Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Lawsuit against LA County Sheriffs moves forward
    A woman with medium-light skin tone with bleached hair wearing a black sweatshirt with white text that reads "Dignity & Power NOW" holds a framed photo of her and a young man with face tattoos smiling at the camera.
    Vanessa Perez displaying a photo of herself and her son, Joseph, together.

    Topline:

    A lawsuit against Los Angeles County filed on behalf of a man who was severely beaten by sheriff’s deputies will move forward. That’s after a Superior Court judge on Monday denied a motion from the county’s attorney that could have seen the case dismissed.

    The backstory: Joseph Perez lives with schizophrenia. In 2020, the 28-year-old was seriously beaten by a group of L.A. County sheriff’s deputies. Perez’s mother, Vanessa Perez, alleges the beating took place just hours after she informed the department that her son lives with mental illness and needed psychiatric help. The deputies alleged Perez was resisting arrest and that they too were injured in the scuffle, according to partially redacted department records.

    The reaction: Standing outside the Stanley Mosk Courthouse Monday morning,
    Vanessa Perez told LAist she was happy with the judge's ruling. “I’m overwhelmed... Maybe justice will come,” she said. The attorney representing the county declined to comment citing ongoing litigation.

    A fight for records: In a separate case, the Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission — a county sheriff watchdog group — subpoenaed the department for an unredacted use-of-force report from the night Perez was beaten. So far, the Sheriff’s Department has not supplied the information.

    Go deeper: Her son was severely beaten by sheriff's deputies. Five years later a watchdog group is fighting for records

  • White House admits it used keywords to kill funds
    A close up of person's hands holding a pipette with teal-colored gloves in a lab.
    University of California research professors allege federal agencies illegally canceled nearly $2 billion in research grants. A student holds a pipette in a lab at Cal State San Marcos on May 6, 2025.

    Topline:

    The Trump administration canceled $2 billion of research grants to University of California professors. Their legal team says it has proof that those terminations were unconstitutional.

    Why it matters: Federal agencies that terminated more than a thousand research grants at the University of California last year admitted that they used keywords related to diversity, gender, vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 to screen for projects that ran afoul of the Trump administration’s priorities.

    It’s an admission that lawyers for the research professors say is proof that the agencies illegally canceled nearly $2 billion in grants. And that’s a major development in a lawsuit filed by UC researchers against the Trump administration to permanently get their grants back.

    The researchers’ legal team is now asking the judge in the case to skip a trial and formally declare that the White House repeatedly violated the constitution, including the First Amendment. A court hearing on whether that’ll happen is scheduled for Oct. 20.

    The backstory: The judge in this case, Rita F. Lin, has repeatedly sided with the UC professors and issued several preliminary injunctions forcing the federal agencies to restore the grants while she reviews the full merits of the case. This includes the restoration of hundreds of grants at UCLA that the Trump administration sought to suspend over its allegations that the university tolerated antisemitism and permitted transgender women to compete on women’s sports teams.

    Read on... for more on the lawsuit.

    This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.

    Federal agencies that terminated more than a thousand research grants at the University of California last year admitted that they used keywords related to diversity, gender, vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 to screen for projects that ran afoul of the Trump administration’s priorities.

    It’s an admission that lawyers for the research professors say is proof that the agencies illegally canceled nearly $2 billion in grants. And that’s a major development in a lawsuit filed by UC researchers against the Trump administration to permanently get their grants back.

    The researchers’ legal team is now asking the judge in the case to skip a trial and formally declare that the White House repeatedly violated the constitution, including the First Amendment. A court hearing on whether that'll happen is scheduled for Oct. 20.

    The federal agencies made the admission about the keywords in signed stipulations filed in federal court last week in a case called Thakur v. Trump that’s been ongoing since last spring.

    The stipulations in the court filing show the agencies “did not terminate any grants based on alleged noncompliance with the terms of the grant” and instead used “general criteria, rather than grant-specific assessment of each award’s compliance, or performance,” the lawyers for the plaintiffs wrote.

