Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Cal State workers get bonus, paid by $144M loan
    Students walk down a pathway with light stands next to grass and buildings in the background.
    Students walk through campus at Cal State San Marcos on May 6, 2025.

    Topline:

    The $144 million loan will be used to pay for one-time bonuses for faculty and staff.

    Why it matters: Cal State’s chief financial officer says the loan will be used to offer one-year bonuses to faculty and staff. While salaries vary widely across the system, the extra $144 million is roughly a 3% increase in the total pay for Cal State’s workers, including executives. State law says the loan needs to be repaid by next July.

    Some background: State lawmakers made the loan available to Cal State after they cut state funding to the system by $144 million this year. Cal State has 22 campuses and enrolls 460,000 students.

    Read on... what unions said about the loan and how the CSU system got here.

    The California State University system will seek a state loan of $144 million that it’ll have a year to repay at no interest, even though current projections show the system will have to add to its deficit to repay the debt.

    Cal State’s chief financial officer says the loan will be used to offer one-year bonuses to faculty and staff. While salaries vary widely across the system, the extra $144 million is roughly a 3% increase in the total pay for Cal State’s workers, including executives. State law says the loan needs to be repaid by next July.

    Despite months of hesitation, the system today took the first step to request the loan and will likely get the money in 60 days or less, said Cal State’s interim chief financial officer, Patrick Lenz, in an interview. The process involves approval from state lawmakers, who are likely to support the move.

    State lawmakers made the loan available to Cal State after they cut state funding to the system by $144 million this year. Cal State has 22 campuses and enrolls 460,000 students.

    The system’s largest union, the California Faculty Association of 29,000 workers, is cheering this decision but says more work is needed to bring back lecturers whose contracts were cancelled as many campuses contend with shrinking budgets. The union’s collective bargaining agreement is expiring but negotiators from the union and Cal State leadership haven’t met since April.

    “We will take this as a win, but we have so much work to do, and I do hope that this provides an opening for the management to come to the table with us and negotiate fairly,” said Elaine Bernal, a lecturer at the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry at Cal State Long Beach and senior member of the faculty association.

    “The one-time investment, great, but we really got to focus on long-term investment,” she said.
    The Legislature intends to increase state spending for Cal State in 2026-27 by just $101 million — far lower than previous promises from Gov. Gavin Newsom of about $250 million — so the system will effectively be $43 million short once it repays the loan, Lenz said. The decision to take the loan came “after careful deliberation, conversations with the chancellor, conversations with our Board of Trustees,” Lenz said.

    Money is chronically tight at CSU. Since 2023 the system has battled ongoing deficits that have led to hundreds of degree and course cuts, fewer lecturers and hiring freezes. Back then, the system said it was spending $1.5 billion less than it should to adequately educate its students.

    Over the past two years that figure has grown by several hundred million dollars as costs rise for campus utilities, insurance, health benefits and more. The deficits exist even as the system in 2024 began increasing tuition annually; the added costs outweigh the new revenue from charging students more. However, most students don’t pay tuition because of state and system financial aid.

    Despite those fiscal pressures and likely new expenses to replace the Trump administration’s cuts to federal education grants, Lenz said system leaders want to spend the money on workers.

    Unions wanted loan

    The zero-interest loan has been the source of intrigue and scrutiny since July as unions representing Cal State workers have been pressuring the system to agree to borrow the money so campuses can offer pay increases for workers. Unions and some lawmakers argued that the the system was fully funded because the state budget gave CSU the option to borrow the loan, which should trigger collective bargaining contract language that stipulated that ongoing raises would kick in if the system received an increase in state funding.

    But Cal State officials say that even if they take the loan, it’s not new or ongoing funding — it’s money they’d have to repay after a year — so the system isn’t obligated to increase wages like those contracts dictate.

    Lenz reiterated that point during an interview, even after indicating the system will take out the loan.

