Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Lecturers bear brunt of cuts at CSULA
    A burnt orange wall with white text that reads "California State University Los Angeles."
    Signage of California State University Los Angeles on one of the student parking structures.

    Topline:

    Over the summer, California State University officials informed its campuses of the bad news: a drop in state funding and enrollment would mean budget cuts of $1 billion. Now faculty say the impact of those cuts is being felt among lecturers, especially at Cal State L.A.

    Cal State L.A.: The university saw a 7.8% drop in student enrollment in fall 2023, according to university data. In the same time period, the university cut over 10% of its classes.

    Enrollment dropping: Student enrollment in 2023 was down nearly 8% at the Dominguez Hills campus compared to the year before while the San Bernardino campus saw a nearly 5% drop in the same time period.

    Why it matters: Less state funding often means fewer faculty members and fewer classes.

    Other campuses: Some administrators at CSU Long Beach are making cuts in supplies and other costs that don’t have to do with salaries. “We have to be very thoughtful about equipment purchases,” said Curtis Bennet, dean of CSULB’s college of natural sciences and mathematics. And that could hurt the college’s laboratory work.

    Over the summer, California State University officials informed its campuses of the bad news: a drop in state funding and enrollment would mean budget cuts of $1 billion.

    Now faculty say the impact of those cuts is being felt among lecturers more than other employees.

    Lecturers are college faculty who teach part time or full time but who do not have benefits or job protections that tenured faculty do. Lecturers frequently have the same types of degrees that tenured faculty do. They also make up a majority of CSU faculty.

    The number of classes lecturers teach depends on the needs of the university departments and during economic downturns are typically the first to be told that their services won’t be needed.

    How faculty are affected

    Last year was a very good year for California State University, Los Angeles lecturer Dmitri Seals.

    “I was awarded the Outstanding Lecturer award for Cal State L.A. in 2023,” Seals said.

    For the previous six years, he’d taught about the sociology of race, gender, and inequality as well as projects that sought to close income and digital inequality gaps.

    “I was so deeply honored by [the award] and I viewed it as an opportunity to expand my work in teaching,” he said.

    But about six months after the fanfare and the recognition died down his department gave him bad news.

    “[I] was definitely disappointed when I learned that I wouldn't be teaching in Fall 2024,” Seals said.

    The classes that he’d taught for years were not available to teach, he said. His higher-ups later offered him fewer classes to teach in topics that he had not taught before; Seals declined those and decided to focus on projects to increase entrepreneurship and other economic opportunities, funded by municipal grants.

    Cal State L.A. has 82 fewer lecturers now versus this time last year, according to a university spokesperson. They added that the number is preliminary and could change.

    Cal State L.A. is not the only campus seeing enrollment drops. Student enrollment in 2023 was down nearly 8% at the Dominguez Hills campus compared to the year before, while the San Bernardino campus saw a nearly 5% drop in the same time period.

    From one campus to another

    Debito Beamer taught political science classes for six years at Cal State L.A. He said that about a year ago administrators told him and other lecturers to brace themselves for budget cuts. He didn’t know how bad it was going to be.

    “Then comes May, and they say, 'Guess what? Budget cuts. We’re not going to give you any classes,'" he said.

    As he scrambled to find work, he found out CSULB and other Cal State campuses, unlike Cal State L.A., were hiring.

    A person with medium light skin and a goatee sits on a concrete bench with cactus plants in the background.
    Debito Beamer taught political science at California State University Los Angeles until he was laid off
    (
    Adolfo Guzman-Lopez
    /
    LAist
    )

    “This semester, I am teaching 400 students, 22.5 units,” said Beamer, who now teaches mostly at Cal State Long Beach this semester.

    Beamer’s experience sheds light on the different impact the CSU cuts are having among the 23 campuses in the university system.

    Amid cuts, some campuses are growing

    At CSU Long Beach there are 1,730 lecturers this month — 60 more than a year ago. A university’s spokesperson said there are eight fewer tenure-track faculty.

