Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Meal distribution, school closures continue Friday
    A woman and three boys with medium light skin tone wear black protective face masks and pick up six clear plastic bags containing oranges, milk, cereal and sandwiches. A woman with medium light skin tone, hair in a bun carries more bags in in the background.
    Estreya Morales and her sons pick up meals from Harry Bridges Span School in Wilmington on Thursday, Jan. 9, 2025.

    Topline:

    All Los Angeles Unified schools, child care and adult education centers will be closed through Friday, Jan. 10. “The confluence of factors — wind, fire, and smoke — have created unpredictable, complex situations that present potentially unsafe conditions for our school communities,” the district wrote in a statement Thursday.

    Food for students: Despite the closures, the district will distribute meals to LAUSD students from 8–11 a.m. Friday. Families may receive two meals per student.

    In region North:

    In region East:

    In region South:

    In region West:

    All Los Angeles Unified schools, child care and adult education centers will be closed through Friday, Jan.10, but some essential staff will be working to distribute food to families.

    The district will distribute meals to LAUSD students from 8–11 a.m. Friday at 16 schools. Families may receive two meals per student.

    In region North:

    In region East:

    In region South:

    In region West:

    A role for closed schools

    Staff arrived at Wilmington's Harry Bridges Span School around 5 a.m. to fill 900 plastic bags with fruit, milk and sandwiches.

    “We want [families] to know that we're here for them,” said Alfonzo Webb, who helps the district oversee school operations. “We want them to know that we care for their well-being and their children, and we would like to see them in school as soon as possible.”

    Workers passed out more than 100 meals in their first hour of service. While most parents LAist interviewed were glad to keep their kids inside— and out of the smoky air— school closures did pose some challenges.

    “I'm on a budget at home,” said Melissa Cervantes, a mom of six school-age kids. “My meals and stuff are [normally] planned out. So I was not expecting lunch today.”

    On a typical school day, LAUSD schools offer free breakfast and lunch for every student, and 80% of the population qualifies for free and reduced-price meals.

    Listen 0:44
    At LAUSD meal distribution site, a small moment of joy
    The one snack 5-year-old Joshua is most excited about.

    Oliver, who declined to give his last name, said one of his daughters called and asked to be picked up from school early Wednesday because the air quality was so bad.

    “Parents always love it when kids get out of the house —they are learning,” Oliver said. “While at home, they eat down the whole pantry [but] at least we know they are safe and we also appreciate the fact that LAUSD are doing everything to keep them safe.”

    Do you have a question about the wildfires or fire recovery?
    Check out LAist.com/FireFAQs to see if your question has already been answered. If not, submit your questions here, and we’ll do our best to get you an answer.

    _

  • Some say a Venice block party didn't deliver
    A large crowd of people are cheering and smiling towards a screen seen behind the picture frame. Palm trees are in the distance with multi-colored tents.
    Spain fans celebrate a goal as they attend a watch party for the World Cup quarterfinal match between Spain and Belgium at the Venice Beach on July 10, 2026.

    Topline:

    In Venice Beach, some are outraged after they say a FIFA Fan Zone misled the public and disrupted their neighborhood.

    What was promised: The fan celebration by the beach took place at a city park and cost up to $125 a ticket, but organizers had also advertised a free block party to go along with it. The license agreement for the event between organizers and the L.A.'s Recreation and Parks Department described an LED screen and two beer gardens that would be available to the public, free of charge.

    What actually happened: Instead, no screens were visible outside the ticketed fan zone, which took place on July 10 and 11. Some were surprised when they showed up to the block party on Windward Avenue and found just a few tents and no way to watch the game besides ducking into a bar.

    Read on… for why officials say plans fell through and what’s next.

    In Venice Beach, some are outraged after they say a FIFA Fan Zone misled the public and disrupted their neighborhood.

    The fan celebration by the beach took place at a city park and cost anywhere between $15 and $125 a ticket, but organizers had also advertised a block party and free area to go along with it. The license agreement for the event between organizers and the L.A.'s Recreation and Parks Department described an LED screen and two beer gardens that would be available to the public, free of charge.

    Instead, no screens were outside the ticketed fan zone, which took place on July 10 and 11. Some were surprised when they showed up to the block party on Windward Avenue and found just a few tents and no way to watch the game besides ducking into a bar.

    Alex Kissin, a Venice resident, attended a Rec and Parks meeting Thursday morning to complain that the Fan Zone didn't deliver.