    “Clearly, anything that is one time is not ongoing,” he said of the loan. So any raise “would be only for the 12 months of the budget year.” But maybe the state will send more cash to the system than what lawmakers and Newsom signaled in the annual budget deal they solidified in June, Lenz said. He also suggested that CSU could negotiate more time to repay the loan.

    “There's a long way to go in this process, and there's a lot of unknowns,” he said.

    The loan is “an unusual financial strategy”, said Robert Kelchen, a professor of higher education budgets and finance at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Asked if this could be a model for other states, Kelchen said it might be for “other blue states that are heavily unionized” and are trying to secure labor peace with labor groups.

    “That's really what this feels like,” he said.

    How CSU got here

    That the loan even exists is itself an example of curious budgeting tactics by lawmakers and Newsom. Last year they passed a state budget that gave Cal State a moderate increase in state funding with a warning of huge cuts of $375 million this July — equal to about 8% of what the state spends supporting the CSU.

    After a half-year of fierce advocacy from Cal State officials, students and workers, the final 2025-26 budget approved in June applied just a 3% cut to CSU, with a promise that the cut — $144 million — would be restored in the 2026-27 budget year that begins next July. To help Cal State manage its finances this fiscal year, the state said the system could borrow $144 million this year and repay it by the end of June 2026.

    The loan option was extended to multiple state agencies, including the University of California.

    System budget leaders, including Lenz, in July expressed wariness over taking out the loan because if the state’s budget picture remains shaky — it’s already projecting billions of dollars in deficits — then lawmakers may decide to apply further cuts to the CSU. That means the system would be in a deeper deficit and be on the hook for a loan they couldn’t repay.

    The fiscal malaise could have been worse. In 2022, Newsom promised the CSU and University of California five years of increasing budget support totaling more than $1 billion for each system in new, ongoing funding. But because of state budget constraints, that so-called “compact” has only been partially funded.

    And new funding pain points are likely on the horizon. Congressional Republicans and President Donald Trump approved spending plans that Newsom says will kick millions of low-income Californians off public health insurance. If the state plans to pay for that care, budgets for other agencies, especially those that can raise tuition, may need to decrease.

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • Republicans delay vote to compel Trump to withdraw

    Topline:

    Republicans struggled Thursday to find the votes to dismiss legislation that would compel President Donald Trump to withdraw from the war with Iran, delaying planned votes on the matter into June.


    The context: The House had scheduled a vote on a war powers resolution, brought by Democrats, that would rein in Trump's military campaign. But as it became clear that Republicans would not have the numbers to defeat the bill, GOP leaders declined to hold a vote on it. It was the latest sign of the slipping support in Congress for a war that Trump launched more than two months ago without congressional approval.

    White House response: The White House argues that the requirements of the War Powers Resolution no longer apply because of the ceasefire with Iran. At the same time, Trump has said he was just an hour away from ordering another strike on Iran earlier this week, but held off because Gulf allies said they were engaged in negotiations to end the war. Still, Trump said on social media that military leaders should "be prepared to go forward with a full, large scale assault of Iran, on a moment's notice, in the event that an acceptable Deal is not reached." Trump has repeatedly set deadlines for Tehran and then backed off.

    WASHINGTON — Republicans struggled Thursday to find the votes to dismiss legislation that would compel President Donald Trump to withdraw from the war with Iran, delaying planned votes on the matter into June.

    The House had scheduled a vote on a war powers resolution, brought by Democrats, that would rein in Trump's military campaign. But as it became clear that Republicans would not have the numbers to defeat the bill, GOP leaders declined to hold a vote on it. It was the latest sign of the slipping support in Congress for a war that Trump launched more than two months ago without congressional approval.

    "We had the votes without question and they knew it, and as a result they're playing a political game," said Democratic Rep. Gregory Meeks, who sponsored the bill.

    Republicans in the Senate are also working to ensure they have the votes to dismiss another war powers resolution that advanced to a final vote earlier this week, when four GOP senators supported the resolution and three others were absent from the vote.

    The actions by congressional leaders showed Republicans are struggling to maintain political backing for Trump's handling of the war. Rank-and-file Republicans are increasingly willing to defy the president over the conflict.

