Frank Stoltze
is a veteran reporter who covers local politics and examines how democracy is and, at times, is not working.
Published November 25, 2024 12:55 PM
Erik Menendez (left) is shown in 2016 and Lyle Menendez in 2018 in photos provided by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
(
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
/
AP
)
Topline:
A Los Angeles judge has moved a hearing date to late January to consider whether to resentence the Menendez brothers, who were convicted of murder in the early 1990s for fatally shooting their parents at their Beverly Hills home.
Why it matters: Superior Court Judge Michael Jesic set a hearing for Jan 30-31, saying that the previous date — set in mid-December — did not allow enough time for him to review 17 boxes filled with information about the case. Jesic also said he postponed the hearing "out of respect for the new administration," noting that a new district attorney — Nathan Hochman — had been elected. The judge said he wanted to give Hochman a chance to "weigh in."
Why now: The judge’s decision comes a week before Hochman is sworn in as the new Los Angeles County district attorney. It is unclear whether he’ll support the resentencing and release of the brothers as current D.A. George Gascón has done. Hochman has said he wants to review the case before making any decision.
A Los Angeles judge has moved a hearing date to late January to consider whether to resentence the Menendez brothers, who were convicted of murder in the early 1990s for fatally shooting their parents at their Beverly Hills home.
On Monday, Superior Court Judge Michael Jesic set a hearing for Jan. 30-31, saying that the previous date — scheduled in mid-December — did not allow enough time for him to review 17 boxes filled with information about the case.
Jesic also said he postponed the hearing "out of respect for the new administration," noting that a new district attorney — Nathan Hochman — had been elected. The judge said he wanted to give Hochman a chance to "weigh in."
Eric and Lyle Menendez listened to the hearing from prison. They are currently being held at the Richard J. Donovan Detention Facility in San Diego County.
The only time they spoke was when one of them said "yes" to the question, "Can you hear us?"
Family members of the brothers were given an opportunity to speak in court Monday. Some relatives of the murdered parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, have been vocal about the case, saying they believe the brothers testimony decades ago that they were abused by their father, and the time has come for them to be released.
"I think it's time for them to go home," said Terecita Menendez, older sister of Jose Menendez, said through tears.
Listen
0:45
Judge sets January hearing for possible resentencing of Menendez brothers
Joan Vandermolen, the older sister of Kitty Menendez, has spoken publicly in support of the brothers previously. She spoke again Monday in the courtroom.
"No child should have to go through what Eric and Lyle went through," Vandermolen said. She acknowledged that her own brother opposes the brothers' release.
The judge’s decision comes a week before Hochman is sworn in as the new Los Angeles County district attorney. It is unclear whether he’ll support the resentencing and release of the brothers as current D.A. George Gascón has done.
Hochman has said he wants to review the case before making any decision. He is a more traditional prosecutor than Gascón, a progressive who has supported the resentencing of more than 300 state prison inmates.
Last month, Gascón said he believes new evidence shows the brothers were sexually abused by their father. The brothers had been sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, but Gascón now recommends they be resentenced to 50 years to life in prison — 25 years for each murder.
That would make them immediately eligible for parole.
Gascón supports their release.
Lyle Menendez (second from left) and his brother, Erik are flanked by their attorneys Gerald Chaleff (left) and Robert Shapiro, in Beverly Hills Municipal Court in 1990.
(
Nick Ut
/
AP
)
"I believe that they have paid their debt to society," Gascón said. "And the system provides a vehicle for their case to be reviewed by a parole board, and if parole concurs with my assessment — it will be their decision — they will be released accordingly."
Gascón made his decision after new evidence of sexual abuse of the brothers by their father surfaced in the case. Some of that came to light in a Peacock documentary from 2023.
In it, Roy Rosselló, a member of the Puerto Rican boy band Menudo made his own allegation that Jose Menendez sexually molested him as a minor. Jose Menendez signed Menudo to RCA Records when he was an executive at the company.
In addition, the brothers’ attorney, Mark Geragos, has submitted to the court a letter Erik Menendez wrote to a cousin decades ago documenting the abuse at the time it occurred.
