Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Trump's executive orders getting real for some
    The risks for foreign students have heightened dramatically since President Trump's recent executive orders cracking down on those deemed to be supporting U.S.-designated terrorist groups, including Hamas and Hezbollah, and the directives already appear to be chilling political activism.

    About the orders: One order targets foreigners who "threaten our national security, espouse hateful ideology" or "support designated foreign terrorists." A second order meant to combat antisemitism specifically targets "Hamas sympathizers on college campuses." Both call for strict enforcement of existing immigration laws that bar visas for any such foreigners.

    Student visa issues: Abed Ayoub, head of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, says the threat is getting real. He says the ADC has heard from at least a dozen students who left the U.S. for winter break and were unable to return because their visas were canceled — with no explanation given.

    State Department response: Asked for confirmation that visas were canceled, a State Department spokesperson said they could not comment because of confidentiality laws. The spokesperson said that "the State Department generally revokes visas when information comes to light indicating that an applicant may no longer be eligible for the visa under U.S. immigration laws, including when an applicant poses a threat to U.S. public safety and national security."

    What's next: Ultimately, any effort to deport a student for protest activity is all but certain to be challenged in court.

    It was billed as a "Palestine Night" gala and fundraiser, with proceeds going to families in Gaza. At the campus student center at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, students in traditional Palestinian red and black robes mingled with others amid tables selling jewelry and keffiyeh head coverings, a photo booth and prayer mats.

    The annual event, put on by Students for Justice in Palestine, is usually a big draw, but this year, more than a few students were nervous about showing up.

    "I was scared that I would get photographed or something, and that would cause a problem," said one foreign student in the U.S. who asked that her name not be used for fear of jeopardizing her visa. "My dad knows that I am very pro-Palestine, and he was like, be very careful, like you don't want to take any risks."

    The risks for foreign students have heightened dramatically since President Trump's recent executive orders cracking down on those deemed to be supporting U.S.-designated terrorist groups, including Hamas and Hezbollah, and the directives already appear to be chilling political activism.

    One order targets foreigners who "threaten our national security, espouse hateful ideology" or "support designated foreign terrorists." A second order meant to combat antisemitism specifically targets "Hamas sympathizers on college campuses." Both call for strict enforcement of existing immigration laws that bar visas for any such foreigners.

    "To all the resident aliens who joined in the pro-jihadist protests, we put you on notice," Trump said. "We will find you, and we will deport you."

    Abed Ayoub, head of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, says the threat is getting real. He says the ADC has heard from at least a dozen students who left the U.S. for winter break and were unable to return because their visas were canceled — with no explanation given.

    "Two of them have no involvement at all with student activism on campus. They just happened to be from Gaza," Ayoub says. "This should be a concern of all Americans because this opens the door to really criminalizing any speech and any expression in the nation."

    Asked for confirmation that visas were canceled, a State Department spokesperson said they could not comment because of confidentiality laws. The spokesperson said that "the State Department generally revokes visas when information comes to light indicating that an applicant may no longer be eligible for the visa under U.S. immigration laws, including when an applicant poses a threat to U.S. public safety and national security."

    Some students welcome the orders, saying any student who crosses the line from pro-Palestinian advocacy to supporting terrorist groups is not acceptable on campus. And they say it's too early to say that any crackdown will prove to be an overreach. But others are fearful, lying low for the moment and skipping events and protests or showing up anyway, with trepidation, like the student at the "Palestine Night" event who asked that her name not be used.

    "I feel like college is a time when we should be able to speak freely," she said. "I've been raised with the values that I should be vocal about what I believe in, so it almost feels like I'm lying to myself when I can't say what I feel."

    Trump's order on antisemitism calls on schools to monitor their foreign students and staff — and report those who are "Hamas sympathizers" or "pro-jihadist," as Trump put it. Schools contacted by NPR declined to comment on how they will comply with the directive, or said only that they're still reviewing it.

    Meanwhile, pro-Israel groups say they're receiving a growing number of tips accusing campus activists of supporting U.S.-designated terrorist organizations.

    "One of my friends … was texting me frantically"

    It's all fueling concerns that "support" will be over-broadly interpreted and authorities will be cracking down even on peaceful protesters, the majority of whom are focused on human rights and divestment. Many students worry that Trump's orders are a thinly veiled attempt to silence any pro-Palestinian advocacy.