    House Republican Leader Steve Scalise told reporters that the vote was delayed to give lawmakers who were absent a chance to vote. House Speaker Mike Johnson did not answer questions from reporters as he exited the House chamber.

    Frustration with Iran war grows on Capitol Hill

    On Capitol Hill, patience with the war has worn thin as the stalemate in the Strait of Hormuz disrupts global shipping and elevates gas prices in the U.S. Another House war powers resolution nearly passed last week, falling on a tie vote as three Republicans voted in favor.

    Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said he had the votes "locked in" this time around.

    "People are beginning to finally listen to the American people who don't support the war in Iran, and I think there's a growing number of Republicans who see how devastating the war has been for our country," said Democratic Rep. Adam Smith of Washington state.

    The lone Democrat who voted against the war powers resolution last week, Rep. Jared Golden of Maine, has said he will vote in favor of the legislation next time.

    In a joint statement, House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries and other caucus leaders said Republicans were "cowardly" to pull the vote.

    "Even as we prepare to recognize our nation's fallen heroes on Memorial Day, House Republicans refuse to show up and be accountable to the brave service members that have been recklessly put in harm's way," they added.

    Republicans have been broadly supportive of Trump's efforts to destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities, but some are now saying the president's legal timeline to wage a war without congressional approval has expired. Under the War Powers Resolution of 1973, presidents have 60 days to engage in a military conflict before Congress must either declare war or authorize the use of military force.

    "We're past 60 days so it's got to be brought to us to vote on. We're following the law," said Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican, adding that he plans to vote for the war powers resolution.

    The dispute over war powers

    The White House argues that the requirements of the War Powers Resolution no longer apply because of the ceasefire with Iran. At the same time, Trump has said he was just an hour away from ordering another strike on Iran earlier this week, but held off because Gulf allies said they were engaged in negotiations to end the war.

    Still, Trump said on social media that military leaders should "be prepared to go forward with a full, large scale assault of Iran, on a moment's notice, in the event that an acceptable Deal is not reached." Trump has repeatedly set deadlines for Tehran and then backed off.

    Sen. Thom Tillis, a Republican who has so far voted against the war powers resolutions, expressed frustration with the Trump administration's stance, especially from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

    "The current status quo, Pete Hegseth demonstrates how incompetent he is," Tillis told reporters, adding that he would be willing to vote for an authorization for use of military force.

    Earlier this week, Democratic senators rallied outside the Capitol Wednesday alongside VoteVets, a left-leaning veterans' advocacy group. They placed signs on the Capitol lawn noting that the nationwide average price of gasoline had risen to $4.53.

    Sen. Tammy Duckworth, an Illinois Democrat who served in the Iraq War with the Air National Guard, argued that the Iran war has amounted to a strategic blunder for Trump.

    "Trump started a war, and he's made things worse than before," Duckworth said, pointing to Iran's new leadership and the country's willingness to put a chokehold on commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.

    Republican leaders praised Trump for taking what they said was bold action to directly confront Iran, a nation that has been a U.S. adversary for decades.

    "I'm an American. I don't believe in getting hit and walking away and pretending as though it didn't happen," said Rep. Brian Mast, the Republican chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

    For Congress, the growing momentum to pass a war powers resolution could eventually lead to a legal showdown over who has the final authority over military conflicts.

    The legislation before the House is a concurrent resolution that lawmakers said would take effect without Trump's signature if it passed both chambers of Congress.

    But Trump has also argued that the 1973 law — passed by Congress during the Vietnam War era in an attempt to take back its power over foreign conflicts — is unconstitutional.
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Sponsored message
  • CA moves closer to banning the artificial stone
    An illustration featuring five members of the California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board sitting at a red table. In the background is an illustration of a damaged lung and a worker cutting artificial stone.
    The California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board took a first step toward banning the fabrication of artificial-stone countertops.

    Topline:

    California regulators took a first step Thursday toward banning the fabrication of artificial-stone countertops, popular with consumers but implicated in a workplace epidemic of the lung disease silicosis. California would be the first state to effectively ban the product.