    California State University, Northridge offers 6,407 classes this semester; that’s 180 more than a year ago, according to numbers provided by the university. CSULB is offering 210 more classes in the current semester than it did one year ago.

    “There was a conscious effort on behalf of the university and its leadership to ensure that we could protect what happens in the class into teaching and the students as much as possible,” said CSUN spokesperson Carmen Chandler.

    CSUN has additional 20 lecturers this year, which puts them just under 1,300. Tenured faculty remained nearly the same.

    It’s unclear how severe the cuts are in the different departments. Universities don’t publicize departmental faculty and class counts and there are other factors affecting those numbers year after year — “for example, curricular changes,” said CSULB spokesperson Jeff Cook via email. “Enrollment shifts; retirements; the rate at which new hiring can be made and the possibility of unsuccessful searches; release time for service, research, and scholarly and creative activity.”

    For now, some CSULB administrators are making cuts in supplies and other costs that don’t have to do with salaries.

    A white brick wall has thin all-capital lettering that reads "California State University Long Beach." Trees peek over the wall from behind, and in front is a green lawn and some bushes.
    One of the main entrances at California State University Long Beach
    (
    Ashley Balderrama
    /
    for LAist
    )

    “We have to be very thoughtful about equipment purchases,” said Curtis Bennet, dean of CSULB’s college of natural sciences and mathematics. And that’s a big deal, he said, because of the college’s laboratory work.

    Enrollment also affects budgets — more students means more tuition filling the coffers. Cal State L.A. saw a 7.8% drop in student enrollment in fall 2023, according to university data. In the same time period, the university cut over 10% of its classes.

    Drops in population in California and COVID-19 contributed to recent enrollment drops at California colleges. But campuses are affected differently.

    At Cal State L.A. two factors are key: “Regional trends on college-age adults and — for this year — the federal processing delays on financial aid for a campus that primarily serves Pell-eligible students,” said Cal State L.A. spokesperson Erik Hollins.

    Enrollment at CSULB was up 3.3% and nearly 1% up at CSUN in that time period.

    More cuts coming

    By most accounts, CSU plans to also cut campus budgets in the 2025-26 academic year.

    What appears to be surfacing are different approaches and different impacts, depending on the campuses.

    “I think the university-wide discourse has been defeatist around enrollment,” Seals said of the approaches he’s heard in the last academic years at CSULA.

    LAist requested an interview with a Cal State L.A. administrator to explain how the drop in faculty is related to the drop in enrollment, but no one was provided.

    Seals said the conversations he heard and took part in before and after his Outstanding Lecturer award didn’t include any forward-looking plans or excitement about serving university students who grew up in mostly working class communities, even amid a dire financial situation.

    “It was more like, 'Well, this is what's going to happen to us,' instead of, 'Here's what we're going to do together,'” he said.

    The ultimate impact, he said, is felt most by students who are just trying to get to graduation day.

  • $37M grant will build fiber broadband
    A view from above of a pair of green hills at the bottom of the frame and the ocean in the horizon.
    More than 4,000 residents on Catalina Island don’t have reliable internet.

    Topline:

    A years-long effort to bring fast, reliable internet to Catalina Island cleared a major vote today after the California Public Utility Commission awarded $37 million to install subsea fiber internet infrastructure between Orange County and the island.

    Why it matters: Catalina Island is home to more than 4,000 residents, and it draws thousands of tourists each year, but the internet connection on the island is often slow and unreliable.

    Why is the internet connection so erratic? Residents don’t have access to fiber internet on the rural island and larger communications companies don’t serve the area because it’s too expensive.

    Read on … for more on what we know about the project so far.

    A years-long effort to bring fast, reliable internet to Catalina Island cleared a major vote today after the California Public Utility Commission awarded $37 million to install subsea fiber internet infrastructure between Orange County and the island.

    More than 4,000 residents on Catalina Island don’t have reliable internet. That’s because the rural island doesn’t have fiber broadband infrastructure, and large communication companies don’t serve the area because of high costs.

    “We currently operate off of a microwave tower, and it’s time that Avalon had nothing better than the rest of the mainland, but the same,” Avalon City Councilmember Lisa Lavelle said during public comment.