    Lawyers for the UC professors now contend that the admission proves three wide-ranging constitutional violations:

    • By using keyword searches to review hundreds of grants and terminate them en masse rather than reviewing them individually on their merits, the Trump administration targeted research it found politically disfavorable, which is a First Amendment violation.
    • In terminating 283 Department of Energy grants from states where a majority voted for Kamala Harris in the 2024 election, and leaving untouched hundreds of grants that went to “red” states, the Trump administration wrongly punished researchers for merely living in states the White House politically opposed.
    • And by terminating billions of dollars in grants, and never rerouting that money to other grant opportunities, the Trump administration violated the constitution by not spending money in ways Congress specifically required through laws it passed on how research funds should be used.

    CalMatters emailed the U.S. Department of Justice, which acts as the legal defense for the federal agencies, on July 16 to ask whether it agrees that the federal grant-making agency stipulations mean the Trump administration violated the constitutional rights of researchers. A spokesperson for the Justice Department didn’t respond by publication time.

    History of lawsuit

    The judge in this case, Rita F. Lin, has repeatedly sided with the UC professors and issued several preliminary injunctions forcing the federal agencies to restore the grants while she reviews the full merits of the case. This includes the restoration of hundreds of grants at UCLA that the Trump administration sought to suspend over its allegations that the university tolerated antisemitism and permitted transgender women to compete on women’s sports teams.

    Those allegations were also the subject of a demand from the White House for UCLA to pay $1.2 billion or experience an additional cascade of research freezes. However, months before President Donald Trump sought that settlement, UCLA took steps to address antisemitism on campus, including commissioning a task force to recommend ways to create a more welcoming environment for Jewish students.

    Lin, a Biden appointee, faulted the administration for disregarding those efforts by UCLA in a preliminary injunction for a different but related lawsuit. The Trump administration’s justification for terminating the grants did not “mention the remedial steps UCLA had already taken to address the issues described,” Lin wrote.

    Lawyers for professors in the Thakur case now want Lin to make a final ruling, rather than a preliminary one, ordering the grants to be restored. Even if that were to happen, the federal agencies could decide to appeal Lin’s ruling to a higher court.

    The stakes are “huge,” lawyers for the professors in the Thakur case wrote. If the White House is “allowed to terminate this funding, the researchers, graduate students, and program staff that relied on the grants to pursue their lives’ work will all suffer significant damage to their reputations and careers.”

    The lawyers warn of lifesaving cures that will never be developed, new understandings of diseases that will go unexplored and the decline in the country’s global standing as an international juggernaut in publicly funded research.

    Using keywords to target disfavored grants

    The agencies admitted to using keywords in various ways, according to a CalMatters review of the new court filings.

    The Department of Transportation identified six grants for projects worth about $42 million to terminate because they sought “transportation equity,” prioritized “disadvantaged communities,” or focused on “diversifying the transportation workforce” and “equity.”

    The termination of three of those grants led by a UC Davis professor resulted in 77 researchers abandoning 79 in-progress projects. Lawyers for the plaintiffs wrote that the project leaders were also forced to lay off or scramble to replace funding for more than 40 graduate and undergraduate research assistants.

    The National Institutes of Health admitted to using an internal search tool to flag UC grants that mentioned “health equity,” "work force diversity," "structural racism," and "sexual orientation." The NIH alone suspended or canceled more than 1,000 UC grants, including nearly 700 at UCLA, related to vaccines, cancer research and disparities in health outcomes.

    That figure is newly disclosed in a court filing — last year, UCLA indicated that closer to 500 NIH grants were terminated. The health research agency also declared that it’s possible that DOGE, the short-lived federal office that billionaire Elon Musk led in 2025, used AI to target grants for termination.

