Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Board approves $21 billion spending plan
    A yellow school bus with green wheels is a parked next to several other buses. The side of the bus reads Los Angeles Unified and there are palm trees in the background.
    The second-largest school district in the country reports that 67% of its 1,300 school buses rely on non-diesel fuels including propane, natural gas and electricity.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles Unified School Board Tuesday approved a nearly $21 billion spending plan for the next school year.

    Why it matters: The budget includes raises, class size reductions and increased mental health support that are part of new contracts with the district’s largest labor unions. There is also nearly $5 billion in school construction and renovation projects, which are funded by voter-approved bonds — that money cannot be shifted to pay for salaries or other school needs.

    The challenge: LAUSD’s budget next year exceeds expected revenue by $2 billion. The district will, for the third consecutive year, pay the difference with reserves. However, district staff say by the 2028-29 school year, the budget deficit will grow to $3.6 billion. The board recently approved a fiscal stabilization plan to solve the deficit — but which will likely result in the elimination of thousands of jobs.

    Tune in: The board’s meeting begins at 10 a.m. Tuesday and will stream online.

    Learn more: How LAUSD plans to reduce spending

    The Los Angeles Unified School Board approved a nearly $21 billion spending plan Tuesday for the next school year.

    LAUSD’s budget includes salary increases for teachers, support staff and administrators but raises questions about how the district will retain those employees with planned cuts in the coming years.

    The board voted unanimously to adopt the 2026-27 budget a week after approving a cost-savings plan that will likely result in the elimination of thousands of jobs.

    What’s in the budget?

    The district’s $20.6 billion budget is divided among different accounts.

    The largest, by far, is the $12 billion general fund, which accounts for the majority of salaries and money for day-to-day school operations:

    • About 40% of the general fund is considered “restricted” because it’s required to go toward a specific purpose, such as the education of students with disabilities or toward low-income communities.
    • The unrestricted portion — about $7.4 billion— includes money for teachers, administrators and other educator salaries, tutoring, transportation and classroom supplies. The vast majority — more than 80%— of this money pays district employees.

    There is also about $4 billion in capital projects funds for school construction and renovation projects. Voter-approved bonds generate the money for these projects and it cannot be shifted to pay for salaries or other school needs.

    The remainder of the budget is for relatively smaller items like food service, adult education and debt.

    A screenshot of a pie chart that shows the makeup of LAUSD's budget.
    A breakdown of LAUSD's 2026-27 budget
    (
    Courtesy LAUSD
    )

    The plan adopted largely matched what was presented last week, with one exception: The board voted to restore $25 million of funding to external afterschool programs. District staff has yet to identify where the majority of that funding will come from.

    What challenges are ahead?

    The new spending plan is nearly 10% larger than the budget adopted last year and exceeds the amount of revenue the district expects to bring in by $2 billion. The district will, for the third consecutive year, pay the difference with reserves.

    “These deficits are only possible to the extent we have reserves,” said Saman Bravo-Karimi, the district’s chief financial officer, during last week’s budget presentation.

    The district expects to end the 2026-27 school year with about $1 billion remaining in reserve, but by the 2028-29 school year, staff expect the negative ending balance will grow to $3.6 billion.

    This is the second year the district has adopted a “fiscal stabilization plan,” at the request of the Los Angeles County Office of Education. California law gives county education leaders the power to intervene when districts are at risk of not meeting their financial obligations. The fiscal stabilization plan is meant to show what factors are straining the budget and include strategies to reduce spending, increase revenue and temporarily spend reserves or one-time funding.

    The elimination of more than 650 jobs in May was one consequence of last year’s plan.

    This year’s fiscal stabilization plan proposes cutting $3.5 billion additional dollars over the next three years. It strips $500 million from the district’s signature equity program, the Student Equity Needs Index, which funnels money to schools with greater perceived needs.

    The board did restore proposed cuts to the Black Student Achievement Plan.

    LAUSD staff have said the fiscal stabilization plan will likely result in thousands of layoffs in the coming years, though job cuts will require further board votes.

    The board also ordered that if the district receives additional revenue from the state, that money will be prioritized for the highest-need schools via BSAP and SENI.

    Contact your board member

    Find Your LAUSD Board Member

    LAUSD board members can amplify concerns from parents, students and educators. Find your representative below.