    Lance Ware, CEO of AVX Networks, the telecom company tasked with building Catalina Island’s broadband infrastructure, said this project is significant to the quality of life for island residents.

    “No one thought Catalina really was worthy,” Ware told LAist. “It really took a long time to convince the grant makers that this is a very much underserved community … not only digitally red lined, but forgotten about from an infrastructure perspective, and I mean that beyond communications.”

    The impact to the community is almost immeasurable, he added.

    “The access to that technology, workforce development, economic development and just the potential outcomes change massively for everybody involved,” Ware said. “Our ability to deliver world-class health care and public safety is huge.”

    What we know about the project

    The commission distributed more than $96 million in federal grant funds during Thursday’s meeting to five groups for high-speed broadband projects, including AVX Networks.

    The planned proposal includes building a fiber-optic network above and underground from Catalina Island to the Orange County coast.

    When it comes to internet connection, the entire island is unserved, according to the commission’s agenda report. That means it has zero access to broadband internet.

    According to records, the undersea cables will run under the San Pedro Channel from two points on the island to landings near Huntington Beach. Those cables will then connect to the Middle Mile Broadband Network in Stanton.

    The grant will cover 100% of the project costs, records show.

    What’s next?

    Grantees are required to follow a set of rules to receive funds, and that includes committing to providing internet service at affordable rates.

    Ware said AVX Networks will have a low-income plan at $40 a month at 100/100 Mbps — this is the download and upload speed of the service.

    “We chose to go symmetrical, which means the upload is the same as the download,” Ware added. “For people doing video streaming or telemedicine or FaceTime, even, or e-learning, it's really important to have symmetrical bandwidth.”

    AVX Networks also has committed to maintaining those rates for at least 10 years, the commission agenda reported.

    Next, the company needs to get permits for building out the project and surveying a route on the sea floor for the cables.

  • Sponsored message
  • City spent $17m in 2 years without major audit
    A tile and glass building. Letters spelling out "Anaheim City Hall 200 S. Anaheim Blvd." are placed on the tile. There are palm trees in the background.
    The city of Anaheim spent around $17 million on credit card purchases from places like Target, Walmart and Amazon over the past two years without a major audit.

    Topline:

    The city of Anaheim spent around $17 million on credit card purchases from places like Target, Walmart and Amazon over the past two years, recently obtained records show, but the system hasn't been audited since 2018.

    Why it matters: The absence of audits was a central issue former purchasing agent Kari Bouffard included in a tort claim in June alleging she was fired for raising concerns that the city’s top finance official, Debbie Moreno, was enabling fraud, wasting millions of taxpayer dollars and lying to the City Council.

    About the purchases: LAist requested and reviewed credit card monthly billing statements for all city-issued credit cards for the past two years. The statements show city employees spent tens of thousands of public money at places like Target, Walmart and Amazon. as well as on “food, office and other operational supplies for city business purposes,” according to Lyster. The statements do not show details about specific purchases.

    Read on... for details about the purchases.

    The city of Anaheim spent around $17 million on credit card purchases from places like Target, Walmart and Amazon over the past two years, recently obtained records show, but the system hasn't been audited since 2018.

    Anaheim spokesperson Mike Lyster, who along with city leadership did not answer detailed questions about the purchases, confirmed the lack of audit.

    The absence of audits was a central issue former purchasing agent Kari Bouffard included in a tort claim in June alleging she was fired for raising concerns that the city’s top finance official, Debbie Moreno, was enabling fraud, wasting millions of taxpayer dollars and lying to the City Council.

    In the legal claim, Bouffard says when she raised concerns over the lack of an audit with the city’s audit team, which then wanted to audit the credit card program, she alleges Moreno told her: “Do not let them in the door.”

    “I found her response unprofessional, dismissive, and deeply concerning, particularly given her role as Finance Director and her responsibility to support accountability and internal controls,” Bouffard wrote.

    In October, Lyster confirmed an external legal team is conducting “an independent outside review” of the allegations in the tort claim. But he did not answer questions about who the firm is or how much that contract has cost the city.