    Lawyers for the plaintiffs wrote to the judge that these admissions show the agencies “identified the viewpoints they wanted to suppress, searched the grants they funded for those that expressed those viewpoints, and terminated those grants on that basis.” That violates the researchers’ First Amendment rights, the lawyers wrote.

    The Environmental Protection Agency, one of the named agencies in the suit, is in the process of settling with lawyers for the UC professors to avoid further litigation.

    A separate federal district judge in Massachusetts last week dealt the Trump administration a blow in its ability to terminate grants and withhold federal funding. The White House relied on a legal phrase in many of its funding cancellations — “no longer effectuates . . . agency priorities.”

    California and 22 other states sued, arguing that there’s no law or right for the federal government to cancel funding based on new program goals and White House desires after the grants were already awarded.

    The judge agreed.

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • Sponsored message
  • Warehouse owner breaks silence 1 month after fire
    A large warehouse is destroyed from a fire at a street intersection.
    Recovery efforts continue at the Boyle Heights warehouse owned by Chill Build and leased by Lineage.

    Topline:

    Public records and new statements reveal the owner has engaged with regulators, emergency responders and provided millions in support since the fire began.

    The backstory: For weeks, the Boyle Heights cold-storage warehouse fire has been known simply as the Lineage fire. It’s a label that leaves out a key detail: Lineage Logistics doesn’t own the warehouse. It leases it. The building belongs to Chill Build Los Angeles I LLC, one of several entities associated with Indianapolis-area developer Gary Edwards. While Lineage has been the public face of the cleanup, Chill Build has largely remained out of public view.

    More details: In its first statement since the fire, the company confirmed with The LA Local it has met with regulators, spent millions on the response and believes responsibility for repair and recovery efforts rests with Lineage.

    Read on... for more on Chill Build.

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    For weeks, the Boyle Heights cold-storage warehouse fire has been known simply as the Lineage fire. It’s a label that leaves out a key detail: Lineage Logistics doesn’t own the warehouse. It leases it. 

    The building belongs to Chill Build Los Angeles I LLC, one of several entities associated with Indianapolis-area developer Gary Edwards. While Lineage has been the public face of the cleanup, Chill Build has largely remained out of public view. 

    In its first statement since the fire, the company confirmed with The LA Local it has met with regulators, spent millions on the response and believes responsibility for repair and recovery efforts rests with Lineage.

    “Lineage Logistics is the lessee of the entire property. They are responsible for all aspects of maintaining and repairing the facility. Lineage Logistics is in charge of the recovery efforts, communicating with residents, and reporting progress directly to city and county regulators.” 

    Lineage did not respond to questions before publication about its relationship with Chill Build, the division of responsibilities between companies involved or whether it coordinated public communications with the property owner.

    Chill Build was on scene in the first 16 hours of the fire

    Records obtained by The LA Local show senior city inspectors from the L.A. Department of Building and Safety (LADBS) met with Edwards on site on June 24, notifying him that the city would order removal of all fire-damaged portions of the building and require permits before any reconstruction. A photo from a follow-up visit on July 1 shows Edwards standing with inspectors outside the warehouse, the same day the city issued a second order requiring Chill Build to submit a full remediation and monitoring plan, along with weekly progress reports. 

    LADBS acknowledged receiving The LA Local’s questions about why its enforcement orders were issued to Chill Build and how the agency determines whether property owners or tenants are responsible for code enforcement actions, but did not respond before publication.

    Chill Build confirmed it met with the Los Angeles Fire Department multiple times at the property from June 18 to July 6. A spokesperson said the company provided $6.2 million in funding to retain specialty contractors, equipment and resources to help extinguish the fire. 

    A smaller image focuses in on a larger image of a man wearing a yellow hazard vest speaking with a person in an orange hazard vest. Underneath is text that reads the case number, date, and comments describing the photo.
    Senior LADBS inspectors Robert Chavez and Mark Rude speak with property owner Gary Edwards at Chill Build’s warehouse in Boyle Heights on July 1, 2026.
    (
    Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety
    )

    The California Division of Occupational Safety and Health has also opened three additional inspections tied to the fire, including one involving Chill Build, according to its public database. A Cal/OSHA spokesperson confirmed the inspections but said the agency could not share further detail while they remain open.