All along the brothers have said they committed the killings because of their father's sexual abuse of them and a fear that he was going to kill them.
Geragos said the January hearing will provide a chance to present reasons why the brothers should be resentenced.
“We’re hoping that by the end of that [hearing] or sometime sooner we will in fact get the brothers released,” he said.
After they were arrested, the brothers never denied committing the killings, in which they repeatedly fired shotguns at their parents as the couple watched television the night of Aug. 20, 1989.
They said their mother knew about the molestation and that hers was a “mercy” killing. Their claims were met with widespread skepticism.
Prosecutors at the time said the brothers were motivated by greed because they stood to inherit their father’s multi-million dollar estate.
Erik Menendez was 18 at the time of the murders. Lyle Menendez was 21. They are now 53 and 56, respectively.
Dana Littlefield
is a senior editor who oversees coverage of politics, health, housing and homelessness.
Published May 11, 2026 5:24 PM
The City of Arcadia posted notice Monday on its website that Mayor Eileen Wang had resigned.
(
Courtesy City of Arcadia
)
Topline:
The mayor of Arcadia has agreed to plead guilty to a charge she acted as an agent for China, federal prosecutors announced Monday. She has resigned from her position with the city.
The charges:Eileen Wang, 58, faces one count of acting as an illegal agent of a foreign government, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office. The charge carries a potential sentence of up to 10 years in federal prison. According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Wang and Yaoning “Mike” Sun of Chino Hills, worked at the direction of the Chinese government and with individuals based in the U.S. to promote pro-People’s Republic of China propaganda in the United States. Those actions occurred between 2020 and 2022, prosecutors said.
What's next: Wang, who was elected to the City Council in November 2022, was expected to make her first appearance in U.S. District Court Monday afternoon. Citing a plea agreement, prosecutors said she's expected to enter the guilty plea within the next few weeks.
Read on... for more on the charges and allegations.
The mayor of Arcadia has agreed to plead guilty to a charge she acted as an agent for China, federal prosecutors announced Monday. She has resigned from her position with the city.
Eileen Wang, 58, faces one count of acting as an illegal agent of a foreign government, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office. The charge carries a potential sentence of up to 10 years in federal prison.
What we know about the criminal case
According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Wang and Yaoning “Mike” Sun of Chino Hills worked at the direction of the Chinese government and with individuals based in the U.S. to promote pro-People’s Republic of China propaganda in the United States. Those actions occurred between 2020 and 2022, prosecutors said.
According to federal prosecutors, Wang and Sun operated a website — known as U.S. News Center — billed as a news source for the local Chinese American community in Los Angeles County. They posted content on the site, described as "pre-written articles," based on directives from Chinese government officials.
Sun, 65, pleaded guilty in October 2025 in federal court to acting as an illegal agent of a foreign government. He is serving a four-year federal prison sentence.
Prosecutors also said Wang communicated with John Chen, whom they described as “a high-level member of the [Chinese government] intelligence apparatus,” in November 2021, and asked him to post an article from her website.
In a group chat, Wang referenced the article and wrote: “This is what the Ministry of Foreign Affairs wants to send,” according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
Chen pleaded guilty in New York to acting as an illegal agent of the People’s Republic of China and conspiracy to bribe a public official. In 2024, he was sentenced to 20 months in federal prison.
What's next
Wang, who was elected to the City Council in November 2022, was expected to make her first appearance in U.S. District Court Monday afternoon.
Citing a plea agreement, prosecutors said she's expected to enter the guilty plea within the next few weeks.
Arcadia's mayor is selected from the elected council members. A post on the city's website announced that Wang had resigned her position as of Monday and that a new mayor would be picked from the remaining council members at the next meeting.
Next Arcadia City Council meeting
Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2026 Location: Council Chambers, 240 West Huntington Drive, Arcadia Time: 7 p.m. Watch: Live stream or via live broadcast on lon the Arcadia Community Television Channel (AT&T channel 99, Spectrum digital channel 3). Daily replays at 10 a.m. and 7 p.m.
