The Brief

A letter earlier this month from new U.S. Department of Education leaders sent shockwaves through K-12 and higher education institutions. In a Feb. 14 "Dear Colleague" memo, the department directed schools to stop using race to admit students or for any other consideration, including scholarships, housing, and "all other aspects of student, academic, and campus life."

The department said it would enforce compliance at the end of February and punish institutions by withholding federal funding.

In the face of uncertainty, some Southern California college educators are waiting for leaders of their campuses to give them clear direction as to whether diversity programs and efforts will be curtailed or shut down — or whether the institutions will resist the Trump administration’s directions in court.

“There are a group of us across institutions, especially in California, who are saying it's time to actually double down on doing diversity, equity and inclusion work,” said Liane Hypolite, a professor of educational leadership at Cal Poly Pomona. “This isn't the time to just comply … out of fear."

Providing data on how students feel

The letter paints diversity programs in a stark light.

“These institutions’ embrace of pervasive and repugnant race-based preferences and other forms of racial discrimination have emanated throughout every facet of academia” and led to discrimination, including of white and Asian students, the department said.

Diversity programs, supporters say, help the targeted students and the population at large.

The USC Race and Equity Center, for example, offers campus climate surveys, said executive director Jessica T. DeCuir-Gunby.

Those surveys can be taken by students or employees to “assess what's going on, see how everybody's feeling," she said. "And then based upon that, we'll, you know, write up a summary and give it to the leadership and let them know, this is what's going on in your institution.”

The goal is to improve inclusion of people of different races, ethnicities, religious, sex, and gender in schools and the workplace.

Graduating students take their seats at the Fresno State Chicano/Latino Commencement Celebration in the Save Mart Center in Fresno on May 18, 2024.

(

Photo by Larry Valenzuela

/

CalMatters/CatchLight Local

)

“Everyone in academia is taking this letter very seriously,” DeCuir-Gunby said. “We are looking to leadership to help us to better understand their interpretations of the letter.”

USC spokesperson Lauren Bartlett said the university is studying the letter.

Spaces for culturally specific activities

The Department of Education letter says “many American schools and universities even encourage segregation by race at graduation ceremonies and in dormitories and other facilities.” It’s calling for those policies to stop.

Campus employees say cultural centers fall within that claim. Many colleges and universities have taken steps to create and fund cultural centers based on student groups’ race, ethnicity, sex, or gender.

“[Cultural centers] end up being these spaces where students can find refuge that they often cannot find on the rest of their college campus,” said Hypolite of Cal Poly Pomona. “They are places where students get connected to services. They actually welcome in, for example, culturally relevant therapists that might work in the counseling center, but students don't feel comfortable going there."

That helps students' social and emotional well-being, she said, which raises the likelihood that they’ll stay enrolled in college and earn their degrees.

“I just haven't seen that kind of really solid communication saying, essentially, ‘We stand with our most marginalized students right now,’ which is what our students need to hear,” Hypolite said.

Dr. Cornel West speaks at a Juneteenth event.

(

Patrick Record

/

Cal State University

)

CSU Chancellor Mildred García did email CSU employees about a week before the U.S. Department of Education letter that the Trump administration’s executive orders would not change the school's commitment to students.

“I write to assure you that, in this moment, the CSU will do what all great institutions — and great people — do in times of uncertainty and change. We will turn to and uphold our core values. We will honor our purpose. We will fulfill our mission,” García wrote.

The California Community College chancellor’s office did not specify how it will respond to President Trump’s directives.

“We are encouraging college leaders to continue their critical work in alignment with state and federal laws, regulations, and our shared goal of expanding educational opportunities, strengthening student pathways, and supporting workforce development to meet California’s economic needs,” said Melissa Villarin, a spokesperson for the California Community Colleges chancellor's office.

A way to meet the federal government’s own requirements

Biola University in Southeast L.A. County is a religious school; its mission is to offer a “biblically centered education, scholarship and service — equipping men and women in mind and character to impact the world for the Lord Jesus Christ.”

The university's board of trustees approved a theological statement on diversity in 2019, which among other things states: "Unity without diversity ceases to be unity and becomes uniformity, and diversity without unity ultimately becomes either radical tribalism or individualism."

It’s also trying to become a Hispanic-Serving Institution, a federal designation that comes with requirements to help Hispanic students in order to tap into federal funds.

How Biola's plans align with the new federal directive remains to be seen.

“Biola is reviewing how this letter's requirements will affect the institution…” said university spokesperson Sarah Dougher. “Biola is still determining what exactly on campus will be affected.”

"There's a fine line between removing programs that are considered to be discriminatory by race and removing programs that speak to a cultural or ethnicity support for students," Cynthia Jackson Hammond, president of the Council for Higher Education Accreditation, told NPR in an interview last week.

How will top university leaders respond?