    The owner of the warehouse

    Chill Build purchased the property in March 2017 for $43 million before developing it into the roughly 500,000-square-foot cold-storage facility that now sits fire-damaged. 

    A review of city permits list Chill Build Los Angeles as the owner throughout construction, and at least 10 permits name Victory Unlimited Construction LLC — another company owned by Edwards — as the contractor. 

    One permit lists Chill Build as owner and applicant for the rooftop solar array, the same system linked to fires in both 2024 and again in June. 

    A review of corporate filings shows Edwards listed as manager, member, agent, or governor of at least a dozen companies operating under the Chill Build name across multiple states. Chill Build Los Angeles did not comment further on Edwards’ relationship with the Chill Build entities.

    Chill Build Los Angeles has also been named as a defendant in at least two lawsuits filed over the fire, alongside Lineage, Altus Power, and Pearce Services.

    Has Chill Build engaged with the community?

    While Chill Build says communication with residents is the responsibility of Lineage, the company said it donated $2 million to national nonprofit Baby2Baby’s Disaster Relief & Emergency Response Program on June 24, providing air purifiers, diapers, formula, wipes, children’s N95 masks, food and hygiene products to support impacted children and families. 

    “Our commitment to the community then and now has been to contribute our time, expertise and resources to protecting the health and safety of the firefighters, first responders, and our neighbors in Boyle Heights and the surrounding communities,” the company told The LA Local. “We continue to maintain an active on-site presence supporting the safe cleanup and mitigation of environmental impacts, wherever and whenever needed.” 

    But that outreach has not extended to local leaders. Councilmember Ysabel Jurado, whose district includes Boyle Heights, said the property owner should take a more public role as recovery efforts continue. Her office said it has not had direct conversations with representatives from Chill Build since the fire. 

    “If an organization has responsibilities related to this property — whether as an owner, operator, contractor, or another responsible entity — it should be at the table,” Jurado’s office said in a statement. “Residents deserve direct answers, regular progress reports, supporting documentation, and the opportunity to ask questions of the people responsible for this recovery.”

    Why responsibility for the fire isn’t straightforward 

    Determining fault for the fire itself is complicated. Lineage has said it believes the blaze started while subcontractors Pearce Services tested a rooftop solar system owned by Altus Power. Pearce Services confirmed its crew was doing that rooftop work and Altus says the cause hasn’t been determined. Cal/OSHA has opened inspections naming Lineage, Pearce, Altus, Chill Build, and refrigeration contractor Chillest Industries

    In its statement, Chill Build said Altus, its contractors and other service companies have contractual relationships solely with Lineage Logistics.

    “It just gets to the point where everyone is accountable, and no one is accountable.”

    Susan Phillips, a Pitzer College professor who has tracked warehouse fires since 2021, said that kind of tangle is common. “All of these entities are trying to protect themselves financially,” she said. “It just gets to the point where everyone is accountable, and no one is accountable.”

    Cold-storage warehouses are typically run under industrial leases that split maintenance, repair and operational duties between owner and tenant, with separate agreements sometimes covering rooftop solar or outside contractors. Attorney Gary Praglin, who handles environmental contamination cases, said responsibility usually flows from those lease terms — but landlords don’t get to opt out when there’s a public health risk next door.

    “Landlords cannot turn a blind eye,” Praglin said. “The cleanup can result in further damage. Millions of pounds of rotten food, smelling up the area. A landlord can’t just let that happen because people are being exposed.”

    Lineage has said it is racing to meet Mayor Karen Bass’ 45-day deadline to remove millions of pounds of spoiled food waste from the site. 