    LAist requested and reviewed credit card monthly billing statements for all city-issued credit cards for the past two years. The statements show city employees spent tens of thousands of public money at places like Target, Walmart and Amazon on “food, office and other operational supplies for city business purposes,” according to Lyster. The statements do not show details about specific purchases.

    The Amazon purchases totaled around $1.7 million of public money over the two years, according to the data. Anaheim provided a breakdown of the Amazon purchases that did not include details about what was bought at the online marketplace.

    Lyster said Anaheim monitors credit card purchases appropriately.

    He confirmed credit card purchases were last audited in 2018 by the city’s Internal Audit team.

    “There was no larger concern with any of the findings, and we reject any mischaracterization and misinformation about oversight of the city’s purchasing cards,” Lyster said in a statement.

    Lyster told LAist the city’s purchasing agent, who until recently was Bouffard, can “pursue audits at any time,” but one has not been done recently. In the tort claim, Bouffard said she raised concerns with Moreno over “lack of time and staffing within the Purchasing Division to adequately manage and audit the program.” Moreno’s solution, she said, was a temporary staffer — “an insufficient solution given the scope of responsibilities,” Bouffard wrote.

    Lyster also said the financial firm KPMG conducts an annual audit of a sample of credit card transactions. LAist asked Lyster for a copy of the KPMG sample audit, but he did not share it.

    Anaheim’s credit card spending amounts to about $800,000 a month.

    Anaheim's credit card purchases

    Amazon: $1,726,954.00
    Restaurant spend: $804,038.12
    Home Depot: $666,982.97
    Office Depot: $557,071.43
    Grainger: $344,650.22
    Hilton: $138,993.06
    Target: $136,050.68
    Sam’s Club: $119,924.50
    Walmart: $57,306.85
    Costco: $42,857.63
    In-N-Out: $21,020.98
    Walmart: $57,306.85

    Source: Monthly billing statements obtained via public records request

    The city of Irvine, also one of OC’s most populous cities, spends around $500,000 on credit cards every month, according to city spokesperson Kristina Perrigoue. Those purchases are audited monthly, Perrigoue said. Irvine’s purchasing staff randomly selects one department per month to audit and they audit a sample of purchases.

    “We take the five users with the highest number of transactions and audit all their transactions for the prior month,” Perrigoue said.

    Why it matters

    Earlier this year, Anaheim grappled with how to close a $60 million budget shortfall after spending more than they were generating in revenue. City leaders closed the deficit with proceeds from capital bonds and by pulling money previously set aside to repay debt. The City Council recently declined to put a gate tax at its entertainment venues, including Disneyland, to voters. Instead, the majority of the council decided to meet at a future date to discuss revenue generating ideas. At that meeting, Mayor Ashleigh Aitken called for “tightening our belts” to boost revenue.

    LAist review of the credit card purchases showed significant spending at vendors — some with which Anaheim has cooperative agreements with.

    Cooperative agreements allow agencies like the city of Anaheim to pre-negotiate pricing so they get the best deals.

    Anaheim’s credit card policy states that the credit card can only be used for the small dollar purchase of supplies or off-site services. Typically, for bigger purchases, cities turn to cooperative agreements.

    “The vast majority of city purchasing — most purchases more than $10,000 — is done by purchase order or contract,” Lyster told LAist.

    Credit cards, Lyster said, “provide an efficient, cost-effective way of making smaller purchases, rather than use of petty cash, direct payments, cash advances and check requests, which can be more cumbersome, administratively costly and bring their own risks of misuse.”

    “There are cases where a purchase order or contract would be unnecessary and excessive, adding time and cost and impacting timely service to our community,” he continued.

    LAist has shared our findings with Aitken, City Manager Jim Vanderpool and all council members. We have also reached out to Moreno for an interview. We will update this story if we hear back.