The California Department of Education and the State Board of Education issued a joint statement Friday saying that the law hasn't yet actually changed: "Executive orders and memos cannot modify or override statutory requirements or regulations or unilaterally impose new terms on existing agreements."

But they did suggest that colleges and universities "consult legal counsel regarding the impact of any potential federal actions."

Leaders of the University of California and California State University systems have not announced whether they will comply with or challenge the Trump administration directives. Together, those universities enroll more than 750,000 students.

“As this type of action is unprecedented, we are consulting with the California Attorney General and higher education partners across the country to better understand the statewide impact of this letter,” said CSU spokesperson Amy Bentley-Smith in an email.

In some instances, California State University’s top administrators have followed policy changes carried out by University of California leaders.

Though UC President Michael Drake said in a video message Thursday that the university's mission and values have not changed, UC leaders have not specified how they will respond to the Trump administration's directives.

“The Dear Colleague letter issued by the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights (OCR) provides guidance on the Department's interpretation of existing anti-discrimination laws and does not name any specific institution,” said UC spokesperson Omar Rodriguez.

“It indicates how OCR intends to enforce these legal requirements,” he said via email. He also noted that state law already restricts the use of race in college settings. “Given the UC’s compliance with Prop 209, we do not use race-based preferences in our practices.”

The stakes are high. How colleges and universities react to this order could shape generations to come.

“There's no other entity that is more influential in shaping American society and arguably the global society than the [U.S.] college and university,” said Eddie R. Cole, who researches the history of higher education at UCLA. “Nobody knows what to do and no one wants to do something preemptive."

Here's the full letter from the U.S. Department of Education

The Trump administration says it’s planning to freeze about $10 billion in federal support for needy families in California and four other Democrat-run states, as the president announced an investigation into unspecified fraud in California.

The plans come on the heels of the Trump administration announcing a freeze on all federal payments for child care in Minnesota, citing fraud allegations against daycare centers in the state.

The state’s Democrat governor, Tim Walz — who ran for vice president against Donald Trump’s ticket in 2024 — announced Monday he was dropping out of running for reelection. He pointed to fraud against the state, saying it’s a real issue while alleging Trump and his allies were “seeking to take advantage of the crisis.”

On Monday, the New York Post reported that the administration was expanding the funding freeze to include California and three other Democrat-led states, in addition to Minnesota. Unnamed federal officials cited “concerns that the benefits were fraudulently funneled to non-citizens,” The Post reported.

Early Tuesday, President Trump alleged that corruption in California is worse than Minnesota and announced an investigation.

“California, under Governor Gavin Newscum, is more corrupt than Minnesota, if that’s possible??? The Fraud Investigation of California has begun. Thank you for your attention to this matter! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP,” the president wrote on his social media platform Truth Social.

He did not specify what alleged fraud was being examined in the Golden State.

LAist has reached out to the White House to ask what the president’s fraud concerns are in California and to request an interview with the president.

“For too long, Democrat-led states and governors have been complicit in allowing massive amounts of fraud to occur under their watch,” said an emailed statement from Andrew Nixon, a spokesperson for U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which administers the federal childcare funds.

“Under the Trump administration, we are ensuring that federal taxpayer dollars are being used for legitimate purposes. We will ensure these states are following the law and protecting hard-earned taxpayer money.”

Gov. Gavin Newsom’s press office disputed Trump’s claim on social media, arguing that since taking office, the governor has blocked $125 billion in fraud and arrested “criminal parasites leaching off of taxpayers.”

Criminal fraud cases in CA appear to be rare for this program

Defrauding federally funded programs is a crime — and one LAist has investigated, leading to one of the largest such criminal cases in recent years against a California elected official, which surrounded meal funds.

When it comes to the federal childcare funds that are being frozen, the dollar amount of fraud alleged in criminal cases appears to be a tiny fraction of the overall program’s spending in California.

A search of thousands of news releases by all four federal prosecutor offices in California, going back more than a decade, found a total of one criminal case where the press releases referenced childcare benefits.

That case, brought in 2023, alleged four men stole $3.7 million in federal childcare benefits through fraudulent requests to a San Diego organization that distributed the funds. All four pleaded guilty, with one defendant sentenced to 27 months in prison and others sentenced to other terms, according to authorities.

It appears to be equivalent to one one-hundredth of 1% of all the childcare funding California has received over the past decade-plus covered by the prosecution press release search.

Potential impact on California families

The plans call for California, Minnesota, New York, Illinois and Colorado to lose about $7 billion in cash assistance for households with children, almost $2.4 billion to care for children of working parents, and about $870 million for social services grants that mostly benefit children at risk, according to unnamed federal officials speaking to the New York Times and New York Post.

In the largest category of funding, California receives $3.7 billion per year. The program is known as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, or TANF.

 ”It's very clear that a freeze of those funds would be very damaging to the children, families, and providers of California,” said Stacy Lee, who oversees early childhood initiatives "at Children Now, an advocacy group for children in California.

