produced by KFF Health News, which publishes California Healthline, an editorially independent service of the California Health Care Foundation.

    KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

  • LA mayor unveils $14.9 billion budget
    A row of American flags hang from a gray building against a sunny sky. A tall gray building is visible beyond in an angle looking up.
    Los Angeles City Hall

    Topline

    Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass on Monday unveiled a $14.9 billion budget that is significantly rosier than last year’s spending plan, when she suggested massive layoffs and service cuts to accommodate a billion-dollar deficit.

    The details: This year, because of a projected increase in revenues, the mayor is proposing no layoffs and a modest expansion of street services. The budget also calls for hiring police officers to keep up with retirements and resignations, maintaining Fire Department spending and holding steady funding for homelessness programs.

    Reserve fund: In Bass’ proposal, the reserve fund is 5.7% of the general fund, or $490 million. The budget does not dip into the reserves, in contrast to last year’s plan.

    Criticism: Bass is seeking re-election this year, and several of her challengers criticized the budget. “The budget the Mayor released today tells us the plan is to largely keep doing what we're doing — but what we're doing is not working,” Councilmember Nithya Raman said in a statement.

    Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass on Monday unveiled a $14.9 billion budget that is significantly rosier than last year’s spending plan, when she suggested massive layoffs and service cuts to accommodate a billion-dollar deficit.

    This year, because of a projected increase in revenues, the mayor is proposing no layoffs and a modest expansion of street services. Bass' budget also calls for hiring police officers to keep up with retirements and resignations, maintaining Fire Department spending and holding steady funding for homelessness programs.

    “This budget is about protecting the progress we have made and making clear that Los Angeles is moving forward and will not go backward,” Bass said at a news conference.

    In the proposal, the reserve fund is 5.7% of the general fund, or $490 million. The budget does not dip into the reserves, in contrast to last year’s plan.

    Bass is seeking re-election this year. The primary is June 2.

    Some of her challengers in the upcoming election, including Councilmember Nithya Raman, criticized Bass’ proposal as doing little more than maintaining the status quo.

    “The budget the Mayor released today tells us the plan is to largely keep doing what we're doing — but what we're doing is not working,” Raman said in a statement.

    Next, the proposal will go to the City Council for consideration. Budget hearings will be conducted in the coming weeks.

    Increasing revenue

    Among the reasons city officials say revenue will go up is the expected influx of thousands of visitors to World Cup soccer matches this summer. More travelers mean more people staying in hotels and paying hotel taxes, as well as more sales tax revenue.

    The budget projects a $412 million increase in general tax revenue, including $71 in business taxes, $34 million in sales taxes and $67 million in utility taxes.

    The budget would add 170 new positions in the department that handles street repairs and increase funding for street and sidewalk fixes, curb-ramp installation, street sweeping, bulky item pickup and dedicated illegal dumping enforcement throughout the city.

    The budget also proposes hiring 510 police officers, representing a target of 8,555 for the Police Department and enough to keep up with attrition, according to budget officials. Bass has set a goal of 9,500 officers.

    “It’s about preventing the shrinkage of LAPD,” Bass said.

    That proposal is likely to see opposition from some council members who want to see the department shrink and funding for unarmed response teams increase.

    Inside Safe

    The budget sustains citywide coverage for civilian unarmed crisis response, maintaining deployment of 500 crossing guards and expanding a program that aims to help children get to and from school safely and protect them from gang violence.

    Under the budget, funding for Inside Safe, the mayor’s signature program to address homelessness, would remain about the same — $104 million.

    The mayor touts an 18% drop in street homelessness as evidence of its success.

    The budget maintains funding for the city Fire Department. In November, voters are expected to decide whether to increase the sales tax by half a percent to pay for more firefighters and equipment.

    Criticism for the budget

    Bass’ challengers immediately criticized her budget as lacking vision.

    “This budget maintains a status quo of reduced services and higher fees, the direct result of fiscally irresponsible decisions made by this Mayor in prior years,” Raman said in her statement.

    In January, the council member voted against Bass’ plan to hire 170 more police officers.

    Adam Miller, a tech entrepreneur and another Bass challenger, said keeping the budget flat “implies that the status quo is working.”

    “That is tone-deaf to the city of Los Angeles as Angelenos overwhelmingly feel we need change," he said.