    "The park was effectively unavailable to the community for more than a week," said Kissin, who is also a member of the Venice Chamber of Commerce. "The free public, public elements described in the report simply did not materialize."

    Event organizer John Cohn told LAist that around 2,500 free tickets were made available for the Fan Zone, but acknowledged that the free viewing party didn't happen.

    " This was a spectacular event about which all of us should be proud," said Cohn, CEO of Venice Beach FWC, LLC, the company that put on the event. "Not only did we put a lot of smiles on faces of people all across Venice and Los Angeles, but I think that this gave an opportunity for Venice to put a positive face on the world."

    Cohn said that he had to change plans for the free viewing area after LAPD prohibited plans to put up screens showing the matches on the closed-down street, citing concerns about security and crowd control.

    " We actually had planned a free block party along Windward," he said. "It had been included in our planning, and LAPD scotched it."

    LAPD did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    The License Agreement with the city had also included plans for a "free Health and Wellness Fair" in Windward Plaza on July 12, the day after the Fan Zone ended. But that event required a ticket, too, which Cohn said cost between $25 and $90.

    Both event organizers and representatives for the Recreation and Parks Department said that there was a last-minute change in who would put on the Fan Zone, which caused a big organizational challenge.

    Cohn, who runs Venice Soleil Nails & Spa, said Councilmember Traci Park's office approached him about taking over the fan zone after the original person who won the FIFA bid pulled out just around ten weeks before the World Cup.

    Sonya Young Jimenez, a Recreation and Parks Department superintendent, told the Rec and Parks Commissioners Thursday that there would be an after-action meeting to figure out what could have been done differently.

    " I know with the Olympics coming, we want to use this as a way to make it better for next time," she said.

    LAist reached out to Park, who represents Venice, but her office did not respond in time for publication.

    On Instagram, the councilmember posted an article about the Fan Zone with the caption, "Venice Beach just showed the world what’s possible."

  • Sponsored message
  • State takes city to task for housing plan failure
    Various office buildings in the background and a palm trees and shrubs in the foreground.
    Towers gleam along the Costa Mesa Civic Center skyline.

    Topline:

    California officials are taking the Orange County city of Costa Mesa to court — not for something local officials did, but for something they failed to do: plan for more housing.

    The court battle: State Attorney General Rob Bonta announced Thursday that his office has submitted filings asking courts to compel Costa Mesa and four other cities to comply with the requirements of California’s housing element law.

    The context: State law requires cities to plan for new housing growth once every eight years. Bonta said for this cycle, 95% of local governments have submitted their housing elements — documents that detail how cities plan to accommodate the required number of new homes, including units affordable to low-income families. “These five that we are suing today are outliers,” Bonta said in a news conference. “They are scofflaws.”

    Why it matters: This is not the first time Orange County leaders have earned the ire of state housing regulators. Coastal cities like Costa Mesa and Huntington Beach have faced much higher housing goals in the current state planning cycle. Historically, housing growth in Southern California was channeled further inland. But recent efforts to boost goals in coastal employment centers have triggered a political backlash in cities that saw their allocations skyrocket.

    Read more… to learn what Costa Mesa officials have said about their plans for new housing.

    California officials are taking the Orange County city of Costa Mesa to court — not for something local officials did, but for something they failed to do: plan for more housing.

    State Attorney General Rob Bonta announced Thursday that his office has submitted filings asking courts to compel Costa Mesa and four other cities to comply with the requirements of California’s housing element law.

    “These five that we are suing today are outliers,” Bonta said in a news conference. “They are scofflaws.”

    State law requires cities to plan for new housing growth once every eight years. Bonta said for this cycle, 95% of local governments have submitted their housing elements — documents that detail how cities plan to accommodate the required number of new homes, including units affordable to low-income families.

    In addition to Costa Mesa, Bonta’s office is demanding compliance from Calexico, Half Moon Bay, Ridgecrest and Turlock.

    Gustavo Velasquez, director of the state’s Department of Housing and Community Development, said the cities are shirking their responsibility to plan for about 24,000 new homes combined.

    That adds up to 24,000 families who, Velasquez said, “could have a path to a home in their communities where they work, where their kids go to school, maybe where they grow up.”

    “Every jurisdiction that fails to meet its obligations is simply shifting the burden and asking everyone else to make up for that difference,” he added.