  • Homelessness has risen second year in a row
    A woman bends down while holding a cell phone in her hands. She is talking to two men, seated on a stone wall. In between the men is a white garbage bac with red ties.
    Heather Filbey-McCabe, volunteer, asks questions of a homeless couple during the annual homeless count in Long Beach, Jan. 22, 2026.

    Topline:

    The number of people without a home in Long Beach rose for the second year in a row — with a larger spike for people who are “chronically homeless” and typically most difficult to keep in permanent housing, officials announced Monday.


    The numbers: It’s a reversal of fortune for a city that two years ago declared it had “turned the tide” on homelessness. Since then, Long Beach has seen at least 10% more people living on the streets, and homelessness has increased in six of the last seven years — even with successes in expanding its shelter system and moving people into permanent housing. 3,729 people were living in interim housing, a car, van, RV, tent or makeshift shelter in Long Beach — a 3.7% bump compared with 3,595 people counted the previous year and more than double the number of those reported in 2019.

    What's behind the numbers: Public health officials and academic experts say the increase reflects a sharp rise in rents, the conclusion of some pandemic-era programs and the abrupt end or delay of millions in health department funding. Homeless respondents have consistently reported that a high cost of living, followed by familial strife and mental illness, is the primary reason they’re living on the streets. Forty percent said financial and employment were their top reason, followed by family disruption and mental health.

    Despite hundreds of millions of dollars spent to curb homelessness, the number of people without a home in Long Beach rose for the second year in a row — with a larger spike for people who are “chronically homeless” and typically most difficult to keep in permanent housing, officials announced Monday.

    It’s a reversal of fortune for a city that two years ago declared it had “turned the tide” on homelessness. Since then, Long Beach has seen at least 10% more people living on the streets, and homelessness has increased in six of the last seven years — even with successes in expanding its shelter system and moving people into permanent housing.

    Monday’s report relies on a “Point in Time” measurement, a local census of people in shelters and living outside, and those reporting chronic problems in finding shelter.

    Conducted by hundreds of volunteers during three days in January, the count found 3,729 people were living in interim housing, a car, van, RV, tent or makeshift shelter in Long Beach — a 3.7% bump compared with 3,595 people counted the previous year and more than double the number of those reported in 2019.

    Public health officials and academic experts say the increase reflects a sharp rise in rents, the conclusion of some pandemic-era programs and the abrupt end or delay of millions in health department funding.

    But efforts to house people, which include hundreds of millions of dollars spent on shelter, permanent housing and outreach, have failed to stem the number of street encampments, as reflected in the report and interviews with outreach workers and shelter operators.

    There are some bright spots: More unhoused people are living in shelters or interim housing than last year, about 30.6% versus last year’s 27.5%. That comes as Long Beach has increased the beds in its shelter system by 12%, bringing it to a total 1,521 shelter beds locally. The city also reported that 1,702 people were moved into permanent housing.

    But the proportion of people newly homeless within the past year also rose slightly, to 12.4% from 10.9%, while the share of people self-reporting as chronically homelessness, meaning long-term or repeated bouts of homelessness tied with mental illness or substance use, rose by double digits to 58% from 46.7%.

    At the Multi-Service Center, which recently reopened after renovations, staffers say they are taking in an enormous amount of newly homeless people — more than twice the amount observed in the Point in Time count.

    Last year alone, the facility saw more than 3,000 new people — at least 20 to 30 new people on a daily basis.

    Meanwhile the situation outside Long Beach has grown more favorable, or at least stayed flat. Pasadena’s homeless population dropped by four people this year while Orange County saw just over 1,000 fewer people this year than in 2024 — a 13.7% drop in their biennial report.

    While it has yet to report this year’s count, Los Angeles County last year saw a 4% drop in its homeless population — the second decline in a row.

    In struggling to explain the continued growth of homelessness in Long Beach, public health officials acknowledged that the reasons are not fully known, but pointed to the growing body of evidence that housing costs are an underlying cause.