    Why now? More than 600 health professionals signed a petition in December asking the California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board to prohibit fabrication of the countertops, which are made of crushed quartz, adhesives and pigments.

    The context: Quartz contains high amounts of silica, one of the most common minerals on earth. When slabs containing quartz are cut, ground or polished a toxic dust with the consistency of flour is released. That dust collects in workers’ lungs and causes silicosis, an incurable illness that leads to early death.

    What did the standards board decide? After a daylong meeting in downtown Los Angeles, the board voted unanimously to grant the petition and ask the state’s Division of Occupational Safety and Health, known as Cal/OSHA, to draft an emergency temporary standard to address the outbreak. The rule would be in place for a year while the agency considered permanent regulations.

    Read more: Public Health Watch, LAist and Univision were the first to report on what was then a cluster of about 30 silicosis cases in Southern California in December 2022. As of last week, the state had recorded 286 cases in Los Angeles County alone and another 120 in Orange County.

    California regulators took a first step Thursday toward banning the fabrication of artificial-stone countertops, popular with consumers but implicated in a workplace epidemic of the lung disease silicosis.

    More than 600 health professionals signed a petition in December asking the California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board to prohibit fabrication of the countertops, which are made of crushed quartz, adhesives and pigments. California would be the first state to effectively ban the product.

    After a daylong meeting in downtown Los Angeles, the board voted unanimously to grant the petition and ask the state’s Division of Occupational Safety and Health, known as Cal/OSHA, to draft an emergency temporary standard to address the outbreak. The rule would be in place for a year while the agency considered permanent regulations. A committee composed of physicians, scientists, union officials and industry representatives would advise Cal/OSHA.

    Quartz contains high amounts of silica, one of the most common minerals on earth. When slabs containing quartz are cut, ground or polished a toxic dust with the consistency of flour is released. That dust collects in workers’ lungs and causes silicosis, an incurable illness that leads to early death.

    Public Health Watch, LAist and Univision were the first to report on what was then a cluster of about 30 silicosis cases in Southern California in December 2022. As of last week, the state had recorded 286 cases in Los Angeles County alone and another 120 in Orange County.

    Statewide, there were 560 cases and 31 deaths. Fifty-eight workers had received double-lung transplants, which will prolong their lives by, at best, 10 years.

    The vast majority of the afflicted workers are young or middle-aged, Latino immigrant men.

    Thursday’s meeting began with hours of in-person and online testimony from dying workers and their families, and sobering presentations by state officials. Amy Heinzerling, chief of the Emerging Workplace Hazards Unit of the California Department of Public Health, said the agency had identified 85 new cases of silicosis among fabricators in the first four months of this year. Enhanced regulation by Cal/OSHA “has not solved the problem,” she said. “It is time to consider other approaches to this public health crisis.”

    Elizabeth Noth, an industrial hygienist with Cal/OSHA, said the state has seen a doubling of silicosis cases among countertop fabricators every 13 months. If quick action isn’t taken, she said, the tally of cases in California could reach 900 by the end of this year. Noth said pulverized silica dust contains ultrafine particles, known as nanoparticles, which circumvent all but the most sophisticated respirators. When they enter workers’ lungs, they cause progressive scarring, known as fibrosis, for which there is no cure.

    One sick worker urged the standards board in Spanish to “do something to stop this evil.” Said another: “We want you to take this artificial stone away.” A third said his illness had put an “expiration date” on his life.

    Representatives of countertop manufacturers, which have been named in hundreds of worker lawsuits, blame the silicosis epidemic on poor workplace hygiene and inadequate enforcement.

    “Banning a product to compensate for failed enforcement is irresponsible,” said Matt Thurston, a regional director for Cosentino North America, a major manufacturer of artificial stone. Cosentino is headquartered in Spain, which has recorded some 2,500 cases of silicosis – more than any other nation.