    District 1 includes Mid City, parts of South L.A. (map)
    Board member: Sherlett Hendy Newbill
    Email: BoardDistrict1@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-6382 (central office); (323) 298-3411 (field office)

    District 2 includes Downtown, East L.A. (map)
    Board member: Rocío Rivas
    Email: rocio.rivas@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-6020

    District 3 includes West San Fernando Valley, North Hollywood (map)
    Board member: Scott Schmerelson
    Email: scott.schmerelson@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-8333

    District 4 includes West Hollywood, some beach cities (map)
    Board member: Nick Melvoin 
    Email: nick.melvoin@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-6387

    District 5 includes parts of Northeast and Southwest L.A. (map)
    Board Member: Karla Griego
    Email: district5@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-1000

    District 6 includes East San Fernando Valley (map)
    Board Member: Kelly Gonez
    Email: kelly.gonez@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-6388

    District 7 includes South L.A. and parts of the South Bay (map)
    Board Member: Tanya Ortiz Franklin
    Email: tanya.franklin@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-6385

  • What SoCal parents need to know
    Children are playing on a bridge in a wooden jungle gym, with one child wearing a paper bear eye mask. People are visible in the background standing around interacting with each other, and some white canopies are spread out on a green lawn.
    Parents and the public can now weigh in on the Trump administrations proposed changes to Head Start regulations.

    Topline:

    Head Start centers in Southern California say they’re operating as usual after the Trump administration last week proposed a vast overhaul of the early education program.

    The backstory: The administration has proposed stripping many of Head Start’s regulations, saying it would provide more local flexibility. Head Start’s regulations dictate services beyond childcare — offering wrap-around supports like health screenings, which advocates fear will go away.

    No changes yet: The proposed rule will undergo a 60-day public comment period.

    Read on… for more on local reaction and how you can weigh in.

    Head Start centers in Southern California say they’re operating as usual despite the Trump administration proposing a vast overhaul to the early education program.

    The administration last week proposed stripping many of Head Start’s regulations, saying it would provide more local flexibility. Advocates fear it could gut many of the features of the program, which goes beyond early education services.

    For now, providers and advocates say parents should continue to enroll their children.

    “Head Start programs will remain open. We will continue to offer services as currently designed. And that won't change until all of this is ultimately resolved,” said Luis Bautista, executive director of early learning at the Los Angeles County Office of Education, which serves around 7,000 children in Head Start through local organizations.

    The proposed rule will now undergo a 60-day public comment period.

    How you can submit public comment on the proposed Head Start changes

    Members of the public have until Oct. 6 to submit comments on the proposed rule change. You can do so by:

    “We want to make sure that everyone is involved in raising their voice and providing feedback,” Bautista said.

    After the public comment period closes, the federal government is expected to analyze the comments before moving forward.

    Bautista and others said it’s possible that if some changes go through, there could be litigation that also puts off implementation.

     ”A lot of times I think people feel because something is proposed, it will just happen, but that is not the case,” said Stacy Lee, who oversees early childhood initiatives at Children Now, an advocacy group for children in California.

    “They do have to take public feedback into consideration, and it is documented as part of the process,” Lee said.

    The proposed rule marks the latest effort by the Trump administration to reshape the federally-funded program. Previously, the administration tried to eliminate funding for Head Start in an early draft budget before restoring the money.

    The administration also tried to ban undocumented children from attending, an effort that's been tied up in court.

  • Sponsored message
  • Budget proposal to slash jobs
    A man sits in one of the oversized chairs next to shelves of books inside a library.
    A man sits in one of the oversized chairs at the Billie Jean King Main Library as he looks out the second floor window overlooking Lincoln Park in Long Beach, Tuesday, Aug. 29, 2023.

    Topline:

    Long Beach's budget proposal would shutter libraries on Mondays and lay off more than a dozen library workers, including ones who staff counters, shelve books and offer mental health services to teens.

    Why it matters: In response, educators, the local library foundation and union leaders are pushing back, saying the city can’t afford to lose a vital service for kids and families.

    Details: Under the budget proposal, five of the city’s 12 libraries — Bay Shore, Burnett, El Dorado, Harte and Michelle Obama — would drop from six days of service back to five, losing their Monday hours.

    The city of Long Beach has proposed cutting library hours and laying off librarians to help balance its budget. In response, educators, the local library foundation and union leaders are pushing back, saying the city can’t afford to lose a vital service for kids and families.

    Under the budget proposal, five of the city’s 12 libraries — Bay Shore, Burnett, El Dorado, Harte and Michelle Obama — would drop from six days of service back to five, losing their Monday hours just a few years after those hours were added. (The city’s other libraries were already closed on Mondays, and all are closed Sundays.)

    On an average Monday, those branches see a total of more than 1,000 visitors, according to city data.