    Costa Mesa officials did not respond to LAist’s requests for comment. State law requires the city to plan for 11,760 new homes by 2029. In City Council meetings, elected leaders have said meeting that goal will require community engagement on a massive rezoning effort.

    The latest in a string of city/state battles

    This is not the first time Orange County leaders have earned the reproval of state housing regulators. A long-running court battle between the state and Huntington Beach recently ended with that coastal city approving a plan to accommodate about 13,000 new homes.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom said the latest legal action is meant to show that no city is able to flout state law.

    “California can't solve the housing crisis while some cities sit on their hands and dare us to do something about it,” Newsom said in a statement. “These five jurisdictions had every chance to follow the law and plan for their fair share of housing. They chose not to, so now they'll answer for it in court.”

    The cities were supposed to turn in their housing elements more than two-and-a-half years ago, state officials said. In past housing planning cycles, the state has done little to punish cities that blow deadlines or deliver unrealistic housing elements. Bonta said this cycle will be different.

    “We are done with delays,” Bonta said. “It's no secret that California's housing shortage is one of the most pressing challenges facing our state. Every delay in compliance translates into delayed housing opportunities for families, for workers, seniors and young people across the state.”

    Why this cycle is different

    The housing element process forces cities to plan for more housing, but it doesn’t force them to actually build it. Instead, cities can comply with the law by doing things like giving developers more incentives to build denser housing, or rezoning certain neighborhoods to allow apartments.

    The current state planning cycle has delivered much higher housing goals to coastal cities like Costa Mesa. Historically, housing growth in Southern California was channeled further inland, concentrating new construction in parts of Riverside and San Bernardino counties.

    But this time, local planning officials took a different approach. They significantly boosted goals in coastal employment centers with the aim of putting residents closer to their jobs. That triggered a political backlash in cities that saw their allocations skyrocket.

    In the previous cycle, which covered the years 2014 through 2021, Costa Mesa’s goal was to plan for only two new housing units.

  • More dads than moms applying for parental leave
    A man with medium-tone skin and wearing a baseball cap that reads "DadGang" holds a newborn baby wearing a diaper and a hospital bracelet.
    Tustin dad Karlo Campana was able to take paid family leave when all of his three children were born.

    Topline:

    More fathers than mothers are applying for parental in California, a record first in the decades old program.

    What the data shows: In 2025, men accounted for 51% of bonding claims filed. It’s a massive shift from when the program first started in 2004, when men made up about 18% of applications.

    Why it matters: “We're in a very different place in terms of our understanding of gender roles, of paternity leave, of dads' roles than we were 20-plus years ago,” said Molly Weston Williamson, policy director at Paid Leave for All, a national organization that advocates for paid family leave policies.

    Read on ... for more about this trend, and, the LAist's guide to taking parental leave.

    Karlo Campana, a father of three in Tustin, took four weeks of paid leave after the birth of his son in May, just as the dad was able to for his older children.

    “You need that adjustment period of like, ‘I need to figure out how we're going to adjust now to a new child into our family,'” he said. “My wife isn’t doing it on her own, she doesn’t feel like she’s alone on this journey. She feels like she has support, and that’s another benefit.”

    Campana is among a growing number of fathers who are taking paid leave in the state to care for a new child, and part of a larger cultural shift in the increasing roles dads play in caregiving. Now, for the first time in the program’s history, more fathers than mothers in California are applying for leave.

    California’s program offers up to eight weeks of paid bonding leave for workers of all genders.

    Paid Family Leave in California

    In 2025, men accounted for 51% of bonding claims filed.

    It’s a massive shift from when the program started in 2004, when men made up about 18% of claim applications. The state additionally saw a record in applications for paid family leave in 2025. That includes leave to care for a sick family member.

    “We're in a very different place in terms of our understanding of gender roles, of paternity leave, of dads' roles than we were twenty plus years ago,” said Molly Weston Williamson, policy director at Paid Leave for All, a national organization that advocates for paid family leave policies.

    Campana has seen the shifting attitudes in his own family.

    “It's funny — my mom sees me being really involved with my kids, changing diapers, staying up with them at night, reading books, cooking for them, and my mom's like, ‘Your dad really didn't do much of that … I didn't know that was something dads did,’ And she was like, ‘I'm glad to see you're doing that,’” he said.

    The trend is playing out elsewhere, as well. California is one of 14 states along with D.C. that have passed laws for paid family leave. Williamson said she’s also seen dads make up a higher proportion of those taking paid family leave in those states in recent years.