    Homeless respondents have consistently reported that a high cost of living, followed by familial strife and mental illness, is the primary reason they’re living on the streets. Forty percent said financial and employment were their top reason, followed by family disruption and mental health.

    There is also a massive demand in Long Beach for rental subsidies. In the three months of a new rental aid program — which officials say will only be able to help 250 households a year — the city has already received more than 3,500 applications. Of those, about 50 households have been enrolled.

    City officials also pointed the finger at federal cuts to the Emergency Housing Voucher program. The program, launched in 2021, provides housing for 582 households locally — particularly for those considered chronically homeless or at risk of falling back into homelessness.

    But funding for the program is set to run out, far faster than expected, as rising rent costs have coincided with a Republican-led Congress unwilling to renew it.

    Local housing officials say they can only transition 125 households to a different voucher program, leaving 375 households without help once the EHV program’s funding runs dry in October. EHV recipients will be given at least 60 days’ notice before their rental assistance runs out, officials added.

    Federal housing aid reaches only about one in four eligible households in Long Beach. About 8,000 households in Long Beach rely on federal housing choice vouchers.

    There’s also an increasing shift, officials say, of unhoused people who come from outside of Long Beach.

    More than half of the people surveyed, 50.9%, said they had lost stable housing somewhere other than Long Beach, a finding city officials said reinforced the sense that homelessness in Southern California does not respect municipal boundaries.

    It’s a trend seen elsewhere in the city. Jeff Levine, who runs the Long Beach Rescue Mission, said many people entering his shelters come from Orange County and downtown Los Angeles, saying the former lacks amenities and the latter is too dangerous.

    The mission’s four shelters, which combine for 227 beds, routinely turn away 5 to 6 single people and 10 to 12 families a day. They most commonly see single parents with kids, which are hardest to place in the city.

    “There’s nothing for them,” Levine said. “Our referral is going to be downtown Skid Road to the shelters out there… And the dads that show up with kids, nobody really is talking about that.”

    The mission’s outreach team, which scours encampments the first Tuesday of each month, say they are noticing an uptick in tents, lean-tos and tarps along freeways, under overpasses and flanking the train tracks that run through West and North Long Beach.

    It’s the kind of sequestered places far from a highway, where people have died from overdoses while waiting for paramedics, even after using Narcan multiple times. “They’re out there in the middle of nowhere,” Levine said.

    He and some others argue that permissive policies around encampments are worsening the crisis.

    The mission runs a strict, one-year recidivism program, that forces participants to wake up early, take classes, work around the facility and do their best to stay clean. Of those who finished — less than 40% — about 87% are financially stable and housed a year later. Levine says that accountability forces many to fix their situation.

    On Friday, friends, family and shelter attendees celebrated the most recent graduates — eight people who spent the past year at the facility. They range in age, height, background and story.

    One came to the city after 10 years in Memphis. Another drove in with a bag of clothes from Las Vegas. One worked at a mission in Orange, and one came without any surviving family.

    One graduate, Akeem Cain, will turn 40 this month. He came to the mission a year ago, homeless, 105 pounds and less than a year into the unexpected death of his mother.

    Cain, had already completed the program once in 2017 and thought he had repaired his life. Then the devil came around, he said, “and it tore me apart.”

    “I had it — a job, everything,” Cain said. “It didn’t work out right. Years go by. I thought I was going to make it. Lost everything, relationship, family, lost my job. I lost it all.”

    With six months or so left until he must move into his own place, Cain is terrified of going back out on his own. He has a job, but it’s not an ideal commute — 90 minutes on the train to downtown LA. He and his girlfriend are estranged, his daughter recently turned 11, and he still is grieving his mother.

    “I’m scared, you know, I’m scared,” Cain said. “I don’t know what’s my first step to get out there in the world when I leave this this place. I know they will still be here, and they will have my back, but am I gonna have my own back when I’m out there? That’s the question.”