    “In a city the size of Long Beach, and with our population, we could be seeing a 2027 where there are no libraries open on Monday. I think that’s pretty crazy,” said Kristen Hernandez with the Long Beach Public Library Foundation. The nonprofit, which raises money for the local library system, is gathering signatures on a petition protesting the cuts. As of Friday, it had more than 1,800 signatures.

    Changes to the city library system are a sliver of the cuts unveiled last week by Long Beach City Manager Tom Modica as part of a citywide winnowing in programs and services to close next year’s expected $58 million deficit.

    Beyond cuts to programs and facility hours, Modica proposed laying off more than 260 city workers and cutting more than 200 additional vacant positions — about 4% of the city’s roughly 6,000-person workforce.

    The proposed library cuts

    Local libraries would lose 14 positions, 11 of them currently filled, including five library clerks, four library assistants, a vacant general librarian position at the Billie Jean King Main Library, and a mental health associate who serves as the library’s teen specialist. The plan also cuts funding for library pages who stock books and funding for security services, as well as nearly all print and digital newspaper subscriptions.

    The combined cuts would save the department a little more than $1.4 million.

    Elizabeth Cespuglio, a librarian at Billie Jean King Library, said that the library assistants at risk of being cut are responsible for planning and running workshops and programs at the branches, pulling materials, tracking which books and genres are most in demand and staffing the information desk. Clerks handle check-outs, check-ins and library cards, while pages keep the shelves organized.

    Perhaps most at risk, Cespuglio said, is the library’s mental health associate, Jasmin Flores, who spends her days building rapport with teens in need. Losing that specialist, she said, leaves her “quite fearful” for the patrons and staff alike, since the library’s other social worker focuses on unhoused adults and doesn’t have the time and energy to build the same relationships with youth.

    Each day, Flores is the calming face for more than a dozen kids. Many of them are in and out of homelessness; some have been in juvenile detention. Others are LGBTQIA and struggle to find friends; others struggle to find food. She’s already told some that she may not be showing up anymore. It’s a difficult conversation, she said, having to console others for the loss of her job.

    “It honestly breaks my heart that I probably will not be in that position anymore,” she said.

    Flores’ main worry is that some of them will stop showing up. “We’ve built that rapport, and it hasn’t been easy to build,” she said. “It’s taken a while to get there, and I just hate to see all that go to waste.”

    Librarians say they’re already stretched thin

    The real problem, Cespuglio said, is that libraries are losing funding even as they’re increasingly in demand — more than 2,800 patrons visit daily across Long Beach’s 12 branches, an 8% rise since last year. The number of programs offered has increased by 50% in the past year, with more than 1,000 adult participants.

    Annually, city libraries have continually climbed in foot traffic since the onset of the pandemic, though averages are still lower than in 2018 and 2019.

    Branches have been understaffed for more than a decade, Cespuglio said, at least since the last time the city announced library layoffs in 2012.

    “There’s still an expectation on the system for us to be doing all of these things and continue the same level of service as we’ve done,” she said. “Cutting those hours, or those Mondays, not only does it impact the public’s access to the library all over the city, but it has these other ramifications in the rest of the five days that the rest of us are working.”

    The looming cuts have created an “undercurrent of anxiety” among staff who still don’t know which of them may lose their jobs, according to Cespuglio. Her own position is not at risk, but her partner’s is, and she said the possibility of losing half her household income is real. She said that rent in Long Beach has outpaced her pay raises for the 12 years she’s lived and worked in the city.

    The bigger budget picture

    The library cuts are part of a far larger fiscal reckoning for Long Beach.

    The proposed layoffs stretch across more than a dozen departments and offices, hitting fire, police, homeless services, parks and libraries alike, as the city grapples with rising personnel costs, mounting legal payouts, the loss of federal grants and a local economic slowdown that has weighed on tax revenue.

    City officials have said the strategy of previous years — pulling from cash reserves to delay layoffs — is no longer sustainable; the city drained tens of millions of dollars from its reserves, including its emergency fund, just to close out the current fiscal year.

    Sashi Muralidharan, a labor representative with the city’s largest union, IAM Local 1930, said they will “fight for every job,” even as labor negotiations — which coincide with the budget talks — are looking grim.

    Eighty percent of the positions proposed to be cut are represented by IAM, including 209 filled positions.

    “Anything that does result in a layoff, we will be bargaining over those impacts to make sure that we lessen the negative impacts,” Muralidharan said.

    At a Long Beach City Council meeting this week, nurses, union shop stewards, library staff and other city workers turned out to protest the cuts, arguing they would bring greater ramifications to the public’s quality of life and further enervate its remaining staff, pushing them to look for work elsewhere.