    The budget needs to be approved by the City Council and signed by the mayor by July 1, the start of the fiscal year.

  • Sponsored message
  • Hundreds of positions to be eliminated
    People wearing "LAHSA" jackets stand by as a police officer and a city worker clear a homeless encampment.
    LAHSA workers observe L.A. city sanitation workers removing a houseless encampment during a sweep of an encampment in Venice Beach.
    Listen 0:37
    LA homeless agency to lay off 284 employees

    Topline:

    The L.A. Homeless Services Authority announced Monday that the agency will narrow its focus and lay off 284 employees at the end of June.

    Why now: The changes at the public agency, known as LAHSA, come after the L.A. County Board of Supervisors voted last April to withdraw more than $300 million in annual funding for the agency.

    The context: LAHSA interim CEO Gita O’Neill called the staffing changes a “necessary evolution," according to a news release announcing the move. “By narrowing our focus to macro-level governance, data management, and securing federal funding, we are stepping into our true role as a strategic architect of the region’s homelessness response system.” In December, a group of LAHSA employees wrote an open letter to the Board of Supervisors demanding they “ensure no County-funded worker is displaced.”

    Hundreds of layoffs: The agency will send layoff notices to the 284 employees on April 30, according to the news release. Another 130 positions that are currently vacant will also be eliminated in the transition. Some of the layoffs may be avoided, a LAHSA spokesperson said in the news release, “depending on the final details of the City of Los Angeles budget.”

    "I want to profoundly thank our staff for their unwavering dedication and hard work serving people experiencing homelessness across Los Angeles County," O’Neill said. "Our staff has been the driving force behind the historic reductions in street homelessness we've seen over the past two years.”

  • Chavez-DeRemer leaves post amid investigation

    Topline:

    Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer is leaving her post amid an internal investigation brought on by complaints about misconduct.

    More details: White House Director of Communications Steven Cheung announced the departure on X, writing "she has done a phenomenal job in her role by protecting American workers, enacting fair labor practices, and helping Americans gain additional skills to improve their lives." Cheung said Chavez-DeRemer was taking a position in the private sector.

    Why it matters: Chavez-DeRemer is the third cabinet member to leave during President Trump's second term.

    Read on... for more on the resignation.

    Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer is leaving her post amid an internal investigation brought on by complaints about misconduct.

    White House Director of Communications Steven Cheung announced the departure on X, writing "she has done a phenomenal job in her role by protecting American workers, enacting fair labor practices, and helping Americans gain additional skills to improve their lives." Cheung said Chavez-DeRemer was taking a position in the private sector.

    A senior official at the Labor Department not authorized to speak publicly about the departure said the secretary had resigned.

    Chavez-DeRemer is the third cabinet member to leave during President Donald Trump's second term.

    In early March, Trump fired Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem shortly after lawmakers on Capitol Hill berated her over her agency's handling of immigration enforcement — as well as its $220 million ad campaign featuring the secretary on horseback.


    A month later, Attorney General Pam Bondi left amid simmering frustration over her leadership of the Justice Department and her handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files.

    While Chavez-DeRemer has played a far less visible role than Bondi or Noem in Trump's second term, her tenure has also been marked by controversy.

    In January, the New York Post first reported that the Labor Department's inspector general was looking into complaints that Chavez-DeRemer was having an affair with a subordinate, drinking alcohol on the job and using taxpayer-funded travel to visit with friends and family members.

    NPR has not independently verified the contents of the investigation.

    While in office, Chavez-DeRemer spent much of her time away from Washington. A year ago, she launched her "America at Work" listening tour, an initiative that took her to all 50 states.

    Chavez-DeRemer's chief of staff and deputy chief of staff, who had been on leave since January, resigned in early March. A third senior member of her staff, Melissa Robey, said in a statement issued March 26 that she had been fired a couple days earlier, after giving a four-hour interview to the Office of the Inspector General.

    Meanwhile, the New York Times was first to report that Chavez-DeRemer's husband, Shawn DeRemer, an anesthesiologist in Portland, Ore., had been barred from Labor Department headquarters in Washington, D.C., after at least two staffers reported he had touched them inappropriately. Washington, D.C. police and federal prosecutors closed the investigations without bringing charges.

    An unconventional choice

    Trump's selection of Chavez-DeRemer to lead the Labor Department was seen by many as a concession to Teamsters President Sean O'Brien. O'Brien had been friendly with Trump through the presidential campaign, taking a prime-time speaking slot at the 2024 Republican National Convention and later declining to endorse Trump's opponent, then-Vice President Kamala Harris.