  • How businesses actually fared during the World Cup
    A woman wearing a white Mexico soccer jersey watches a TV above her and reacts, along with other people wearing green and black Mexico jerseys in a restaurant.
    Ame Oropeza, center, along with other soccer fans, cheer at a watch party at Distrito Catorce in Boyle Heights.

    Topline:

    Inglewood businesses scored big during the international tournament, and watch parties provided a big opportunity for restaurants around L.A.

    The backstory: With so much hype around the World Cup, local businesses across L.A. expected to get an economic boost from fans coming out to watch matches. The tournament was projected to generate nearly $892 million in economic impact across L.A. County, with more than $515 million in direct visitor spending on hotels, restaurants, transportation and entertainment, according to LA’s World Cup website.

    Why it matters: Restaurants and bars near SoFi Stadium said they saw packed houses during the World Cup. Bars and restaurants in other parts of L.A. also saw some of their busiest days of the year during key games. For a Koreatown hotel operator, though, business was actually slower than normal. Taken together, businesses said the World Cup offered a valuable preview of the opportunities — and the problems the city still must solve — as the 2028 Olympics approach.

    Read on ... for more on how businesses fared.

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    Chad Merrill said he wasn’t a soccer fan before the FIFA World Cup, but he enjoyed learning about the game from the local and international fans who came to the city for the tournament.

    “To host it here was actually awesome and it was great,” said Merrill, manager at Inglewood’s 3rd and Out Sports Bar on Market Street. “We had people from everywhere, and the vibe was outstanding!”  

    On top of that, Merrill estimated the bar made 25-30% more than what they’d normally make on game days. 

    “We understood that we’re blocks away from SoFi Stadium, and there was nothing but positivity from the World Cup,” Merrill said.  

    The sports bar’s boost in business wasn’t a one-off, either. With so much hype around the World Cup, local businesses across L.A. expected to get an economic boost from fans coming out to watch matches. The tournament was projected to generate nearly $892 million in economic impact across L.A. County, with more than $515 million in direct visitor spending on hotels, restaurants, transportation and entertainment, according to L.A.’s World Cup website.

    So now that the tournament is over, how well did the businesses do?   

    Restaurants and bars near SoFi Stadium said they saw packed houses during the World Cup. 

    Bars and restaurants in other parts of L.A. also saw some of their busiest days of the year during key games. For a Koreatown hotel operator, though, business was actually slower than normal. Taken together, businesses said the World Cup offered a valuable preview of the opportunities — and the problems the city still must solve — as the 2028 Olympics approach.

    Foot traffic from SoFi helped Inglewood businesses

    The front of a restaurant with black walls and decorated in mini flags of countries sits in between two other storefronts.
    The Nile Restaurant and Bar in Inglewood on July 7, 2026.
    (
    Bella Buccino
    /
    The LA Local
    )

    The influx of soccer fans transformed portions of downtown Inglewood into lively gathering spots, like the Wood Cup events held on Market Street.  

    Businesses along Market Street, like Merrill’s sports bar, benefited from visitors looking for food, drinks and entertainment before and after matches at nearby SoFi Stadium.

    Every World Cup match felt like a cultural celebration for Saizana Evans, manager at The Nile Restaurant and Bar on Market Street.

    “We tried to play music that catered to certain countries,” Evans said. “If we had Spain’s fans in here, we would play some Spanish music.” 

    Evans said they partnered with sponsors like Casamigos, Don Julio and Bud Light, and estimated that sales were up 30-35% during the international soccer tournament.

    “It was great. It did bring in a lot of foot traffic,” said Evans. “The World Cup was just another example of how big it can get with different countries coming over to support their team.”

    Restaurants did well in Koreatown and Pico Union; hotels not so much

    A man with medium skin tone, wearing a black suit and tie, poses for a photo in front of a brick wall with a large "H" neon light on it.
    H Hotel manager Nojan Haddadi stands inside the Koreatown hotel on June 16, 2026.
    (
    Hanna Kang
    /
    The LA Local
    )

    For restaurants in Koreatown and Pico Union, the World Cup brought a much-needed economic boost to their businesses. 