Elly Yu
reports on early childhood. From housing to health, she covers issues facing the youngest Angelenos and their families.
Published May 11, 2026 3:36 PM
The state is partnering with Baby2Baby to send 400 free diapers home with families when they’re discharged from the hospital.
(
Didier Pallages
/
AFP via Getty Images
)
Topline:
Starting next month, families in California will get hundreds of free diapers for their newborns in a new state initiative.
What’s new: The state is partnering with Baby2Baby, a Los Angeles-based nonprofit, to send 400 free diapers home with families when they’re discharged from the hospital. Any baby born in a participating hospital would be eligible, regardless of income.
Which hospitals? State officials say the program will be first prioritized in hospitals that serve a large number of Medi-Cal patients, but said there isn’t a current list of participating hospitals. A spokesperson for the state’s Department of Health Care Access and Information said once hospitals begin to opt-in, a list will be available on Baby2Baby’s website.
Why now: Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office said the program is aimed at easing the financial strain of raising a family. Newborns can need up to 12 diapers a day — and families spend about $1,000 on diapers in the first year of a baby’s life, according to the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Keep up with LAist.
If you're enjoying this article, you'll love our daily newsletter, The LA Report. Each weekday, catch up on the 5 most pressing stories to start your morning in 3 minutes or less.
The Supreme Court on Monday gave itself more time to consider a national ban on telemedicine access to the abortion pill mifepristone. Rules for prescribing mifepristone online or through the mail remain in effect through Thursday at a minimum.
The backstory: The tumult over the future of telemedicine access to mifipristone started on May 1 with a ruling from the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. That ruling re-instituted prescribing rules from before the pandemic that required patients to receive mifepristone in person in a doctor's office or clinic. The Food and Drug Administration determined that the rule was medically unnecessary in 2021. The state of Louisiana sued last fall, arguing that telemedicine access undermines the state's abortion ban.
What is telemedicine abortion: The telemedicine abortion process starts with a patient connecting with a healthcare provider on the phone or online. If the patient is eligible, that provider can prescribe two medications — mifepristone and another pill called misoprostol. Patients can pick up the medicine at a local pharmacy, or providers can mail the drugs to a patient's home. Now, most abortions in the U.S. use this combination of medications, and one quarter happen via telemedicine. After the 5th Circuit ruling, some providers said they would continue offering telemedicine access to abortion medication using a different protocol that involves higher doses of misoprostol and no mifepristone.
Read on... for more on what's at stake.
The Supreme Court on Monday gave itself more time to consider a national ban on telemedicine access to the abortion pill mifepristone.
Justice Samuel Alito extended an earlier order he issued by three more days, so rules for prescribing mifepristone online or through the mail remain in effect through Thursday at a minimum.
The case at issue
The tumult over the future of telemedicine access to mifipristone started on May 1 with a ruling from the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. That ruling re-instituted prescribing rules from before the pandemic that required patients to receive mifepristone in person in a doctor's office or clinic.
The Food and Drug Administration determined that the rule was medically unnecessary in 2021. The state of Louisiana sued last fall, arguing that telemedicine access undermines the state's abortion ban.
What is telemedicine abortion?
The telemedicine abortion process starts with a patient connecting with a healthcare provider on the phone or online. If the patient is eligible, that provider can prescribe two medications — mifepristone and another pill called misoprostol. Patients can pick up the medicine at a local pharmacy, or providers can mail the drugs to a patient's home.
That access is a big part of the reason why the number of abortions nationally has actually increased since the Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion in 2022. Now, most abortions in the U.S. use this combination of medications, and one quarter happen via telemedicine.
After the 5th Circuit ruling, some providers said they would continue offering telemedicine access to abortion medication using a different protocol that involves higher doses of misoprostol and no mifepristone.
Researchers say that method is just as safe and effective, but tends to cause more pain for patients and more side effects, like nausea and diarrhea. Misoprostol has other medical uses, such as treating gastric ulcers and hemorrhage, and has been on the market longer than mifepristone. It is likely to remain fully accessible, even if mifepristone is restricted.