    Dr. Jane Fazio, a pulmonologist with UCLA Health who has treated more silicosis patients in California than any other physician, offered an emotional rebuttal to such arguments. Her patients, she said, suffer “slow and then quick and then very painful deaths. This disease is really unlike any other.” Silicosis, she said, “should not exist” in 2026. “Period. End of story.”

    Public Health Watch interviewed three ailing countertop workers in Southern California earlier this week. Each was dealing with the physical and emotional fallout from a double-lung transplant. Each insisted he’d never been told about the dangers of fabricating artificial stone. Had he known, said Jeison, 44, of Anaheim, “Not even if I was crazy would I have worked in this industry.” (Public Health Watch agreed to use only Jeison’s first name because he does not have legal immigration status.)

    ‘They lied to me and they lied to my employers’

    At a meeting in Santa Rosa last month, the standards board heard testimony from five former fabrication workers who said they wore masks and used water when they cut artificial stone slabs but weren’t warned that the dust was much more hazardous than that given off by natural stone, like granite. Four of the workers appeared in a prerecorded video with their identities concealed because they did not have legal immigration status.

    “You could feel how the dust entered our lungs,” said a man from Orange County identified as Crispin. He said he wanted manufacturers “to stop selling this material because there are still many workers who are not yet sick and don’t know what is coming.”

    A fifth worker, Jose Francisco Andrade Pena of Alameda County, testified in person. He spent 33 years fabricating artificial stone in the Bay Area and was diagnosed with advanced silicosis in 2024.

    Countertop manufacturers “never explained how dangerous [artificial stone] was,” Andrade said in Spanish. “They lied to me and they lied to my employers. They continue to lie today ... It is painful and frustrating to know that the government still allows this toxic product to be sold. Artificial stone should have been removed from the market long ago.”

    Andrade paused repeatedly during his testimony to cough or collect his breath. Before he was diagnosed with silicosis, he said, he was the person his family depended on.

    “I worked hard to provide for them and took pride in being strong. I could lift 60 pounds easily, work a full day and still have energy for my family. Today, that life feels very far away ... Even small outings are difficult ... I get tired very easily and have to plan my entire life around my breathing.”

    California tightened workplace regulations for silica in December 2024, and Cal/OSHA stepped up enforcement of the countertop fabrication industry. As of mid-May, the agency said it had opened 181 inspections of fabrication shops, assessed about $1.9 million in penalties to shop owners and issued 26 stop-work orders for the dry-cutting of countertop slabs, a practice that creates thick clouds of white dust.

    Still, there is only so much Cal/OSHA can do.

    As of January, the agency’s inspector workforce had a vacancy rate of 35 percent. California only has one inspector for every 99,000 workers – compared to one for every 23,000 workers in Oregon. California has an estimated 1,342 countertop fabrication shops, many of which are small, mobile and hard to find. That may be an undercount, officials say.

    Artificial-stone – also known as engineered-stone – countertops became popular with consumers over the past 15 to 20 years because of their durability, relative value and versatility (they come in a wide variety of colors). But there are safer alternatives. Slabs made of crushed, recycled glass release amorphous silica, which is far less toxic than crystalline silica, whose jagged, microscopic fragments are unleashed during fabrication of quartz. Granite and marble are safer, too; they contain some crystalline silica, but not nearly as much as quartz. Other countertop options include laminate, porcelain and concrete.

    The standards board’s vote Thursday to grant the petition seeking a fabrication ban was nearly derailed when the chairman, Joseph Alioto Jr., suggested that an advisory committee and a silica science subcommittee be convened before any emergency rule was considered. But the two other board members present — Derek Urwin and Nola Kennedy —convinced Alioto that the state needed to act with urgency, given that a new silicosis case is diagnosed, on average, each day.

    Urwin, an engineer with the Los Angeles County Fire Department, was especially persuasive. After the vote, James Nevin, a lawyer whose firm represents more than 750 countertop workers, called Urwin “a hero who just saved 100,000 California fabrication workers’ lives.”