    O'Brien had pushed for Chavez-DeRemer's selection, noting that she was one of only a few Republicans in Congress to have supported the PRO Act. That bill aimed to make it easier for workers to organize unions, including by overturning state Right to Work laws, which weaken unions.

    At the time, Trump wrote, "Lori's strong support from both the Business and Labor communities will ensure that the Labor Department can unite Americans of all backgrounds."

    Deputy Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling, who has already been running much of the day-to-day operations of the Labor Department, has been named acting secretary, according to Cheung's post on X.

    Sonderling previously served at the Labor Department during the first Trump administration and at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission under the Biden administration, having been nominated by Trump during his first term to fill a Republican seat.
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • 'Judge of the Year' award questioned
    A man sits on the witness stand, wearing a suit and tie. He is gesturing with his hands as he answers a question put to him.
    Orange County Judge Ebrahim Baytieh, a former high-profile prosecutor, answers questions in a San Diego courtroom in 2024 about evidence involving jailhouse informants that was withheld from defendant Paul Smith.

    Topline:

    Before he became an Orange County Superior Court Judge, Ebrahim Baytieh was fired as a prosecutor by District Attorney Todd Spitzer for allegedly cheating to win convictions. And Baytieh was accused by a San Diego judge last year of lying under oath. But an O.C. nonprofit that teaches youth about constitutional rights awarded Baytieh “Judge of the Year” at its annual reception last week.

    The backstory: Before becoming a judge, Baytieh held a top position in the office of former O.C. District Attorney Tony Rackauckas, when it came to light that he and other prosecutors had illegally used jailhouse informants or “snitches” to win convictions. Baytieh repeatedly denied the misconduct in public, and was accused last year by a San Diego judge of trying to conceal his own role in the misdeeds.

    What does the nonprofit say? The group that gave Baytieh the award, the Constitutional Rights Foundation, Orange County, said in a statement that they honored Baytieh because he was the top volunteer for the group’s high school mock trial competition. They said the group had “received positive feedback from coaches and students over whose trials [Baytieh] presided.”

    Before he became an Orange County Superior Court Judge, Ebrahim Baytieh was fired as a prosecutor by District Attorney Todd Spitzer for allegedly cheating to win convictions. And Baytieh was accused by a San Diego judge last year of lying under oath. But an O.C. nonprofit that teaches youth about constitutional rights awarded Baytieh “Judge of the Year” at its annual reception last week.

    The group, the Constitutional Rights Foundation, Orange County, said in a statement that they honored Baytieh because he was the top volunteer for the group’s high school mock trial competition. The statement said the group had “received positive feedback from coaches and students over whose trials [Baytieh] presided.”

    Some questioned whether the award was appropriate.

    “It’s disgusting,” said Scott Sanders, the former public defender who uncovered the so-called “snitch scandal,” in which Baytieh was a major player. “If you’re going to have a group that’s dedicated to constitutional rights, it is not a good look to make your ‘Judge of the Year’ a guy who has been found to violate constitutional rights.”

    What’s come to be known as the O.C. snitch scandal refers to the systematic use of jailhouse informants to coax confessions from defendants without their lawyers present, and then hide that evidence from defendants — both of which are illegal. The misconduct took place under former District Attorney Tony Rackauckas. Spitzer, the current DA, has vowed to never let such misconduct happen again. But he has been left to deal with the fallout, including past wrongful convictions that continue to come to light.

    Baytieh, who held a top position in Rackauckas’s office, repeatedly denied the allegations of misconduct.

    Nevertheless, a federal civil rights investigation ultimately concluded that O.C. law enforcement “systematically violated criminal defendants’ right to counsel."

    Baytieh’s prominent role in those violations has come into focus in recent years, most recently when the District Attorney’s Office was forced to drop murder charges in a decades-old case that Baytieh had initially prosecuted. The judge in that case concluded that Baytieh and his prosecution team had withheld evidence, and then lied on the stand about it in 2024. The judge called the prosecution’s behavior "reprehensible."