    Why now?

    In addition to changing gender norms, Williamson said there are other factors at play that’s likely contributing to the increase in men filing for claims: greater awareness about the program in general in California and recent changes to the benefit.

    In 2025, the state increased the amount of income a worker can recoup while they go on family leave. Before then, most workers would get 60% of their pay. Now, they can get 70% to 90% of their income.

    “ We definitely heard from a lot of fathers that they went out to take bonding leave, then came back [to work] when they got their first check because they realized [that] 60% just wasn't going to cover their bills,” said Jenya Cassidy, director of the California Work & Family Coalition, a statewide advocacy organization based in the Bay Area. “ I do think that the expanded wage replacement, especially for low income fathers maybe is part of that — that they're able to take the time.”

    But both Cassidy and Williamson said more research is needed to understand the data. Barry White, a spokesperson for the state Employment Development Department, which administers the program, said the department couldn’t provide “definitive reason(s)” in the increase in male bonding claims.

    “We're getting one particular vantage point into this data, which is useful and valuable, but it's only telling us sort of part of the story,” said Williamson.  ”Is it that more dads are working and therefore are potentially eligible for these benefits? Is it that women are deciding not to take leave?  We'd need other kinds of information to better understand the full picture.”

    Williamson said, for instance, mothers who leave the workforce after having children would not be captured in the data.

    Who benefits from paid leave?

    Research has shown that paternity leave has benefits beyond allowing a father the time to bond with their new baby — it has positive effects on the whole family, including better health outcomes for both parents. Paid parental leave is also linked with lower incidents of postpartum depression and even a decrease in infant mortality rates. It’s also linked to higher employee retention.

    Campana said taking paid leave allowed him to team up with his wife in taking turns feeding their baby, or changing constant diapers.

    “People don’t think about the mental strain," he said.
    "Like, you’re both a little bit sleep-deprived. And you’re kind of just adjusting. Nobody gives you a playbook.”

    As someone who didn’t have close friends who were dads, Campana also joined the local chapter of a nonprofit support group, Dads Supporting Dads, for a community to lean on. The group provides virtual support groups and meetups for dads in an aim to help change “the narrative around modern fatherhood.”

    Initially, Campana said he wasn’t sure about taking leave with his first child because of lingering stereotypes.

    “ I think dads feel like they need to be the provider. I felt guilty for sure,” he said. “I think that’s because my dad … he worked three jobs, and so it was very different for him. It was hard for him to be present, and I think that’s the one thing now — it’s like, ‘No, be present. Be there for your kids. You have that paid time.’”

    The LAist Guide to taking care of your new family

    These resources were recommended by California legal experts, birth workers and families.

    Work and family basics and help

    • Legal Aid at Work: Overview of California laws and helpline to get pro-bono legal advice, handouts about family leave and returning to work, sample letters to share with your doctor, and more 
    • A Better Balance: A federal and state overview of labor laws related to pregnancy and caregiving. Also, a national, free legal helpline.

    Understanding the laws that protect your time off

    Programs for pay while you take leave

    Understanding sick leave

    Finding a doula

    Breastfeeding and lactation resources

    Share your story to make a change

  • Bike lanes and speed cameras cut from list


    Topline:

    The Federal Highway Administration has quietly stripped bike lanes, speed cameras and several other best practices from a list of "Proven Safety Countermeasures," as they're known, that have been shown to reduce crashes and save lives.

    Why now: The Department of Transportation is doubling down on its campaign against "DEI bike lanes," as Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy called them in a social media post earlier this month. The FHWA says the changes to its website, which have not been previously reported, are part of a broader review of safety countermeasures to ensure they align with current DOT policies and the administration's priorities. In a statement to NPR, an FHWA spokesperson said the DOT is "taking action to reverse the last administration's policies that decreased lane capacity and increased congestion."

    Why it matters: Critics say the Trump administration is undermining safety strategies that have already been proven to work. For example, speed cameras can reduce crashes on urban arterial roads by as much as half, according to a booklet published by the FHWA in 2021. In the same document, the FHWA said that adding a bike lane could cut crashes on a two-lane road by as much as 30%. For a four-lane road, that number jumped to 49%. While the list of Proven Safety Countermeasures does not directly affect how the government funds projects, safety advocates say the list can have a big influence on decisions at the state and local level.