    "Their main target is anyone who supports Palestine in any way shape or form," says another student, an American citizen born to Palestinian parents, who asked not to be named for fear of harassment. He says his friends on student visas are terrified that even an old post or photo could come back to haunt them.

    "One of my friends actually was texting me frantically" in the middle of the night, he recalls. "His face was in one of those posts, and he was texting me, 'Can we get this post removed?' And that kind of hit me, this is serious."

    Some college newspapers are hearing the same concerns, so much so that the student newspaper at Purdue University, The Purdue Exponent, decided to give blanket anonymity to all students at all pro-Palestinian protests. The paper even scrubbed all protesters' names and photos from its archives, explaining that it "refuses to be party to such a blatant violation of the First Amendment rights."

    Other students, however, have denounced the paper's new policy, saying that'll make it tougher to hold protesters accountable and to restore safety and stability to campuses.

    "I think that's wrong," says Sabrina Soffer, a pro-Israel student at George Washington University. "It's like when [protesters] wear masks. It's just another way to put another obstacle in the way of holding students accountable."

    Of course, Soffer says, implementation of the executive orders must be thoughtful and judicious. "Being pro-Palestinian is not being pro-jihad," she says. "But at the same time, we have to be scrupulous enough to make sure that those who really are a threat and who are connected to these terrorist organizations are the ones held accountable."

    Maia Shteyman, a pro-Israel student from UMass Amherst, agrees. Students demanding humanitarian aid in Gaza, criticizing Israel or waving a Palestinian flag, for example, are not the issue, Shteyman says. But, she says, she's seen some protesters openly supporting U.S.-labeled terrorist groups on her campus, and that needs to be addressed.

    "They were wearing Hamas-like uniforms, with the headbands, and there were intifada signs everywhere [saying] 'Go Hamas,' and pro-Hamas stuff. They were just saying this stuff straight up to our face," Shteyman says.

    "I think it's much more common that you might imagine, that there are people actually coordinating with Hamas, that they are acting as the PR agents of Hamas," says attorney Mark Goldfeder, director of the National Jewish Advocacy Center. He has filed a federal lawsuit alleging direct ties between student groups and U.S.-designated terrorist organizations, and some protesters' explicit support for them.

    "They are saying, 'We are Hamas and we want to do these things,' " Goldfeder says. "It behooves us to believe them and to take precautions for our national security. It is genuinely dangerous. And you don't even have to like the Jews to worry about it because they're coming for the United States, as well."

    Deportation attempts are likely to wind up in court

    Ultimately, any effort to deport a student for protest activity is all but certain to be challenged in court.

    "The government would have a huge First Amendment hurdle to overcome if it sought to go after someone for their pure speech," says David Cole, Georgetown Law professor and former national legal director with the American Civil Liberties Union. "If it were enforced, it would be, I believe, struck down."

    Others take a different view. Ilya Shapiro, a senior fellow and director of constitutional studies at the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank, is also a staunch free speech proponent. But in this case, he says, "It's not about policing or prosecuting speech, it's about enforcing immigration regulations, and immigration regulations say that if you espouse support for certain groups that are inimical to the American interest, then you don't get a visa, or if you're here already then your visa gets revoked."

    Meanwhile, pro-Palestinian students are left contemplating their risk. Some, like a 27-year-old graduate student from the West Bank, who asked that his name not be used for fear of being targeted, says he will continue to speak out.

    "I mean, my people are being slaughtered there and dehumanized," he says. "I'm not going to just sit down there and just be afraid of speaking out, no matter what the consequences are."

    Still, he did reach out to a free-speech advocacy group to make sure he's got help lined up just in case, as he put it, someone wants to "get rid of" him.

    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • LA council votes to pursue Nov. ballot measure
    A man with dark skin tone and bald head wearing a dark blue suit with a light blue button up underneath sits behind a wooden dais with a wooden name sign that reads "Harris-Dawson" there's a tiled wall behind him and a part of an American flag. He speaks into a mic.
    President of the Los Angeles City Council, Marqueese Harris-Dawson, at a city council meeting in April, 2025.

    Topline:

    After months of debate and false starts, the Los Angeles City Council voted Wednesday in favor of developing a potential November ballot measure that would ask voters to rein in the city’s controversial “mansion tax.”

    The proposed exemption: During the meeting, Councilmembers Tim McOsker and Katy Yaroslavsky put forward a motion asking the City Attorney to draft a ballot measure that would ask voters to cancel the tax on sales of multifamily and residential mixed-use buildings within the first 10 years of their construction.