    The setting is a courtroom: A man wearing a dark suit is sitting and looking at a man, also wearing a dark suit, as the man is speaking in reference to some papers in his hand.
    Orange County Asst. Public Defender Scott Sanders questions former prosecutor Ebrahim Baytieh, now an O.C. Superior Court judge, about the use of jailhouse informants in a San Diego courtoom on June 10, 2024.
    (
    Nick Gerda
    /
    LAist
    )

    Previously, Baytieh had been fired by Spitzer after an internal investigation found Baytieh had illegally withheld evidence in the same murder case. Baytieh would go on to win election to the O.C. Superior Court a few months later, with endorsements from dozens of current and former judges and law enforcement leaders.

    LAist reached out to Baytieh for this story but has not received a response. Paul Meyer, a defense attorney who has represented Baytieh in recent years, declined to comment.

    One-man protest from an unlikely critic

    As high school students and their parents arrived at Calvary Church in Santa Ana last Thursday for the mock trial awards ceremony, Paul Wilson walked through the parking lot, handing out copies of a six-page letter, penned by Sanders, the former public defender, highlighting Baytieh’s unethical behavior and urging the Constitutional Rights Foundation not to honor the judge.

    The event went on as planned.

    What is the Constitutional Rights Foundation?

    The Constitutional Rights Foundation, Orange County is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that teaches teens about civics and the legal process. It runs moot court and mock trial competitions for middle- and high-schoolers.

    The board of directors, judicial advisory board, and sponsors include dozens of prominent lawyers, law firms, and judges in Orange County.

    Wilson and Sanders have become unlikely allies in a quest to root out past misconduct by O.C. law enforcement and seek justice for defendants who didn't get a fair trial.

    More than a decade ago, Sanders and Wilson were on opposite sides of the courtroom. Sanders was defending Scott Dekraai, the man accused of killing Wilson’s wife, Christy, and seven others in the county’s worst mass shooting in modern history, at a salon in Seal Beach.

    Dekraai was arrested in what appeared to be a slam dunk legal case. But then, while preparing for trial, Sanders discovered a secret law enforcement program that offered money and perks to jailed informants to surreptitiously question defendants, including Dekraai. Questioning a defendant without giving them the opportunity to have a lawyer present runs afoul of the Constitution. Prosecutors were also hiding evidence about informants from defendants, another constitutional violation.

    As a result of Sanders’s discovery, the Dekraai case dragged on for years. In a humiliating defeat, the DA’s office was removed from prosecuting the case because of the misconduct. And in a blow to the victims’ families, a judge ruled that the death penalty would be off the table.

    An investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice followed, during which Baytieh, then a top prosecutor, denied having any knowledge of the misconduct.

    In a parking lot, a man hands a document to a woman in a suit who is walking with another man in a suit.
    Paul Wilson hands copies of a letter detailing Judge Baytieh's role in the snitch scandal to attendees of an awards ceremony sponsored by the Constitutional Rights Foundation of Orange County.
    (
    Courtesy: Paul Wilson
    /
    LAist
    )

    After the ordeal, Wilson began crusading to reform O.C. law enforcement. “We haven’t gotten the justice we deserve,” Wilson said of himself and other victims’ family members.

    That’s what led him to make copies of Sanders’s denouncement of Baytieh’s “Judge of the Year” award, and to bring them to the Constitutional Rights Foundation’s celebratory event last week, he told LAist.

    “ I felt a great need to go down and let some of these students that Baytieh has been mentoring … know who this guy was and what he's all about and what he continues to be,” Wilson said.

    “For years and years, those guys operated behind this shield that nobody was going to catch them,” Wilson said of Baytieh and other former O.C. prosecutors and sheriff’s deputies who were found by judges and the U.S. Department of Justice to have participated in the misconduct.

    Wilson told LAist he passed out about 45 copies of Sanders’s letter before someone from the Constitutional Rights Foundation asked him to leave.

    Read the letter:

    Pending justice

    Sanders retired last year from the O.C. Public Defender’s office after 32 years. Before he left, around 60 convictions tainted by the misuse of informants had been lessened or overturned. In one, a 69-year-old man was freed from prison after the DA's Office admitted that prosecutors withheld evidence decades ago that mitigated his guilt. The man had already spent 41 years in prison.

    Sanders said there’s much more work to do — in court filings, he has detailed dozens of convictions that he argues should be revisited because of law enforcement misconduct.

    Baytieh prosecuted many of those cases.

    “Every one of his cases should be torn apart,” Sanders said.