    Nate Kim, a city nurse and negotiator with IAM Local 1930, told the council that while his own position had been renewed, many of his colleagues had not been so fortunate. “Many have been laid off already,” he added. Emily Quest, a resident who uses the library’s free craftspace, begged council members through tears not to cut the hours or the staff who run it.

    Mayor Rex Richardson has proposed restoring 70 of the positions slated for elimination and said the city remains on track for its first structural budget surplus by 2028, even as another deficit, projected at $27.3 million, looms for the following year.

    The City Council is expected to hold public hearings on the budget through the summer before a final vote in late September. You can find a schedule of hearings to attend here or fill out an online survey to share your priorities with the City Council, which must debate and pass the budget by Oct. 1.

  • Only one business reimbursed by pipeline operator
    Crews clean the scene along Cesar E. Chavez and Eastern avenues after an oil spill
    East Los Angeles will undergo months of soil testing and excavation after May’s crude oil spill, with the cleanup expected to continue into early 2027, according to county officials.

    Topline:

    Two months after a pipeline rupture sent more than 25,000 gallons of crude oil onto East Los Angeles streets and into storm drains, many businesses along the Cesar E. Chavez Avenue corridor are still waiting to be paid back for their losses.

    Why now: Reimbursement from pipeline operator Pacific Pipeline System has been slow, said Kelly LoBianco, director of the LA County Department of Economic Opportunity. As of Tuesday, 19 businesses had filed claims and only one had been approved.

    The backstory: The May spill forced weeklong street closures near East Cesar E. Chavez and Eastern avenues, prompting restaurants, barbershops and bike shops to cancel appointments, delay deliveries or close entirely. A survey of nearly 50 businesses found a 70% to 75% loss in revenue following the spill.

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    Two months after an oil spill shut down streets in East Los Angeles and disrupted businesses along the Cesar E. Chavez Avenue corridor, many owners are still waiting for reimbursement.

    The May spill forced street closures after crews punctured an underground pipeline, sending more than 25,000 gallons of crude oil onto nearby streets and into storm drains. Along the commercial corridor, owners of restaurants, barbershops and bike shops had to cancel appointments, delay deliveries or close their doors for a week as cleanup crews worked in the area.

    What the spill cost businesses

    In the days following the spill, a survey of nearly 50 businesses near the intersection of East Cesar E. Chavez and Eastern avenues found a 70% to 75% loss in revenue, according to Kelly LoBianco, director of the LA County Department of Economic Opportunity.

    “You know how the barbershop gets on a Friday. … We lost a lot of business that week,” said Barber Avila, owner of Brooklyn Lab Barbershop. Avila preferred not to share his first name for this story.

    For the past month, Avila has been working with LA County and pipeline operator Pacific Pipeline System (PPS) to submit documents – including tax records, sales reports and expenses – to show how the spill affected his business and file a claim for reimbursement.

    Avila said his claim was approved this week and he is now awaiting payment.

    Reimbursement has been slow

    Many other businesses are seeking reimbursement from PPS, but the process has been slow, LoBianco said.

    As of Tuesday, 19 businesses had filed claims. Only one had been approved, while three others were close to approval, LoBianco said. She did not have details on the amount reimbursed.

    Veronica Ramos, co-owner of Ramos Industries, a commercial and residential glass and aluminum contractor, said she was reimbursed by PPS a week after submitting a claim. The spill caused contracted jobs to be canceled and deliveries to be rescheduled for a fee because trucks could not access the shop.

    Ramos said her business had a bookkeeper who was able to quickly gather the required documents but she worries her neighbors may struggle to provide the needed records for a claim.

    A PPS spokesperson said claims are still being accepted and processed. A third-party claims administrator has been helping businesses with the filing process in English and Spanish, the company said.

    “We understand how important a timely resolution is for those affected and remain committed to working through each claim as efficiently as possible,” PPS said.

    Cleanup could stretch into 2027

    What lies ahead are months of soil testing and excavation to remove contaminated soil from the site of the spill, which county officials say could continue into January 2027. Neither Avila nor Ramos knew about the remaining work and worried about how additional street closures could affect their business again.

    “It’s good to keep it in mind,” Ramos said.

    Was your business affected by the oil spill?

    Anyone who believes they were impacted by the oil spill can still contact the PPS claims line at 1-877-817-5465 to be connected to a third-party administrator who can guide them through the process in English and Spanish, PPS said. There is currently no deadline to submit a claim.