    What city leaders are saying: Ahead of the 9-5 vote to proceed with proposed tax breaks for new apartment buildings, Council President Marqueece Harris-Dawson said he has seen affordable housing construction decline in his district after the policy — called Measure ULA — took effect in 2023. “I can tell you with certainty ULA has not helped,” he said. “Housing starts are as low in my district as they’ve been the entire time I’ve been in office.”

    What happens next? The council’s proposed measure is still far from officially qualifying for the November ballot. Sending final language to the ballot will require another council vote, and the council could potentially decide later this summer to pull the measure.

    Read on… to learn how we got here, and why L.A. voters may end up seeing multiple “mansion tax” measures on their November ballot.

    After months of debate and false starts, the Los Angeles City Council voted Wednesday in favor of developing a potential November ballot measure that would ask voters to rein in the city’s controversial “mansion tax.”

    Ahead of the 9-5 vote to proceed with proposed tax breaks for new apartment buildings, Council President Marqueece Harris-Dawson said he has seen affordable housing construction decline in his district after the policy — called Measure ULA — took effect in 2023.

    “I can tell you with certainty ULA has not helped,” Harris-Dawson said. “Housing starts are as low in my district as they’ve been the entire time I’ve been in office.”

    Harris-Dawson said neighboring cities, such as Inglewood and Gardena, where new apartment buildings are not subject to L.A.’s tax, have not seen similar declines.

    While a majority of the council voted to proceed with a possible ballot measure, Councilmembers Ysabel Jurado, Imelda Padilla, Monica Rodriguez, Eunisses Hernandez and Hugo Soto-Martinez voted against the proposal.

    Reform advocates cheered the vote, but said more work is needed. Miguel Santana, president of the California Community Foundation, has pushed for changes with the “Mend It, Don’t End It” coalition, a group of affordable housing developers, labor organizations and business leaders.

    “Today the City Council took another important step towards reforming Measure ULA in a way that will allow us to start building housing again while saving a critical funding source that we desperately need," Santana said in a written statement.

    ‘Mansion tax’ nuts and bolts

    Measure ULA taxes the sale of real estate worth $5.3 million or more. That includes large, luxury single-family homes, which is why the measure is often called the city’s “mansion tax.”

    However, the tax also applies to apartment buildings and other commercial real estate. Economists have said that’s causing a slow-down in new multi-family construction at a time when L.A. needs more housing supply to keep up with demand and prevent rents from spiking.

    During Wednesday’s meeting, Councilmembers Tim McOsker and Katy Yaroslavsky put forward a motion asking the City Attorney to draft a ballot measure that would ask voters to cancel the tax on sales of multifamily and residential mixed-use buildings within the first 10 years of their construction.

    That reform proposal is somewhat similar to earlier failed attempts at changing the tax, including from Councilmember (and now mayoral candidate) Nithya Raman and a separate effort from state legislators.

    What happens next? 

    The council’s proposed measure is still far from officially qualifying for the November ballot. Sending final language to the ballot will require another council vote, and the council could potentially decide later this summer to pull the measure.

    If it does appear on the ballot, a majority of L.A. voters would need to approve the changes before new apartment buildings would be exempt. Close to 58% of the city’s voters supported Measure ULA when it first came up for a vote in November 2022.

    In a separate vote Wednesday, the council moved forward with another potential ballot measure that would ask voters to exempt Pacific Palisades homeowners from the tax if they sell their properties after the January 2025 Palisades Fire.

    To complicate matters further, voters are likely to encounter yet another measure on the November ballot related to the city’s “mansion tax.”

    The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association has qualified a measure that would repeal L.A.’s tax, and similar taxes across the state, while simultaneously raising the voter-approval threshold for new taxes.

    How we got here

    Though reforms are tentative at this point, the council’s decision to pursue a ballot measure is an about-face from a committee’s earlier decision to keep changes off the November ballot.

    Jurado, the chair of that committee, repeated her argument that it’s too soon to conclude the tax has caused apartment developers to retreat from L.A.

    “When we focus just on housing production alone, we’re missing the mark about what this measure was actually intended to do, which is to keep Angelenos housed,” Jurado said during Wednesday’s meeting.

    What has tax revenue funded so far? 