    Local pupuseria Pulgarcito Family Restaurant in Pico Union saw an increase in customers and hours for workers. 

    “They were waiting for this for a long time; it was a big help for us,” employee Elizabeth Aguirre said. 

    Erik Avila, owner of Baja Cantina Sports Grill in Koreatown, said the World Cup helped many customers discover his business as a sports restaurant, and it was the busiest they’ve been since starting seven years ago.

    “It’s the most attention we’ve ever gotten; people kept calling,” said Avila.

    While soccer fans may have visited restaurants in the area, Nojan Haddadi, operations manager of the H Hotel, said he thought the World Cup would bring in more visitors. But business was slower than he expected.

    “We were definitely expecting a lot more of an outcome for the World Cup being here,” Haddadi said. “But we’ve been super slow through the World Cup, and it’s been unfortunate.”

    Haddadi told The LA Local he thinks the issues at MacArthur Park, which is a little over a mile away, may have deterred people from booking rooms at the H Hotel. 

    “It affiliates us to that area,” said Haddadi, who also serves on the Wilshire Center-Koreatown Neighborhood Council. “If you just take a walk around the area, you can see there’s trash everywhere. The unhoused problems are tough here. It’s like a ripple effect.” 

    To keep rooms filled, the 49-room boutique hotel lowered its nightly rates, which Haddadi said has significantly reduced monthly revenue.

    “That could be a $30,000 to $40,000 difference at the end of the month, which is huge,” Haddadi said.

    Businesses in Boyle Heights thrived during the games

    A man with medium skin tone, a bald head and peppered beard, wearing a black LAFC t-shirt poses for a photo leaning behind a bar .
    Guillermo Piñon, co-owner of Distrito Catorce in Boyle Heights, said the World Cup saved his business and brought in a 200% increase in sales.
    (
    Laura Anaya-Morga
    /
    Boyle Heights Beat
    )

    Guillermo Piñon, co-owner of Distrito Catorce on East 1st Street, told The LA Local the World Cup saved his business and brought in a 200% increase in sales. 

    It was the best month of business the restaurant has seen since Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids picked up last June, which decreased foot traffic exponentially, Piñon said. 

    The raids caused him to close the business during lunch service. But throughout the World Cup, doors were open one hour before the starting game of the day and didn’t close until the last game was over. 

    “That’s more important than the financial stuff,” Piñon said. “We need the money to keep surviving, but we need each other more to grow and to just, you know, be better for each other.”

    Thousands of people showed up on June 18 for the Mexico-Korea game on 1st Street, and dozens of people watched the games in their soccer jerseys, cheering loudly every time the national team scored a spectacular goal, or a “golazo.” 

    Now, the smells of rotting food that sometimes waft over from the Lineage warehouse have at times deterred business. 

    Still, Piñon is hopeful that the hype around soccer events and Distrito’s hospitality will keep customers coming back, especially for upcoming LAFC games.

    “We really focused on giving people the best experience that we possibly could because we knew that if we did that as best as we could, we were going to have those people come back,” Piñon said.

    Looking forward to 2028

    With L.A. preparing to host the 2027 Super Bowl and the 2028 Olympic Games — both of which will be in or have a presence around Inglewood —  some businesses believe the World Cup served as a rehearsal for the upcoming global events. 

    Business owners along Inglewood’s Market Street say they are already making plans to expand operations, improve customer service and capitalize on what they expect will be another influx of international visitors when the Olympics arrive.

    “I’d like to see a lot more businesses here on Market Street,” said Evans, who said The Nile Bar is a member of the Downtown Inglewood Association and the Inglewood Chamber of Commerce

    “We need to see things happening, businesses improving before 2028.”