    Federal ban unlikely

    Should California impose a fabrication ban, it would join Australia in deciding that artificial stone can’t be worked with safely, even when precautions are taken. Australia enacted a nationwide ban on the product in 2024 after recording an estimated 1,000 cases of silicosis among countertop fabricators.

    A nationwide ban in the United States, however, seems unlikely.Marty Davis, CEO of the biggest American manufacturer of artificial-stone countertop slabs, Cambria, is a major Republican donor who has pressed Congress to shield slab makers from liability for silicosis outbreaks. Davis also has argued for tariffs on imported quartz slabs.

    At a U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee hearing in January, Rebecca Shult, Cambria’s chief legal officer, testified that the underlying problem “is not the stone slabs or manufacturers and distributors like Cambria. The problem is the unlawful fabrication cutting businesses who violate the regulations and requirements seemingly to gain unfair economic advantage.”

    But Tina Jordan, who owns a countertop fabrication business in Colorado with her husband, Jimmy, told the subcommittee that following the rules didn’t save their son, Tyler, from being diagnosed with silicosis and kidney failure after working there less than a decade.

    “We have always operated a clean shop and have done everything we thought we needed to do to keep our employees, including our own son, safe,” Tina Jordan testified. “We spent $500,000 on sophisticated, wet-cutting computerized machinery ... From inception we installed a custom-built ventilation system with filters to extract dust. We require our employees to always wear masks when fabricating ...”

    Her family’s mistake, she said, was believing salespeople who assured them that the fabrication of quartz-based slabs required no special safeguards. “These engineered stone ... companies did not warn us that their products were more dangerous than natural stone or that we needed to do anything differently other than what we were already doing to fabricate them safely.”

    Last month, a jury in Denver awarded Tyler Jordan $17.45 million in his lawsuit against Cambria and another manufacturer, Hyundai USA LLC. One of his lawyers remarked after the verdict that “only a human wearing a Class A hazmat suit” could safely work with artificial stone.

    Jim Morris is executive director and editor-in-chief of Public Health Watch, a nonprofit investigative news organization.

  • Reopens next month as behavioral health campus
    A group of people stand outside a building on a sunny day.
    St. Vincent Medical Center in the Westlake neighborhood has sat vacant for several years. Developers plan to reopen the medical campus in June 2026.

    Topline:

    The long-shuttered St. Vincent Medical Center is set to reopen next month as part of a sprawling behavioral health and housing campus.

    More details: The center, just a few blocks away from MacArthur Park, is aimed at addressing homelessness, mental illness and addiction in the area. The first phase of the project, a 205-bed interim housing program for people struggling with mental illness and substance use disorders, is scheduled to open in June. The program will be housed at Seaton Hall on South Lake Street, according to developers.

    Why it matters: The opening marks the first major milestone in an ambitious redevelopment effort that aims to transform the former St. Vincent campus into a centralized hub for social services.

    Read on... for more on the redevelopment.

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    The long-shuttered St. Vincent Medical Center is set to reopen next month as part of a sprawling behavioral health and housing campus. 

    The center, just a few blocks away from MacArthur Park is aimed at addressing homelessness, mental illness and addiction in the area. 

    The first phase of the project, a 205-bed interim housing program for people struggling with mental illness and substance use disorders, is scheduled to open in June. The program will be housed at Seaton Hall on South Lake Street, according to developers.

    The opening marks the first major milestone in an ambitious redevelopment effort that aims to transform the former St. Vincent campus into a centralized hub for social services.

    “We try our best to do this on the streets,” said Victor Narro, project director at the UCLA Labor Center and a longtime organizer in the MacArthur Park area. “But it’s much easier when you have a physical location. This building may offer us an opportunity to provide services for the category of unhoused people who are chronically ill, who have suffered major mental health issues and also people who are really deeply addicted.”

    “I think it’s something that’s been long overdue,” Narro added. 

    Additional phases of the redevelopment are expected to open through 2027, with the full campus projected to be up and running before the 2028 Summer Olympic Games, developer Shay Yadin said. 

    Yadin said the project is moving fast partly because developers are reusing the existing hospital campus rather than building entirely new facilities.