    Measure ULA has raised $1.2 billion over the last three years, far less than the $1.1 billion in annual funding supporters said the tax could raise. That funding has gone toward affordable housing construction and tenant aid programs, such as rent relief and eviction defense.

    However, the city has encountered trouble spending the money on its intended purposes.

    City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto has refused to sign contracts approved by the city council and the mayor in April for $177 million in tenant aid. And the measure’s strict rules on how tax revenue can be spent to support affordable housing projects have required city leaders to pursue changes to funding restrictions.

    Tax supporters expressed disappointment with the council vote. Joe Donlin, executive director of the United to House L.A. Coalition, said a local ballot measure aimed at carving out certain types of real estate could help fuel the argument for full repeal being made by tax opponents.

    "Such a move plays into the hands of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayer Association and its allies in the real estate lobby," Donlin said in an written statement.

    He went on to say tax breaks would lead to less revenue meant to keep city residents housed.

    "If this ballot measure were to pass, it could mean tens of millions of dollars per year cut from programs that build affordable housing and combat homelessness," Donlin said.

  • Sponsored message
  • Shelter-in-place order in Boyle Heights
    A residential street with rows of palm trees and cars parked along the sidewalks. The sky is filled with black smoke.
    A fire at a Boyle Heights commercial building sent massive plumes of black smoke up Wednesday and prompted a shelter-in-place order.

    Topline:

    Fire broke out around 2:35 p.m. at 1400 S. Los Palos St., according to the Los Angeles Fire Department

    What we know: A shelter in place order has been issued for the area south of Interstate 5, east of Soto Street, north of Washington Boulevard and west of Indiana Street. According to East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice, the structure is an industrial freezer facility.

    A fire at a Boyle Heights commercial building sent up a massive plume of black smoke on Wednesday and prompted a shelter-in-place order due to hazardous materials, including ammonia.

    Fire broke out around 2:35 p.m. at a 1,000-foot by 500-foot cold storage facility at 1400 S. Los Palos St. with solar panels on the roof, according to the Los Angeles Fire Department. The fire reached an ammonia line, officials said, prompting firefighters to pull back as it started off-gassing and order people nearby to shelter in place.

    The ammonia is not toxic to individuals unless they have respiratory issues or come into direct contact with it, LAFD Chief Jaime Moore said. Adjacent structures were evacuated to keep people from breathing in the ammonia that was in the air, and firefighters pivoted to using water drops from helicopters to take on the flames as they spread across the building’s rooftop solar panels “almost like a brush fire would,” he said.

    “Get inside IMMEDIATELY and close all windows and doors. Turn off air conditioning/heating. Bring all people and pets to an inside room until you receive more instructions,” an LAFD alert said.

    A street map with a large section highlighter in purple

    The shelter-in-place order was in effect for the area south of Interstate 5, east of Soto Street, north of Washington Boulevard and west of Indiana Street. As of 5:30 p.m. Wednesday, LAFD Capt. Anthony Tubbs said officials did not know when it would be lifted.

    East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice urged people outside the shelter-in-place boundaries to also take precautions.

    “The 5 freeway is not an air filter. The smoke is spreading and everyone in adjacent neighborhoods should reduce the risk of smoke exposure ASAP,” the organization wrote in an Instagram post.

    By 4 p.m., authorities added a smoke advisory covering East LA, Commerce and parts of downtown. Heavy, black smoke was visible across the region.

    The water drops via helicopter were helping to get the fire under control by Wednesday evening. Authorities planned to use an LAFD robot to get inside and assess the building, Moore said.

    “This is a very unique situation because of the size of the building,” he added.

    The business at 1400 Los Palos is called Lineage, a logistics company that offers cold storage services, according to the company’s website.

    According to LAFD firefighter Jennifer Middleton, over 120 firefighters were on scene battling the blaze. Air quality was being monitored in the area, Middleton said.

    “Any sort of structure fire with [solar] panels burning, there’s going to be some sort of hazardous materials in the air,” Middleton said.

    No injuries have been reported, she added, but she also urged people to stay inside if smoke was reaching their area.

    “Close your windows, stay indoors, turn off your air conditioning, and just shelter in place. We don’t want anyone breathing that smoke. And don’t go outside to watch the fire,” Middleton said. “If need be, you can leave the area to more clear air.”

    Local organizations including Neighborhood Music, Centro CSO and Plaza de la Raza announced on social media they were either canceling classes and meetings or moving them online.

    In a statement, District 14 Councilmember Ysabel Jurado said her office was monitoring the situation.