    Here are some of our key findings from Anaheim’s credit card purchases:

    • Over $800,000 spent on restaurants

    City employees spent more than $800,000 on restaurants in Southern California and elsewhere over two years including around $60,000 at K&A Restaurant and over $20,000 on In-N-Out. Some restaurants from the credit card statement include Aloha Steakhouse in Ventura County, Tacos 1986 in Pasadena and BaBaLoo Lounge in Palm Desert.

    Lyster told LAist the restaurant spends “are catering expenses for events or meals for special work operations.”

    He said the city also provides meals when they “bring together a large contingent of our own police officers and those of other agencies to work demonstrations, high-profile dignitary visits or other occasions,” especially for work in the evening or on weekends.

    Lyster added that the council meetings are also catered and the city hosts community events where they cater food for the public.

    How to reach the reporter

    • If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is @yusramf.25.
    • You can follow this link to reach me there or type my username in the search bar after starting a new chat.
    • For instructions on getting started with Signal, see the app's support page.
    • And if you're comfortable just reaching out by email I'm at yfarzan@laist.com

    • Around $650,000 spent on hotels

    LAist’s review of the credit card purchases showed thousands of dollars spent at hotels, including the Grand Hyatt in Nashville, Caesars Palace in Las Vegas and a pet hotel in Oxnard.

    “The vast majority of this spending is for employee development to ensure our people are continually learning and aware of best professional standards,” Lyster said about the hotel charges. “This is an investment in our workforce that brings better service to our community.”

    • Around $40,000 spent at Costco, close to $120,000 at Sam’s Club, around $120,000 at Target and around $57,000 on Walmart purchases in two years

    Lyster attributed this spend to “food and supplies.”

    The Community Services Department, he said, buys “food and crafts and other supplies” for the city’s Fun on Wheels program, the Mobile Library and family resource centers.

    He declined to answer questions on whether employees submit a request for the purchase of goods and services and how the city tracks if these purchases are used for public benefit. The requests, called requisitions, are typical first steps in the purchasing process detailing quantity, description and use, Bouffard told LAist. When she worked at the county, all purchases went through this “checks and balances process,” she said.

    • Over $600,000 spent at Home Depot, more than $550,000 at Office Depot and over $340,000 at Grainger

    Lyster didn’t confirm if the purchases at these vendors were made using a purchase order.

    He confirmed Anaheim has accounts with Grainger, Office Depot and others, but not if the city’s credit card purchases at the vendors are made through the dedicated account.

    LAist correspondent Jordan Rynning contributed to this report.

  • State votes to lower them, but not by much
    A work crew fixes a power line.
    A crew fixes a power line in Altadena. Worsening wildfires are driving up utility bills across the state.

    Topline:

    California regulators voted to lower how much profit the state’s big four investor-owned utilities can make — but only slightly.

    The proposal: The decision lowers the maximum allowed profits for the state’s four investor-owned utilities — Southern California Edison, So Cal Gas, San Diego Gas & Electric and Pacific Gas & Electric — by about 0.3%. That’s less than the 0.35% reduction originally proposed.

    The vote: In a 4-1 decision, the state’s five governor-appointed commissioners approved the proposal to lower the payout to shareholders from the state’s major utility companies. They argued the decision strikes a balance between the effort to lower energy bills with the need to keep the utilities financially stable, especially as they work to harden an aging power grid against worsening wildfire conditions. Commissioner Darcie L. Houck was the sole no vote.

    The response: Critics say the reduction should go further to meaningfully reduce energy bills, pointing out that the companies have reported record or near-record profits in recent years. The utility companies argued that lowering their returns on equity too far below national averages would hurt shareholder investment and their credit, driving up customer costs over time.

    Go deeper: Will California OK lower utility company profits? How a pending vote could affect your electric bill

  • Fire-damaged 55+ community gets state funds
    Eight people stand in front of an apartment complex holding oversized checks.
    Former resident Wayne Clarvoe (left) poses with officials and giant checks at a press event Wednesday.

    Topline:

    An affordable housing complex in Altadena will get $2 million in state dollars to help with remediation and repairs for wildfire damage, state and L.A. County officials announced this week.