    “We’re not adding a single square foot to this whole place,” Yadin said. “Everything we’re doing is internal renovation.”

    The 7.7-acre property has a long history in LA. Founded in 1856 by the Daughters of Charity, St. Vincent is widely considered the city’s first hospital. But after years of financial struggles, the hospital’s previous owner declared bankruptcy and the facility closed in 2020.

    Later that year, the property was acquired by Los Angeles Times Patrick Soon-Shiong through his company NantWorks, though most of the campus remained shuttered. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Soon-Shiong sought to use the campus as a coronavirus treatment and research center, according to the LA Times. 

    At the end of last year, Yadin’s firm, St. Vincent Behavioral Health Campus LLC, purchased the property for $66.5 million, according to the LA Times. 

    Reviving St. Vincent’s hospital

    The full redevelopment is expected to cost roughly $300 million, Yadin said, and include more than 800 beds, including interim housing, permanent supportive housing, recuperative care and addiction treatment programs.

    The project has rapidly gained support from the state and private sector at a time when California is investing billions into behavioral health infrastructure. The statewide measure Proposition 1 intends to expand treatment facilities, housing and services for people with serious mental illness and substance use disorders.

    In a recent social media post, LA Mayor Karen Bass said St. Vincent is “what I’ve wanted to see happen for a long time: a place where people can get treatment, support, and build real, independent lives in permanent housing.”

    In March, Gov. Gavin Newsom announced the St. Vincent campus would receive $135.8 million through Proposition 1’s funding to support new mental health and substance use treatment facilities planned for the site.

    In April, Health Net and the Centene Foundation, private healthcare partners, also announced a $6 million investment in the campus.

    Yadin said the project is designed around what he describes as a “continuum of care” model — bringing housing, treatment and support services together in one place rather than spreading them across different providers and locations.

    “A lot of individuals, especially within the unsheltered population, fall between the cracks between one level of care and the next,” Yadin said. “For them to finish a program and then say, ‘Go to the other side of town to organization X to get the next level of care,’ oftentimes these individuals don’t make it.”

    The St. Vincent campus is intended to centralize services in one location, something he says is desperately needed when considering unhoused residents.

    Some unhoused residents, Narro said, are full-time workers who simply cannot afford rent. Others have been chronically homeless for years and need long-term support. Others struggle with severe addiction or mental illness.

    “That’s the more complicated one,” Narro said. “So you have to have a special type of wraparound services for them, which I think this building has the potential for.”

  • Highs around mid 70s and 80s
    PASADENA-IN-FILM
    Pasadena to see a high of 81 degrees today.

    QUICK FACTS

    • Today’s weather: Partly cloudy then sunny
    • Beaches: 66 to 71 degrees
    • Mountains: Mid-70s to 80s
    • Inland:  80 to 89 degrees
    • Warnings and advisories: None today

    What to expect: For most of SoCal, a pleasant and mild weekend, with highs in the mid 70s to mid 80s. That will be in stark contrast to Coachella Valley, temperatures will reach 95 to 100 degrees.

    Read on ... to learn more.

    QUICK FACTS

    • Today’s weather: Partly cloudy then sunny
    • Beaches: 66 to 71 degrees
    • Mountains: Mid-70s to 80s
    • Inland:  80 to 89 degrees
    • Warnings and advisories: None today

    We're in for a nice, cool Memorial Day weekend with cloudy mornings and sunny afternoons.

    Taking a look at the Inland Empire, temperatures have dipped slightly with highs today sticking around the 80s, and up to 89 degrees in the warmest areas.

    For Orange County, temperatures there will hover in the mid to upper 70s. Also expect clouds and patchy fog in the morning followed by afternoon sun.

    In L.A. County valleys, temperatures will stick around the upper 70s to around 86 degrees. L.A County beaches will see highs from 66 to 71 degrees.

    In Coachella Valley, temperatures will reach 95 to 100 degrees.

    Looking ahead to the weekend temperatures will stick around in the mid 70s to mid 80s.