    “Right now, the most important thing is to follow the shelter-in-place order that has been issued because of the smoke,” Jurado said. “Residents should stay indoors, keep windows and doors closed, avoid unnecessary travel in the area, and follow instructions from first responders.”

    Mayor Karen Bass also urged people to stay inside.

    “I urge everyone in the impacted area to get indoors immediately, close windows and doors, turn off air conditioning, and avoid unnecessary travel to the area,” she said. “I want to thank the brave LAFD and public safety personnel who responded quickly and remain on scene.”

    Officials in the neighboring city of Maywood also urged people to stay away from the area.

  • Air regulators cited an oil recycling facility
    A close-up of a green street sign hanging from a lamp post with a blue sky in the background. The sign reads "Compton Blvd 100 W City of Compton"
    A street sign in the City of Compton.

    Topline:

    Air quality regulators say an oil recycling facility in Compton violated pollution rules and improperly maintained some of its equipment.

    The details: The South Coast Air Quality Management District issued four notices of violation to World Oil Recycling in Compton, and one notice of violation to a contractor operating leaky equipment on its property.

    Keep reading ... for more on the violations and what's next.

    Air quality regulators say an oil recycling facility in Compton violated pollution rules and improperly maintained some of its equipment.

    The South Coast Air Quality Management District issued four notices of violation to World Oil Recycling in Compton, and one notice of violation to a contractor operating leaky equipment on its property.

    The Compton facility “receives used oils, glycol and wastewater and re-refines these materials into engine oil and glycol products for reuse,” according to the air district. The largest oil recycler in the state, it’s located in some of the most pollution-burdened and low-income neighborhoods in California, as well, where asthma rates are higher than 95% of census tracts, according to state data.

    The violations came after the air district started receiving odor complaints from residents at the start of this year. The agency received more than 70 complaints of strong odors of gas, including from the nearby Jefferson Elementary School, the agency said in a news release.

    Officials then carried out more than a dozen on-site inspections, including using an infrared camera to identify gas leaks. They found hydrocarbons leaking from a wastewater storage tank, as well as a centrifuge pump. A small fire at the facility in late May also led to nuisance notices from the agency.

    The company told LAist it is working to remove the leaky storage tank that may have caused the odors.

    “World Oil Recycling provides an essential environmental service by recycling used oil and other materials, helping to keep them out of landfills and waterways,” a spokesperson for the company said in a statement. “We are committed to meeting or exceeding the highest standards at our facility in Compton, where we have operated safely for more than 40 years and serve as a major local employer.”

    If World Oil Recycling doesn’t comply, it could face fines or litigation.

    The company has faced such issues in the past. In 2019, the Environmental Protection Agency reached a settlement with World Oil’s Compton and Vernon facilities for violating hazardous waste regulations. The agreement required the companies to pay a $39,092 penalty and spend $167,967 on air filtration systems in nearby schools to reduce indoor air pollution.

    The facility has received dozens of violation notices from the air district over the years, as well, mostly for minor maintenance issues.

    In a statement to LAist, Compton Mayor Emma Sharif said the city “is working with the appropriate regulatory agencies as they continue their investigation.”

    How to report smoke, dust, smells or other air pollution near you

    The South Coast Air Quality Management District is tasked with regulating air pollution in the region. The public can report odors, dust, smoke or other air quality concerns by:

    Is there a potentially hazardous facility near you? How to find out

    • At a local level, the South Coast Air Quality Management District regulates air pollution across the region, but it has just one inspector for every 200 industrial sites, according to the Voice of O.C. You can search for violations by facility through the agency’s public search tool here. You can report any concerns about strong odors, excessive dust, smoke or other air pollutants here. Find LAist’s in-depth guide on reporting air pollution concerns here
    • You can search for violations by various types of regulated facilities across the state using this map from the California Environmental Protection Agency, or CalEPA. GKN Aerospace, for example, has dozens of violations logged there. You can also file a complaint with CalEPA here or to the federal EPA directly here
    • The California Department of Toxic Substances Control regulates hazardous waste sites. You can use their tool, EnviroStor, to search for public information about hazardous sites near you. 
    • The California Geologic Energy Management Division oversees oil and gas facilities across the state. You can search for wells near you via their searchable map here. L.A. County also has its own searchable map for oil and gas wells here.