    WASHINGTON — The Department of Transportation is doubling down on its campaign against "DEI bike lanes," as Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy called them in a social media post earlier this month.

    The Federal Highway Administration has quietly stripped bike lanes, speed cameras and several other best practices from a list of "Proven Safety Countermeasures," as they're known, that have been shown to reduce crashes and save lives.

    The FHWA says the changes to its website, which have not been previously reported, are part of a broader review of safety countermeasures to ensure they align with current DOT policies and the administration's priorities. But critics say the Trump administration is undermining safety strategies that have already been proven to work.

    "We should be making decisions about safety based on evidence," Stephanie Pollack, the former acting administrator of the FHWA under President Joe Biden, told NPR. "It's hard for me to understand how you could say you're putting safety first, and then make arbitrary decisions about what does and doesn't improve safety."

    Pollack oversaw the most recent expansion of the Proven Safety Countermeasures program in 2021, when the list grew to a total of 28 recommended strategies for state and local planners to consider. In recent weeks, she said, the FHWA has removed five of those strategies, including bike lanes, speed safety cameras, variable speed limits and two other recommendations.

    The FHWA has not publicly announced or explained the decision to cut the list of safety strategies from 28 items to the current total of 23.

    In a statement to NPR, an FHWA spokesperson said the DOT is "taking action to reverse the last administration's policies that decreased lane capacity and increased congestion."

    "Drivers paying taxes and vehicle fees expect their dollars to be reinvested into our roads, not social initiatives that burden their commutes," the statement said. "Under Secretary Duffy, the Department is getting back to basics and putting safety first."

    Bike lanes are not a new target for the DOT. The Trump administration previously tried to remove a stretch of bike lanes around the National Mall in Washington, D.C., and pulled back funding for projects across the country that it deemed "hostile" to cars.

    It's not clear exactly when the FHWA dropped these safety strategies from its website. Safety advocates say they first noticed the change late last week, after the DOT announced more than $1.7 billion in discretionary grants that included no funding for bike lanes or pedestrian projects. The Biden administration, by contrast, had used the same program to fund hundreds of millions of dollars in bike lanes and trails nationwide.

    On Tuesday, July 7, the same day DOT announced the grants, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said in a post on X that the Biden administration "used YOUR MONEY for DEI bike lanes and climate change." In response, some of the administration's critics noted that the federal government itself had previously acknowledged that bicycle lanes make roads safer.

    By last weekend, bike lanes and the four other strategies had been stripped from the FHWA's website.

    The list of Proven Safety Countermeasures does not directly affect how the government funds projects. FHWA distributes tens of billions of dollars each year to the states, which decide how to spend them. But safety advocates say the list can have a big influence on decisions at the state and local level.

    "It's not just changing the web page, but it's really going to put lifesaving projects at risk," said Josh Naramore, a policy expert at NACTO, the National Association of City Transportation Officials.

    "That list of approved safety countermeasures and all the research really helped change the game for local agencies and even for states to have conversations with the federal government, with state departments of transportation, and even with regional planning agencies," Naramore told NPR. "So you're essentially taking tools out of the toolkit that would be available for them."

    For example, safety advocates worry it will now be harder for state and local authorities to make the case for speed cameras, which have faced significant pushback from drivers despite evidence that they make roads safer.

    Speed cameras can reduce crashes on urban arterial roads by as much as half, according to a booklet published by the FHWA in 2021 when it announced the expanded list of Proven Safety Countermeasures. In the same document, the FHWA said that adding a bike lane could cut crashes on a two-lane road by as much as 30%. For a four-lane road, that number jumped to 49%.

    Former FHWA staff say the agency based its conclusions on rigorous analysis.

    "We had a team evaluate the research literature and identify countermeasures that are effective," said Michael Griffith, who worked for more than a decade in the safety office at FHWA before retiring from the agency in 2022. "'Proven' is basically backed by sound research, research that we have confidence in."

    More than 36,000 people were killed on U.S. roads last year, though that number has declined since 2021. The number of pedestrians killed in the U.S. has also been falling since 2022, when it reached a four-decade high, though it's still higher than before the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Overall, safety advocates say U.S. roads are far less safe than those in other developed countries that are equally attached to driving, including Canada.

    "We're still struggling in the United States with a completely unacceptable number of roadway deaths," Pollack said. "These measures are one of the most important tools that the federal government has to help state and local transportation officials make smart decisions about how to make their roads safer. And they need to be credible."
    Copyright 2026 NPR