Since the FDA's prescribing rules for medications apply to the whole country, a change to the rules about how mifepristone can be accessed has national impact. That means it affects states with constitutionally-protected access to abortion, states with criminal bans, like Louisiana, and all states in between.
States' rights
Nearly two dozen Democratic-led states submitted an amicus brief in this case, writing that the appeals court decision put the policy choices of states with bans above the choices of states "that have made the different but equally sovereign determinations to promote access to abortion care."
There are also stakes related to the power of FDA and other expert agencies to set rules. While the Trump administration's FDA did not respond to the Supreme Court's request for briefs, a group of former leaders of the agency, who served under mainly Democratic and some Republican presidents, wrote about this in an amicus brief.
They defended the FDA's process in approving the medication and modifying the rules for prescribing it, and say the appeals court decision "would upend FDA's gold-standard, science-based drug approval system."
Andy Cheatwood
is vice president of product. His team has developed numerous features to improve LAist voting guides.
Published May 11, 2026 2:13 PM
(
Erin Hauer
/
LAist
)
Topline:
LAist is launching Voter Game Plan+ to give you new tools to enhance your voting research experience.
How we got here: For a decade, LAist has been making navigating elections in California and L.A. easier through our Voter Game Plan guides. More than 3 million people visited the Voter Game Plan during our coverage of the 2024 elections. That’s equivalent to more than half of the overall registered voters in L.A. County.
Why it matters: We’ve heard from so many people who tell us that Voter Game Plan has helped them make their most informed votes ever. You’ve told us that these helpful, plain-spoken and nonpartisan guides are essential in Southern California.
How VGP+ works: If you already support LAist’s work as a member, thank you. You’ll have full access to these new tools. If you haven’t yet taken the step of joining the LAist member ranks, we are asking for a small, one-time payment of $7 for these additional features through the Nov. 3 midterm election.
For a decade, LAist has been making navigating elections in California and L.A. easier through our Voter Game Plan guides. More than 3 million people visited the Voter Game Plan during our coverage of the 2024 elections. That’s equivalent to more than half of the overall registered voters in L.A. County.
We’ve heard from so many people who tell us that Voter Game Plan has helped them make their most informed votes ever. You’ve told us that these helpful, plain-spoken and nonpartisan guides are essential in Southern California.
And each election cycle, we strive to find new ways to make them even better. Over the last few elections, we’ve added charts that let you follow the money in key races by tracking campaign finance. We’ve expanded to Orange County, Long Beach and Pasadena. We spun up our popular newsletter, “Make It Make Sense,” which keeps you informed on what goes on after the election. This year, we added a pre-game to the newsletter and brought you up to speed on recent big elections ahead of this primary election day.
What is Voter Game Plan+
Now we’re launching another new experiment. We call it Voter Game Plan+. This feature will offer you a new toolkit of features to enhance your voting research experience. Here's how it works:
If you haven’t yet taken the step of joining the LAist member ranks, we are asking for a small, one-time payment of $7 for these additional features through the Nov. 3 mid-term election.
All of our voter guides remain free for all to use, and you can still submit your questions to our reporters and we’ll get them answered.
Why ask for money? This nominal fee will help offset the cost of producing these specific guides and tools, as well as the overall Voter Game Plan, which takes the equivalent of at least two journalists working full-time for a year to produce every election cycle.
As part of VGP+, you will be able to match your interests and topical positions against 14 candidates in the L.A. mayoral race through an interactive quiz. And the California governor's race quiz launches later this week.
We’re also offering a way to follow and save your favorite candidates across all races. This tool will be useful if you want a printable list of choices to take to the ballot box, or if you just want to keep track of how you voted when the general election comes around in November. And there are more features to come.
Our ask to you
With VGP+, LAist continues our tradition of working hard to make elections and long ballots less intimidating and giving voters more context and support for making informed decisions.
This is not a paywall, and you are not under any obligation to purchase VGP+. But we are asking this: Has LAist’s Voter Game Plan saved you time and given you confidence at the ballot box? If the answer is yes, we’d be very grateful for your support.