    Why it matters: Before the Eaton Fire damaged the facility, the Altadena Vista Senior Apartments provided 21 housing units for people aged 55 and over with incomes at or below 60% of the area median income. The influx of state dollars will allow it to bring these much-needed affordable housing units back online within about a year, officials said.

    The damage: The Eaton Fire did an estimated $7 million in damage to the complex, according to the Los Angeles County Development Authority, which has owned and operated the complex for more than three decades.

    Read on ... for more about who will be most helped by these funds.

    An affordable housing complex in Altadena will get $2 million in state dollars to help with remediation and repairs for wildfire damage, state and L.A. County officials announced this week.

    Before the Eaton Fire damaged the facility, the Altadena Vista Senior Apartments provided 21 housing units for people aged 55 and over with incomes at or below 60% of the area median income.

    The Eaton Fire did an estimated $7 million in damage to the complex, according to the Los Angeles County Development Authority, which has owned and operated the complex for more than three decades.

    Insurance will cover about half of the complex’s nearly $2 million claim, according to the authority.

    The influx of state dollars will allow it to bring these much-needed affordable housing units back online within about a year, officials said.

    State Sen. Sasha Renée Peréz advocated for the state general fund dollars to be used for the Altadena complex’s recovery.

    "We want to get people back inside fast,” Peréz said Wednesday at a press event. "This location was identified as a space that needed some additional financial assistance, and we could get 21 people back into housing very quickly."

    Most displaced residents are planning to return, but about six have decided to permanently relocate to other areas, according to the development authority.

    Before the fire, Wayne Clarvoe had lived at the apartment complex since 2014. The 64-year-old said he’s been struggling to find affordable rent elsewhere.

    "The cost of living here was fair,” Clarvoe said of his former home. "I was able to afford the rent, compared to what's going on now.

    "This is a very special day for me. This is the beginning of all of the residents coming back to Altadena, and especially this building here."

    Fire damage

    The area where the apartments are located didn’t receive an official evacuation order until 5:42 a.m. Jan. 8, according to county officials.

    But Clarvoe said he and about 20 other residents decided to leave the buildings the previous night.

    Sometime the next morning, Clarvoe said, he noticed one of the apartment buildings had caught on fire. He flagged down firefighters for help.

    "The fire was in the walls and traveling up into the attic," Clarvoe said. "If we'd have waited any longer, this building would not have been standing here."

    a damaged wall with exposed insulation and pipes.
    Two units at the Altadena Vista Apartments were badly damaged by the Eaton Fire.
    (
    Aaron Schrank
    /
    LAist
    )

    Two units were damaged by the flames. The complex’s carports and roof were damaged by embers. And water from fire sprinklers warped walls and carpets in several units.

    During the repairs, the development authority said it will update the facility. For example, it hopes to make all units accessible for residents with disabilities, instead of just a few.

    The authority’s director of construction and asset management, Carolina Romo, said the complex settled its insurance claim Dec. 16, nearly a year after filing it.

    A community need 

    Peréz said she worked with the nonprofit Department of Angels to identify community priorities for wildfire recovery. Affordable housing, particularly for older adults, quickly rose to the top, she said.

    At Wednesday's press event, officials highlighted a survey by the Eaton Fire Collaborative that found 78% of renters can’t afford the asking price for a one-bedroom unit in Altadena.

    There were fewer than 200 federally subsidized units in Altadena before the Eaton Fire, according to a UCLA report. More than a quarter of renters there were spending half of their income on housing.

    Officials say the state funding will accelerate the rebuilding process.

    "This investment is a major step to protect needed housing for seniors who deserve to age in place," said L.A. County Supervisor Kathryn Barger, who represents Altadena.

    However, the funds won’t cover the full cost of Altadena Vista’s remediation and repairs.

    Barger has authored a separate L.A. County motion requesting more than $4 million from a federal grant program to cover the rest.

    The funding for the Altadena Vista Apartments is part of a larger $8 million in state general fund dollars Peréz secured for rapid rehousing efforts in Altadena, she said.

    That includes $1 million for San Gabriel Valley Habitat for Humanity and $1 million for Greenline Housing Foundation.