  • CA won't consider LA's extension request
    The intersection of San Pedro and Second streets is included in the scope of the Skid Row Connectivity and Safety Project, one of the projects L.A. city officials had won state grants for.

    Topline:

    California will not consider the city of Los Angeles’ request for a time extension on three mobility projects in underinvested communities that are largely funded by more than $100 million from the state.

    The city’s request: In April, the city formally requested a six-year time extension on state-mandated deadlines to complete pre-construction work on the projects in Boyle Heights, Skid Row and Wilmington. The projects won grant funding in 2022 and 2023. Staffing constraints have prevented progress, city officials have said.

    State’s response: The California Transportation Commission is the state body that administers the grant program. Justin Behrens, the spokesperson for the commission, said that while the state grant program offers time extensions in certain cases, “The requested time exceeded what is allowable under the guidelines” and the extensions were ultimately not recommended to be considered by the commission.

    Read on … for reactions from local leaders.

    California will not consider the city of Los Angeles’ request for a time extension on three mobility projects in underinvested communities that are largely funded by more than $100 million from the state.

    The exclusion of the request from the California Transportation Commission's June agenda spells an uncertain fate for the projects in Boyle Heights, Skid Row and Wilmington, which involve repairing sidewalks, adding bike lanes and installing traffic-calming measures to make streets friendlier to non-vehicular modes of transportation.

    In April, the city formally requested a six-year extension on state-mandated deadlines to complete pre-construction work on the projects, saying recent staffing and funding constraints in the public works and transportation departments have hampered progress.

    Justin Behrens, the spokesperson for the commission, said that while the state grant program offers time extensions in certain cases, “The requested time exceeded what is allowable under the guidelines,” and extensions were ultimately not recommended to be considered by the commission.

    The state funds for pre-construction work, including environmental review and design, are set to lapse at the end of June.

    L.A. officials said in a March report that without the time extension, “The city will be unable to meet these deadlines and lose the opportunity to provide these critical improvements for the city.”

    The Bureau of Street Services, which is the lead agency on the three projects, did not respond to requests for comment.

    'A deeply disappointing moment'

    A statement from the office of L.A. City Councilmember Ysabel Jurado said the situation is “disappointing” and that the councilmember is taking time to “fully understand” what the California Transportation Commission’s decision means for the projects in her district.

    “What we can say clearly is this: We are not giving up,” the statement read. “Boyle Heights and Skid Row have waited far too long for safer, more accessible streets, and the residents who organized for these improvements deserve more than a setback and a closed door.”

    Jurado advocated for additional staffing resources across the bureaus of Street Services, Street Lighting and Engineering, as well as the Department of Transportation, to deliver the projects.

    For Jens Midthun, the president of the DTLA Neighborhood Council, any investment in improving the walkability of downtown L.A. is a worthy one.

    “People in downtown L.A. are here because they want to be,” Midthun said about the neighborhood’s transition from a business hub to a residential destination. “People want to be part of a vibrant city center.”

    L.A. City Councilmember Tim McOsker's office said in a statement that infrastructure improvements in Wilmington “remain a priority.”

    “We will continue exploring funding opportunities and other available options to advance as much of the project as possible,” McOsker's office said.

    The grant program

    Since its launch in 2013, the state’s Active Transportation Program has funded capital projects that promote walking, cycling or other non-motorized ways to get around. Behrens said the program is competitive and over-subscribed, meaning the applications for funds “far exceeds the available resources.”

    Over the course of the grant program, L.A. has secured $500 million to fund 46 transportation projects across the city, according to a June report from Laura Rubio-Cornejo, the general manager of the city’s Department of Transportation.

    Twenty of those projects have been constructed and staff is actively working on designing, implementing or closing out another 22.

    Jurisdictions that win the funds have to adhere to strict timelines to retain the money, which is allocated based on different phases of a capital project. Failing to meet the program’s deadlines can jeopardize a city or county’s likelihood of clinching future grants.

    The program’s deadlines require the city to allocate funds for construction for the three projects in question by the end of June 2027. In its request for a time extension, the city said it would need an additional six years to get to that point.

    Absent a time extension, it’s unclear what the path forward is for the three projects.

    The city in June submitted its application for the next round of Active Transportation Program grants, though its ambitions were tempered by “staff resource limitations and the city’s existing grant commitments.”

    The projects it submitted for consideration to the state include extending the LARiverWay bike path and enhancing mobility along Huntington Drive.

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is kharjai.61.