 ”It is a significant portion of our funds and will impact families and children and providers across the whole state,” she added. “It would be devastating, in no uncertain terms.”

About 270,000 people are served by the TANF program in L.A. County — about 200,000 of whom are children, according to the county Department of Public Social Services.

“Any pause in funding for their cash benefits – which average $1000/month - would be devastating to these families,” said DPSS chief of staff Nick Ippolito.

Ippolito said the department has a robust fraud prevention and 170-person investigations team, and takes allegations “very seriously.”

It remains to be seen whether the funding freeze will end up in court. The state, as well as major cities and counties in California, has sued to ask judges to halt funding freezes or new requirements placed by the Trump administration. L.A. city officials say they’ve had success with that, including shielding more than $600 million in federal grant funding to the city last year.

A union representing California childcare workers said the funding freeze would harm low-income families.

“These threats need to be called out for what they are: direct threats on working families of all backgrounds who rely on access to quality, affordable child care in their communities to go to work every day supporting, and growing our economy,” said Max Arias, chairperson for the Child Care Providers United, which says it represents more than 70,000 child care workers across the state who care for kids in their homes.

“Funding freezes, even when intended to be temporary, will be devastating — resulting in families losing access to care and working parents facing the devastating choice of keeping their children safe or paying their bills.”

Federal officials planned to send letters to the affected states Monday about the planned funding pauses, the New York Post reported. As of 3 p.m. Tuesday, state officials said they haven’t gotten any official notification of the funding freeze plans.

“The California Department of Social Services administers child care programs that help working families afford safe, reliable care for their children — so parents can go to work, support their families, and contribute to their communities,” said a statement from California Department of Social Services spokesperson Jason Montiel.

“These funds are critical for working families across California. We take fraud seriously, and CDSS has received no information from the federal government indicating any freeze, pause, or suspension of federal child care funding.”

Housing officials in the city of Los Angeles say a pandemic-era voucher program is set to run out of money later this year, putting thousands of renters at risk of homelessness.

The federal Emergency Housing Voucher program was launched in 2021 as a way to get vulnerable people off the streets and into housing during the COVID-19 crisis. The city of L.A. received more than 3,300 of the vouchers.

With federal funding now running out, the city is preparing to wind down the program. On Monday the city’s housing authority said it had told 2,760 tenant households and 1,700 landlords that unless new funding is found, vouchers will expire by November or December of this year.

“We are providing this notice nearly a year in advance because our families deserve the respect of time to prepare, but this is not a notice of resignation,” said L.A. Housing Authority President Lourdes Castro Ramírez said in a news release. “We are exhausting every avenue — at the local, state and federal levels — to bridge this funding gap.”

The Housing Authority said each household using a voucher had an average of 1.58 members. That puts more than 4,000 Angelenos at risk of losing their housing later this year.

Homelessness progress could be reversed

Congress originally intended the program to continue through 2030, but last year, the Trump administration announced funding would end sooner. The program’s demise risks reversing L.A.’s reported progress at stemming the rise of homelessness.

After years of steady increases, the city has registered slight reductions in the number of people experiencing homelessness for the past two years. In 2023, the region’s homeless services authority reported 46,260 people experiencing homelessness in the city of L.A. By 2025, that number had fallen to 43,695.

The accuracy of those official counts has been questioned by local researchers, but elected officials have cheered the numbers as a sign that the tide is turning in addressing one of L.A.’s most vexing problems.

With thousands of renters now at risk of losing a key resource helping them afford the city’s high rents, sharp increases in homelessness could be on the horizon, said Mike Feuer, a senior policy advisor with the Inner City Law Center.

“They're going to fall into homelessness, and they're going to increase L.A.'s homeless population by almost 10%,” Feuer said. “Those are the implications of what the Trump administration is doing.”

Voucher holders have low incomes; many have kids

According to L.A.’s Housing Authority, about 1-in-4 voucher holders has children and 1-in-5 is elderly. And about 40% are disabled. These households have an average income of less than $14,000 per year, and they receive an average of $1,789 per month in rental subsidy while paying about $350 out of their own pockets.

The loss of federal funding for Emergency Housing Vouchers is distinct from the issues facing renters using Housing Choice Vouchers, another federally funded program often referred to as Section 8. Existing vouchers in the Section 8 program have continued to be funded, but federal funding reductions have caused city officials to cut the amount of rent new vouchers in that program can cover by 10%.

L.A. Housing Authority officials said they have dedicated staff reaching out to tenants to explore other housing resources that might keep them housed after the vouchers expire.

Manuel Villagomez, an attorney with the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles specializing in subsidized housing, said with city and state budgets strapped, tenant advocates are not counting on California to find alternative funding sources to continue the program.

“It seems like it's a tragedy in the making,” Villagomez said. “We're preparing for the worst.”