    The Department of Economic Opportunity’s Office of Small Business (OSB) is continuing to provide guidance on claim preparation, documentation requirements, and submission for affected businesses. To book a one-on-one appointment, businesses can:

    • Call OSB at (844) 432-4900,
    • Visit OSB’s East LA Entrepreneurship Center located at 4716 E. Cesar E. Chavez Ave., or; 
    • Email osb@opportunity.lacounty.gov. 

    All impacted businesses seeking assistance should indicate that their request is related to the East LA oil spill.

    How to avoid scams:

    Rafael Carbajal, director of the LA County Department of Consumer and Business Affairs (DCBA) said bad actors may prey upon communities during environmental disasters like the oil spill including contractors and legal services providers.

    Carbajal said the DCBA office is helping residents verify contractors, legal services providers and is providing information on their website on how to recognize scams.

    Residents who have concerns or questions can call the DCBA hotline at (800) 593-8222.

  • 20-year journey to set 'Fireman's Prayer' to music
    Musicians in an orchestra playing their instruments. Behind them is a screen with a projected image of firefighters.
    The orchestra performing "The Fireman's Prayer" in Los Angeles in July.

    Topline:

    Composer Charles-Henri Avelange has spent nearly 20 years trying to find a way to honor firefighters with music.

    Why now: In July, that longtime dream took shape when dozens of Hollywood orchestral musicians gathered at Sony Pictures Studios to record the "Fireman's Prayer."

    Back story: The poem was written by Wichita firefighter Alvin William "Smokey" Linn, inspired by a 1958 apartment fire in which three children died — words that firefighters have recited ever since.

    What's next: Thanks to private donations, Avelange recorded with the Los Angeles Children's Chorus and the Los Angeles Master Chorale in May, then returned last month with Grammy-winning conductor Grant Gershon and dozens of Hollywood's best musicians — some of them survivors of the Eaton and Palisades fires — to record the orchestral portion. He is still fundraising to add the California Professional Firefighters Pipes & Drums Corps.

    Composer Charles-Henri Avelange has wanted to find a way to honor firefighters with music since the 9/11 attacks.

    Last month, that longtime dream started to take shape when over 85 orchestral musicians working in Hollywood gathered at a Sony Pictures Studio soundstage to record the “Fireman's Prayer.”

    The poem, written by Alvin William “Smokey” Linn, was inspired by an apartment fire in 1958 in which three children died. It’s something every firefighter learns to recite.

    Not long after moving to the U.S., Avelange found the Fireman’s Prayer inscribed on the wall of a firehouse in 2006 — and began singing a melody.

    Avelange asked the firefighters whether the piece was already set to music. “Because to me, this is not just a prayer, it's an anthem,” he said.

    Twenty-four hours later, he had written the first draft of the anthem.

    A white man with slicked back hair in a suit jacket. He is seated behind a mixing board.
    Charles-Henri Avelange.
    (
    Slava Pedan
    /
    Courtesy The Fireman's Prayer project
    )

    A $100,000 vision, and no idea how to pull it off 

    Avelange’s vision was to have 200 to 250 musicians, including a children's choir, full adult choir, full orchestra and a 56-piece drum and bagpipe corps for the recording, which costs nearly $100,000. All proceeds from the song would go to firefighters.

     “Everybody who knows me eventually always heard about the Fireman's Prayer,” he said. “I have no idea how or when it will get done.”

    A piece of sheet music with notes on it. The title says "The Fireman's Prayer"
    Composer Charles-Henri Avelange has set the poem, The Fireman's Prayer, to music.
    (
    Slava Pedan
    /
    The Fireman's Prayer project
    )

    Then the January 2025  fires hit Los Angeles. Avelange and his wife found themselves just blocks from a Palisades Fire evacuation zone. They could see the firefighters protecting homes on their street.

    “My wife, Jennifer … looked at me and she said, ‘Well, if this is not a sign, Charles, this thing is needed. It is really time.’”

    Thanks to private donations, Avelange recorded with the Los Angeles Children’s Choir and the Los Angeles Master Chorale in May. He is still fundraising to record  the Pipes and Drums of California Professional Firefighters performing.

    Last month, he was joined by Grammy-winning conductor Grant Gershon and many of Hollywood’s best musicians — some are survivors of the Eaton and Palisades fires — to record the orchestral portion of an anthem he had heard only as digital samples for nearly 20 years.

    How to support the 'Fireman's Prayer' anthem

    The recording is being funded through the nonprofit, Los Angeles County Fire Museum. Learn more on how you can help.

    Joining them in the audience were members of the firefighting community.

     “When I heard them playing, it sounded exactly the way it's supposed to and actually even better,” he said. “It was quite a magical moment.”